Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Kim K. Brad Vs Angelina Khloé Demi Lovato PerezTV

Crybaby Roman Polanski Releases Statement.

| Filed under: Icky Icky PooLegal Matters


Wah wah wah!

Deplorable child molestor Roman Polanski has attempted to take his drawn out court battle - regarding his 1977 sex crime against a 13 year old - into his own hands, and has released a statement that chronicles in his own words why he should be absolved of his disgusting, horrific crimes:

Throughout my seven months since September 26, 2009, the date of my arrest at Zurich Airport, where I had landed with a view to receiving a lifetime award for my work from the representative of the Swiss Minister of Culture, I have refrained from making any public statements and have requested my lawyers to confine their comments to a bare minimum. I wanted the legal authorities of Switzerland and the United States, as well as my lawyers, to do their work without any polemics on my part.

I have decided to break my silence in order to address myself directly to you without any intermediaries and in my own words.

I have had my share of dramas and joys, as we all have, and I am not going to try to ask you to pity my lot in life. I ask only to be treated fairly like anyone else.

It is true: 33 years ago I pleaded guilty, and I served time at the prison for common law crimes at Chino, not in a VIP prison. That period was to have covered the totality of my sentence. By the time I left prison, the judge had changed his mind and claimed that the time served at Chino did not fulfil the entire sentence, and it is this reversal that justified my leaving the United States.

This affair was roused from its slumbers of over three decades by a documentary film-maker who gathered evidence from persons involved at the time. I took no part in that project, either directly or indirectly. The resulting documentary not only highlighted the fact that I left the United States because I had been treated unjustly; it also drew the ire of the Los Angeles authorities, who felt that they had been attacked and decided to request my extradition from Switzerland, a country I have been visiting regularly for over 30 years without let or hindrance.

I can now remain silent no longer!

I can remain silent no longer because the American authorities have just decided, in defiance of all the arguments and depositions submitted by third parties, not to agree to sentence me in absentia even though the same Court of Appeal recommended the contrary.

I can remain silent no longer because the California court has dismissed the victim’s numerous requests that proceedings against me be dropped, once and for all, to spare her from further harassment every time this affair is raised once more.

I can remain silent no longer because there has just been a new development of immense significance. On February 26 last, Roger Gunson, the deputy district attorney in charge of the case in 1977, now retired, testified under oath before Judge Mary Lou Villar in the presence of David Walgren, the present deputy district attorney in charge of the case, who was at liberty to contradict and question him, that on September 16, 1977, Judge Rittenband stated to all the parties concerned that my term of imprisonment in Chino constituted the totality of the sentence I would have to serve.

I can remain silent no longer because the request for my extradition addressed to the Swiss authorities is founded on a lie. In the same statement, retired deputy district attorney Roger Gunson added that it was false to claim, as the present district attorney’s office does in their request for my extradition, that the time I spent in Chino was for the purpose of a diagnostic study.

The said request asserts that I fled in order to escape sentencing by the U.S. judicial authorities, but under the plea-bargaining process I had acknowledged the facts and returned to the United States in order to serve my sentence. All that remained was for the court to confirm this agreement, but the judge decided to repudiate it in order to gain himself some publicity at my expense.

I can remain silent no longer because for over 30 years my lawyers have never ceased to insist that I was betrayed by the judge, that the judge perjured himself, and that I served my sentence. Today it is the deputy district attorney who handled the case in the 1970s, a man of irreproachable reputation, who has confirmed all my statements under oath, and this has shed a whole new light on the matter.

I can remain silent no longer because the same causes are now producing the same effects. The new District Attorney, who is handling this case and has requested my extradition, is himself campaigning for election and needs media publicity!

I can no longer remain silent because the United States continues to demand my extradition more to serve me on a platter to the media of the world than to pronounce a judgment concerning which an agreement was reached 33 years ago.

