Home Videos Photos

Second Polanski Victim Revealed.

| Filed under: Icky Icky PooFilm FlickersLegal Matters

wenn1890854_jb2__opt11__opt__opt1__opt1.jpg

Absolutely sickening.

We reported earlier that another woman who claimed to be sexually abused by Roman Polanski was preparing to come forward.

That woman has now been revealed as actress Charlotte Lewis, who appeared in his 1986 film Pirates.

She claims that when she was 16 - four years after Polanski fled the United States - the director abused her.

Awful.

She presented her case to the El Lay Deputy DA and lawyer Gloria Allred yesterday, but it's unclear if these allegations will play any part in the current case against the monster.

Awful.

Thoughts??

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Michelle Rodriguez's Bad Girl Past! Arrests, Fights And Why She's A Bad Influence On Zac Efron!
Happy Birthday Lindsay Lohan! Celebrate With Some Of The Worst Moments Of Her 28-Year Life!
Shia LaBeouf’s Most SHOCKING Moments!
Top 15 Deadliest Movies By Body Count
The 13 Most Ridiculous Horror Movie Deaths Of All Time
Movies Where The Star Was Changed At The Last Minute!

97 comments to “Second Polanski Victim Revealed.”



  1. 1

    Why do you automatically believe her?



  2. 2

    What, 30 odd years later she comes forward?

  3. Rynne says – reply to this


    3

    If there's a Hell, this guy belongs there.



  4. 4

    This dude is scary, but let's make sure that this new victim is one and not someone trying to ride a coat. We know he is sick because the first one was true but this just causes other people to make shit up!



  5. 5

    I believed anything until I read that Gloria Alred was involved. Anyway, I hope justice is done if he's really guilty. But proving a sexual abuse that allegedly took place so long ago it's not that easy. Sometimes most of the evidence is lost after a shower.



  6. 6

    Statute of limitations. It was more than five years ago, therefore legal proceedings against Polanski can't be taken at this point. Too bad she didn't say anything back then. Still makes him sound like creep though.



  7. 7

    yes he is a major douche, but i don't believe anything she says.



  8. 8

    you are aware that the age of consent in france is 15, arent you perez? soooo not illegal



  9. 9

    I will first say: ROMAN POLANSKI IS TERRIBLE & SHOULD BE IN JAIL. Having said that, this all of this seems fishy. He fled the US in 1978, right? Four years later would be 1982? Pirates was made in 1986, which means that she was in his movie even though he abused her three years earlier? The legal age of consent in France where he was living is 15, not 16, 17 or 18 like it is in the US states, so it wasn't statutory rape. It doesn't seem like it was abuse because she starred in his film a few years later!! This has-been actress who starred in bombs like Pirates and The Golden Child wants some recognition. We should really be discussing how she let him "abuse" her to get a part in the movie? Just like the first girl's stage mother wanted her to become famous and whored her daughter out to Polanski.



  10. 10

    Where did this abuse supposedly take place? Unfortunately if not here in America, it is out of our jurisdiction and we can't do anything about it.



  11. 11

    Sorry but I'm calling bullshit on anything involving Gloria Allred.



  12. 12

    Hate to not believe someone when they make such a horrible claim but why is she represented by Gloria Alred? Makes it less credible.



  13. 13

    Listen, Lady, if you had a problem you should have gone to the police
    few decades ago.
    Don't come after 30 effing years and throw shit into the air.
    It makes you look like a desprate fame seeker and a sick opportunist.



  14. 14

    thoughts? meh. thats what i think.
    I have to admit my skepticism that she's only coming forward now… its a lot easier to get a bunch of money out of a man who reputation has already been sullied.
    she sounds like a bit of a tart if you ask me.. i wonder how she got that role in his film… humm. Abuse? perhaps… or perhaps not
    of course I could be wrong… but my jaded view of this sicking world where people will exploit anything and anyone to obtain a gain of their own makes me think…
    take that comment however you wish, I see how it could go either way



  15. 15

    I have to say it dont sound right why so long and what she want from it.. And why do all the women have Gloria Allred backing them i mean really Tiger woods, Jess James, That bones guy and now this one??



  16. 16

    -
    …and it happened in France, where the age of consent is 15….sooooo what is the issue here?
    -



  17. 17

    First of all I don't know why anyone who wants to be taken seriously would go to Gloria Allred at this point. She has lost all her credibility as far as I am concerned. then with all the time that has taken place this girl really seems to be asking for trouble. I can't even imagine why she would want to go through with this, but it might be true. I mean I really don't doubt that it is true, I just can't imagine anyone wanting to go through this nightmare. This poor woman has no idea what she is getting herself into.



  18. 18

    Get him girls! I hope this a hole rots in jail!



