Home Videos Photos

Tina Fey Does Sarah Palin On David Letterman!

| Filed under: TV NewsTina FeyDavid LettermanSarah Palin

This impression just never gets old! LOLz!

Tina Fey stopped by The Late Show With David Letterman last night, and when the topic turned to politics, the 30 Rock star once again graced us with her HIGHlarious take on Sarah Palin!

Check out a clip (above)!

Spot on, as always, bb! We're obsessed!

Tags: , , , , ,

44 comments to “Tina Fey Does Sarah Palin On David Letterman!”



  1. 1

    Completely boring and a waste of bandwidth Prez. Stick to 30 Rock Tina.

    Tea Party is rolling hard baby - - LIFE WILL NEVER BE THE SAME!!!



  2. 2

    I love Tina's impression of what can only be called Sarah Palin's ugly sister.



  3. 3

    Oh please her Sarah bashing is getting old. She cant find any new material? Sarah had the last laugh on Tuesdays elections!



  4. 4

    I love Tina Fey but she should know what's she's talking about before saying it - they call Sarah palin Gov. because that's the custom to refer to former governors, presidents, judges, etc with their former titles. I don't agree witht the custom but Fox isn't the only one to do it - she must be a Fox viewer - good for her.



  5. 5

    NO, IT DOES GET OLD, IT GOT OLD REAL FAST. And what is sad about it, is there are a lot of PEOPLE, INCLUDING YOU MARIO/PEREZ, that have quoted Tina (as the fake Sarah), because you are too lazy to google and see if you have a real quote or a STUPID TINA FEY QUOTE. But you DIDN'T CARE, if you could trash the TEA Party, you did. No apologies, I don't think have the time you realized you were quoting a made up person. IDIOT



  6. 6

    LOL DAIRY QUEEN EMPLOYEE



  7. 7

    Funny but am sure the conservatives will be angry about this lol.



  8. 8

    Bristol Palin didn't vote.



  9. 9

    I love Tina Fey.



  10. 10

    omg people! always negative comments! I LOVE her impersonations of Palin. It's funnier to watch Tina do it than feeling embarrassed to watch Palin make a fool of herself. GOOD JOB TINA!



  11. 11

    Re: nycyankeeguy
    "She cant find any new material?"
    Yeah, because the last time she did anything Sarah Palin related was like 5 months ago.



  12. 12

    no mario…… YOUR obsessed!!!! it's old, we get it … you dont like sarah or anything to do w/ her, let it go dude.



  13. 13

    Lame and old - get some new material bully . . .



  14. 14

    Hilarious!



  15. 15

    Re: YoungTaurus – You are incorrect - she has done Palin impersonations several times over in the last month - get your facts straight.

  16. baby says – reply to this


    16

    oh yes, lets blame things on the GOP and bush, when OBAMA HAS BEEN IN THE OFFICE FOR ALMOST 2 YEARS, BTW UNEMPLOYMENT IS AT 10% AND WHAT DOES OUR GREAT OBAMA DO???? HE TAKES A VACATION TO INDIA THAT IS COSTING THE TAXPAYERS 200 MILLION DOLLARS PER DAY!!!!!

    ENOUGH OF THIS FREE SPENDING IDIOT! I AM SICK OF WATCHING MY FRIENDS AND FAMILY STRUGGLE TO FEED THEIR FAMILIES AND PAY FOR THEIR MEDICINES, AND HE REFUSES TO GIVE SOCIAL SECURITY A COST OF INCREASE RAISE, 2 YEARS IN A ROW NOW! BUT HE WILL GO ON A VACATION THAT IS COSTING US 200 MILLION PER DAY!!!!

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, WHEN IS THIS JOKE GONNA BE OVER WITH????



  17. 17

    Tina, honey, get a stylist. You never look put-together correctly. You are too old for Black to be your signature color. And your garments are never fit properly. You have been around too long to not get it correct. The woman you are making fun of looks better than you. And I cannot stand Palin.



