Home Videos Photos

Ingrid Michaelson Does New Version Of Parachute!

| Filed under: Music MinuteCheryl ColeIngrid Michaelson

Very cool!

Although Cheryl Tweedy recorded the gorgeous single Parachute for her first solo album, 3 Words, last year, the track was actually co-written by Ingrid Michaelson, who has just done her own version of the song - with an accompanying music video (above)!

We're really digging this version!

It's fascinating to listen to how they each make the song their own!

What do U think?? Do U like Ingrid's version or Chezza's more??

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

THE Most Embarrassing Music Videos!
Breakup Songs from the 00's You Still Listen To Today!
Best Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
15 Fandoms You DON'T Want To Piss Off!
Can You Guess The Pop Diva Based On Their Early 2000s Outfit?
ACM Awards 2014: Hottie Nominees

17 comments to “Ingrid Michaelson Does New Version Of Parachute!”



  1. 1

    i love the original & this is good too lol



  2. 2

    I like them both, but I sooo prefer Chezza's. She just made it her own.



  3. 3

    Cheryl's video is terrific, but I like Ingrid's version better.



  4. 4

    good version but dislike the video



  5. 5

    I just you tubed cheryl's version and heard both for the first time today and must say Cheryl's video is better and so her version of the song.

  6. koe says – reply to this


    6

    I like this version better, but thats mainly because Cheryl is a mediocre singer and I'm not a big fan of her style. This is a really pretty version.



  7. 7

    This is so much better.



  8. 8

    ingrid is obviously better, she can sing and isnt autotuned. (well quite honestly she probably was for this song, as any popular artist is today. but! way less then that other one, and also have a way more unique voice that is better heard without autotune) the other one is shit. sorry.



  9. 9

    Ingrid Michaelson wrote this song… She wrote it for Cheryl though.



  10. 10

    Re: g.e.toes – You should hear ingrid sing it live, so amazing!



  11. 11

    ingrid can sing, cheryl can carry a tune - based on that, i say ingrid………



  12. 12

    Re: manduuuh – I am sorry but unless the bitch can sing it live better than Ingrid, then no, just no. I love how people reward auto-tune and lipsynching, it's sad. I still don't understand how people reward "singers" who cannot sing live or write a song. I am not a huge pop fan but at least lady gaga writes her music, sings live and plays the piano. People who cannot do any of these do not deserve money and fame, there are plenty of naturally beautiful MUSICIANS who can blow these fakes out of the water, they just don't have the connections(or didn't fuck their way to the top).

    And Perez, you are months late on this as usual.



  13. 13

    I prefer Chezza's version :)



  14. 14

    beautiful.



  15. 15

    Ingrid Michaelson is an amazing singer. Her voice sounds even more amazing live in person than on her recorded tracks. Most artists nowadays can't ever match or exceed the way they sound on their tracks. I HATE Cheryl Cole's version of this song–she butchers it, in my opinion. The beat ruins the soulfulness of the lyrics.



  16. 16

    they're both good versions (and I don't like chezza), but I think I like this one more, it's more quirky. I like quirky.



  17. 17

    Ingrid Michaelson is amazing. she has more talent in her little finger than most of us have in out whole body. this song touches my heart and makes me tear up. haha… the "original" (I guess it's considered that) is cute, but I prefer Ingrid's