  19. 19

    I am no fan of Polanski, but if this girl did infact have sex with him at that time, she had it with him in France where the age of consent is 15. Even had the statute of Limitations not been up they would not have been able to prosecute for statutory rape, given that, and the fact that she has made a clearly pointed choice in lawyers, I would have to believe that they are choosing to stack the deck against Mr. Polanski's existing trial, both with th public, and within the courts, who will have no choice but to try to ignore her testimony once it has been presented.



  20. 20

    Perez, you really piss me off when you talk shit on Polanski. You obviously don't know the whole story behind the major case going on and you definitely don't know how legit this (probably) wacko is. How many times do people accuse celebs of shit that's not true?



  21. 21

    I am sure there are more. Justice, FINALLY ! Life ain't gonna be pretty for an old European dandy in rison. Bettah watch yer back, and get youself one big black bitch of a boyfriend !



  22. 22

    He raped me too ! But, I was O.K. with it ……



  23. 23

    At THIS stage of his life, any such action would be considered ASSAULT WITH A 'DEAD' WEAPON ! Just say'n ………He is, what ? a 100 years old ?



  24. 24

    Suddenly, out of the blue, she comes forward 28 years later?
    And of course, via Gloria Allred.
    Can you say 'publicity hound'?



  25. 25

    bullshit!
    this girl knows what she doing, she just want use him she just want money and fame.
    Leave him alone! he was in jail for this long time ago… so now just leave him and his family alone!
    thats crazy that they still/again want him in jail for this!!!
    FREE POLANSKI



  26. 26

    Anyone who has Gloria Allred for an attorney is a dirty, money grabbing whore. She has already lost all credibility by hiring that bitch.



  27. 27

    Re: RAdamsIsAGod – The most recent accuser may or may not be telling the truth. But Polnski pled guilty to the charges made by his first accuser. He fled before sentencing, but it was never ambiguous as to whether or not he committed the crime.



  28. 28

    I've seen an interview with this guy and he is verrrryy bizarre. He actually said in the interview that he sees NOTHING wrong with being with young teenagers. Yikes.

  29. zooby says – reply to this


    29

    Anyone defending this sick piece of **** is disgusting. even if this is a lie, it was confirmed that the first victim's abuse did take place, so i ask you - how can you defend such actions? "it happened a long time ago" or "he went through a lot" does not justify such actions. i hope what he did never happens to anyone close to any of you defending him.



  30. 30

    there is no age of consent for rape.

    she is British. maybe she is unaware of Gloria Allred's reputation.

    apparently,Polanski is known for hanging around very young women in Paris.

    please do not post his face again. It makes me sick.

  31. @v@ says – reply to this


    31

    Statute of limitations or not, it alleges a pattern of behavior.



  32. 32

    Re: imawesome
    Which guy was interviewed, Polanski of Perez?



  33. 33

    This degenerate pedophile needs to be locked up till he dies!



  34. 34

    It bullshit.. First, like many of you intelligent foks mentioned, statute of limitations. Done.. Second, what proof?? How do you hold on to proof 30 years late?? And why did she not come forward sooner?? And for them to say this lady does not want to sue, well, you have no case or way to sue.. And again, if he was a pedophile, real pedophile, we would have seen many more victms. Thats how they roll.. what he did to the 13 year old was disgusting, but technically he served the time agreed upon by the judge. when the judge realized all of the publicity was going to go away once this case was finished, he changed his mind and wanted Polanski to do more time. even the prosecutors were shocked and objected what the judge was trying to do… This is old, done, he served plenty of time in Sweden, end it and let it go.. if he ever came back to the U.S., register him as a sex offender and be done with it..



  35. 35

    obviously, the girl has nothing to gain from coming forward — except ridicule and criticism. The statute of limitations has passed and he will not be tried for the crime against her. She came forward perhaps as more of a character witness, and may possibly encourage other girls who have been wronged to come forward as well. I commend her bravery.



  36. 36

    Re: Rican31 – The only good thing that you said was "what he did to the 13 year old was disgusting". Roman Polanski did not serve ANY time for his crime. When you plead guilty to a crime, you are not in a position to say whether or not the sentence is fair or harsh. You plead guilty, you take the sentence, if it's unfair, your lawyers appeal, you don't flee the country and give the justice system your middle finger!



  37. 37

    I'm not sure that her testimony is relevant. Ignoring the statute of limitations issues for a moment, the key fact is that she was a legal adult at the time, and obviously made the decision to have sex with Polanski to get a movie role in Pirates, which she got. That's just typically sleazy casting couch behavior, just another day in the movie biz, the sort of thing that adult actresses do all the time.

    Since Polanski doesn't seem to have committed a crime in his interaction with Charlotte Lewis, it's not really relevant to Polanski's other case. The connection would be considerably more persuasive if she is alleging that he raped her forcibly, but I'm not getting that signal.

