Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Kim K. SAG Awards Khloé James Franco PerezTV

Quote Of The Day

| Filed under: Ashton KutcherDemi Moore


"I think my wife is a genetic freak."

- Ashton Kutcher to Nightline, on Demi Moore's ability to have children at her advanced age, if she wanted to

All The 2017 Celebrity Shade We're Thankful For!
Now And Then: Where Are They NOW??
Moves That Are Sexy In Movies, But Not So Much IRL!
Celebs Who Went From Fuckboys To Fab Partners!
Movie Kisses That Were Pure Fireworks!
Most Ridiculous Natural Products & Beauty Treatments Pushed By Celebs

109 comments to “Quote Of The Day”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. 1

    Photoshop much?

  2. 2

    Sure, she can still have kids, just like lots of other women her age or older … but the chances are she'll pop out some soul mates for Trig Palin !!

  3. 3

    This is dumb and ridiculous. There is no proof that she can have kids at her "genetic" age unless she tries to have them. Women over 42 have under 5% chance of having children. and even if they did create some embryos, there is no proof that they are genetically normal until they go through a pregnancy to term.

  4. 4

    He's right. She's a genetic freak and he's a mental freak.

  5. 5

    Quit swallowing and take it like a woman Demi

  6. 6

    who cares??

  7. 7

    genetic freak? Hardly. Many women are capable of conceiving into their 50's.

    She looks malnourished.

  8. 8

    Forget the baby talk. This was one of the worst W Magazine covers everrrr. Some people just weren't meant to rock Balmain. She is clearly one of those people.

  9. 9

    Is Demi Moore a closet fan of Sarah Palin ?!? Just like Octomom did the Angelina Joli thing … is Demi going to pop out some Down Syndrome babies and then get them that facial cranial cosmetic surgery to make them look un-retarded-like ?!?

  10. 10

    Haha, this pair love to see their pontificating drivel in print. Well done Ashton, another genius quote arrives in tabloid land!

  11. 11

    Re: valentino2003Re: ShoeWhore – That's under 5% per cycle. Women aged 25 or so have under a 25% chance of getting pregnant per cycle. That's not great either. Know your stats!
    As for Down's, again…women aged 25 or so have a .001% chance of giving birth to a baby with Down's. Women over 40 have double that chance. So that's .002% or something like that (under .1% for sure). Besides there is mandatory testing for that. In fact, most kids with Down's are born to women under 30 b/c testing is not mandatory. Very few Down's kids are born to women over 40. But I guess you don't know that either.
    In fact, most older women have problems having kids b/c of the age of their husband/partner. Older sperm is not good for pregnancy. It has been SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN that older women have healthier and smarter kids, controlling for the age of the man (which means keeping the age of the man constant). My friend is 42 and EASILY got pregnant and gave birth to a beautiful healthy boy with the sperm of a man in his 20s/early 30s (not sure exactly of his age).
    It's sad to see women parrot things they know nothing about. As woman you should be more informed. Way to perpetuate misogyny in society.

  12. 12

    Re: ShoeWhore – Actually she's a huge fan and supporter. She wants to emulate me. Hopefully right after she gives birth one of her daughters will get knocked up. She loves getting teabagged too. Todd is a mental giant compared to Ashton but you can't have everything. Until the bitch can field dress a moose she can eat my dust. She'll vote for me too because she loves America.

  13. 13

    She Looks like Sarah Brightman in this photo…sort of.

  14. 14

    her plastic surgeon would disagree

  15. 15

    ugh nice photoshop job. saw her on letterman recently in HD and bitch looked haggard. she had that plastic surgery "witch" face with her pointy chin. really white trash looking features.

  16. 16

    a genetic freak - yeah, if you can call one that's due to TOO MUCH PLASTIC SURGERY!

    they're both talentless twits -

  17. 17

    HELLO!!!!!!! Doesn't anyone see how fake this picture is??? Look closely! Her hip does not even match up with the rest of her leg!!!!! Look at HER Left hip- right by her wrist. Then look down- they don't match up.

