Home Videos Photos
Home >> Film Flickers, Hugh Jackman >> Wolverine Sequel NOT A Sequel?
« Previous
Next »
darren aronofsky says new wolverine movie is not a sequel

Wolverine Sequel NOT A Sequel?

11/16/2010 9:20 AM ET | Filed under: Film Flickers • Hugh Jackman
View Full Post
[Image via: WENN]

Anybody who's seen Requiem For A Dream, Pi, or The Fountain knows that Darren Aronofsky is ANYTHING but a conventional director. The Black Swan director … Read more…

darren aronofsky says new wolverine movie is not a sequel
Email this  »
See All 4 Comments

No comments to “Wolverine Sequel NOT A Sequel?”



  1. 1

    there's like a thousand batman movies between keaton, kilmer, clooney and now bale - none of which are considered sequels……….

  2. Low says – reply to this


    2

    The last Woverine movie was HORRIBLE….. to any fan of X-Men and Woverine.

    I don't know who that was on screen but it was NOT Woverine in the last movie.



  3. 3

    Just so long as it has Hugh Jackman in it (and preferably shirtless) I'll be happy.



  4. 4

    An ego thing? You know, if you actually knew what the fuck you were talking about you would realize that Wolverine, despite being called an origin, was pretty far off from the comics. You can't just shit on one of the coolest characters created and expect people to just accept it. The movie was shit and now it can hopefully be redeemed.