Home Videos Photos

Jodie Foster Denies Attacking A Teenager, Claims He Was A Pap!

| Filed under: Wacky, Tacky & TrueJodie Foster

wenn5487594jb.jpg

And the plot thickens!

After a story broke this morning alleging that Jodie Foster attacked and verbally abused a teenage fan of hers, her representative has released this 'alternative' take on what exactly went down.

It says:

"This guy was most definitely a professional paparazzo. He had a large camera bag and 1000mm telephoto lens. He tailed Jodie and followed her all the way from the movie theater to the valet. He crowded her and her two young children and took photos of them the whole time. This guy's behavior was completely inappropriate and the police report is a fabrication of the incident."

Hmm - we have a really hard time believing that Jodie would attack a teenager, so this sounds a little more accurate to us!

What do U think?? Who do U believe??

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , ,

Email this  »
Most Bizarre Quotes From Celebs
These Celebs Were Exploring Space WAY Before Interstellar!
Celebrities Who Aren't Known By Their Real Names!
Celebs Who Are Out!
90s Fashion Is Taking Over! See The Biggest Style Trends Then AND Now!
Celebrity Weddings Of 2014 — So Far!

66 comments to “Jodie Foster Denies Attacking A Teenager, Claims He Was A Pap!”



  1. 1

    But she's a lesbian DYKE, is she not ?!? Why do you think there aren't any lesbian bars that stay in business for more than a couple of years !!! Because the dykes destroy them slowly but surely with their ultra-aggressive bitch fighting ways !!! Never corner a lesbian, she'll kick your nuts straight up through your esophagus !!!



  2. 2

    I believe Jodie, she is a classy lady, and no way she would attack someone, esp in front of her children…I'm sure by now she knows how to handle the paparazzi



  3. 3

    Hmmm, I wonder why you don't give Dane Cook the same benefit of doubt.



  4. 4

    I read this on HuffPo HOURS ago.



  5. 5

    I side with Jodie. When you see videos of these paparazzi a lot of them are total assholes.
    they yell insults to the celebs like "You deserve your divorce" so they can get an angry reaction shot to sell ot the rags



  6. 6

    Like you know Jodie personally… as if!!!



  7. 7

    i think she's telling the truth, think about it… one of the things she said to the guy was do you even have a mother? that goes with the idea that she's just out as a mom trying to have a nice movie date with her kids and this asshat can't leave her alone.



  8. 8

    JFo all the way. And ShoeWhore, you clearly need to get out more. Lesbian bars go under because us dykes are cheap, not because we bust nuts. Get it together.



  9. 9

    Photogs deserve to get shot. Most of them are illegal. I bet you if the INS started getting a bunch of phone calls and they showed up to investigate it you'll see alot less paps..But then again people that complain about it just turn around and support it by going to sites like these :(



  10. 10

    Foster went off the deep end years ago. The kid should have decked this homely bitch.



  11. 11

    Jodie Foster made her do it! Oh, wait…



  12. 12

    I think he most likely was aggressively pursing her and invading her privacy. He invaded her personal space and she slapped his ass back. She is entitled to her privacy, especially with her children.



  13. 13

    so who was the dad that commented on his sons attack?



  14. 14

    that is just terrible–and she shouldn't make excuses

  15. elo says – reply to this


    15

    Damage control can make one say the darndest things.



  16. 16

    BULLSHIT FOSTER!!!! HOW DOES SHE KNOW IT'S A 1000MM LENS?? DID SHE ASK HIM NICELY FOR A LENS INSPECTION? THINK NOT!! IF THE DUDE IS 17 YRS OLD AND INDEED HER KIDS APOLOGIZED TO HIM FOR HER BITCHY ASSAULTING WAYS THEN SHE'S GUILTY OF ASSAULT WHETHER HE'S A TEENY PAP OR NOT. FUCK OFF DYKE! HER STORY IS AS PHONY AS THE ONE'S PEREZ CUT & PASTES IN HIS PSEUDO BLOG. JUST SAYIN…



  17. 17

    FOSTER… NOT EVERYONE WHO HAS A 1000MM TELE LENS IS A PAP!! PRIVATE CITIZENS ARE ALLOWED TO CARRY THEM TOO. SHE CAN INSPECT MY "1000MM TELE LENS" IF SHE WANTS… CONSIDERING SHE'S A FULLY CERTIFIED DYKE, I'M PRETTY SURE I'M SAFE. MUAHAHAHA.



