Home Videos Photos

Tom Cruise Paid No Lump Sum To Katie…Just Cash For Suri!

| Filed under: Tom CruiseLegal MattersKatie HolmesSuri Cruise

Tom Suri Child Support

Looks like Tom Cruise hasn’t coughed up the cash just yet!

While there have been reports that Katie Holmes received $50 million from her and Tom’s divorce settlement, that just doesn’t seem to be the case!

Reportedly, no lump sum was given to Katie at all and as we already know, she had signed a prenup, which didn’t grant her much from Tom, after filing for divorce.

Tom, however, will still end up shelling over a LOT of money — but in the form of child support over the next 12 years!

Supposedly, Cruise will be dishing out over $10 million for little Suri…not a bad deal at all!

Of course, Holmes isn’t worried, as, according to a source, “she has her own money,” and we’re sure she’ll be just fine with all her upcoming projects on the way!

[Image via Ramey Pix.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Email this  »
Worst Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
The Top 10 Scariest Celebrity Stalker Stories!
Celebs Who've Never Changed Their Hairstyles!
Celebrities Accused Of Sexual Misconduct!
Happy Birthday Gwen Stefani! She Sure Doesn't Age -- Just Like These OTHER Celebs!
The Real Housewives Who've Had Trouble With The Law!

11 comments to “Tom Cruise Paid No Lump Sum To Katie…Just Cash For Suri!”



  1. 1

    I guess I don't understand how their personal finances are our business. Yes, the divorce bombshell and the method Holmes used was interesting. But they're not answerable to any of us when it comes to settlements and child support. I get freedom of the press, but this kind of stuff is way too invasive.

  2. YesYouBoreMeBoresMe says – reply to this


    2

    Well, I guess that is $50 million less for the Cult of Scientology.



  3. 3

    COME ON PEOPLE…….
    WHEN A WOMAN LEAVES A MAN, ALL SHE WANTS IS FOR HIM TO GO FAR FAR AWAY AND HE CAN TAKE ALL OF HIS MONEY WITH HIM AS LONG AS HE STAYS THE HELL OUT OF HER LIFE…
    BUT
    WHEN A MAN LEAVES A WOMAN, YOU BEST HIDE YOUR MONEY BECAUSE YOUR GOING DOWN HARD AND WITHOUT YOUR MONEY……. !

  4. To Funny and Too True says – reply to this


    4

    Originally posted by Horton Hears a Wha? :

    "L. Ron Hubbard was a gay man with a penchant for young boys. Expecting someone like "Yes You Bore Me" to be comfortable with his homosexuality (or possible bi-sexuality) is asking a lot. But yes, I think that "Yes You Bore Me" is secretly gay too. His user name is telling enough. The word "bore" can also be used to describe digging, grinding, or pushing into something with force. Saying "yes you bore me" could be interpreted as an invitation for other males to perform anal sex on him. So in all likelyhood, Yes You Bore Me would be what that gay community calls a "catcher", and on a subconscious level, he knows this, which is why he chose that user particular username."

    Hahahahahahahahahha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. Jay-Zee says – reply to this


    5

    Anyone else notice Yes You Bore Me only posts in Scientology/Tom Criuse related posts? I suspect he has a crush on Tom the way he always defends him. A big GAY crush! Keep reahing for that rainbow, YYBM!



  6. 6

    Re: Jay-Zee – "A big GAY crush! Keep reahing for that rainbow" Perhaps, but i believe boring is just a flack for stupidology, following orders to lie, obfuscate, and spew misc horse shit.

  7. Yes, You! Bore Me!!! says – reply to this


    7

    Yes You Bore Me obviously has a 7 inch poop shoot. Most likely given to him by Tom Cruise or John Travolta.

  8. Source Code says – reply to this


    8

    Yes You Bore Me is most likely code that means "anything not releated to the postive side of Scientology, and the way we see the world, bores me (us)." He definitely has a narrow vision of the world. Extremists often have a logic of their own. As for him being gay, I doubt he is, but I'm sure if asked, he would give Travolta a happy ending… for the good of the church!

  9. El K says – reply to this


    9

    I thought Katie had her own money and she didnt want any of Tom's money? but she wanted sole custody and money? What a gold digger.

  10. fancypants66 says – reply to this


    10

    C'mon folks. If everything we are reading about Katie is true (she lived solely in NY for two years for their local system, etc.) she has been planning on leaving him for a long time. The last thing she wants from him is a big settlement. She just wants AWAY from him. If anyone has ever been in a controlling relationship, all that person wants is OUT. This has all been proved by the 'speediness' that the route of the divorce has taken. Usually, couples split for a few months, then someone files. She was very quick to get everything done. It was all planned in advance. Since when is a settlement reached in less than two weeks in a relationship with that kind of money? Never. This was planned and she was very smart about it. She doesn't want him money. Period.



  11. 11

    Chances are that Suri is not his biological child. Rumour has it that TC shoots blanks. TC is the only father Suri knows. The court will grant him rights for visitation. Access to the child he hardly spent time with (except in front of the camera) should be limited and supervised.