    I'm not defending Polanski, but dats da fax, Jack.

  38. MP says – reply to this


    38

    Shady. Why come out after all these years? Is there a statute of limitations to the alleged crime?



  39. 39

    The first thing is he should come back and just do the rest of the time, he was stupid to leave when he only had to serve a few more months and then he would have been out. That was just stupid.
    Now the second case…
    If he did do it; it was in france and the legal age was or still is 15! read your facts Perez.. and another thing she hires a hollywood attroney Gloria Alred come the fuk on? She would use a real high powered attroney. BULLSHYT!!



  40. 40

    Hm. Gloria Allred. Sounds like a bucket of money is behind this stunt.



  41. 41

    @Indigo - You are wrong. He never pled guilty. He entered a plea bargain to a charge of unlawful sexual contact (or something like that). No one has ever heard his side of the story. Everyone is hanging on to what the victim said in her deposition, which was obviously coached. This newest "victim" is just looking for publicity. As others have said, statute of limitations + Gloria Allred = case not going anywhere.



  42. 42

    I'll bet, even as we speak, that Polanski pedophile is auditioning little girls between the age of 13-17 to sing and dance in front of him, promising them a shot at being in a famous new girl band. Hmm.



  43. 43

    Not for nothing By Why wait 24 Years and tell now? Gloria Alred is just looking to get her name out so ppl can remember her. She is a Trouble maker



  44. 44

    Roman Polanski's lawyer called me two months before he was arrested in Switzerland. I warned him weeks before Polansky's arrest. Polanski's attorney ignored me. I told him to check with Warren Beatty. The producers on the Lot knew that the police in Los Angeles were re-opening Polanski's case. Everybody thought Roman Polanski's recent awards would shield him from danger. I contacted Beatty from the Lot, where we were producing the digital storyboard for Marilyn Manson's film. His agents returned my message by fax, but Beatty's representatives ignored the danger to Roman. The only person to return my message by phone was Shirley MacLaine's assistant. Shirley is Warren's sister. Months earlier I wrote Polanski in Paris and told him what the producers told me in Hollywood. Polansky called his attorney. The guy sounded old, the lawyer uninterested in Polanski's legal problems in Los Angeles, and Polansky's attorney pushed away my fact as if the past were behind him.

    Thomas Chi
    Author
    Marilyn Manson Murders, Screenplay



  45. 45

    entitled hollywood jew.

  46. @v@ says – reply to this


    46

    Re: Rican31 – That's not at all the court's version of what happened. That's Polanski's version, but the tail doesn't wag the dog in American law, even though as you can see, he and his are STILL trying to run things from overseas. After the judge ordered a 90 day psychiatric evaluation, he was released after 42 days, evaluation complete. It was Polanski's CAMP that had the expectations that he would receive only probation, but the judge had apparently decided otherwise. A ruling on his sentencing had not happened, as it was probably pending the judge looking over the outcome of the psyche evaluation. When the judge suggested to Polanski's attorneys that more jail time and possible deportation were in order, and upon learning of the judge's plans, Polanski fled to France on 1 February 1978, hours before he was to be formally sentenced.



  47. 47

    Charlotte hasn't worked in years. She must be really desperate for a job.



  48. 48

    the whore sucked his cock for the roll, she knew what she was doing.



  49. 49

    I don't believe it at all. I think she's a liar. Why would she come forward after all this time? What, shes all of a sudden not afraid and has pangs of "i need justice"? I think if she and him DID have sex of any kind, she had to be OK with it? Why would she want to be in the same room with the guy AFTER he fled the USA? Doesn't make sence at all….to me!!



  50. 50

    Re: NervousNell – That's not correct. Most states will prosecute for up to 30 years after the victim turns 18 in rape cases.



  51. 51

    Gloria Allred is to the credibility of lawyers what Al Sharpton is to furthering the respect of black americans = A JOKE



  52. 52

    Alright so let's seriously think this through.
    Charlotte Lewis was born in 1967, therefore she would have been 16 in 1983. Only here's the catch. She played in Pirates in 1986.
    Now why would a young girl who's been abused by a film director agree to play in one of his films 3 years later?
    Also, how come she waited 27 years to press charges?
    Does anybody hear the sweet sound of a pathetic attempt to get back into the spotlight and to cash in a few millz?



  53. 53

    Charlotte Lewis has always had a struggling career and has looked for any way to promote herself (Playboy 1993 ?). This is just another PR attempt by herself and Gloria Allred. Come on Gloria knows better, this isn't admissible as it was in France where there it was legal.

    All this does is point out that Roman Polanski is an idiot that thinks he can do what ever he wants.



  54. 54

    I took this seriously until I read the name Gloria Allred.

