Home Videos Photos

Ugh! Katherine Heigl Forces Studio To Recast Her In Adaline

| Filed under: Film FlickersKatherine Heigl

katherine-heigl-exits-adaline-film.jpg

Because she's not doing it anymore!

This morning, source report that Katherine Heigl withdrew from her commitment to the movie Adaline. Both the studio and her reps deny that she's just being a bitter Betty for some reason or another and are going with the same excuse she pulled out when she refused to go back to Grey's: she's a new mommy who doesn't want to work right now.

As if she is the first woman in the history of movies to have a newborn while shooting a major motion picture!

The role now has to be re-cast immediately in order to make the mid-March production deadline and in a statement released by one of the producers of the film, they insist that everyone at the studio is still "great fans of hers and if this is what she has to do, we respect that."

Uh-huh. Sure. Let's see if they ever call her again to make a movie!

Bad decision, Kat! How many other chances are you going to get to play alongside Angela Lansbury! NONE, thats how many! Bad, bad choices!

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , ,

Email this  »
10 Of The Biggest Movie Remake Flops In Hollywood History!
Christmas Movies That Are NOT Safe For The Whole Family!
Jake Gyllenhaal's Amazing Movie Transformations!
Best Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
The Golden Globes Nominations Are IN! See Who Earned A Spot On The Ticket HERE!
2015 Golden Globe Nominations -- Surprises & Snubs!

18 comments to “Ugh! Katherine Heigl Forces Studio To Recast Her In Adaline



  1. 1

    Thought you weren't going to hate anymore. How dare a woman want to stay home and raise her baby on her own instead of giving it to a nanny to bring up like every other so called celeb. Shocking!

    You are an idiot fatass!

  2. Dusss says – reply to this


    2

    So, according to Perez it's better to be an actress with a nanny for her little child, than a full-time mother, who wants to spend time with her child?

    Since she can afford it, unlike some other moms who are forced to work to take care of their children. Respect to that as well. But that's a must. Katherine is not looking for more money or fame.



  3. 3

    i think pulling out because of her child is a perfectly good reason.



  4. 4

    What are you bitching on about cause she backed out of a movie which has happened like a million times in hollywood. If it were a male actor doing the same you wouldn't see a problem with it. You just hate women cause your jealous of what women have class and dignity. I may be a gay dude but I have a lot of respect for females and I don't appreciate you bashing them. Giving all us gays bad name.



  5. 5

    She is such an unprofessional ho-bag. I truly hope she burns so many bridges that she cannot be hired anymore. I cannot stand her acting.



  6. 6

    "This morning, source report that…"

    Corr.: This morning, sourceS report that…

    "…and in a statement released by one of the producers of the film, they insist that everyone at the studio is still…"

    Corr: and, in a statement released by one of the producers of the film, they insist that everyone at the studio is still…."



  7. 7

    What the hell is the matter with you? Do you have any idea the message you are sending to any mother who is torn between working and being home with their child? I can't believe you are sitting there on your ass (childless by the way), lambasting a woman who feels her CHILD is more important than her job. She can afford to stay at home, and she's choosing to do so. WHAT THE FUCK IS THE MATTER WITH YOU? Did your mother abandon you to the wolves? Yeah, the nice streak is over. Once an ass, always an ass. Oh, and by the way….you did know that her child is a special needs child, right? Yeah, let's just plop her down with a nanny…Great parenting….But then you'd have something to say about that too. God your a jerk!!



  8. 8

    She had the baby already when she signed on to the movie. She shouldn't have bothered if she wanted to stay home. It's great that she wants to be with her baby. But don't commit to movies if that's what you want to do. Don't screw things up for everyone else. Stay home and raise your kid. She's not that good an actress anyway. It's no loss if she never acts again.



  9. 9

    Who gives a shit and it is really no big deal to be in a movie with Angela Lansbury. She sucks now.



  10. 10

    idky everyone's getting mad? it's not like a nanny is going to raise her child.. that was a stupid statement.. she can have her on set and she has a husband.. but that's not really the issue.. she shouldn't of signed on if she wasn't fully committed.. if she wants to be a mom then be a mom.. but don't join something and then change your mind.. cause it does make her look bad and will hurt her career cause it messes with production..

  11. tj77 says – reply to this


    11

    They should cast Amy Adams!!!



  12. 12

    as a hard working corporate mom, I totally respect her decision. Work is not life. HOLLYWOOD is not everything. Both are great and rewarding, but nothing compared to being active in your child's life. We all strive for balance, and she is too.



  13. 13


  14. 14

    she should just quit the business, then. last season was really rude to do on ga. i heard she ased to stay on for s6, when she new she was getting a kid. how shitty.



  15. 15

    honestly.. I normally dont defend perez.. but for everyone saying oh yea she deserves to stay home with her child and that she is being a good mom.. yea thats all fine and good.. but dont sign contracts and dont agree to be in movies if you are going to back out. if she was sooo hell bent on being a "good mommy" and staying home with her child instead of working.. she would have passed on the offer from the jump!



  16. 16

    Re: crickets – I agree with you 100%! these people on here defending her backing out.. dont understand she was FULLY away that she was a mother at the time she agreed to it..babies dont just pop out of the womb unexpectedly :D



  17. 17

    Re: MsJules – she adopted her baby.



  18. 18

    either way she's getting old and is not as pretty! so whatever. she's past her prime, on to the next.