  18. 18

    flip your picnic table dave! LOL



  19. 19

    Re: Cezanne
    She's also done numerous projects as well, including her TV show–you know the one for which she won an Emmy–which gives her a plethora of new material with which to work. Her life doesn't revolve around impersonating Palin, and when she does impersonate Palin, it's because she's asked to do it. It's not like you really believe this segment was unrehearsed and Dave didn't set it up, or do you? Don't preach to me about facts, honey.



  20. 20

    Re: Cezanne
    "get some new material bully"
    Learn the meaning of bully, idiot!



  21. 21

    Re: baby
    Your login name is befitting, seeing that you must have the mentality of a baby if you believe any of that shit you're spewing.



  22. 22

    Re: YoungTaurus – Wow - you know way too much about this broad - and I will preach when I feel like it - if you no likey - don't post HONEY! :-)



  23. 23

    Re: YoungTaurus – Also, I never said whether it was rehearsed or not - don't really even care about that at all - get your undies unbundled HONEY! Love and Kisses.



  24. 24

    Re: Sean Knowlingers – WAY TO SERIOUS . . . IDIOT - laugh much?



  25. 25

    Re: Sean KnowlingersRe: Sean Knowlingers – WAY TO SERIOUS . . . IDIOT - laugh much?



  26. 26

    Re: Sean Knowlingers – You are some kind of foul - go out and have some fun will you? Peace



  27. 27

    Re: Sean KnowlingersRe: Sean Knowlingers – I think I just learned it - DAYUM - you are scorching!



  28. 28

    Re: Sean KnowlingersRe: Sean Knowlingers – I think I just learned it - DAYUM - you are scorching!



  29. 29

    Re: baby – I agree with you - take note of "Sean Knowlinger's prolific post in response to yours - one of the reasons the very issues you speak of seem to linger on - IGNORANCE IS BLISS I guess - at least for "Sean"



  30. 30

    Re: YoungTaurus – Emmy's are a little overrated in this big scheme of things don't you think?



  31. 31

    Re: Cezanne
    "Wow - you know way too much about this broad."
    I barely typed a paragraph on her, not her autobiography.
    "don't really even care about that at all"
    Then why bring it up?
    "Emmy's are a little overrated in this big scheme of things don't you think?"
    So are Sarah Palin impersonations, but they seem to bother you. Or are you going to pretend you didn't care about that either?



  32. 32

    Fucking Love her!!!!



  33. 33

    Re: Cezanne
    Yeah, I laugh much. I'm laughing much at your "retort" as we speak.
    Try being a little more witty in your responses, and at least compound them to one response. You might actually convince people that you really told them off, and duplicate and multiple postings, when one would have sufficed, won't make it look like you're trying hard to find something clever to say.
    No need to speak for Baby, either. I'm sure he/she can defend him- or herself, unless you two are one and the same, which I don't doubt, since the stupidity in both of your postings are blatantly apparent.
    If you want to talk "prolific," nothing beats "prolific" like "lame and old" or "DAYUM you are scorching." Such profundity indeed. Postings like that should guarantee your stay on the left of the bell curve. Now how's that for me having fun, "Cezanne?" Thanks for playing!



  34. 34

    Re: baby
    If you watched the clip, nobody blamed Bush/GOP for anything. They weren't even mentioned. But I don't see the big deal about a President taking vacation. It's one of their perks. GWB took more vacation days than other President. There's no truth either to the claim that Obama's vacation will cost $200 Mil a day, no matter how many times Michelle Bachmann claims it. No matter what your political affiliation is, you can't expect the current Pres to fix the mess he inherited in just under 2 years.



  35. 35

    Re: YoungTaurus – "Wow - you know way too much about this broad."
    I barely typed a paragraph on her, not her autobiography.
    "don't really even care about that at all"
    Then why bring it up?
    "Emmy's are a little overrated in this big scheme of things don't you think?"
    So are Sarah Palin impersonations, but they seem to bother you. Or are you going to pretend you didn't care about that either?

    No - I don't claim to pretend anything. Thanks for providing me with some content for my term paper. Seriously - I appreciate it.