  55. Ocean says – reply to this


    55

    The age of consent was NOT 15 in France at the time this took place, and second, it happened in England..

    From the comments here i can se a LOAD of pro polansky coming out the bush to defend him and make that girl looks bad by discrediting anything she said.. thats what they also did about the other woman, saying she was a whore (!) and that it was her fault!!
    pro polanskis are assholes!
    He was the adult he had to dont do it.
    This is not about wether or not the girl should have stop him (if she could! dont forget he beat up the other one for resisting) this is about the fact that polanski fuck underage grils and is a pedophile!

  56. Ocean says – reply to this


    56

    After he flee from USA he dated Natasha Kinsky who was ALSO underage: 15 years old! and for several years!
    So no this is not a "second case" after he flee from USA, this is one among a very long serie of cases that I do hope will come up now!
    And before the girl in USA complained agaisnt him, he did fc a lot of young girls, all underage between the age of 12 and 14, in USA and had no shame what so ever at doing it!!

    He is a pedophile and a serial rapist!

  57. Ocean says – reply to this


    57

    As for those stating that she should have come before, hello! see how hard it is today for an adult woman to get her case through. In the 70'es it was 1000 times worse!
    Specialy agaisnt him, a celb praised by the intelectual class and protected, and specialy with his case in USA already and the fact that he had so many supports in France!
    She had zero chance to can come through.
    Instead to blame her you should praise her courage to come forth now!.
    If polansky had went to USA to face justice, as he should, last year, she might not have come forth, but my guess is that seeing him lying so much and pretending that he was innocent, like he never did it before nor since, made her so sick and angry that she decided to come forth.
    When you are 15 -19, you do not see the world the same way as when you are 40!
    I hope he get 25 years sentence in jail, with no appeal!
    He is too arrogant and show no sign of repentence, and is still denying facts.

  58. Ocean says – reply to this


    58

    Shame on all his women friends, in and out the hollywood/movie business, who support him and protect him so much, and do all what they can destroy the credibility of the accusations of his previous victims, and do all to discourage them from telling the truth, and try so hard to discourage us from believing oin what they have to tell us!

    :(

  59. Ocean says – reply to this


    59

    Re: edmonton

    why do you automatically belevee him and defend him?



  60. 60

    what the HELL is wrong with Gloria Allred??????

  61. Ocean says – reply to this


    61

    Re: TravistheTrex

    so does childrens abused by their father, or family members, or childrens abused in orphanages, and abused by priests:
    - It first come out many years later.
    Children very seldomly come forth when it happened to them , out of shame, and because of the threats that the pedophile rapist always put on them. And beleive me, polansky had a lot of decades of experiences in how to seduce, rape and silent a child!
    The closer to the child the person is, the harder it is for the child to go to an authority and complain. And who say she didn't do so and was convinced to drop it?
    Many childrens experience that, when they go to see a communal worker or welfare worker, and tell them about the abuse who are going on in their home or at the step fathers home, or at school, or at work: they are often denied credibility and thats why the pro-polansky here, keep posting shit to discredite the victim and hack on their credibility, to make them feel bad so that they retract and drop the accusations!
    They are also trying to influence the public opinion - YOU!! - to can influence the case and its verdict!

  62. Ocean says – reply to this


    62

    Thats what supporters of a rapist and pedophile, his lawyer and friends, always do!
    They all try to scare the victims from complaing, using the psychological factor and the fact that its the strongest weapon against the person: Her own insecurities, the victim's own fear to dont be believed and to be turned into derision and humiliated, and be put to shame!
    So think of what you are saying and do some research before talking!

    Dont forget either that declaring a fraude or theft, is lot more easily done than talking about a rape and sexual abuse of any kind. It is taboo. Was, and still is. And is always surrounded by shame. And worse, the fact that people might doubt what you say, accuse you of lying, and put you in derision and refiue to aknowledge what you went through, often discourage women who have been raped, from going to the police or doing anything about it, and even from talking about it to anyone.

    It is very caracteristic of the situation a person who has been raped is into. The psychological aspect weight most, as the victim was attact in the most private sphere an individual has: sexual sphere, and at an age they cant defend themselves mentaly as they are not yet formed psychologicaly at that age, and do not have build the psychological barrier and defense adults have. Still, a rape is very traumatising for an adult and much more for a child, as it mark the person for lifetime!

  63. Ocean says – reply to this


    63

    Shame on the polanski-supporter-gang for using their knolwedge of how a rape affect the victim's life and psyché, and its life as an adult, to turn it agaisnt the victim, by trying to make her feel bad and shamefull for complaining, and by trying to shoot down her credibility by bringing doubt in her mind and in the mind of the public, by repeating that it was HER FAULT (!) and that she was willing to be raped (!), and that she is the perverse one in the story, who wanted to have sex with an old man, for career or whatever they can found, and to involve the victim's mother by saying its her mother who was bad to dont look after her, pushing the victim even more down, and trying to convince her to drop the case, for fear of making her own mother looking bad as well as herself!