I can remain silent no longer because I have been placed under house arrest in Gstaad and bailed in very large sum of money which I have managed to raise only by mortgaging the apartment that has been my home for over 30 years, and because I am far from my family and unable to work.

Such are the facts I wished to put before you in the hope that Switzerland will recognize that there are no grounds for extradition, and that I shall be able to find peace, be reunited with my family, and live in freedom in my native land.

Roman Polanski

Someone just needs to accept that they're fucked and stop whining - especially because for the better part of 30 years they've been free to do whatever they want rather than serve time for an inexcusable and despicable crime!


[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

All The Witches Caught In 'WITCH HUNT' Trump Investigation So Far...
Celebrities Who've Been Accused Of Homophobia!
The Teen Mom Franchise: A Mugshot Collection!
Too Many Trump Scandals To Follow? Get The Breakdowns HERE!
Biggest Teen Mom Scandals!
Consent In Film: Classic Movies That Are WAY Disturbing In Retrospect!

95 comments to “Crybaby Roman Polanski Releases Statement.”

  1. 1

    That was really long winded. Allow me to summarize:

    Waa Waa Waaaaaa!

  2. 2

    fuck you, roman polanski. you're a child rapist. you've been on the lamb from american justice for 33 years. i hope you spend every day of the rest of your miserable life in jail.

  3. 3

    Naturally, as usual, Perez doesn't read what he cuts and paste from other sites: Polanski isn't whining, he's just setting the record straight:
    1) he pleaded guilty
    2) he served time (as decided by the judge)
    3) and then he was fucked by a corrupt judge.
    No wonder he had to flee.

  4. 4

    Longest sentences ever.

  5. 5

    yeah bottom line romy you fucked a 13 year old, illegal, wrong, makes u a pedo NO EXCUSES!!!

  6. 6

    I'm willing to bet money that if he were gay you would be campaigning for his freedom and claim that this is just another case of gays being discriminated against.

  7. tees says – reply to this


    you clearly know nothing perez hilton.
    literally nothing.

  8. 8

    What the hell Perez? Mr Polanski is not a child molester, by any defination under law. I think you should get your facts straight and until then shut the f**k up. This is a politically motivated abuse of district attorneys powers.

  9. 9

    he did something disgusting and RAN!!!!! He never knew what his sentence was, he was NEVER SENTENCED, HE RAN!!!! Never mind what the victim said, it is up to the law. Also, he paid the victim, an estimated million dollars, maybe more. He has to do whatever time. If the crybaby just did the time in the beginning, he would not have had to hide in europe all these decades. and now all the extreme liberal celebrities like debra winger will start in saying that he gave soooo much in art, that the united states is being a monster. I hope if anything ever happens to her kid, she can come up with something forgiving like 'well he is the world's best janitor so I can forgive him' NOT.

  10. 10

    fuck you, babyraper!

  11. 11

    He did serve time. shit head.

  12. 12

    and he wants to be 'treated like anyone else' Well sir, YOU HAVE BEEN A FUGITIVE FROM THE LAW FOR 3 DECADES. 3 months might have been you sentence back in the 80's (DISGUSTING) but we have to add on for your taking off and jumping bail.

  13. 13

    Hollywood loves child rapists

  14. 14

    He needs to go into federal pound me in the ass prison so he's raped unceremoniously like he did to that little girl, now 43 who doesn't want anything to do with this because she was bought off years ago.

    Pedophile rapists should get NO benefit of any doubt.

  15. 15

    Not long ago 13 year olds were married,blame that girls mother.

  16. jham says – reply to this


    "All that remained was for the court to confirm this agreement . . ." Ya - that's called a ruling. And until it's made, the judge can tell you he'll fly you to mars . . . it doens't matter for the purposes of THIS extradition. Now - at the time, Polanski had EVERY RIGHT to say, hey, you reneged on our plea agreement, and therefore, I withdraw my guilty plea. He would have had to stand trial - and he didn't want to do that.

