And we have another victim!
Honestly, we're so confused about why this photo hacker hasn't been stopped yet!
And it's starting to seem like no one in Hollywood is safe!
Such a sad thing to keep happening.
Contrary to how it may look, Breezy's conspicuously placed artwork has NOTHING to do with that ex he kissed at the VMAs!
“Naw man, that’s [isn't] Rihanna tatted on [Chris] no matter how much [you all are] trying to make it seem. Sorry, it [isn't] her. [Chris] loves women and you know he loves Ri, but come on now, he [isn't] about to tat a b**** on him. That [isn't] how he rolls.”
Not about to "tat a bitch on him"?
Is he calling our precious RiRi the b-word or does he refer to women in general??
Because if he means Chris would never tattoo a woman on him, we'd be forced to assume Breezy's tattooed a dude on him!
That would be… bold?
Hmm. I guess we can see a little Ryan Seacrest in there. And some Christopher Walken.
CB wouldn't comment directly on the situation but we think we found answers in his Twitter feed.
I’m an artist and this is art. Dia de los Muertos.
— Chris Brown(@chrisbrown) September 11, 2012
Ah, we get it.
It's an image of a woman wearing Day of the Dead make-up!
And certainly NOT Rihanna's battered face as so many others wrongfully and egregiously assumed!
We still aren't sure we love the new look, Chris, but thanks for clearing up any confusion!