  18. 18

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – Actually, the older a woman AND her partner, the greater the chances of having autistic kids. You can do prenatal testing until you're blue in the face, but you're not going to be able to screen for autism. I didn't read that off the back of a cereal box either.

  19. 19

    daggum, she looks amazing.

  20. 20

    She's 47, her eggs are 47. Such liars!

  21. 21

    Re: My black circumcised baby!
    Yes, it really is sad to see women parrot things they know nothing about. What country do you live in that forces you to test for things like Down's Syndrome? I live in the USA and it certainly is not MANDATORY here. I can just imagine the lawsuits if doctors tried forcing women into unwanted tests.

    I'd love to know how they "know" she's able to have kids at her age (or any age for that matter). I mean, if they want to have kids more power to them. But there is no way of knowing until they try. Genetic freak, pfft.

  22. 22

    Re: Indigo – Susan Boyle's eggs are 49. That could explain why her brothers are so concerned for her well-being, that they should be allowed to enter her kitchen and remove all her turkey basters !!

  23. 23

    What?? I don't get it. Is that his way of telling us she hasn't hit menopause?

  24. 24

    My mom had my little sis at 42 and her friend had a healthy baby at 45. 47 though, that's pushing it… but if she can get pregnant though more power to her!

  25. 25

    Re: crayon482 – Where have you been??? Demi's missing hip has been a tabloid rant for months and NOW you're noticing it??

  26. 26

    Yes it's true!!!!, she has fugly kids; that´s why Ashton doesn´t have fugly kids… She has wrong genes, all we see is plastic surgeries. tons of them!

  27. 27

    Re: ShoeWhore – I suppose cereal boxes are your primary source of reading material, and of cousre this would not be written on a ceral box. You are COMPLETELY WRONG. It has been proven SCIENTIFICALLY in peer-reviewd journals, no less, that the OLDER A MAN (and not his wife/gf), the much higher the risk of Autism. Autism, Sz, mental disorders are b/c of MALE SPERM MUTATIONS. Older women have SMARTER and HEALTHER babies (controlling for the age of their man) compared to children of younger women. Again this is FACT. If you are too stupid to understand, that's your problem. I don't know where all this self-loathing of women comes from but it's very sad. Educate yourself before you open your dumb shoewhore mouth.

  28. 28

    Re: JustEmma – Hi, I'm in Canada and past the age of 35, women get automatically tested for Down's. It is then up to them if they want to keep the child or not. No one makes that choice for them. But testing is covered. I actually should have said automatically instead of mandatory.

  29. 29

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – ACTUALLY misogynist, YOU get YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT! They are NOW saying that genetic defects like Down's and autism are being tracked to the aging male FATHERS. (which autism has become rampant with the baby boomer generation mid-life crisis folk that are remarrying younger women and feeling the need to procreate again!) When men get over 45 and have children, even though they're always producing new sperm, the DNA is being althered and is now showing to be the source of these defects. Google IT! Of course you don't hear much about this contriversal scientific discovery in our highly patriarchal society that would rather put the limits on women's sexuality.

  30. 30

    Re: ShoeWhore – You just obviously do not have a scientific mind. "Actually, the older a woman AND her partner" ARE YOU FOR REAL? Anyone with half a brain would realize that a statement like that is vague at best. Most people would say "Hmm, but what happens when we try to isolate the cause?" "Can the cause be isolated?"….and then as a FIRST STEP do research on the age of the woman controlling for the age of the man…and then on the age of the man controlling for the age of the woman. And that's only a first step. And that has been done and the FACTS are out there. Advanced paternal age has been implicated for a while now in things like Autism, Sz, low IQ, etc.
    You are such a superficial thinker! Society cannot advance with people like you, sorry.