  18. 18

    Sounds like the truth to me.



  19. 19

    i really believe her.



  20. 20

    Re: katiep23 – Where the fuck do you live ?!? Lesbo bars go under because all the fucking dykes keep on trashing the fucking places, better than looters looting an electronics store during a race riot !! Now, multiply this on a daily basis, and, fuck, just close up the fucking place already !! Not only are lesbians cheap, they're fucking filthy !! Ask any chamber maid how long it takes to clean up a hotel room occupied by lesbians !!! DISGUSTING !!!



  21. 21

    Re: ShoeWhore – all of the lesbians i know are pretty clean. however they do have a tendency to fight to the point where they will throw blows at one another. i cant tell u how many times i have seen a hard core girl on girl fight at a lesbian bar or gay pride festival. on the contrary u will rarely see gay men coming to blows.



  22. 22

    The guys need to f-off.! Leave her the hell alone.



  23. 23

    Re: ShoeWhore – You're Canadian. No one cares what you think.



  24. 24

    Re: the Period – Sometimes they prong one another with their feather dusters or if really angry, start swinging their Hello Kitty purses. Oh the carnage.



  25. 25

    the fucking paparazzi just wants money!



  26. 26

    She was well within her rights to manhandle an innocent teenager if he took a picture of her.



  27. 27

    Um NO!!! Jodie attacking someone…. I think NOT!! This women has class. and what ever happened would have been a MOTHERS response to protect their kidz!!!! GO JO!!!!



  28. 28

    I realize that dealing with paparazzi would be annoying, but movie stars who don't wish to deal with that facet of the business have lots of options - change professions, do theater rather than blockbuster films that put them in the spotlight, live in places that are not L.A., or retire (god knows they have enough money, should they choose to live a normal, slightly less extravagant life). I find it ridiculous and amusing to hear people who earn more for a few months of work than most people make in a lifetime complain about their circumstances. If Julia Roberts, who is a thousand times more famous than Jodie Foster, can remain out of the lenses of the paparazzi, Jodie can too. She has obviously chosen not to, so she really has no business complaining.



  29. 29

    I would be inclined to believe ms foster's story if she hadn't felt the need to address his "1000 mm telephoto lens." A telephoto lens is designed to take clear, close up images of subjects from a large relative distance, hence "telephoto" like "telescope"

    A 1000 mm lens has a minimum focal distance of 24 feet, which means if this young man was indeed a paparazzo, he wold have remained at least 24 feet away from ms. foster, because no one in the industry would pay for a blurry, out of focus image of a relatively obsolete celebrity.

    Additionally the 1000 mm lens is designed to capture close up images of subjects at distances of up to and over 1 mile. Those lenses weigh upwards of 35 pounds and require their own monopod in order to function properly.

    It is very unlikely to me that a pap would be sitting around by the movie theatre with a lens that would be better suited to shooting JLo's wedding from a helicopter than trailing jodi foster to the valet.

    She's lying.



  30. 30

    First of all Jodie is a tiny little thing so the thought that she messed someone up inadvertently is beyond ridiculous..
    Paparazzi's are way out of line with no sense of decency or respect.
    Fight back.



  31. 31

    Jodie Foster keeps things low profile, she's not a hot head. If she indeed lost her shit, no doubt that kid was fucking with her children in public. I'd beat his ass too if I were a mom. You know his family is shady.



  32. 32

    Regardless of who he is… a 17 year old or a 17 year old paparazzi… what gives JFoster the right to assault anyone?!

