Home Videos Photos

Beautiful New Images From Dorothy Of Oz!

| Filed under: Film FlickersLea Michele

dorothy-of-oz-promotional-photos
dorothy-of-oz-promotional-photos

These are just simply STUNNING!

We are going to LOVE this!

Although we'd already posted some character sketches from the upcoming animated adaptation of Dorothy of Oz, starring Lea Michele as Dorothy, Hugh Dancy as Marshal Mallow, and Oliver Platt as Wiser the Owl, new, fully colored and completed promotional photos have made their way onto the net, and we think everyone can agree that this film's aesthetic is going to be completely GORGEOUS!

Ch-ch-check them out (above)!

So much color and attention to detail! Yet it still feels completely in the realm of the classic book's world!

More! More! More!

What do U think?? Are U looking forward to Dorothy of Oz?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Books That Should NEVER Have Been Made Into Movies!
Former Co-Stars Who Put Each Other On Blast!
11 Stars Flaunting Their Underwear As Outerwear!!
Before They Were Liars: Check Out The Pretty Little Liars Cast Then and Now!!!
Hottest Movie Sex Scenes Of All Time!
Hollywood’s Elite Club Of Celebrity Triple Threats!
Email this  »

11 comments to “Beautiful New Images From Dorothy Of Oz!”



  1. 1

    No, I'm not looking forward to this. It's terrible when classics are re-written under the guise of being "modernized" .. there was no "wiser owl", "marshal mallow", etc in the Wizard of Oz. Just leave the classics alone - they're good enough to stand on their own without being bastardized by Hollywood.



  2. 2

    Re: Meggie246524 – Agreed. These photos look more like a Bratz doll on the set of the Nutcracker. No thanks.



  3. 3

    I agree completely with the other 2 comments. Remaking classics in any form is absurd.



  4. 4

    Dorothy of Oz is based on a BOOK…not the MGM musical movie.
    Read it sometime and you will see 'Wiser owl” marshal mallow are all there.
    YES of course they are not in the 'Wizard of OZ”…but this ISN'T the WIZARD OF OZ…. OZ has over 25 books….read them sometime.



  5. 5

    No scarecrow, tin man or lion? Not seeing it. And I dont care if its not the Wizard of Oz..thats the only one that means anything to me



  6. 6

    Re: Mydoona – Not quite. L. Frank Baum wrote 14 books about Oz, the first of which being "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" and MGM created the classic movie based on this fantastic book. After his death, numerous authors jumped on his storyline and wrote their own books based on his idea (ie: Wicked, Lion of Oz, Toto of Oz, etc and Dorothy of Oz, which was written in 1989 by Roger Baum, Frank's grandson). Dorothy of Oz is a cheap novel written a few years ago by Roger, who tried to cash in on his grandfather's fame by continuing the legacy. The book was a failure and this movie looks cheap. It's too bad that Hollywood can't leave this classic alone; but Roger & the studio are trying to make money through this cheesy spin off of his grandfather's success.



  7. 7

    Nope, another one I will not see.



  8. 8

    They got it right the first time! It is a timeless classic!



  9. 9

    Re: wwefan01 – Ive seen on their official site the tin man and the sacrecraw, but I was hugely dissapointed at the way they have made sacarecraw, the original drawing was okeish but the final definitely made him look bad, it just doesnt look made of hey and straw!.



  10. 10

    Also I wont be looking it cause that goofy Lea Michele is Dorothy. I just cannot stand her.



  11. 11

    dont like it to clayish and nutcracker look to it i will of respected it more if it was some what similar to the classic feel to it but no.