  17. buck says – reply to this


    A Liberals view: 'Its my world, everyone else just lives in it"

  18. 18

    Could not care less what he has to say. He raped a 12 year old girl, in every hole, after giving her champagne and qualudes; and took naked pictures of her showing she was so immature she didn't even have tits…you gotta be majorly sick to do that..he should have been in jail for life without parole. And, then he directed 14 year old Natasha Kinski and fucked her, too. And, why was he able to hit 14 year old Kinski? Because he was not in jail! Lord knows how many other tit-less children he's fucked..he's been on the lam for over three decades..I'm sure a trip to Thailand must have been squeezed in there (they have many 9 year olds for sale) when he couldn't get any blond, blue-eyed babies. Sick fuck…

  19. 19

    If the facts are as stated in this post, then it looks as if he's falsly persecuted and everybody else has just been jumping on the badwagon without knowing what they've been speaking about.

  20. 20

    I have a thought Perez : how about someone more deplorable than him do his time for him? I suggest you.

    Either way, Roman Polanski does not deserve to do more time.

  21. 21

    Heh, I smell a book title.

    "I can remain silent no longer"…

  22. 22

    Too long to read. Too boring to care. Kill him.

  23. 23

    You guys need to get your facts straight. He actually NEVER served time fuckheads.

    Under the terms of the plea agreement, the court ordered Polanski to report to a state prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation, but granted a stay to allow him to complete his current project. Under the terms set by the court, he traveled to Europe to complete filming.[34] Polanski returned to California and reported to Chino State Prison for the evaluation period, and was released after 42 days. Polanski's lawyers had the expectation that Polanski would get only probation at the subsequent sentencing hearing, with the probation officer, examining psychiatrist, and the victim all recommending against jail time.[13] The documentary Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired alleges that things changed, after a conversation with LA Deputy District Attorney David Wells and the judge. Polanski's attorneys assert that the judge suggested to them that he would send the director to prison and order him deported".[9] In response to the threat of imprisonment, Polanski bought a one-way ticket to England and fled the United States.[6]


  24. 24

    Re: marianne17 – you say "he is not a child molester".. do you know what he did to a 13 year old girl while he was a grown man? he drugged her and raped her and sodomized her. you're right, he's not a child molester, he's a child rapist.

  25. 25

    Re: curiousred – You think the 30 days he "served" for raping a child is enough? Or correct under our legal system? Or any legal system?

  26. 26

    (continued) olanski fled initially to London on February 1, 1978, where he maintained a residency. A day later he traveled on to France, where he held citizenship, avoiding the risk of extradition to the United States by Britain. Consistent with its extradition treaty with the United States, France can refuse to extradite its own citizens, and an extradition request later filed by U.S. officials was denied. The United States government could have requested that Polanski be prosecuted on the California charges by the French authorities.[35] Polanski has never returned to England, and later sold his home there. The United States could still request the arrest and extradition of Polanski from other countries should he visit them, and Polanski avoided visits to countries (such as the UK) that were likely to extradite him and mostly travelled and worked in France, Germany, the Czech Republic and Poland.[citation needed] In 1979, Polanski gave a controversial interview with the novelist Martin Amis in which, discussing his conviction, he said “If I had killed somebody, it wouldn’t have had so much appeal to the press, you see? ”

  27. 27

    Re: curiousred – That may be true, but you DO forget that serving that little time is NOT equivalent to what he did to a 13 year old girl. I don't care how many judges tricked him, he admitted to the crime and has been "free" for the past 30 years, it's time to pay for it.

    Polanski is whining because he seriously thought he could get away with it. Had it been your child, sister or mother who had been drugged and raped, would you still be defending him? I think not.

    And the fact that all he speaks about is how HE'S become a victim and nothing about any kind of remorse or sensitivity towards the victim (who he actually refers to as the victim in his letter) shows how little he cares about her and how it's all about his scared ass.