    They did it last year with the central known victim of Polansky's history of sex abuses, and they are doing it again with this new victim coming forth!
    Thats what they deliberatly do and they know so!
    So dont let yourself be fooled by their comments!

  64. Ocean says – reply to this


    64

    Child rape do not conform the the "5 years limit" for a case before its too old to be prosecuted. The rule do not apply here for abovious reasons! if the kid is 5 years old when he or she is being raped, how big are the chance that the kid will make a lawsuite before he reach 10???

    The girls who have been victims of Polansky's sexual abuses and rapes, lived in shame and never dared coming forth, because of his notoriety, and the more they waited, the less they dared. No doubt that they told their best friends about it with time, and no doubts that some advised her not to tell a thing to dont get into trouble and be exposed for nothing.

    But now, one of them, Charlotte Lewis, must have talk to friends and taken the decision that it was best for her to support the other woman, both for her own sake, to get even with a case she has been bearing alone in silence for far too long, and for the sake of all the other underaged girls that she saw being sexually abused by Roman Polansky.

    Roman Polansky is a child rapist and a recidivist!

    He deserved to be sentenced to jail!

  65. Ocean says – reply to this


    65

    Re: galleon10 – would you also say this to her if it was her stepfather raping her at home for years? and her not daring coming forth with it before very late?

    Would you also say this to a kid raped in an irish orphanage years ago who is now 40-50 years old, and first come forth to talk about it after the police found out of what was going on, to several hundreds kids too, and they had more courage to tell the truth? BECAUSE BACK THEN NOBODY WILL HAVE NEVER BELIEVED THEM! AND IT LOOKS LIKE THAT ITS STILL THE CASE!
    SO BEFORE FLYING OFF STUPID ACCUSATIONS, WHY DONT YOU REFLECT A BIT ABOUT YOUR ATTITUDE NOW, AND THE FACT THAT IF SHE HAD COME FORTH WHEN IT HAPPENED, WHEN POLANSKY WAS AT THE PEAK OF HIS CARRER, YOU OR OTHER LIKE YOU, WOULD HAVE SAY THE EXACT SAME THING: THAT SHE WAS DOING IT FOR FAME!!

    70'ES, AND NOW 2010, A GIRL IS RAPED, ITS STILL THE SAME, IF SHE COME FORTH WITH IT 50% SAY SHE MADE IT UP! 30% SAY SHE WAS WILLING, 10 % SAY IT DOESNT MATTER, AND GET OVER IT, AND ONLY 10% BELEIVE IT AND SUPPORT HER!

    YOU ARE IN THE WRONG RANGE.

    FC SHAME ON THIS SOCIETY DAMNET!

  66. Ocean says – reply to this


    66

    Re: RAdamsIsAGod

    yeah just name one.. lol

    polanski is a nazi.

    whats next he is going to say for his defense?

    "I was just obeying to orders"??

    What an asshole!

  67. Ocean says – reply to this


    67

    OF ALL THE PEOPLE IN WARSAWA GOULAG, WHO DESERVED TO LIVE, AND WHO WERE GOOD PEOPLE, WHY DID THIS JERK OF POLANSKY SURVICVED AND NOT THEM?

    SHAME ON YOU POLANSKY! YOU BRING SHAME TO ALL OF THEM WHO DIDNT MADE IT!

  68. Ocean says – reply to this


    68

    Re: omega20203 – it is relevant for the case as it prove that polansky kept doing child abuse after he flee form USA diotto that he is a serial child abuser, and the conclusion is that he is a pedophile

  69. Ocean says – reply to this


    69

    Re: alfabravo – not in the 70'es… the age of consent was 21 back then..



  70. 70

    wish someone would fuck HIM up the ass!

  71. Ocean says – reply to this


    71

    Re: galleon10 – and your words makes you look like an ignorant idiot trying to pretend he know better.

  72. Ocean says – reply to this


    72

    Re: Bö!!!SEMICOLON!!!rte Petrarchia

    dont pretend to hide, WE DO KNOW that oyu are a polansky suporter pretneding not ot be so to can spread shit on the victimns ot undermine their credibility!

    SHAME ON YOU!

  73. Ocean says – reply to this


    73

    Re: CBenji – YES SHE HAS thats also why it took her so long to take that step..
    I wil tell you why she is ready to go through all this trouble now: because she is tired of keeping silent and she is angry to see this arse polansky getting away with everything.
    she do it for her own sanity, and for the sake of all the other little girls he abused, too.
    Be certain that she witnessed a lot of what he idd with other girls too.

