Home Videos Photos
| Filed under: TV NewsRoyals RoyceFilm FlickersKate MiddletonPhotos!

Did you really think Lifetime would be the only channel making a movie about the royal couple? Hallmark will premiere their version of the love story Aug… Read more…

18 comments to “New Pics From Hallmark's William & Catherine: A Royal Romance!”



  1. 1

    Chicago once again held its weekly program directors meeting and the main topic was an award MTV suddenly invented called Best Video with a Message, despite announcing other nominees the week before. So, why was this category “suddenly” added? According to radio programmer Jared Stelling, this award was added because Lady Gaga threw a fit.



  2. 2

    Okay but who those 2 people are supposed to play in the movie ?

    Oh Wait !I don't give a damn.



  3. 3

    This looks so dumb, so ridiculously stupid I can't even look at the pictures much less a trailer and I know I won't even look at the movie. Ugh!



  4. 4

    Wouldn't it be so funny if Kate is as barren as the hills? LOL



  5. 5

    ACTING IS SUPPOSED TO PLAY A LARGE PART OF IT MARIO…. the looks do not have to be the same… SAYING THAT THOUGH…. they could have made them up-IN MAKE UP BETTER… unless this is just an intro and not the movie shots… Anyhow, HOW MANY MOVIES DO WE NEED ABOUT THESE TWO? We have seen their story through the NEWS, through PEOPLE AND other RAGS…. why all the movies???????????



  6. 6

    Re: justtfax

    That's what I was thinking about the final "Harry Potter" scene where Perez thinks they should have used older/different actors. If they can act the part, then it will be believeable.



  7. 7

    It doesn't matter if the actors look like the people they're portraying. It's whether or not they can capture their behaviors/style/mannerisms, etc. Ie: Cate Blanchet doesn't look like Bob Dylan, Colin Firth doesn't look like King George, Kristin Stewart doesn't look like Joan Jett, etc.



  8. 8

    Re: boston61 – Why would that be funny? Makes no difference to anything one way or the other. They could adopt if they like … the only difference is that an adopted child would have no succession rights to the throne - it would just revert to another member of the family.



  9. 9

    Shouldn't they have gotten a bald guy to place prince William?

    He hasn't had that much hair since he was 11.



  10. 10

    Re: justtfax – "Why all the movies?" Because ~3 billion people watched their wedding. Obviously, there's an interest in them and a market for movies about them.



  11. 11

    Barf.



  12. 12

    This is just offensive…



  13. 13

    Well from the looks of it, life time is the better movie. I think thats stupid they are making ANOTHER! hopefully they will do something different but i dont see how unless they changed their story

  14. dl006 says – reply to this


    14

    Really, they couldn't have casted two people who more resemble Kate and William? I get it's Lifetime but seriously…my brother and his girlfriend look 100 times more like the royal couple then these actors.



  15. 15

    Re: Meggie246624 – I agree, there will be a lot of people interested in seeing this film, especially in the US, where the majority of people obsessed with Kate Middleton and the Royal Family are. Fortunately, the UK media has been over the Duke and Duchess since early May.



  16. 16

    The actress who plays Kate looks totally different.



  17. 17

    That dude looks nothing like William lol! The only thing the girl has in common with Kate is brown hair. The other William and Kate film was so bad it was good though so maybe this will also bring the lols.



  18. 18

    i will only watch this if the prince is bald like in real life