Home Videos Photos

Software Designer Announces Big Error In Casey Anthony Trial

| Filed under: Legal MattersTech Talk

casey anthony software error

Inneresting.

Yesterday, a software designer who testified at Casey Anthony's trial announced that prosecutors and police had made a mistake when they asserted that Casey searched extensively for "choloroform" on her computer.

According to designer John Bradley, Casey visited a "crucial web site" about choloroform usage only one time, as opposed to 84 times, which is what the prosecution had said.

There's certainly a vast difference between visiting a web site once as opposed to 84 times…but why did she feel the need to search for chloroform at all???

What do U think about this new information? Does this change your opinion about her guilt one way or the other?

[Image via AP Images.]

Tags: , , , , , ,

13 Celebs Who Were Arrested When They Were 21 Or Under!!
Michelle Rodriguez's Bad Girl Past! Arrests, Fights And Why She's A Bad Influence On Zac Efron!
Happy Birthday Lindsay Lohan! Celebrate With Some Of The Worst Moments Of Her 28-Year Life!
Shia LaBeouf’s Most SHOCKING Moments!
Celebrities Accused Of Sexual Misconduct!
17 Real Housewives Who've Had Trouble With The Law!

33 comments to “Software Designer Announces Big Error In Casey Anthony Trial”



  1. 1

    So the prosecution cheated and still lost.



  2. 2

    I don't know. All I know is she was found innocent so whatever. It would be funny if she got killed though…just for the lulz.



  3. 3

    @ Foxy. She killed her fucking daughter. straight up. just cause the prosecution is inept doesnt mean shes not a baby killer.



  4. 4

    John Bradley should not be doing all of these interviews. Jose Baez found out and RAISED an objection in open court (outside of the presence of the juror) before closing agruments took place about this issue. He asked that the Prosecution tell the jury of the mistake in closing arguments. The JUDGE OVERRULED IT as it's not a misconduct and the prosecution is not required by law to provide this information as it found out after the testimony. It would be suborning perjury if they knew before hand and still used his testimony. They didn't. This isn't NEW news. It was discussed DURING the TRIAL after the 25th when BAEZ found out!



  5. 5

    So there was one search for chloroform on the computer, and one rather large spike of chloroform from the air samples taken from her trunk. One + one still = 2.



  6. 6

    Does not matter! She did it and everyone knows it. 31 days, 31 days, who does that? She is a dirty murdering whore and will live a tormented life.



  7. 7

    the florida SAO issued a press release refuting this claim. get up on your facts perez. the software designer has since retracted his statement.



  8. 8

    Doesn't really matter how many errors they find in the trial, she cannot be charged with the same crime again



  9. 9

    Re: CaliCoyote – angry much?



  10. 10

    PLEASE STOP POSTING ABOUT CASEY ANTHONY! THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A CELEBRITY GOSSIP SITE, SHE IS NOT A CELEBRITY, PLEASE PEREZ, PLEASE STOP POSTING ABOUT CASEY ANTHONY.



  11. 11

    This crazy ass was responsible for watching her daughter and her daughters well being.
    Not ignoring the fact that her child was missing and partying like a rock star.
    If she killed her daughter she will have to answer to a higher power if there is such a thing. The huge fail of the Florida judicial system is hard to swallow to most of us loving and caring parents and grandparents. They should have been a child neglect charge for sure.
    She and her parents are sad examples of people! It looked as though all Casey's mother was worried about was how she would look on tv. Then off for a vacation. I don't know how these people can sleep.



  12. 12

    Ignore haters. God will render judgment on the real killer in His own time.



  13. 13

    If you could convict based on someone's search history, I'd go to prison for all kinds of shit.



  14. 14

    Re: HeatherIsOnFire
    You mean the same way the Ramsey's killed their daughter. There was the same outrage, the same Nancy Grace comments, the same hatefull wishing harm.
    Every one was positive sure they did it but guess what. After they died early because of the pain they were proven innocent.



  15. 15

    Re: Still_very_much_a_BULLY

    No one who waits 31 days is innocent. Let's not be so naive.

  16. barny says – reply to this


    16

    Re: HeatherIsOnFire – That is not what the evidence showed which is why the Jury found Casey innocent.You need to get over it and move on with your life.



  17. 17

    Re: barny – They just didn't have enough evidence. A sane person would not wait 30 days to report your daughter missing. Even if you had your daughter at someone's house, you still make sure she is ok.



  18. 18

    The prosecution dropped the ball pretty hardcore on this whole case.



  19. 19

    wonder how many other things the prosecution was 'wrong' about? Woman was found not guilty, prosecution seems to have been exaggerating evidence - yet America still isnt going to admit they might have been howling for the death of an innocent woman.



  20. 20

    Re: HeatherIsOnFire – How would you know if she killed her daughter or not. Were you there? Did you see her kill her daughter? I doubt it.



  21. 21

    But didn't they find choloroform in her car? Anyways that still does not mean she was innocent! Her own defense said her baby’s death was an accident, they claimed she drowned in the family pool. Well then how did the body end up in a swamp down the street? Why didn’t Casey report it right away? And if she knew her child was dead, the fact that she went out and partied for 31 days makes it even more heinous. Why would she lie to the cops about her daughter being with a nanny who doesn’t even exist if she had nothing to do with it, or if it was an accident?… The bitch is still as guilty as OJ!



  22. 22

    She was found "not guilty" NOT "innocent". There is a big difference! Even the jurors said they do not believe she in innocent, they just said they did not have enough evidence.

  23. @v@ says – reply to this


    23

    Even when they thought it was searched 84 times they let still let her off, so it's moot.



  24. 24

    Odd. We heard that news yesterday in Florida, and today they've already said that the guy is backtracking on what he claims.



  25. 25

    if she was drugging her daughter she was using zanax as a babysitter to knock the child out for the entire night so she could leave her alone to go and party
    you know
    the infamous
    "Zanny" the nanny!!



  26. 26

    STOP talking about her and eventually she will go away! She doesn't deserve any media attention at all. If the media (including you Perez) would just stop talking about her no one would miss it. JUST SAY NO TO CASEY ANTHONY!



  27. 27

    Re: barny
    they didn't find her innocent
    they found her not guilty beyond a reasonabe doubt
    there IS a huge difference!



  28. 28

    Re: the1 u luv 2 h8!
    apparently when a body is dead and begins to decompose- chloroform is one of the gases given off



  29. 29

    It was one website, but 82 different links were accessed in that website.



  30. 30

    THat search was done right after viewing a chloroform joke . That was a widely circulated email/internet joke.



  31. 31

    I'm so over this case. The rest of you should get over it as well.

  32. @v@ says – reply to this


    32

    Re: Scatter – Agreed. For normal people, hell would be having your little daughter gone.



  33. 33

    This doesn't change shit.. searching for chloroform couples with "accidental death" SIDS and breaking necks…. show that she was clearly looking for something that could end a childs life. Hell.. if she went on the one site printed everything she needed.. there wouldnt even be a need to go back. STILL GUILTY.