  28. 28

    Re: marianne17 – Not a child molester? Are you on Polanski's payroll? Or are you, too, a pedo? The girl had no tits when he photographed and raped her! That's a pedophile…by any definition….

  29. 29

    I can remain silent no longer…..You are a nasty piece of shit who rapes 13 year old little girls

  30. 30

    Re: TORTEZ – The girls mother left her to be photographed and the Angelica Huston was in the house and was supposed to be the baby-sitter!

  31. 31

    If Lady GagGag had sex with a 13 year old boy, you would probably be on the barricades to defend her. Know your facts!

  32. 32

    Sounds like a good screen play! They should give him plenty of TIME to work on it..lol

  33. 33

    FUCK YOU Roman Polanski. You're a child rapist!!!!!!!

  34. 34

    blah blah blah blah. waaaah waaaaah waaaaaaah!!!
    this is just a bunch of POOR ME, PITY ME nonsense.
    this piece of eurotrash scum DRUGGED & ANALLY RAPED A CHILD. and he did it HERE in america. maybe in europe that shit is ok but it's NOT OK HERE.
    he needs to go to jail and stay there.

  35. 35

    Polanski makes some very cogent points

  36. 36

    Re: Varinia01 – No, the "facts" stated are not correct. They are self-serving bullshit. But, no different than what most criminals spew to get themselves out of jail. See Skeetz81 posts for a fuller description of the facts. Although, not by any means complete (it would require many multiple posts, due to the word/length constraints). The victim has only said they should drop it in the last years, as a 40-something-year-old, after she was paid millions by Polanski to lobby for him. While a child, she cried and gave full testimony of all the horrible things he had done to her. And, of course, there were the naked photos of her he had taken that night, AND last but not least HE ADMITTED HE HAD DRUGGED AND RAPED HER. Oh, and then HE FLED BEFORE SENTENCING.

  37. 37

    Dear Roman,
    You ran. If that doesn't say you are guilty then I don't know what does. The Judge did not think you had learned your lesson and added more time. But like a guilty man you ran. Tell this all to your victim. There is no telling what joys in life you took from her, and still to this day take from her. You schemed against lady justice. And you should be brought to justice for it. Now it should be up to a jury to tell you (not you telling us) if you should go free or not.

  38. 38

    I don't call fleeing a country, making movies, and chillin at his mansions and big fucking chalets as serving time. He has never served any time for a crime he admitted he committed. He thought he was going to get off until he discovered that wasn't going to happen. Then he ran like he raped somebody. This was perhaps one of the few times a famous person was going to get his appropriate consequence.

    Fuck that guy, I hope he burns in hell.

  39. 39

    This guy served his time and is not DENYING he did anything wrong. He even referred to the victim as "the victim". He accepted responsibility, didn't flee because he served his sentence, and should be left in peace!

  40. 40

    I believe him.
    And really, why wasn't the pedophile Woody Allen ever jailed? 99% of Hollywood (and NY, in Allen's case) actors n-e-v-e-r serve time, do they?

  41. lmlol says – reply to this


    And, how funny is it that Woody Allen is one of the leaders of the "free Polanski" crusade?lol A New York City judge decided there was SO much evidence that Woody molested HIS OWN 7 year old daughter Dylan, that the judge severed ALL TIES between father and daughter. Woody has never been able to see her again. And, he fought for full custody of her like a maniac, hiring Alan Dershowitz (harvard law prof) and appealing the case. And, he lost the appeal. Now he has two brand new girls he can molest. THAT'S Polanski's pal…LMAO…

