Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Khloé Selena G. Meghan Markle T. Swift PerezTV

EXCLUSIVE! Rachel Uchitel Responds To Page Six Drama!

| Filed under: Exclusives!Celebrity FeudsSad Sad


Gurl is NOT backing down!

Rachel Uchitel has given PerezHilton.com an EXCLUSIVE statement in regards to her legal battle against The New York Post for allegedly misquoting an article in which she discussed losing her fiance in the 9/11 attacks, and although she's currently not planning to press charges, she is not taking the whole mess lying down!

She says:

"I am not suing anybody. But I have lawyered up, and a letter will go to the Post tomorrow…They TOTALLY turned my quotes around and made the tone negative. I will make noise about this and see if this paper will really stand by this biased writer. And if they do, this is a paper people will come to understand should not be trusted."


Who knows exactly went on in this interview, but we must admit, it seems highly unlikely that she would speak about such a tragic loss - which clearly affected her very deeply - in the fashion that the Post inferred she did.

What do U think?? Team Rachel or Team Post??

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Stars We Lost In 2018
Celebrities Who've Opened Up About Miscarriage
The Teen Mom Franchise: A Mugshot Collection!
Craziest Moments From Vanderpump Rules!
Tearjerker Cinema: The Saddest Movies Of All Time!
Kim Cattrall Vs. Sarah Jessica Parker: A Timeline Of The Feud -- Rumors & Fact!

19 comments to “EXCLUSIVE! Rachel Uchitel Responds To Page Six Drama!”

  1. 1

    She should shut the hole in her face AND the one between her legs!

  2. 2

    I'm on "Team Who Cares About This Skank and Why Are You Even Giving her One Second of Your Attention".

  3. 3

    Not sure why they would even interview her in the first place.

  4. 4

    "lawyered up"
    "letter to POST"
    "make noise"
    "biased writer"
    ………………….I don't know who this (almost fat) person is, but I'm guessing she is "new money." No one talks like that.

  5. 5

    Re: Realness
    OHHH, I just read who she is. She's, no one.

  6. 6

    That's one very ugly woman….

  7. 7

    I have no idea who she is, but it looks like a blind 6-year-old colored her hair.

  8. 8

    Bottom line she is a person and I dont believe the post.

  9. 9

    She can't sue because it's all on tape otherwise she'd sue the Post for slander. Dumb bitch.

  10. @v@ says – reply to this


    I think anybody with half an empathetic brain understood what she meant, and knows how words can get twisted. Her response is measured by the amount of hurt this garnered.

  11. 11

    Doesn't anyone have a recording of the interview? I thought that usually interviewers taped their interviews to use while writing the article. (And let me tell you, if I was a celebrity, I would never DO an interview without taping it myself just in case something like this happened, so I would have PROOF of the things I really said and the context they were said in.
    Now as for Rachel Uchitel…she's a whore and I can't stand her. She doesn't deserve one second of attention from anyone, either about her fiance who died on 9/11 or about any of the many married men she's f-ed.

  12. 12

    "it seems highly unlikely that she would speak about such a tragic loss - which clearly affected her very deeply - in the fashion that the Post inferred she did."
    Are you high? This is the bitch that had no compunction about fucking someone else's husband and getting a pay out for it. I don't think ANYTHING effects her even remotely deeply.

  13. 13

    Will this home-wrecking whore ever go away??!!! Damn!

  14. 14

    Not really knowing much about her, I saw her on Celebrity Rehab, visiting Ground Zero. She was wearing a mini dress and "fuck me" heels, with Dr. Drew in tow, who appeared to quite smitten with her. I was taken aback with how inappropriate this attire was for the occassion and how Dr. Drew appeared to loving every minute of it. What a sick world we live in.

  15. 15

    Don't worry about it, dear. The public's opinion of you couldn't possibly be any worse anyway.

  16. 16

    Re: Azure88 – You're so right! And I think she's just using this to stay in the public eye. So disgusting!

  17. 17

    I can understand the comments even written as they were, people suffering greif usually need to find a reason something awful happened to them. When shes sad , she tells herself that at least she had this man while all was perfect, cause lets face it, relationships and problems go hand in hand. Shes saying shes thankful for those beautiful times and thankful that amidst the tragedy shes able to look back on her time with Andy and only have good memories. Myslef when i read those comments i dont get the impression shes glad he died, just that shes found a beautiful way to deal with it.

  18. 18

    and lets not forget, she gave BACK Tigers money, and shes certainly not the first woman to sleep with someones husband….. all that being said how would any of you feel if you lost a loved one that tragically and anyone dared to say YOU LIKED IT!

  19. @v@ says – reply to this


    Re: Roachies – Didn't she HAVE to give it back because she allegedly broke a gag order that stipulated repayment if she talked about the Tiger thing, which she did?