Wolverine Sequel NOT A Sequel?

Anybody who's seen Requiem For A Dream, Pi, or The Fountain knows that Darren Aronofsky is ANYTHING but a conventional director.
The Black Swan director is going to continue his unconventional trend with his Wolverine film, which will be titled The Final Destination The Wolverine.
Aronofsky has stated that the film, which will once again star Hugh Jackman, will be a "one off," and not a "sequel in the conventional sense."
We're not 100% sure how this film isn't a sequel. Is it going to completely negate all the events that took place in X-Men Origins: Wolverine? Is it simply an ego thing? Are you uncomfortable having your name associated with a sequel, Darren?
If the problem here is that you're just anti-sequel, you should get over it, Darren! You KNOW you want to tell us the continuing story of The Wrestler's Randy "The Ram" Robinson depending on how you interpreted the end of that movie.
Do U think the new Wolverine movie REALLY won't be a sequel?
[Image via WENN.]
Tags: black swan, darren aronofsky, director, pi, randy the ram robinson, requiem for a dream, sequel, the final destination, the fountain, the wrestler, unconventional, wolverine, x men






















there's like a thousand batman movies between keaton, kilmer, clooney and now bale - none of which are considered sequels……….
The last Woverine movie was HORRIBLE….. to any fan of X-Men and Woverine.
I don't know who that was on screen but it was NOT Woverine in the last movie.
Just so long as it has Hugh Jackman in it (and preferably shirtless) I'll be happy.
An ego thing? You know, if you actually knew what the fuck you were talking about you would realize that Wolverine, despite being called an origin, was pretty far off from the comics. You can't just shit on one of the coolest characters created and expect people to just accept it. The movie was shit and now it can hopefully be redeemed.