  42. 42


  43. 43

    Geimer testified that Polanski gave her a combination of champagne and quaaludes, a sedative drug and muscle relaxant, and despite repeated protests and being asked to stop, he performed oral sex, intercourse and sodomy upon her. A grand jury charged him with rape by use of drugs, perversion, sodomy, lewd and lascivious act upon a child under fourteen, and furnishing a controlled substance to a minor. At his arraignment Polanski pleaded not guilty to all charges. In an effort to preserve her anonymity, Geimer's attorney arranged a plea bargain which Polanski accepted, and, under the terms, five of the initial charges were to be dismissed. He pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of engaging in unlawful sexual intercourse. The judge received a probation report and psychiatric evaluation, both indicating that Polanski should not serve jail time, and in response the filmmaker was ordered to ninety days in prison in order to undergo a psychiatric evaluation.He was released after forty-two days.Despite expectations and recommendations that he would receive only probation at sentencing, the judge "suggested to Polanski's attorneys" that he would imprison and then deport him.Upon learning of the judge's plans Polanski fled to France in February 1978 hours before he was to be formally sentenced. Even if they did a plea deal the bottom line is he raped a 13 year old and doesn't seem to feel any remorse at all.

  44. 44

    He's absolutely right. Judge Rittenberg is the one who caused the massive fuck-up, so go and dance on his grave, Perez. Watch the documentary that is mentioned, 'Wanted and Desired'. I would've done the exact same thing he did.

  45. 45

    Re: emk078 – You are wrong. He did not serve time. He went to a hospital and it was found he needed jail time. That is not serving time. Know what the fuck you are talking about.

  46. 46

    Re: RadioWaveGril – He isn't saying he isn't! Ffs, read the whole post before you comment on it, ignorant twat! It actually says he pleaded guilty!

  47. 47

    Jesus! That is not a statement, it's a novel.

  48. 48

    Here's the bottom line. Polanski raped a 13 year old girl and he doesn't want to go to jail. He thinks that since so much time has passed that he shouldn't go to jail. He thinks he is above the law.

  49. 49

    What's sad is the victim has made a plea to the authorities to drop the charges, but she has no say…even as the victim, she still continues to have no say. Victimized twice.

  50. 50

    Re: LovelyCup – No. He went to a psychiatric hospital to see if he was a pedophile. Conclusion was a no. Jailtime came after this evaluation. Came out of jail and the judge had changed his mind. The only sad thing about this situation isn't Polanski or any of the people involved back then, it's been the US its inability to do anything about it for over 30 years and now acting like it's the most important thing ever. There are far worse people out there than Polanski, hope the US will give them the same kind of hell as they are giving Polanski right now.

  51. 51

    Re: lmlol – Allen and over a hundred other people who have nothing in common with Allen nor Polanski.

  52. 52

    oh , perez you world savior you !!!

    stop biting his neck and get your teeth in important stuff like world hunger or whatever!!!! you do not stop , do ya ??! this person made one mistake , havent you done anything youre ashamed off . ??? ( yes you did ) ireally dislike you if you get fierce on the wrong things .

    save the world

  53. 53

    I can stay silent no longer because: WWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
    Shouldn't have drugged and fucked a kid. Period.

  54. 54

    ya know what? all he has done is confirm that he has no remorse. Period.
    ya know what? all he has done is confirm that he has no remorse. Period. i hope he feels 'raped' by the system, how lucky he is that he can speak out about it, and it is posted on Perez Hilton for all to see…..i wonder, have we has the victim had this privilege? No, she has not, and for that reason, laws are in place Mr Polanski. Laws that speak on her behalf.

  55. 55

    (oops this is the correct msg:)

    ya know what? all he has done is confirm that he has no remorse. Period. i hope he feels 'raped' by the system, how lucky he is that he can speak out about it, and it is posted on Perez Hilton for all to see…..i wonder, has the victim had this privilege? No, she has not, and for that reason, laws are in place Mr Polanski. Laws that speak on her behalf.

  56. binna says – reply to this


    hmmm, i think one of the biggest points here is that the victim herself as repeatedly asked for this to go away. he did serve time for that crime and he was rebuked by the judge after the fact. if you have ever experienced a crime of a sexual nature, the last thing you want to do is to re-live it constantly. the LA legal unit hell-bent on this do seem to be posturing themselvs and at the expense of this now very-grown woman who will never have a moment free from what happened in the public eye. forget roman, our attention should be about helping her heal.