    She is a "public figure" and while I'm sure paparazzi are like gnats to the rest of us non-celebrities… they come with the territory… having said that, she is out of line.



  33. 33

    Just because she's famous doesn't mean she should just allow someone to harass her children too and make them uncomfortable. She was wrong how?

    And for you people saying she attacked him, she beat him up. The police report states the extent of violence was a "FINGER POKE". lmao. Get real people. You're dumb if you don't see this is some jerks trying to get money off a famous rich lady after harrassing her innocent children.



  34. 34

    Re: ShoeWhore – Because all lesbians are exactly the same and Jodie Foster has to be ultra violent. Please she has a rep for being the most stable person. And she's said she's never even hit someone in her real life. The fact that she's been hounded by paparazzi her whole life and has not had an incident like this before, tells you this punk who is not a kid but one step away from being an adult was the one harassing her children and her and she told him to buzz off like any mother would.



  35. 35

    Re: speidismells – A "finger poke" is an assault and out of line? Are you stupid? And we don't even know if that occured. She said she grabbed his elbow to speak to him and tell him to stop because he was frightening her children. SHE and her kids are the victim not this money seeking stalkerazzi.



  36. 36

    Re: ninilee – nice try trying to sound smart but how would you say she's lying when you don't even know the whole story.? She only mentioned the 1000 mm camera as evidence that he had the equipment typical of paparazzi. She saw that that was among his equipment. She didn't say that's the camera he shot her and her kids with. Paparazzi often bring along big and smaller cameras you know. Maybe he was shooting her with a smaller one up close.

    She's the one lying, yet this kid claims to be assaulted and bruised and batttered by a "FINGER POKE" Nice perception there.



  37. 37

    I believe Jodie all the way!



  38. 38

    I believe Jodie.



  39. 39

    The fact that she's a lesbian,
    has nothing to do with this case.
    So stop bringing It up!

  40. dimel says – reply to this


    40

    To all those people who are convinced she wouldn't have done it, this is what Jodie Foster said about a year ago in an interview:

    "Look, it's terrible, I know, but weakness really, really bugs me, to the point that if there is a wounded bird on the sidewalk, I look at it and I go: 'I think I'll just kick it.'"

    If this kid was scrawny as his father described him, I wouldn't be surprised if she went even more apeshit on him, than on a real paparazzo. Especially since the kid apologized profusely and didn't fight back. She probably interpreted this as weakness…but think about it…it's easier to push and shove a scrawny teenager than it is a real paparazzo…What bothers me about this is that this isn't the first time she's been photographed, so why blow a fuse now?

    I totally believe she did this, and I do believe this kid. If he was a paparazzo as she's claiming, the police can check that out. They can check out his background, if he works as a paparazzo or not…But I'm almost certain this kid was just a kid.



  41. 41

    There was a recent G.Q. article regarding a very aggressive teen paparazzi Austin Visschedyk, same age, could be same kid.



  42. 42

    jodies classy but still tough stuff and if ur a 13 yr old papapari snapper (and ive heard some of them are young) who wants to take photos of her kid for every geek on earth to perv at im sure shell kick their balls in and right ly so!!

    paparazzi shouldnt be taking photos of the kids



  43. 43

    she should have kicked his ass what right does he have to take photo's of her kids.



  44. 44

    There is NO WAY any mother out with her small children would attack another child. I don't believe this at all; an act of fiction to impune Ms. Foster who historically covets her privacy. I think the paps shoudl respect her desire to live her life outside the flash of a camera. This woman does so much for charities and groups that benefit the community - leave her alone!



  45. 45

    I 100% - without QUESTION believe Jodie. I mean puh-LEASE! Like she's going to randomly attack some teenager. Give me a break. Give HER a break - and while you're at it, give that paparazzo's NOSE a break. (just kidding).



  46. 46

    Utimately the courts will have to decide if her behavior was that of a protective mother or an out of control bull dyke.



