Home Videos Photos

Inferno Moving On Without Lindsay!!!

| Filed under: Lindsay LohanFilm Flickers

lindsay-lohan-not-doing-inf.jpg

We're SO happy for her! This was the last thing she needed!

Although Inferno director Matthew Wilder claimed that he was waiting for Lindsay Lohan to get out of rehab to star in the Linda Lovelace biopic, he is officially moving on without her.

Wilder said:

"We are withdrawing our offer from Lindsay Lohan. We are currently in negotiations [with another actress] and working out the legalities of bringing her onboard.

We have stuck by Lindsay very patiently for a long time with a lot of love and support. Ultimately, the impossibility of insuring her—and some other issues—have made it impossible for us to go forward."

Lilo is on the right track and we would hate to see this derail her!

The actress' rep added, "Lindsay is dedicated to her recovery and together they decided to move forward without her."

She made the right decision.

Tags: ,

Best Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
Most Awkward Celebrity PDA!
Most EXPLOSIVE Famous Twitter Feuds!
13 Celebs Who Were Arrested When They Were 21 Or Under!!
Celebs Who've Shaved Their Heads For Roles
Celebrities Who've Been Caught Shoplifting

23 comments to “Inferno Moving On Without Lindsay!!!”



  1. 1

    Good! LL doesn't need to be in such a dark film right now. She needs to prove herself with strong smaller roles in good movies.



  2. 2

    amazing what a sober mind will help you realize. glad she dodged a showgirls bullet.

  3. pj88 says – reply to this


    3

    As much as I want to see a Lohan comeback, I think this is a good move. If this is a bad movie, it will put the final nail in her acting coffin. I think Lindsay would be smart to stick with a fluffy comedy or an ensemble piece and then slowly get into the more dramatic roles.



  4. 4

    'ultimately the impossibilty of insuring her…' DUH, EVERYONE KNEW SHE WAS UNINSURABLE. Now, was she ever going to DO THIS MOVIE, or WAS THIS ALL A BIG PUBLICITY STUNT FOR HER AND THE MOVIE??????????????



  5. 5

    Re: pj88

    Agreed.



  6. 6

    WHAT actress would want to touch this now?? I'll be VERY curious…..



  7. 7

    Yeah like this guy didn't know she would be hard to insure. What a jerk. I didn't plan to watch that dumb movie anyway. I hope it cost him a lot of money for those stupid posters.



  8. 8

    I've read Lovelace's book Inferno. It's brutal. I don't think Lindsay should make this king of film. It's wayyyyy to dark & depressing (and gross).



  9. 9

    Naturally, in a couple of months, you will play this against her. Poor woman hater Perez.



  10. 10

    Re: Ultraworld – Completely agree with you. The only thing I would add is I seriously have to wonder what actress in her right mind would be in negotiations to star in this movie. If she or anyone close to her reads these blogs she ought to fire her team stat. That is unless she is already a no namer or a porn star already, then by all means star in it, lol…!



  11. 11

    Oh good. Yeah playing Linda Lovelace would subject her to some crazy demons. She's got enough of her own to deal with as it is, let alone Linda's.



  12. 12

    Are people believing that she said she didn't want to do the film? Or what probably happened the film decided to give up on her? Now that this is out of the way all the major worthwhile film will start pouring in for her, is that right? Oh, okay. I get it. Come on LL and Mom give the public some credit for not being as stupid as you'd like them to be. You're turning out like that Spiedi freaky couple with all the stories.



  13. 13

    Shame! thats what you get for being a crack whore

  14. fiona says – reply to this


    14

    She is unavailable, uninsurable, and time is money.
    She wouldn't fit the part now that she has packed on a few…



  15. 15

    So they're just finding out now that its impossible to insure her?!



  16. 16

    I don't want to say "I told you so," but I TOLD YOU SO!". This film was never going to be made with La Lohan, no matter how many times the director said it would. They milked the publicity (or rather the notoriety) from Lindsay's legal & personal problems and now are moving on with the project firmly in the public's awareness and having benefited from months of free press and word of mouth. This would have been a career killer for Lindsay anyway. She has been a victim her whole life, she doesn't need to play a character that is victimized and has her soul ripped to shreds.



  17. 17

    Although this movie would not appeal to most general audiences, I have to disagree with most of the posts here. It's about her getting back to ACTING, and i believe a role like this would take lots of skill and talent on her part because it is very unqiue. Yes, it would have been controversial, but if she took that character and rolled with it she could have gained some major respect from insiders. You got to think, she would've only been playing a ROLE, which as most of you know has nothing to do with the personality or morals of the character portraying it. And no matter what the character is, it's all about developing yourself into that person on camera. Also, you have to think, there are plenty of modest women in Hollywood who take on roles with nudity and sexual inuendo. If she was good at the part (especially something dark like this), it could have brought back that raw talent of hers that we have not seen in a very long time. That in itself could have put her back on top.



  18. 18

    Swedish newspaper Expressen.se says on first page: swedish actress Malin Åkerman is playing Linda Lovelace since LiLo can't. Åkerman has been seen in films like "Watchmen", "Trouble in Paradise" and "The Proposal" before. Good choice, swedish ppl are comfortable without clothes ;-)



  19. 19

    Re: LisaRose – Probably swedish/american actress Malin Åkerman, time for her to prove she can do a serious role like this and not only romcoms.



  20. 20

    I think things happen for a reason! I would love to see her in a comedy!!



  21. 21

    ALL IS NOT LOST. I MEAN, IT'S THE SHOOT THAT TAUGHT HER TO PUT HER FILTHY FINGERS IN HER MOUTH WHENEVER A CAMERA WAS AROUND.

  22. @v@ says – reply to this


    22

    I'm kind of glad, because she could be aiming higher. This movie will be hard to do tastefully, I'm sure.



  23. 23

    This makes those stupid tyler shields posters seem 10 times more ridiculous than ever. She's a nut.