Why so sad? Oh right. Because Obama's successor is already showing what an unaware buffoon he is.
Did you see that embarrassing interview on Fox & Friends?? Just let Colbert break it down for you (below)!
[Image via CBS.]
Here's what Sarah had to say about another SATC movie:
"I would go back. I think there's one more story to tell. I know there is."
"I'd definitely tell that [third] story, and I know Michael would do it right. But maybe not now. Maybe in five years, you know?"
And more from
"It's not that I want to get away from [SATC]. In a million years, who could get away from it it?"
"…If I'm not scared again that's not good for me. That's literally no good for me. If I'm not terrified and nauseous and worried the first two weeks of production, then what's going to happen? You could wither on the vine. It's like if you can't use your leg. It just atrophies."
And here's Sarah on the possibility of a SATC prequel movie:
"I was like, Wha-a-a-a-t? There are a lot of important and interesting stories that 21-year-olds can tell. I don't begrudge any 21-year-old the opportunity to tell their stories. They prove to us on an everyday basis that they're interesting. Even their narcissism is interesting. Even their inertia is interesting. Even their tonal speech patterns are interesting."
"But I don't think we can pretend to go back. It's creating two histories. It's like, 'Oh I didn't know that about Carrie Bradshaw.' "
Sarah certainly makes some valid points.
As far as we're concerned, whenever they decide to do a third one, whether it be five years from now or five months from now, we just hope they'll put a lot of care into it. What's the point if they just phone it in?
We won't go so far as to say that they phoned in the sequel…but it could def have been better!
Would U like to see another SATC movie? Is five years cool…or do you want one sooner?