  57. 57

    Child rapist…disgusting human being…don't feel sorry for your pompous spoiled ass one bit. Come back and face your crime like a man.

  58. 58

    marrianne17-Um hey dumb ass…he fucked a 13 year old girl up the ass…take a minute to read the police report and court documentation you'd know this before spouting off on something you obviously don't know anything about.

  59. 59

    I can remain silent no longer - RP, you drugged and raped a little girl. I feel no sypathy for you.

  60. 60

    Re: marianne17 – You're right … he's a child RAPIST! Asshole.

  61. 61

    hope this crucify this pompous pedophile fuck

  62. 62

    note to self Roman:
    Don't molest 13 year old girls and you don't have to worry about the law coming after you.

  63. 63

    He totally misstates the facts, and misinterprets the law on whether judges must accept a plea bargain made between attorneys. Judges do NOT have to agree to what the sides devised; the JUDGE is the ultimate arbitrator, and this one declined the agreement because it was CLEAR the paultry amount of time served in a chi chi manner did not fit the heinousness of the crime.

  64. 64

    As John Bender said many years ago in "The Breakfast Club", 'B-O-O-H-O-O'…..
    FUCKWAD PEDOPHILE! Cry me a river of date rape drugs you fucking sicko……

  65. 65

    Re: marianne17Re: marianne17 – What he plea bargained to and what was stated in court are NOT the same. He admitted to giving a 13 year old girl qualuudes and alcohol and then having intercourse AND anal sex wtih her. If that does not meet the criteria for being a molester I do not know what does. As for the sentencing….it never happened. He had not been sentanced yet….in his arrogance he assumed he knew what the sentance would be. He needs to do the time.

  66. 66

    Re: Linnythepooh – Really?? And what are the facts??? He gave a 13 year old girl drugs and alcohol and had intercourse in her vagina and anus. He spent a short time in jail during his trial and assumed that would be all if pled down. The plea should never have been allowed and NOTHING is certain unless it is in writing. Shame on him for being a rapist and shame on him for being stupid. There is no way to justify what he did and I have no problem with what has happened to him. NONE

  67. 67

    Polanski is right–all of his statements are correct. He should not be extradited. However, if he were to come to the U.S. and "face the music" I doubt he would again be put behind bars. It would be a formality and he would be allowed to leave. There would be some embarrassment and drudging up of the past and this would go on for a couple of weeks and then it would all be done and he'd have a better career than ever.

  68. 68

    IF, and IF he was to have served all his time at that prison in Chino AND THEN the judge changed his mind then yes I can understand a bit of the running for 30+years. In the 70's (I was born in them so don't yell at me if I am wrong) sex crime laws were not nearly as tough as they are today. The judge might have just had a hard-on against Polanski b/c who he was OR he wanted to be a trailblazer in these type of cases…..hard to say. But the victim wants to drop the charges so she doesn't have to go thru this again, so I think they really need to listen to her wishes.

  69. 69

    i don't condone roman polanski's actions that occurred over 30 years ago, but what hasn't been addressed is that the victim herself has decided to have no part in todays current legal proceedings. roman has young children that no one seems to have taken into consideration. my personal belief is that if the victim wants to act along with this case, fair enough…..otherwise leave him alone and share a thought to his young family.

  70. 70

    Re: Varinia01 – That's EXACTLY what is happening. People are condemning him without knowing the facts. Even when the facts are stated, they don't care. It's a modern day witch hunt.

  71. 71

    Polanski the girl 13, it doesn't matter what the victim wants, Most rape victims are ashamed and feel at fault. You took advantage of a child. Grow some balls come back to the US and face the music.

  72. 72

    It all seems unfair to me.

