Home Videos Photos

New Details On The Surveillance Video That Proves Lindsay Stole That Necklace!

| Filed under: Lindsay LohanBusted!

lindsay-lohan-video-footage-proves-guilty.jpg

You better seriously consider taking that plea bargain, Lindsay. Six months sounds a lot more manageable than three years.

Yesterday, Judge Schwartz looked LiLo square in the face and told her she was going to prison. The only reason she wasn't going that very instant was because new evidence surfaced that needed to be reviewed by her lawyer and after taking it into account, she and LiLo could decide on how they wanted to proceed. The evidence in question is the mysterious surveillance video from the jewelry store, which has long been rumored to be able to prove Lindsay had sticky fingers that fateful day. Now, we've got specifics deets from this video, as shared with sources by a law enforcement insider on the case.

Let's go to the tape!

According to the source, in the video, Lindsay is seen taking off her own jewelry, specifically a necklace, to try the supposed stolen necklace on. A few moments later, she is seen putting her own necklace back on, without having taken off the store's one. While this is going on, her "male companion" is seen "distracting" the store clerk. Once Lindsay had gotten her own necklace back on, she and her friend walk out of the shop with the store's necklace "clearly visible" around her neck .

Now that's what we like to call BUSTED! The legal system, however, more officially classifies this as a "distraction theft." However, according to sources, the D.A. is sure Lindsay knew what she was doing. The insider explains:

"The District Attorney believes that Lindsay's friend distracted the clerk on purpose and that could bolster the case if it goes to trial against Lindsay. This simply wasn't a case of miscommunication of a necklace being loaned and not returned, as Lindsay has claimed."

Yeah, sure doesn't sound like that to us either

Do the right thing, LiLo. Admit your guilty, send your orange jumper to the dry cleaners and lets give this prison thing another whirl. Maybe this time, you'll be lucky. Maybe this time, you'll stay learn something.

[Image via WENN.]

Worst Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
All The Cray New Oxford English Dictionary Words As Illustrated With Celebrities!
Best Bikini Shots Of Summer 2014!
Worst Red Carpet Tans EVER!
20 Disney Starlets: Then & Now!
Celebs' Drunkest Moments Caught On Camera!
Email this  »

31 comments to “New Details On The Surveillance Video That Proves Lindsay Stole That Necklace!”



  1. 1

    Yeah she'll get 6 months in prison and serve 2 weeks because of "over crowding" funny how NORMAL AVERAGE people never get out early because of over crowding! That must be a rich white person privilige in this country.



  2. 2

    "loaned & not returned"?? lol!!…LOCK HER UP & THROW AWAY THE KEY :)



  3. 3

    id like to see a celebrity to serve a sentence for more than 6 months!



  4. 4

    OF-COURSE THAT BITCH STOLE THE NECKLACE AND FOR WHOEVER WANTS TO SECOND GUESS THAT SHOULD BE SLAPPED ACROSS THE BACK OF THEY'RE HEAD..
    LOCK THAT BITCH UP BECAUSE IF SHE WAS A REGULAR PERSON THERE WOULD BE NO QUESTIONS ABOUT IT…



  5. 5

    As easy as it is to jump to the conclusion this makes her guilty, I fail to see how this incriminates her any more than previous evidence. If she did indeed leave behind earrings that are worth more than the necklace was (over)priced at, her lawyer should still be able to argue this was the act of an absent minded woman. Though I am not sure if they need reasonable doubt since this is a parole violation which is not held to the same standard. What does the alleged distracter have to say?



  6. 6

    Her defense will claim that her "male companion" was negotiating the deal to loan her the necklace - not "distracting" the clerk. I, of course, am not high, or insane, or an alien from outer-space - so I think she is as guilty as they come and she should pay the price anyone else would pay for her crime. She's a thief and a drug addict and a prostitute.

  7. Rohan says – reply to this


    7

    Do you rip ALL your stories from Radar??



  8. 8

    She needs to just face the facts and admit guilt or maybe claim that's when she was doing drugs and partying all the time and did something stupid.



  9. 9

    Lock her up! Maybe 3 years of jail time would do her good! I would like to see her serve her entire sentence and not just a few days or months.



  10. 10

    Re: Blueness – The reason it proves her guilt is when she gave her statement, she said the necklace was loaned to her and her stylist made arangements. The video shows her going into the store, putting on the necklace, and leaving with it. If it would have been to her or her stylist there would have been no need for her to go in the store and put it on.



  11. 11

    If it was a loan, where are the papers? If it was absent-mindedness, why did she not call the store after realizing she had walked out with a necklace that didn't belong to her? And why did she not return calls the store made to her before they resorted to filing a police report? She's going down this time. The weird thing is, I don't think she really believes that.



  12. 12

    She could of have EVERYTHING, that necklace an much more. (I still remember the outragous quantity of cloth she has). But she decided to throw her good career away, she aint a bad actress, thats the worst part.
    Wasted talent. But if she comited a felony, she has to pay.



