Home Videos Photos

Hillary Clinton Photoshopped Out Of Situation Room Picture

| Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Now you see her
Now You Don't

That's not cool!

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and another woman were REMOVED from a photo of the Obama administration watching the raid that killed Osama bin Laden when printed in a Brooklyn-based Hasidic newspaper called Der Tzitung.

The newspaper is described as "ultra-Orthodox", meaning it has a policy of never printing photos of women in its pages because it thinks they could be sexually suggestive.

As you'll see above, the original photo depicts the Obama national security team watching the events that led to Osama bin Laden's death in the White House Situation Room, with Hillary covering her scantily clad mouth in shock, while counterterrorism director Audrey Tomason watches seductively from the back of the room.

Yes, that's totally sexually suggestive…or MAYBE those behind the newspaper are simply SEXIST!

It's truly awful to see such a disrespectful action in this day and age. This newspaper falsified news AND not only disrespected the U.S. Secretary of State, but ALL WOMEN in the process.

Do U think Hillary and Audrey were too "sexually suggestive" to be featured in this photo for readers to see?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Email this  »
Celebrities With The Highest IQs!
22 Celebs You Didn't Know Were Girl Scouts!
Horror Movies That Had WAY Too Many Sequels (We're Lookin' At You, Leprechaun In The Hood)!
HalloWood! A Collection Of Celebrity Quotes & Memories About Halloween!
Celebrities You Forgot Made Cameos In Scary Movies
These Stars Should Switch To Bruce Jenner's Flowing Locks!

110 comments to “Hillary Clinton Photoshopped Out Of Situation Room Picture”

More comments: [1] 2 »



  1. 1

    messed up!



  2. 2

    just another example of how stupid religions are. i don't understand why one woman on this planet chooses to be religious, because at best they treat them like second class humans and others the're treated like dirt.



  3. 3

    Okay, obviously this religious group has a different set of cultural mores and beliefs. No need to knock 'em.



  4. 4

    a world with no women? sounds like a gay man's paradise …



  5. 5

    sexist? are you kidding? do your research.



  6. 6

    I support the newspaper. Nothing turns me on more than a 63 year old woman in a pant-suit.



  7. 7

    Human rights must be respected before religious freedom: the newspaper should immediately apologise to the Sec. of State in particular and women in general, and change their policy.



  8. 8

    "Ultra-Orthodox" meaning they don't publish pictures of women out of respect for women, also so that they're male followers don't start thinking lustful thoughts towards Hillary Clinton (because you know they all would.)



  9. 9

    what do you expect from Hasidic Jews…



  10. 10

    Hilary is TOTALLY asking for it…..shes being mysteriously sexy by covering her mouth. And that girl in the back, that girl is totally seducing the camera. lmfao i just cant



  11. 11

    Nothing to do with being sexually seductive. They don't want women seeing other women in positions of power or positions equal to men. That simple.



  12. 12

    perez, as someone who has recently visited israel and remarked about the culture and the religion, i think it is slightly hypocritical of you to say it is a sexist thing they are doing. to you, maybe it is - but it is part of their religion and it is part of their culture. as non-religious individuals, sure, we may think it is a clear cry of sexism - but that is the way they are. i think that before you start making comments such as this, you do a bit of research first and discover why they do this.



  13. 13

    Are you kidding me Perez… The Jewish religion is the oldest religion.. and yes part of the religion is that woman if not covered are presented to be sexual. It's how it's been forever.. If you don't like the way Orthodox jews are keep it to yourself. But don't be prejudice! You don't like it when people say shit about being Gay so how dare you diss the orthodox Jews.. I am ashamed and never thought for you to make this such an issue.. Every religion has it's way of life that's theres!



  14. 14

    there is nothing sexually suggestive about a pant suit. uh just call it what it is….they cant stand the idea of competent women in power, having the same rights and jobs as men because they think the role of women is in the home. screw those guys and their assbackward way of thinking.

  15. @v@ says – reply to this


    15

    Hasidism is a Judeic mystical sect. It was started many centuries ago, and that appears to be the time where it still belongs sociologically. Photos of women aren't inherently any more 'sexually suggestive' than photos of men. This is an outdated and purposely patriarchal and archaic belief, underlined by the fact that Hilary Clinton is Secretary of State of the United States, and the other woman they removed is Counterterrorism Director. Filed under dusty historic fragments.

  16. loli says – reply to this


    16

    it is rewriting history and disenfranchising women. Putting it off as simply a religious belief so it must be respected is ignoring HUMAN rights.



