Home Videos Photos
Home >> Anglophilia, Simon Cowell, Kelly Rowland, X Factor >> U.K. X Factor Ratings Are Low, Low, Low!

U.K. X Factor Ratings Are Low, Low, Low!

10/10/2011 3:20 PM ET | Filed under: Anglophilia • Simon Cowell • Kelly Rowland • X Factor

x-factor-three-year-ratings.jpg

Ouchie mama! Where were all you Brits Saturday night???

The X Factor didn't have such a stellar night in the ratings as the first live edition fell well below the average of the last three years. Only 10.4 million viewers tuned in to ITV1 over the weekend, down nearly 2 million viewers from the year before (12.2 million) and a million from the year before that (11.3 million).

What's the dealio, guys? We thought you were loving the sass of Kelly Rowland and crew? What's not living up to your expectations enough to tune in?

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , ,

Email this  »
« Previous story
Perez Recommends: Richard Marx - Right Here Waiting
Next story »
Perez Recommends: Arts Funding Is Supporting A Wealthy, White Audience: Report
See All 16 Comments

16 comments to “U.K. X Factor Ratings Are Low, Low, Low!”

  1. Inigo says – reply to this


    1

    Get the story straight before you start posting on our affairs. To many bloody commercials just like your website!



  2. 2

    The sheeple are on the turn. Only so much copycat, insincere, manioulative BS crap can be rammed down the throat of a nation.



  3. 3

    Probably because theres no real need to watch it on TV- since you seem to post a dozen or so items about it everyday.



  4. 4

    You dont have a fucking clue do you Perez?



  5. 5

    Never watched it, never will. Rubbish!



  6. 6

    They kicked-off all the talented singers and kept the ones without any talent!



  7. 7

    Everyone knows its a fix! Frankie Cocozza is friends with another member of Take That and has been for years. As for Kitty, shes been on FOUR tv shows! Its complete bollocks!!!!



  8. 8

    When Frankie and Kitty leave I might tune in again…until then I agree the show is a fix and I don't want to see there faces no more!

  9. luzr says – reply to this


    9

    Frankie does my head in, James should not have been kicked out, he was by far the better of the two. Might give it another go next year, but until then, no thank you! Absolute let down this time round.



  10. 10

    There's no point - The "Winners" don't win.. they evaporate.. it's all the losers/runners up who end up getting better contracts… plus.. it's repeatetive and mundane now.



  11. 11

    Wow these figures are wrong. Saturday's show was about 800,000 down, don't know where on earth you got 2 million from.



  12. 12

    I turned off when John Wilding and The Keys got sent home. Frankie shouldn't even have made it to the live shows- John is much more talented. Can't believe Gary put Frankie through based on "personality". As for Kitty, she's ridiculously annoying and makes me want to turn off anyway. I love the new judges but the show just isn't up to par this year.



  13. 13

    Louis isn't that old but he reminds me of an old man–
    not sure why



  14. 14

    Kelly Rowland is the best they can do?



  15. 15

    It's just too many adds!!!



  16. 16

    30 mins worth of ads, thats why people turned off.

    "kelly and crew"? don't get me wrong I like Kelly but the star power comes from Mr Gary Barlow, lead vocalist of highly sucessful boy band 'take that' and voted greatest songwriter of all time above Paul Mccartney and John Lennon.