  31. 31

    Re: JackWad – Um, we are saying the same thing. Are you sure your comment was meant for me? However, Down's is linked to the woman…there you are wrong.

  32. 32

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – You're Canadian? I thought Canadians were polite!

  33. 33

    Ok, have to comment. Ashton's an idiot. He should use some of his free time to read up on childbirth after 40. Demi is not an anomaly, other than her income provides more options. I wish anyone wanting a child to be successfull but the odds are not good at her age. As far as testing being "mandatory", what the poster was most likely referring to is that insurance companies DO require you to be tested for abnormalities after age 35. I got pregnant at 34 and since the due date was close to my 35th birthday, the insurance company would not cover anything unless I had the test. So,people are forced to be tested if they want insurance to cover it. As for statistics, approx. 4% of women over 40 have a Downs Baby. That doesn't sound bad until you realize that is approx. 1 in 25! Downs babies can bring joy just as any other but it is a real risk to be considered.

  34. 34

    Re: Indigo – LMAO!! Don't cling to stereotypes sweetie. Although….TBH I frequently do that myself.

  35. 35

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – You are very condescending for somebody who does not know the facts. Google women over 30 and chromosonal defects and please click on reputable sources and not some chat room. You are obviously trying to defend your 42 year old "friend" who had the healthy baby. You have no idea how lucky you are that baby didn't have anything wrong, and the crap about older women having smarter babies….you definately got that off of a cereal box.

  36. 36

    Re: Indigo – I'm Canadian and I can assure you, this person is a total ass!

  37. 37

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – Pray tell !!
    You'd have to post links to the so-called peer-reviewed medical journals you like to reference in passing, the same way a delusional about-to-flunk-out uni student, when desperately writing up term papers, starts fabricating false footnotes, only to end up on a provincial disabilty pension !!
    I used to work at one of the epidemiology departments at Health and Welfare Canada, Tunney's Pasture cataloguing such medical literature, so I guess I would know all the journals !!
    Aren't you worried about potential cuts in provincial welfare payments ?!?

  38. 38

    Re: SpiralJetty – Thank you!

  39. 39

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – I sense you're either running out of your anti-psychotic meds, or you need to tweak / change the prescription. Your delusions can be entertaining, but mostly they remind me of the verbal diarrhea one has to put up with whilst walking through hospital psych wards.

  40. Gigi7 says – reply to this


    Re: WatcherOne – Sorry, you're wrong. Many women over 40 who get pregnant have to use donor eggs from a young donor. Experts advise women who want kids to start trying by age 30, unless you feel like paying for fertility treatments.

  41. 41

    I adore the dress but that is bad editing. That hip is looking strange.

  42. Gigi7 says – reply to this


    I just read through the comments and I have to say I was appalled by the idiot calling herself "My black circumcised baby".
    I too used to be under the impression that it was easy to get pregnant into your late 30s from seeing old actresses on tv who got pregnant (I didn't know they were all using donor eggs).
    So I waited until I was 37 and it was VERY difficult to get pregnant and it ended up costing $30,000.00.
    Don't listen to crazy people like her who tell you it's easy for older women, for a few rare people it's easy, for others it's very HARD at that age.

  43. mleed says – reply to this


    you people should be ashamed talking about down syndrome people like they are some sort of aliens. I a mother of 13 year old (conceived when I was 35)and testing was not even recommended and when on to have a perfect child w/the same father a year later. Idid get tested the second time just because but the dr was adamant that he would not terminate if ds again. chances after 35 are actually 1 in 800. brangelina babies are not ds. not sure they are perfectly normal (whatever that is) maybe just delayed because they are twins. but i wouldnt trade my girl for anything.

  44. 44

    I thought this was Courtney Cox

  45. 45

    Has been reading these posts and would like to say @ shoe whore and @ my black circumcised baby..the rude and politically incorrect stuff you guys are saying is making me embarrassed to be Canadian. Grow up.