  17. 17

    The point is … if they don't want to publish pictures of women, fine, then don't. This means that they shouldn't have published the picture at all. To re-write history by airbrushing the 2 women out is nothing short of deplorable. The newspaper has just issued an apology though: "We should not have published the altered picture, and we have conveyed our regrets and apologies to the White House and to the State Department," the newspaper said in a statement Monday.



  18. 18

    gangbang after that scene..maybe



  19. 19

    Thankfully anything ultra-orthodox is such a small minority their not even a blip on the radar.



  20. 20

    There is freedom of speech and religion and they are entitled to run their publication however they choose.

  21. mw says – reply to this


    21

    "Audrey Tomason watches seductively from the back of the room." that line made me crack up!



  22. 22

    At least we have a picture of our awesome president looking so presidential.

    No more monkey Bush in office any more which is a wonderful thing.



  23. 23

    That's because most women act and look like whores, so iI totally understand. I respect their religion and choice. Don't like it, don't buy their newspaper. plain and simple.



  24. 24

    1 wat difderence does it make to u if its meant for them isnt there enogh antisemitism? Its part of there religión who aré you to judge you big bully, yes turn the world moré prejuduce respect the oldest religión that has existed,you being gay should learn to respect others ways of thinking SHAME ON YOU MARIO, u should know better



  25. 25

    What people do in other countries due to their beliefs is not my issue, not should it be. Let the women there fight that battle like we've done and are still doing in the States. Until the US is equal, we have no right to criticize. And we are still very far off from being equal.

  26. joka says – reply to this


    26

    clearly something is fake about that because just because you take someone out of a picture, you can't magically see what was behind that person, for example the rest of that man's body who is behind her. it would just be a blank area.



  27. 27

    Re: adg100 – You hit the nail on the head. No matter how these religions justify their segregation of women, the bottom line is power and control.



  28. 28

    Re: Pacific Ocean Gal – First off all, it's a paper based in Brooklyn, U.S. so for the majority of ppl here it is their country. Learn how to read. It's one thing to respect a religion, but it's totally another when they misrepresent facts that will be recorded in history and influence others. If their religious beliefs take priority over factual integrity, then they should have not reported the story at all, rather than omit an important political fact.
    For you to say you'll just let the women 'fight' their own battles is hilarious considereing most women under these religions, particularly this patriarchal one, haven't any rights at all. Just bc there isn't perfection in the US doesn't they should stop striving for equality.



  29. 29

    religion can be so fucking pathetic



  30. 30

    Hillary is covering her mouth as if she is trying to swallow something. I think she is purposely trying to be seductive.



  31. 31

    There were two women in the picture and they were both cropped out. Must be a women thing.



  32. 32

    Absolutely sexist. Glad I'm an atheist. In this day and age religions cause more problems than they solve.



  33. 33

    A belief in a higher power, yes. Belief in religion, no. It's bullshit and only used to influence and control.



  34. 34

    Re: caroaber – you're probably a man. Religions need to start respecting others and this includes women, if it was the other way around you would definitely feel insulted.



  35. 35

    Re: litnight – I agree with you that the newspaper should apologize and change their policy but they cannot be forced to do so. Via the first amendment they can do whatever they want as long as it is not libel.



  36. 36

    Hasidic jews ARE sexist. Can you imaging the backlash if they had removed Obama because he's black? The only difference is women won't protest like the blacks would.



  37. 37

    Re: adg100 – You are exactly right. Would they still have cut Hillary out of the photo if she were president?



  38. 38

    Re: caroaber – Organized religion is the scourge of humanity.



  39. 39

    How do you know the top picture isn't fake. It's a lot easier to photoshop someone into a picture than photoshop them out (whereby you have to recreate portions of a scene that weren't part of the original picture)?



  40. 40

    Wow; I guess you must be a sexist for thinking you're too good to sleep with women then. Are you retarded? Seriously, you have to be either retarded or willfully ignorant of the laws of people's religions to make such a hollow correlation, in which case you are spreading disgusting libels about a people of which you know nothing.



  41. 41

    The prohibition is about protecting the sanctity of a woman's body, so that men do not lust over flesh. Is it YOUR particular goal in life to be free from material desire? No, so how could you possibly understand what goes into living your life so carefully as to not even look at women in a newspaper clipping. Are they creating a model for success? No, I think they are placing too much importance on the female body which circumvents their attempts to be without lust on a daily basis, but that's not their method.