  13. 13

    This system is so fucked up. She doesn't belong in prison for such a measly crime. It's really a waste of our taxpayers money to lock up people like her. What she needs is some bi-polar meds because SHE IS CRAZY. That is all…



  14. 14

    PURE WHITE TRASH. PUT THE GARBAGE IN THE CAN. HER LIES ARE UNRAVELING. SHE IS PATHETIC. MAYBE SHE AND SAM CAN SING 'GOING DOWN IN A BLAZE OF GLORY" CUZ THAT IS WHATS HAPPENING. I BET SHE DOES A YEAR AFTER BEING SENTENCED TO 3 AFTER SHE LOSES HER TRIAL. SHE IS AS SHARP AS A BOWLING BALL.
    GOOD LUCK WITH THAT NEW FILM PROJECT. PICK UP THE SOAP YOU SKANK. OUR PARENTS SHOULD GO TO JAIL WITH YOU THEY ARE COMPLETE LOSERS AS WELL. TRASH IN TRASH OUT



  15. 15

    After Winona Ryder shoplifted no one really liked her anymore. I wonder if that's how LiLo's gonna be. It's just soooo weird for rich ppl to steal. It's like, why?



  16. 16

    people need to get over this whole "her earrings were worth more than the necklace" thing. this girl has absolutely no concept of the value of money, which is how she manages to get herself into sticky financial situations. she probably never even looked at the price tag. if lindsay wants something, she gets it.



  17. 17

    Seriously? They even have proof on a SURVEILLANCE VIDEO? As usual Lindsay is going to somehow get away with it or serve a extremely short time. If it were a ethnic person they would have been locked up right away with NO questions asked.



  18. 18

    At some point, after leaving the store she had to realize that she still had the necklace on, ANY law abiding person would have:
    returned to necklace immediately, explaining they did not realize that they had walked out with it on or at least called the store, explaining what happened, then returned the necklace ASAP…
    The fact that she knew she had it, made NO attempt to return it UNTIL she was called out, IMO clearly screams GUILTY!!!!!
    PLEASE put her arss in jail for the full 6 mons or we will be reading more BS she is pulling in 6 mons!!! GUARENTEED.



  19. 19

    Bull Shit! ALL LIES!!!!



  20. 20

    It is not unusual for an addict to substitute one addiction for another. She is a kleptomaniac in addition to being an addict. I'm not an expert, but I do know that the reason her kleptomania was not in the forefront (even though there have been several instances of her stealing items), is that she was still indulging in her drugs. Without the drugs, the one thing that provides her with a high is stealing.



  21. 21

    Isn't that just the same fucking tape from last week? The only difference is the prosecutors point of view. The defense team has yet to show their hand. Lindsay's lawyer believes her client is innocent. Most Lawyers don't unless they have proof.



  22. 22

    Anyone else annoyed by the poor grammar in this story? "Do the right thing, LiLo. Admit your guilty, send your orange jumper…". It should be "you're" as in "you are".



  23. 23

    Re: redmond – Proves her innocents. You get papers signed when you're handing an item over to a assistant. But when dealing with the client in person. You can just loan it out straight to them no need for paper work. She isn't just some random client. She's Lindsay Lohan a personal friend of the owners and she lives just up the street. You can trust her. Besides it's a cheapo item so who cares? The only reason why they called the cops is for shits and giggles. Who cares if they're further ruining some one's life. Plus free press!



  24. 24

    6 months bs still. She will be out in a month or less and I know of people who was in jail for stealing 11 dollar and went to jail for 16 years and the only reason she got out then she had to donate a kidney to her sister. BS. Good to white in this country. BS BS BS and more BS



  25. 25

    In light of "over crowding," I hope the judge has the guts to sentence her to the maximum so she might actually experience real prison time for her antics.



  26. 26

    Re: trakstar5 – With a Gun or knife? Yea big difference dipshit.



  27. 27

    Sounds like they need to go after the "friend," too.



  28. 28

    OK- is she actually going to PRISON, or did he mean jail when he said that?? Because they sure as hell aren't the same thing. ((It's jail that she has previously been to))



  29. 29

    Its pretty obvious it was intentional. Lindsay wants to maintain an image of success and the ability to own new clothes/jewelry but she doesn't have the income she once had so she needs to steal to maintain the image. That's why she stole that woman's mink coat in NYC and is stupid enough to be photographed in it days later. Same thing with necklace - photographed wearing it days later.

    I'm sure it's hard for her to have had such success in '04 and then each decision she makes for years to come sends her down to the Z list. She needs to realize her former B-list status was not a lifetime membership and that she's a has-been now.

  30. @v@ says – reply to this


    30

    If that's what happened, it's such grade school sh*t. Most people learn these lessons when they're minors. This girl didn't get to have a normal childhood, and all of this adolescent stuff is rearing its head about a decade late, I swear. She behaves like a naughty, rebellious juvenile. Reminds me of Spears. I think she'll outgrow it eventually, but unfortunately, at this late age, it will mean paying lawyers and living in prison until she learns how to function properly and responsibly in society.



  31. 31

    Riddle me this: If the prosecution considers this a "distraction crime," why isn't her friend also being prosecuted?