  74. Ocean says – reply to this


    74

    Re: whtevr – you are a propoalnsky asshole and we can see it by the smell of your post..

    age of consent in France was 21 at that time..
    dang! he fall your last hope..

    Polansky coudl travel througout Europe and the world he wasnt jsut limited in France, he traveled extensivle during allthe year he was in vacation in france, and in mororcco and Reunion and tahiti, having a good time!
    YOU are thre one trying to infulence the public opinion and the course of this trial!

    She is trying ot have justice been done and the worng that was done to her acknowledged!

  75. Ocean says – reply to this


    75

    Re: Be-Atch – yes youa re rigtjh, there is MUCH MUCH MORE TO THE POLANSKY SEX-CRIME-HISTORY THAN THOSE 2 LITTLE CASES.

    HE RAPED OVER 50 GIRLS AND FOR MANY OF THEM ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS!

    THE CLOSET IS OPENING WIDE!

    HE RAPED MORE GIRLS WHILE HE WAS IN FRANCE TOO, AFTER HE HAD FLEE FROM USA!

    MANY OF THEM WERE EVEN THREATENED TO KEEP SILENT USING SOME VERY HARSH METHODS.

    POLANSKY DESERVE TO BE FRIED!

  76. Ocean says – reply to this


    76

    Re: emilia50

    HELLO DEAD BRAIN,

    POLANSKY NEVER WENT TO JAIL FOR RAPE.
    HE FLEE OFF USA, BEFORE HE COULD BE TRAILED! AND THATS WHY THEY WANT HIM BACK! TO TRAIL HIM! YOU DUMB COW!

    AND HE WAS WITH NATASHA KINSKY, AGE 15, IMMEDIALTY AFTER , THE SAME YEAR!

    HE KEPT RAPING UNDERAGED GILRS FOR DECADES.

    SO SHUT UP UNLESS YOU CAN MAKE A COMMENT WHO DOESN'T SOUND LIKE AN ADVERTISING OF YOUR TOTAL IGNORANCE OF THE CASE!

  77. Ocean says – reply to this


    77

    Re: manon is me

    I agree with you! and his wife was also underage when he dated her. He stay married with her as a coveer to can keep dating underaged girls, still today!!

    A guy that say that he sees nothing wrong in having sex with kids and underage girls is a PEDOPHILE WHO IS TOO SICK TO CAN STOP HIMSELF!
    OF COURSE HE KNOW ITS WRONG, BUT HIS SICK MIND EXCUSE HIS RAPES BY PRETENDING ITS ALRIGHT!

    He must be jailed!

    He also fced the girls in the ass! Because he wanted to hurt them!
    HE WANT UNDERAGE GIRLS TO BE IN PAIN!
    MOST OF THEM HAD NEVER HAD SEX BEFORE AND THAT WAS THEIR FIRST SEXUAL EXPERIENCE THAT TRAUMATISED THEM FOR LIFE!
    HE KNEW THAT, AND THATS WHY HE DID IT.

  78. Ocean says – reply to this


    78

    Re: Rican31 – ARE YOU CRAZE OR WHAT?

    polansky was 3 days in jail in usa before he flee, he was never in Sweden you must smoke too much crack.
    he only stays in switzerland because he refuse to come back to USA to be trailed as he should!

    no he didn't raped just one girl! he was raping underaged girls each and every week!
    He had orgies with underage girls at Jack Nicholson's home in CA, EVERY WEEK!!
    He was doing this shit all the time.
    He had audit for girls underage for his movies, and he was also sexualy abusing them, both those who werent choosen to act in the movies, and those who were taken for his movies.
    He systematicaly sexualy abused all girls who acted in his movies!
    All of them being underaged!
    His wife was underaged when he met her!
    He keep with her to cover for the sexual abuses he still keep performing on underaged girls in France!

    He is a pedophile and a sex addict with a very perverted mind!
    He dont jsut want to have sex with gilrs and boys, he also want them to feel pain! He wants to hurt them!.

  79. Ocean says – reply to this


    79

    Re: snyper – Good! I agree with you!

  80. Ocean says – reply to this


    80

    Re: Uncle Scoopy

    maybe you should read back the article.. she was underage dude!

  81. Ocean says – reply to this


    81

    Re: NaughtyAngel

    She is english, and the legal age was not 15 in France either back then.
    and even today with legal age 15, if the guy is consideralbly older than the girl , like here 40, or more, then its call pedophile crime in France.

    You cannot be 30 and have sex with a 15-16 years old girl as you are twice her age, its call pedophile crime in France!
    The law is very strict about it.

    So what he did to her is an act of pedophily, wether there is consent or not the law in France are very clear about it!

    as for the choice of lawyer, she dont live in USA, so how could she contact a lawyer unless she was advised to chose that one.. she is an actress therefor chose a hollywood lawyer who know about the people there and has experience working agaisnt big celebs.