  36. 36

    Re: Sean Knowlingers – Yeah, I laugh much. I'm laughing much at your "retort" as we speak.
    Try being a little more witty in your responses, and at least compound them to one response. You might actually convince people that you really told them off, and duplicate and multiple postings, when one would have sufficed, won't make it look like you're trying hard to find something clever to say.
    No need to speak for Baby, either. I'm sure he/she can defend him- or herself, unless you two are one and the same, which I don't doubt, since the stupidity in both of your postings are blatantly apparent.
    If you want to talk "prolific," nothing beats "prolific" like "lame and old" or "DAYUM you are scorching." Such profundity indeed. Postings like that should guarantee your stay on the left of the bell curve. Now how's that for me having fun, "Cezanne?" Thanks for playing!

    You are very welcome - thanks for playing as well. Your post has given me some great insight - glad you had fun too.



  37. 37

    Re: Cezanne
    "No - I don't claim to pretend anything. Thanks for providing me with some content for my term paper. Seriously - I appreciate it"
    Glad to have helped. That community college degree should do you well! :)



  38. 38

    not funny anymore just boring



  39. 39

    Re: YoungTaurus – OMG - that is good - taking that on the road are we? Put the pen down on that Tina Fey autobiography and start writing some comedy routines. You're clearly suited for work beyond snarky posts. Good luck to you and again thank you for the content.



  40. 40

    Re: YoungTaurus

    Now you are slamming people who attend community college as well - aren't we high and mighty? :-) Sorry - didn't recognize from your posts that I was in the presence of greatness or any degree of high intelligence. What is important is what you think of yourself and you clearly have that under control however skewed that view may be - it seems to work for you.



  41. 41

    Re: Cezanne
    "Now you are slamming people who attend community college as well - aren't we high and mighty?"
    Now why do you want to take it as a slam? I could have very well been sincere in my wishing you well in your future endeavors. A little self-esteem issues, I see. But if you didn't leave yourself so wide open with some of your lame comments, perhaps you wouldn't feel so slammed. You make it so easy.
    "Put the pen down on that Tina Fey autobiography and start writing some comedy routines. You're clearly suited for work beyond snarky posts."
    I appreciate the career advice, but I'm already doing quite well for myself in my choice of vocation, thank you. Besides, your own attempt at snarkiness and cleverness is providing me with much comic relief.
    "Sorry - didn't recognize from your posts that I was in the presence of greatness or any degree of high intelligence."
    Of course you wouldn't, but I can say the same about you as well. But you're putting on a great act. Bravo! :)
    "What is important is what you think of yourself and you clearly have that under control however skewed that view may be - it seems to work for you."
    It works very well for me. Perhaps you should try it.



  42. 42

    Re: YoungTaurus – You are trying too hard and that is just sad. I suspect your "vocation" is being part of the unfortunate 10% and growing of the unemployed. Get back to doing something productive with your life. I've wasted too much time on you already - Cheers!



  43. 43

    Re: Cezanne
    "You are trying too hard and that is just sad."
    No, what's sad is you cannot see that for yourself. I already stated that you made this debate quite easy. A difficult challenge is what you were not for me, my dear.
    "I suspect your "vocation" is being part of the unfortunate 10% and growing of the unemployed."
    Then I suggest you get back to your books and study a little harder, because your "suspicions" and other assessments of me are so off the mark.
    "Get back to doing something productive with your life."
    Did you really think you did anything productive by attempting to argue with me? This has probably been the highlight of your fucking week.
    "I've wasted too much time on you already - Cheers! "
    I didn't ask you to respond. But like you previously and so eloquently stated, "if you no likey - don't post HONEY!" Quote of the year, right there.



  44. 44

    Re: Cezanne
    You should have conceded a long time ago. You are CLEARLY out of your league, here. You got owned SEVERAL times on here, yet you keep coming back for more, rehashing the same tired, cliched lines, as if you think you're doing something. Desperate to get the last word in, I suppose.
    Heed your own advice, and do something productive, like volunteering yourself for some sort of retroactive abortion.
    I look forward to your response. I know you will respond..you're THAT predictable.