  42. 42

    And to accuse them of being sexist just because you can't imagine someone seeing lust as impure for the soul, is sad and small. It is understandable though, as you are gay, and sex for you is solely about lust, and never procreation. And that is totally fine for you, and I have no problem with it, which is why I would never accuse your homosexuality of being sexist or anti-procreation or some such stupid connection like you have drawn here; but for them sex is strictly for procreation, otherwise you are tying yourself to the physical world.



  43. 43

    And they guy who posted this story originally did so because he has a bone to pic with Pharisaic Rabbinic Judaism at large, and nothing to do with the editors and writers of the newspaper who were simply trying to protect their devout practitioners while still filling them in to the story. So they're over-zealous about keeping pictures without women for the male readers; why don't you do your thing, and they'll do theirs.



  44. 44

    Everyone below who is saying this is sexism because they couldn't possibly find anything attractive about those pictures: you have been desensitized. They live very different life-styles than you do, and like MOST people, are going to find different things sexually arousing than you. What about that woman who will be on this season of Taboo, who is sexually attracted to walls? What you mean you don't find walls attractive? Well then I guess she's lying right?



  45. 45

    And saying that they're re-writing history is just ridiculous. They didn't show a fucking picture the way it was taken, they aren't going to any great lengths to say Hilary Clinton wasn't ever Secretary of State of the United States. Women are not beaten and kept down by Hassidic Jews, give me a break. Do you even know what a Rebbetzin is? I've never heard of a female priest, yet women can be community leaders and teachers of the highest order in the Jewish community. Yeah, real sexist.



  46. 46

    Golda Meir was a fucking whore or something ?!?! Oy !!



  47. 47

    I'm shocked and appalled at how many people are defending this newspapers actions. This is an old, outdated belief that should've been put to rest years ago. I hate it when people use religion as an excuse to validate these kinds of actions. Any form of sexism, racism and discrimination should not be tolerated. This is the 21st century, women, men, blacks, whites, asians…we're ALL equal. There's no excuse for this blatant display of sexism.



  48. 48

    An apology should be issued. This is disgusting.



  49. 49

    Re: SAlexisB – Oh God, could you be more wrong?? There's been LOADS of religions before Judaism. I feel embarrassed for you.



  50. 50

    Re: caroaber – That whole idea that any and all religion is immune from criticism? Yeah, it's wrong. Go fuck yourself.



  51. 51

    Aside from this newspaper being a bunch of morons who need to get with the times and stop thinking they can play by their own rules, the other problem I have is that Hilary's face in particular showed genuine concern in that photo. It shows that our leaders weren't sitting in there with champagne and cheering like they were watching a hockey game. It conveys a seriousness that is important in conveying to the rest of the world that we're thoughtful in our actions, even when they involve taking another human life. There's no need to rile up a bunch of other religious psychos by rewriting history. These Jewish folks should be ashamed.



  52. 52

    Re: Nathan Alexander – Get mental help.



  53. 53

    Since the jews control the US and this happened in Brooklyn, I'd say the White House should be ashamed they sent a picture without covering up Clinton and Tomason in a niqab.



  54. 54

    perez, as a woman and a feminist who is accepting of others' beliefs including freedom of religion and homosexuality, i would like to say that i am not offended by this article as much as by the lack of respect that you have for others. you expect others to be accepting of homosexuality, yet you are disrespectful towards anyone else whose beliefs differ from yours. this is a private newspaper sold in a religious neighborhood for a specific group of people. it is within their rights as american citizens to follow their religious beliefs. why should a private newspaper and a religion around much longer than perez hiltons blog conform to your personal feelings? you want respect and acceptance? why dont you learn what that means before demanding it from others. miss "loveislouder", your comment is completely hypocritical. you are discriminating towards a belief that does harm or affect you in any way. this picture was not edited for sexist or discriminatory reasons. it was not edited in a public american newspaper. it was done for a small group of religious men who live in a different world than the rest of us. they are entitled to their beliefs and the censorship of their private lives whether you understand or agree.



  55. 55

    Re: Nathan Alexander – My goodness…is all i can say. I hope when you procreate you allow your children to be who they are because when they become adults they might as fucked up as you are.



  56. 56

    Re: Nathan Alexander – Be as fucked up as you are***



  57. 57

    why is this not filed under icky icky poo?

  58. Mygz says – reply to this


    58

    try watching the news next time, perez. the newspaper already came out with an apology and gave reasoning as to why the women were cut out of the picture to begin with. it's VERY disrespectful of you to claim that this newspaper is sexist when it's run by jewish ultra-orthodox men. in their religious culture, men have the ultimate respect for women. research the facts before you open your mouth and make others turn against the people of this religion for no reason.