  82. Ocean says – reply to this


    82

    Re: jacksparrowlover

    there is no statute of limitiation for rape nor for pedophile crime.
    French law: Sex with a minor (underage) or where the age difference is too big, is equal to pedophily.

    A 15 -16 years old girl can have consentual sex wiht her bf, if he is about her age or 19-25 years old max.
    If he is 30, thats sex crime.
    Even with age of consent at 15, Polansky was over 40 years old at that time, thats about 30 years older than she was..
    3 times her age!
    Its call PEDOPHILE CRIME in France and he is therefor now charged of pedophily!

    Second, he did plaid guilty on the charge of assault, drugging a child, giving alcohol to a child, raping a child in its sex and raping the child in her anus, as well as beating the child and causing open wounds on her, as well as blue marks.

    The photographs taken of the child body, and used in the case, show clearly how badly she had been enjured by Roman Polansky, with open anal wound bleeding as well as blue marks on her bottom, between the legs, and arms, and other parts of her body.

    He also acknowledged the fact that she tried to stop him and screamed no and begged him to stop, many times, and called for help, and that he didnt listened and kept raping her several times.
    He pleaded guilty on those charges.

    - Do you need more?
    or are you still keeping the style "rape-rape"…

  83. Ocean says – reply to this


    83

    Re: jacksparrowlover

    The alone reason why he wasn't jailed immediatly, before the sentence was given, was because he was a celebrity and had MANY FRIENDS AND CONNECTIONS!

    So the story of "public reactions to media" is BS!!
    The public reaction wont have been lower for anyone else with that kind of evidences!

    WHY ARE YOU DEFENDING HIM??
    HE IS A SERIAL RAPIST OF CHILDREN AND A PEDOPHILE!
    DO YOU NEED MORE?
    AND HE ALSO TOLD IN RECENT INTERVIEWS THAT HE DONT SEE WHATS WRONG WITH HAVING SEX WITH CHILDRENS(!)
    dOESNT SOUNDS LIKE A REPENTER NOR SOMEONE WHO UNDERSTAND THAT HE HAS TO STOP TO ME!

    SOUNDS MORE LIKE A PEDOPHILE EXCUSING HIS MONSTRUOUS ACTS, SO TO CAN KEEP DOING THEM AND KEEPING BEING ARROGANT AND FULL OF HIMSELF AND PROUD OF IT TOO!

    THE WAY HE HAS SEX, IT MEANS HE DONT SEE WHATS WRONG WITH RAPING AND HURTING CHILDRENS!

    AND YOU AGREE???

    EVEN IF THAT GIRL HAD BEEN AN ADULT WOMAN , WHAT HE DID WAS HORREFUL AND A FULL RAPE, WITH INCREDIBLE VIOLENCE!
    AND WE ARE HERE TALKING ABOUT A 14 YEARS OLD GIRL!

    POLANSKY IS A MONSTER AND MUST BE JAILED NOW.

  84. Ocean says – reply to this


    84

    There is no statute of limitation on rape done on a child!
    Pedophily crime is a crime you can be charged of even 40 years later.

    What about all those irish kids raped constantly and tortured and kiled by priests in this closter, that came up recently?

    Those priests were like polansky, they didnt want to see the wrong of their doings, and kept excusing it for decades just to can enjoyi perpetrating their crimes, with kids feeling like shit and guilty for the rest of their life!!

    Its only because someone bought that place, closed since a very long time, and found squelettes and bones and sculs in its soils, and in its basements, that the police got involved and ask for help and informations fromm kids who had been in that institution long ago..
    and then people begin to call with an avalancjhe of testimonies of the horrors that went on there for so many years!

    The testimonies came from men and women, who had spend all their childhood there. For some since they were babies! and who had kept silent all their lives for fear of being humiliated, called liers and be jailed, because they had been told all the time:

    "NOBODY IS EVER GOING TO BELEIVE YOU, ITS ME A PRIEST, AGAINST YOU A NOBODY, AN ORPHAN, AND YOU WILL BE PUT IN JAIL SO SHUT UP AND BEND OVER!"

  85. Ocean says – reply to this


    85

    In many occasions, some of those kids had tried to contact the police and other people to tell them about what was going on there, but nobody ever believed them, and they were delivered back in the hands of those monsters, with hte consequences we can imagine, and some were even killed by beating to have dared to talk, to serve as an exemple for the others!!

    WHEN YOU DEFEND POLANSKY, YOU DEFEND THIS AS WELL!

    KEEP THAT IN MIND!



  86. 86

    I think we have to take her says into account, but for me she lies. This is something too old to be proved

  87. @v@ says – reply to this


    87

    Re: Ocean – I believe the case victim was 13 years old at the time, not 14.