    He is not denying he did it and he served the time he was told to.
    The problem is the judge miscalculated the sentence time but that's not Polanski's fault.

    He should be treated equally and he's clearly being aggravated by his fame for publicity purposes.


  73. 73

    Polanski is a useless, talentless bum who made a holocaust film to try to get sympathy and help from American Jews to help let him back in the country. As a half Jew, this embarasses the heck out of me, because some fell for it. Go back and read Moses' Ten Commandments, Polanski, you bum!

  74. Stepy says – reply to this


    Perez, this is one subject I TOTALLY AGREE with you on. He RAPED a 13 year old, and expects to just be let off the hook because he spent a little time in a jail cell and because he's a famous director.

    Fuck that.

    He needs to be extradicted back and serve the time he was sentenced to! No matter if the judge "changed his mind" he did….and you have to SERVE the time given.

  75. 75

    Re: Bungle22

    It's so true! What is UP with that? Woody Allen, M Jackson, R. Polanski, it doesn't matter what they do! If they have talent, Hollywood does not care.

  76. 76

    He's served his time, FREE ROMAN POLANSKI

  77. 77


  78. @v@ says – reply to this


    We'll see. He seems to have a different interpretation of the facts than the court does. The court's version trumps Polanski's version. That's why they're justices.

  79. 79

    You asked for our thoughts. I think he is right. He served his time. His victim says she is fine. It's been 33 years. Not excusing what he did, but I believe in this instance, he is right.

  80. 80

    Shut the fuck up. He's right. It's shamelss manipulation on the part of the district attorney. There's no justice in famewhoring. No wonder you defend that scum, Perez!

  81. 81

    I would like to know just how long this sentance was that he served. If it was anything less than 5 years, he didn't do enough time. It is time for the rich to stop beleiving that they have a different set of rules than the rest of the world. You F&^%&^%& a 13 YEAR OLD. DIE SCUM!

  82. 82

    loser! mj gets all the heat but he actually showed up to court and was found innocent! this true ped ran way and now moans and whines!

  83. 83

    he forgot to mention that little matter about him anally raping a 13 year old. I am just saying…did not see it mentioned. unless "time spent in chino" is code for that.

  84. 84

    too much to read.

    summary: "please don't put me in prison! i don't deserve it! even though i fucking raped a 13year old!!!!"

  85. 85


  86. 86

    Shocking how many stupid people exist in this world. He paid for his crime….his punishment was at the time equal to any other man found guilty of the same. Half of you commenting aren't even old enough to know who the guys is.

  87. 87

    Re: Skeetz81 – yes he did. in chino…9 mos. you're a twit

  88. 88

    Re: justtfax – 9 mos, chino…dumbass

  89. 89

    Re: leo245 – hey morons…9 mos, chino….9 mos chino…wake the fuck up!!!!! go do some research (i did, at the law library at the law office where i work in LA) that was the going sentence for the crime he was convicted. GOD why i thought anyone on here had half a brain..my bad.

  90. 90

    Re: HellenKiller – feeling superior to folks who post on perez hilton do yah? and proud of this?

  91. 91

    [re=4983506]Re: TORTEZ[/re: he didnt marry this 13 year old. he gave her qualudes and then he anally raped her.

  92. 92

    zzzzzzz…..I'm sorry; what were you saying? I fell asleep about half way through.

  93. 93

    The victim herself has asked that American authorities cease pursuing this case, so why don't they get their heads out of their asses and listen to her?

  94. 94

    he fucked a 13 year old girl, end of discussion

  95. 95

    If the facts as he states them are correct (and I believe them to be), he has already done the time for his crime as per the plea agreement. If the victim especially does not want this case reopened, I think she should be the loudest voice that is listened to, and then the former DA that is contradicting the judge that "changed his mind". Sorry, but that's not justice. And can someone really say that a person in L.A. wouldn`t do something for publicity's sake? C'mon…