  46. 46

    The cause of autism is unknown…I have two autistic sons and I was 19 with the first and 22 with my 2nd and my husband was the same age. Myth busted!!!!

  47. 47

    Didn't Demi Moore have almost $400,000 worth of plastic surgery before her Charlie's Angels movie. It was part of her contract! She probably has a Raw Foods chef and trainer too! Please! It infuriates me that these "role models " pass themselves off as healthy and beautiful when it's unhealthy behavior rearing it's ugly head. Praise the beautiful and amazing women out there who work their gluts off mind, body & spirit who don't have plastic surgery.

  48. 48

    she looks like a walking stick. I doubt she would want to get fat again with a baby when she already married one…

  49. 49

    Re: SpiralJetty – You are too stupid for words. Don't address me again.

  50. 50

    Re: ShoeWhore – Insecure, petty, and empty inside - you have just been busted and you can't handle it, can you? You and your psychobabble - LOL. You have no clue what you are talking about. All I have for you is pity.

  51. Lyns says – reply to this


    Translation: "FUCK no, I don't want kids!"

  52. 52

    Re: Jodie 1 – Why yes, a sample size of ONE busts the "myth". Uh huh. What other "myths" do you want to bust based on your own personal anecdotal experience? Geezus….the stupidity here is unreal.

  53. 53

    Re: meggypie88 – Don't force your pathetic BS cowering fear masquerading as "political correctness" on me. Fuck you and your orders. Grow a backbone and maybe some tolerance.

  54. 54

    Re: Gigi7 – Don't blame your infertility on all women sweetheart. I'm willing to bet that even if you HADN'T have waited until 37 you STILL would not have been able to get pregnant easily. Dumb bitches like you need to blame their inadequacies on everyone else. Blame yourself, you barren woman. Just b/c you have bad genese doesn't mean all women do.

  55. 55

    Demi, will you have me?

  56. 56

    Re: Gigi7 – Don't blame your infertility on all women sweetheart. I'm willing to bet that even if you HADN'T have waited until 37 you STILL would not have been able to get pregnant easily. Dumb bitches like you need to blame their inadequacies on everyone else. Blame yourself, you barren woman. Just b/c you have bad genes doesn't mean all women do.

  57. 57

    Re: Seafan
    This may be how your insurance is. I am 40 and pregnant. My insurance does not "require" any particular testing. My pregnancy is covered whether I do the testing or not. All the extra testing is offered to me and it's my decision whether I want to take advantage of it or not. I can't imagine why an ins. co. would not cover your pregnancy just because you don't want to test for DS. Would they not cover the pregnancy if the baby tested positive? That seems very suspicious.

  58. 58

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – I asked you politely for the links to the peer-reviewed medical journals you like peppering your posts with … but, as expected, you only responded with more of the same verbal diarrhea that is so typical of the delusional welfare bums (provincial welfare bums vs city welfare bums, that is) who'd rather pay their internet bills than pay for their meds !! Oh well, I wasn't the only one who busted your tyre-skid marked arse on here it seems …

  59. Gigi7 says – reply to this


    Re: My black circumcised baby! – I have children NOW, but I'm guessing you don't. If you do, somebody from CPS is probably trying to get your IP address as we speak.

  60. 60

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – Do you have Tourette's ?

  61. Gigi7 says – reply to this


    From babycentre.co.uk/preconception
    "Putting off starting a family until your career is established or your debts cleared can have its problems. Fertility falls more sharply for women as they age than for men.
    As you can see from the chart below, women are most fertile between the ages of 20 and 24. As women grow older the likelihood of getting pregnant falls steeply while the likelihood of infertility rises sharply. Men can remain fertile for much longer but male fertility still declines with age, albeit less dramatically. "

  62. 62

    Re: ShoeWhore – It's hard to feel stupid, isn't it? So many people here disagreeing with you as well…for shame! LOL. And if you THINK that I will provide your stupid shoewhore brain with links just b/c you ordered me to….you are dumber than I thought. Do the research yourself lazy dumb ass. I suggest Google Scholar.