  59. 59

    this post sums up why other nations think we're arrogant. to start they are not mutilating women, they are taking them out of a picture because they have their own view point/belief. focus on the issues that really matter. if you choose to focus "small" issues people won't listen or take you seriously when you try to effect change on bigger issues.



  60. 60

    Re: maribou – "it was done for a small group of religious men who live in a different world than the rest of us. " We all live in the same world moron its Brooklyn NY. Not space.



  61. 61

    Re: Nathan Alexander – You're absolutely right. People should not criticize the beliefs of those that they know nothing about. And by the way, I'm SO excited for the new season of Taboo. I've been a fan for years. But this season in particular looks amazing (especially that episode that you were talking about).

    But when it comes to you, Perez, that is very hypocritical of you. What happened to "being yourself", or "sticking up for what you believe in"?? A situation shouldn't be deemed "disrespectful" just because an LA-based celebrity blogger does not agree with it. Like someone had said in a post before me, how would you feel if you were told that homosexuality was direspectful?? The term "lifestyle" does not just apply to one's sexual preference. It applies to how a person lives, in general. It really disgusts me because you are usually the first person to stick up for "living how you want to live". That is, unless, it goes against your OWN personal belief system. It's different strokes for different folks. Yes, it may seem a bit odd to us in the U.S. But for them, it's what they believe in, and it's also how their mind works. We may not be attracted to an AARP member in a pantsuit, but that doesn't mean that they aren't. ESPECIALLY since some of them rarely get to see caucasian women.



  62. 62

    I'm all for respecting religious beliefs, but they could have just blackened their silhouettes, not erased them from history completely.



  63. 63

    Re: biana v – It will be recorded properly in the history of United States. Yes, they are in NYC. but america is a melting pot and they are allowed to excercise their freedoms as they see fit. Honestly, I know many would disagree, but this post is such a small issue in the scheme of things. But, then again, for some on this site, their only exposure to things such as this , is the exposure they get from perez's posts. Which is scary.



  64. 64

    [re=5719583]Re: Nathan Alexander[/re Thank goodness for an intelligent post.



  65. 65

    Re: Fizzylips – Name them. Specifically. You've taken a very firm stand. Name them and site your source.



  66. 66

    I CANNOT believe the amount of women defending this on here! Idiots. It's people like you that keep women treated like 2nd class citizens.



  67. 67

    Disgusting, but not half as disgusting as the crimes mooslums perpetrate against women and all their citizens. The difference between them and the mooslums, however, is that Jews will not tolerate this sort of behavior in Israel, whereas mooslums will kill you if you don't support the subjegation of women.
    If they are so tempted by a woman's flesh, Hassidic Jews and mooslums of all stripes, then why the hell don't they put blinders on their fucking eyes or lobotomize their brains or cut their balls off?
    When are we going to stand up for women and quit allowing them to be marginalized in any way, but especially by patriarchal religions that demean and dehumanize women? I'm sick of this shit, but at least they apologized. You'll never get a mooslum to apologize for nothing.



  68. 68

    Taking that ugly, rude, fat, gross cow (who only got elected because Bill got caught) out of the photo is a GREAT idea:)



  69. 69

    Total jackassery.



  70. 70

    Disgraceful.



  71. 71

    Anything can be photoshopped or created out of thin air. Like the Federal Reserve printing money and the President's birth certificate.



  72. 72

    please, please 'god', just cancel all religions from the face of the earth!



  73. 73

    Re: annabellybean – Ok, because it's a religious thing, that's alright? Shall we start stoning women to death for adultery? Religious bigotry is disgusting and should be fought at every level.



  74. 74

    It's their religion. You need to respect it, Mario, just like you expect everyone to respect your flamboyant gayness.



  75. 75

    Hassidic Jews are like any other religious zealots: FUCKING CRAZY and totally repulsive.



  76. 76

    I agree with other's people comments about not using a picture at all. if you are not printing women's photos, well, tough. do not print the picture, full stop. do not photoshop and distort the history. if I was Hillary I would sue them.
    poor women who have to live under this religion. i can imagine they way they are treated…

  77. jle says – reply to this


    77

    Re: SAlexisB – I agree with you. However, we need to remember… Perez Hilton does not report on anything concrete and substantial anymore. He solely relies on creating stories out of nothing to get a rise out of the individuals who read them, thus creating this long comment thread. By Perez saying "or MAYBE they are SEXIST"… Yeah, ok Perez, or maybe do your research regarding the Jewish religion/ ultra orthodox Jews. He is either incredibly stupid (which I think he is- I believe he has no worldly/ cultural knowledge and strives off creating ridiculous stories), or, he is brilliant in the way he creates drama and gets individuals to visit his site thus creating more hits for himself… either way, it's working for him… and we are all feeding into his unintelligent behavior.