  47. 47

    I still remember that Jodie Foster made a shocking racial slur about an "aging Asian whore," and I did not appreciate that. So it would not surprise me if she is actually a lot more hillbilly and nasty than you know about!



  48. 48

    team foster. And, sheesh! What a bunch of bullshit nonsense about lesbians.



  49. 49

    Re: ninilee

    That lens comment was a red flag to me too. If he were using it, he'd be far away. If not, it would be safely tucked away in his bag and carefully stored, and no one would know it was there unless they went through it. They didn't, so that comment was made up. What else was?



  50. 50

    I don't believe that Jody intentionally attack the teenager. Hay she taught that he was a paparazzi. Give her a break people!! If you love to shop then visit www.saxxix.com



  51. 51

    don't mess with a mother protecting her young
    everyone knows that
    if not u deserve to be mauled



  52. 52

    I think jodie is awesome. She and stewart was good in panic room. I don't like the paps either. If I was famous, I wouldn't want to be followed 24.7. STARS need a life of their home



  53. 53

    Jodie Foster has always shown intelligence and class. Now why would she go out of her way to assault a young man who was taking pictures of her and her two young children, when any such assault could cost her a ridiculous sum of money. Does this really make sense? I think this is a young paparazzo who is trying to hustle some easy money from the wealthy actress, by claiming an assault occurred.



  54. 54

    Maybe her ex (Cydney Bernard) put the guy up to it. lol Who knows? Maybe her Prozac wore off.



  55. 55

    Even if the kid had a camera&not a phone&took her picture, she had no right to bitch about it; He wasn't at her hpuse taking pics! And yeah, I can totally see her doing it!! I hope she pays!!

  56. Jaded says – reply to this


    56

    Let's see do i believe that there is an innocent 17 year old straight non-actor who is a huge fan of Jodie Foster? No. Do i believe that an over aggressive 17 year paparazzi got way to close to a normally private woman and her children and even after she asked him to he wouldn't back off. Yeah that seems a bit more plausible.



  57. 57

    she should have broken his damn jaw and shoved the camera up his ass because its what phogs deserve !!! scumbags !



  58. 58

    I think its within reason to get one or two pictures of your favorite celb, but to actually follow her to the valet with her kids in tow???? Thats too aggressive and he went over the line.



  59. 59

    oh i believe jodie over any of the media they will say anything for good story. this is just plain stupid!

  60. @v@ says – reply to this


    60

    A seventeen year old pap? Could be, but it also could be that he was a 17 year old kid who loves photography and so had a really nice camera, and because of her profession, she was paranoid?

  61. @v@ says – reply to this


    61

    Anyway, since when was it ok to physically (and verbally) go after a media photographer?

  62. @v@ says – reply to this


    62

    Re: Christina Polo – Great and bullseye comment. Wish I'd read that far down first.



  63. 63

    Re: Tigerlily24 – It's not hard sounding smart when I'm up against someone like you.

    The lens was 1000 mm, not the camera. There is no such thing as a 1000 mm camera. Most paparazzi carry around cameras of identical sizes and models with lenses of various compression. A 1000 mm lens is about the size of a chubby toddler (like you, when you were young), so I really doubt that the pap just had it hanging off his shoulder. If he did have a 1000 mm lens it would have been stored away in a hard case where Jodi or her reps wouldn't have been aware of it.

    I am not saying she beat or bruised him, but I am saying that she is not telling the whole truth and is trying to throw people off this story by fabricating another story about how awful the paparazzi are.



  64. 64

    yeah because it's so believable that the cops just made up a story about a star attacking a teen when it was a paparazzi. what's with the conspiracy theories hollywood? own up and apologize.



  65. 65

    Re: ShoeWhore – You're a retard.



  66. 66

    Re: Eldridge Cleaver – I 100% don't agree with ShoeWhore, but why does it matter if she/he is Canadian???? You think people don't care what Canadians think? hahahahahahhahaahha ya ok!