  88. 88

    Blah, blah, blah! …and so was I



  89. 89

    I don't understand why this person chose to come forward NOW, after all these years. I hate to sound cynical, but I think she's in it for the money and/or publicity. Otherwise, why wait this long? Why go to Gloria freaking Allred? Or why not ask to keep your name out of the public eye? It's very possible that Polanski abused this girl too - but there's something fishy about her waiting so long to come forward.



  90. 90

    whatever allegations there are need to be proved, and thats the end of it. innocent until proven guilt, yes?
    however, he is a genius in film. he produces great work and has for years despite running from the law. now, he has to face what may or may not have been done years ago. so instead of all of us persecuting him for something, lets celebrate his work and see what our justice system decides actually happened.



  91. 91

    Re: Ocean – don't "shame" me, byatch. and who is "WE"? Just say "I", because YOU are the one who has spent hours replying to everybody on this board. i don't support him. i think he's an entitled douche and i don't listen to a word he says about how he has "suffered". once you drug and ass-rape a 13 yr old girl, you're not allowed to talk anymore. i can separate a person from their art but i have zero respect for him as a person or anyone who signed that stupid ass petition when he was arrested last year.
    i just don't think that a woman who truly was abused would get gloria allred as a lawyer when that lady is known for famewhoring and immediately signifies the degradation of female integrity: octomom, tiger's whores, etc. so, charlotte lewis should be ashamed for using allred as a lawyer. there may not be all the facts right now, but one thing is known: lewis is making all victims of Polanski (THERE ARE PROBABLY HUNDREDS) look like a joke right now.

  92. @v@ says – reply to this


    92

    I see weaselly people.



  93. 93

    Well this would be a more worthwhile case for Allred than her representation of goldigging famewhores who sleep with famous married men and then attempt to extort money from them in exchange for silence about their trick turning. This woman may actually have been a victim, Tiger and Jesse's whores…not so much.



  94. 94

    yeah.. um.. why would she just fess up more than 20 years later?



  95. 95

    Re: Ocean
    PLEASE STOP spanning the article and people who are not ok with your arguments: this is called democracy.

    I recommend you start knowing how to S-P-E-L-L POLANSKI (not Polansky) if you want to be taken seriously (should be difficult in your case) on the first place.

    Get your FACTS right: -WHY would a victim of an alledged rape SHOOT a movie WITH her predator 3 YEARS AFTER thE alledged rape took place? -Why did she declare " I wanted to be his mistress" in 1999 to the News of the World? - Gloria Allred. Doesn't it ring BELLS to you ? No - far too complicated for you. - Age of consent in France: 15. Took place in France. US laws have nothing to do on the first place, and certainly not a Gloria Allred. If she wanted to be taken seriously, she would sue in France, and 26 years ago, AND not during the Cannes Festival and when the extradition decision is to take place in a week or 2.

    Extradition: YES - false claims for a 15 min of fame: NO!

    Now go back to play.



  96. 96

    Re: Ocean – PLEASE STOP spanning the article and people who are not ok with your arguments: this is called democracy. I recommend you start knowing how to S-P-E-L-L POLANSKI (not Polansky) if you want to be taken seriously (should be difficult in your case) on the first place. Get your FACTS right: -WHY would a victim of an alledged rape SHOOT a movie WITH her predator 3 YEARS AFTER thE alledged rape took place? -Why did she declare " I wanted to be his mistress" in 1999 to the News of the World? - Gloria Allred. Doesn't it ring BELLS to you ? No - far too complicated for you. - Age of consent in France: 15. Took place in France. US laws have nothing to do on the first place, and certainly not a Gloria Allred. If she wanted to be taken seriously, she would sue in France, and 26 years ago, AND not during the Cannes Festival and when the extradition decision is to take place in a week or 2.

    Extradition: YES - false claims for a 15 min of fame: NO! Now go back to play.



  97. 97

    Ocean:

    PLEASE STOP spanning the article and people who are not ok with your arguments: this is called democracy.

    I recommend you start knowing how to S-P-E-L-L POLANSKI (not Polansky) if you want to be taken seriously (should be difficult in your case) on the first place. Get your FACTS right: -WHY would a victim of an alledged rape SHOOT a movie WITH her predator 3 YEARS AFTER thE alledged rape took place? -Why did she declare " I wanted to be his mistress" in 1999 to the News of the World? - Gloria Allred. Doesn't it ring BELLS to you ? No - far too complicated for you. - Age of consent in France: 15. Took place in France. US laws have nothing to do on the first place, and certainly not a Gloria Allred. If she wanted to be taken seriously, she would sue in France, and 26 years ago, AND not during the Cannes Festival and when the extradition decision is to take place in a week or 2.
    Extradition: YES - false claims for a 15 min of fame: NO!

    Now go back to play.