  63. 63

    Re: barbados789 – are you the one with the "tricky" posts? LMAO!! dumbass.

  64. 64

    Re: Gigi7 – OMG NO!!! Please don't sic the CPS people on me! Pleaes don't. I'm so scared. Frightened. >>>>. LOL!! I pity your kids having such a dumb as fuck parent as you. Unable to read, unable to comprehend, posting useless "copy and paste" prose that everyone already knows. Unable to fully appreciate the nuances of a topic. Nobody is saying fertility doesn't decline with age for women more than for men.
    What is being said is that ADVANCED PATERNAL AGE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR A HOST OF PROBLEMS SUCH AS AUTISM, MENTAL ILNESS, LOW IQ, Sz. In other words, although the little swimmers may still swim they are all fucked up…broken, shortened, missing necessary genes.
    Advanced maternal age causes no such problems. And Down's, which is still

  65. 65

    Re: ShoeWhore – Oh and one more thing you dumb twat….DO THE RESEARCH YOURSELF….it will do you some good. Google Scholar (as opposed to regular Google) links to peer-reviewed journals. M'kay? (dumbass).

  66. 66

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – You sound so fvcking mental I bet you ate the lopped off foreskin from your circumcised black baby too. Ewwwww

  67. 67

    If she's still practicing vegan raw foodism, then its possible since raw organic food stops or slows the aging process.

  68. 68

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – Its called respect and class. There's a difference. Lol Big people behind their computers.

  69. 69

    Re: schoolyard bully – No I didn't. Not everyone is like your mom you know.

  70. 70

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – Google Scholar is for amateurs. I always tend to go straight to Google Scholar Advanced. Or are you too busy masturbating to gay porn sites and / or too lazy to type in the extra parameters.
    Now, I suggest you take your combative delusional self and attempt to type in some terms into the search engine and stop wasting everyone's time.

  71. 71

    Re: My black circumcised baby!
    "PROVEN that older women have healthier and smarter kids"

    I'd like to see that test! smarter? really? based on what IQ test??
    I'd wager that intelligence has a lot more to do with environment than old old and rancid some woman's vag is!
    you're obviously some old desperate woman breeder…

  72. 72

    Wow! It's amazing that anonymity allows SOME people to feel it's ok to behave so despicably toward others. If you were face to face with these people I'm sure you wouldn't dare! MBCB

  73. 73

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – You just contradicted yourself … go back and read some of your posts about maternal age and male vs female genetic degradation. You're not medicated right now, are ya !! I hear discussions like yours all the time, but it's usually towards the end of the month when the outpatients start showing up en masse for their med re-evaluations.

  74. 74

    this photo is so photoshoped!! even this is not her body! this is Anja Rubik pic with Demi face!

  75. switz says – reply to this


    What? If she's so able & ready, then have a baby already! We've heard over the years how much they both want a baby…

  76. 76

    women having babies in their 50s…bar one in a million of them…are using in vitro with their own frozen younger embryos or someone else's eggs. THAT is something they don't tell you in Hollywood. Sure, Genna Davis had twins, all these older actresses, they just aren't their genetic offspring and they aren't telling the public this fact!

  77. 77

    Not entirely true. Sorry. But male sperm isn't the issue so much as older eggs simply can't get sperminated as easily. Older mothers do NOT have smarter babies. Natural selection means younger eggs (those dropped first) are the best genetic viability. REARING by older mothers means for smarter kids is what happens. A test was done on those living to 100, what they had in common, and the ONE anomaly was THE AGE OF THE MOTHER WHEN SHE GAVE BIRTH. Younger mothers mean healthier babies. The current trend is that a lot of 40 something mothers are better RAISING kids, but what you aren't hearing is that they are using in vitro YOUNGER eggs they get from 18 yo or 20 yo mothers in college. GENETICALLY newer eggs, Environmentally OLDER, more mature, financially stable mothers. THIS is what we are seeing.