  78. @v@ says – reply to this


    78

    Re: StinkyGoddess – What about 'respecting' the truth? Omitting the two women is outrageous. It will be reported to the WDL, and an outraged systematic campaign will begin. The WDL is an ironic fictitious entity, or the Women's Defense League.



  79. 79

    what about me as a woman? i feel so sexual swayed by all the sexy men in this picture … can somebody please protect me from that? …



  80. 80

    It's out of respect for women, Perez. Ultra-orthodox feel that men are the weaker sex and will succumb to lustful thoughts and so women are RESPECTED, as the stronger sex, by being strategically left out. In the Jewish religion, especially for the ultra-orthodox, women are seen as more important and spiritual than men. The religion centers around supporting their needs… Facts straight please, Mario.



  81. 81

    Perez, your a rasist SOB. your always yelling about rights for the freaking gay and lesbian. But the fact that some men CHOOSE not to look at other women except for their WIVES is bad? You need to go and get some education. Women in Judaism are treated better than women in ANY OTHER RELIGION. Jews arent sexist, they put women on a pedistal. Men, only have eyes for their wives, and I think thats beautiful. And you are a pig.



  82. 82

    It makes me sick women anywhere allow to be treated this way, religion or not!
    "Hello, how about we treat you like lower class, would you like that? Yes please!"



  83. 83

    its time to end sexism, once and for all



  84. 84

    That's just plain freaky.



  85. 85

    Chassidm ARE very sexist. Women and men must be separated during services so that the men are not "distracted" while they worship God. They are also expected to be baby making machines and don't usually get the opportunity to work or do anything else with their lives.



  86. 86

    Did anyone else notice that the only other woman in the back is also photoshopped out? What the heck!



  87. 87

    Re: jay1234567 – i dunno, it seems that your resorting to name calling when youre the one having difficulty understanding a relatively simple comment might be a better indicator of who the real moron here is. i wasnt being literal, its a different world the same way people of different income levels or any other standard of living would be considered a different world



  88. 88

    Re: SAlexisB – THATS WHY RELIGIONS ARE SO FUCKING STUPID ASSHOLE!



  89. 89

    Re: Nathan Alexander – Jesus Christ……shut the fuck up



  90. 90

    both woman in the picture were taken out. It is clearly their religion, not showing women…..



  91. 91

    Ok, seriously? For someone who preaches against racism, you sure are acting racist. It is part of their religion to not show pictures of women unless they have heads covered. It's like bashing muslims for wearing scarves or having all skin covered. In the strict jewish religion, women should actually be wearing wigs when they are photographed. I seriously take offense to your ignorant comments.



  92. 92

    organized religion is perverted



  93. 93

    While we may not understand this, calling them sexist is hypocritical. They are entitled to their own religious beliefs and they are in no way forcing them upon the general public. I think it's unfair to criticize them for this.



  94. 94

    She should be photo shopped out of existence along with all these bull shit extremist groups who did this. What the hell country do they think they are living in? If it was so great in their own toilet of a country then why do they have to impose their views here Fuckers. Go Home!



  95. 95

    Are you SERIOUS?! This has NOTHING to do with sexism! I'm so angry that a GAY man, who HATES when people bash his gay rights would post something like this to bash HASSIDIC rights! Who the hell do you think you are? Let me explain something to you- The do not want anything distracting them from studying Torah… If they have females on their mind it MAY interfere with them learning, and with them being fully connected to G-d! I'm so angry that you wouldn't even do your research and are so quick to start hating on a religion you know NOTHING about. Sure you went to Israel, but how much did you REALLY learn if this is the type of fabricated information you are posting? THAT'S what's disrespectful…



  96. 96

    Couldn't they have just CROPPED the photo? This is changing history and is thus the photo becomes a lie. Ridiculous!



  97. 97

    Re: adg100 – Exactly.



  98. 98

    Re: justtospeaktruth – Funny comment.



  99. 99

    I'm more surprised hey could use photoshop so well.



  100. 100

    Ha! Everyone knows that P**** runs the world.. haha women are the reason men strive so hard to look good.. buy new cars, have nice houses- its all in an attempt to please women.. unless of course they are gay and then in those cases (some not all) the men are trying to be women… :) I LOVE WOMEN lol

More comments: [1] 2 »