  78. 78

    The best genetic freak a few million dollars worth of plastic surgery, hair stylists, makeup artists, personal trainers and nutritionists can buy! Charge it!

  79. 79

    I think he is right…. photoshopped or no she looks amazing

  80. 80

    Re: bitapeach – Absolutely true. Geena Davis was 47, she gave birth, but not her eggs, and because these people are public, they give a false impression that you can have babies forever.

  81. 81

    Re: My black circumcised baby!
    Unless you plan on testing every single fucking person on the planet thats bullshit. You're also forgetting to take overall genetic makeup and heredity into condition. Stop trying to be a pseudo intellectual on fucking biology. You fucking fail. Older women don't have smarter children "factually" than a younger woman. And you need to do better fact checking.I love how you mention "scientific journals" like people are suppose to be like oh well she said she read such and such from a scientific journal. When you get older your eggs aren't as healthy and vibrant as when you're young. Not to mention even if that weren't true. A younger woman wouldn't have less healthy/smarter babies than older women, for the simple fact that women have all the eggs they are gonna have even before birth. Shut the fuck up you ignorant bitch.

  82. 82

    Re: Gigi7 – I'm sorry you had a hard time conceiving, however, I personally know 5, yes 5, women in their 50's who had children without benefit of donor eggs or fertility treatments of any sort.

  83. Rynne says – reply to this


    That looks nothing like her.

  84. 84

    Re: WatcherOne – I'm sorry, but this is simply not true. Were you in the room with them during conception? People don't always share, even with good friends, the lengths that they went to to achieve a pregnancy. 5 people in their 50's, extremely unlikely!

  85. 85

    She could purchase embryos from a younger women and carry the baby as her own - probably the safest route to go.

  86. 86

    Re: barbados789 – It is true. My best friend's mother, my husband's mother, my husband's best friend's mother, a neighbor, my youngest son's friend's mother…menopause babies. They were not trying to have children. (These people do not all live in the same state). Anyway. don't tell me something simply isn't true, when it is.

  87. 87

    Man did they photoshop her! Don't get me wrong , she's a beautiful woman, but her face looks so much slimmer and more cut on this picture- everything about her face looks much more refined - why do they do that? I wonder if the celebrities like that or not - because it's sort of a let down for most people when you actually see them because they don't look at all like that.

  88. 88

    i'm confused, does she really look like that in real life? the anorexic look was so 5yrs ago. ewww.

  89. 89

    Anyone who has only negative comments about Demi, is ignorant. The woman looks great, healthy and unlike you negativos, HAPPY!

  90. 90

    Maybe they can photo-shop their baby better than W photo-shopped that cover. What's up with Demi's left hip and thigh? BUSTED!!!!

  91. 91


  92. 92

    Major Photoshop including body-thinning.
    As if she is not thin enough already.

  93. @v@ says – reply to this


    What, she's got him believing that's something special at her age? Many could.

  94. @v@ says – reply to this


    She certainly wouldn't conceive naturally with a photoshoporiexia body like this in real life; not nearly enough body fat to conceive.

  95. 95

    Yeah but what are the chances of her having ATTRACTIVE children? Of course, higher with Ashton. . .

  96. 96

    Re: My black circumcised baby! – lets all vote,, on a scale of one to ten how stupid and bitchy and ugly is black circumcized baby 10 10 10

  97. 97

    A genetic freak thanks to good plastic surgeons and fertility doctors.

  98. 98

    Its called "PLASTIC SURGERY"

  99. 99

    Whoop….didnt read the whole thing, thought it was about looking young…….But still

  100. 100

    um yeah so where are the babies? And I mean naturally concieved ones no turkey bastor involved!

More comments: [1] 2 »