Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Khloé Selena G. Meghan Markle T. Swift PerezTV
| Filed under: Icky Icky PooRoyals RoyceLegal MattersKate Middleton

Whoa! Didn't see this one coming!! The French magazine Closer has published photos of Kate Middleton sunbathing topless on the private property of Lord Read more…

132 comments to “Kate Middleton's Nude Photos Published By French Magazine!”

More comments: [1] 2 »

  1. 1

    Hope she sues - private property is private property

  2. 2

    The media is out of control ridiculous and it gets worse all the time. How do these scum sleep at night?

  3. truthbetold says – reply to this


    Its pretty sad when a woman can't even be topless with her husband on secluded private property. These paparazzi are so money hungry they don't care whose lives they damage or destroy to get what they want.

  4. williaminraleigh says – reply to this


    Here's an idea, don't lay out nude sunbathing, don't get naked in a Loss Vegas hotel, these people are idiots

  5. Scientist says – reply to this


    This is very unfortunate. Shame on the press that let this happen.
    it is a shame that the magazine has nothing worthy to put on its front pages. is invading privacy of royals has become a matter of entertainment. very sad indeed.

  6. 6

    Serioiusly, this sux for them. They go out of their way to find a private remote location where they can have a nice worry free vacation and yet you get freaks breaking the law to get on your property to take pictures of you half naked. That is so not cool. I hope the sue.

  7. Diana Fan says – reply to this


    Sadly I see history doomed to repeat itself..

  8. Daiyaire says – reply to this


    I feel so sorry for both of them. What's next, "William takes a dump! Pictures inside!"

  9. Molly says – reply to this


    I understand that this sucks for them, and I LOVE Kate. However, I'm kind of sick of them complaining about privacy- the royals live lives of luxury thanks to the U.K. citizens, so is it too much to ask that they wear clothes when they're outdoors?

  10. S says – reply to this


    I don't see why you had to publish the picture on your website, it only causes more distribution of our future queen. I hope they sue the magazine and every international media that showed a copy of the cover! People have no common decency anymore.

  11. Jessica says – reply to this


    That's like a celeb being surprised when they don't wear undies and their dress blows in the wind and everyone sees their coo-kah. Paps will do anything for a good shot, they should know and expect that. It's sad but true.

  12. 12

    Re: williaminraleigh – if you actually read the article …. they were on a PRIVATE french island. PRIVATE island! as in no one should be around them anywhere.

  13. Jeremiah says – reply to this


    Their British what do you expect??!!

  14. 14

    The paparazzi are nothing but glorified stalkers.

  15. Reality says – reply to this


    Re: Molly
    They were in a remote private estate with every expectation of privacy. Lots of people sunbathe nude or topless. Just because they are royalty doesn't mean they cannot do this either. It's not like she was walking topless in front of Buckingham Palace. I guess they're both going to have to walk around in burkas and go into bomb shelters to use the bathroom.

  16. An Australian says – reply to this


    Taking photos like this is just plain wrong

  17. ny1hae589 says – reply to this


    Re: Daiyaire

    There are already full monte pics of William taking a pee by a polo field.
    Unfortunately for Royals, we all live in the (too much) Information Age!

  18. BeautyLaBomb says – reply to this


    well, looks like she isn't preggers ;)

  19. brad says – reply to this


    Where??? I can't find them!!!!!

  20. 20

    Re: williaminraleigh – She was on a PRIVATE estate, sunbathing topless with her husband. Total violation of privacy. Prince Harry was in a hotel room, drunk, playing strip games with strangers. Completely different.

  21. cat says – reply to this


    If she doesn't want anyone to see her boobs then keep them covered up! Surely she isn't stupid enough to think that the media wouldn't have been around!

  22. annoyed says – reply to this


    Re: williaminraleigh – you're a fucking idiot. 1. It's Las* Vegas and 2. Sunbathing topless is the norm in Europe, which you wouldn't know because you're obviously an uneducated dumbass.

  23. Dr.BigStuff says – reply to this


    Re: Pacific Ocean Gal – The media sleeps just well at night after all they give us the gossip drug and people line up to take there medicine.Like I say,unplugg from the cable drugg.

    Dr.Big Stuff

  24. Thomas Irving says – reply to this


    Id be more concerned of the poor security. If someone can photograph her with a high powered photo lense, then they could also use a sniper scope and take out the Prince and Princess.

  25. Janine says – reply to this


    Re: williaminraleigh – what will you say next? Don't take a bath naked?? go through life acting like a robot because someone may take a picture??

  26. kev says – reply to this


    If you dnt want eny1 t see then dnt get them out

  27. 27

    I have nothing against Kate Middleton, I actually like her, but seriously! topless pics on private property yet still in the open, royal family don't get annoyed at her but at the press. Prince Harry's naked pictures were in a hotel room in the night with a group of so called "friends" and security and he gets all the shizz :S what's that about?

  28. tshhhh says – reply to this


    What's so shocking about boobs? Boobs are boobs, boobs are awesome.

  29. Abdul says – reply to this


    That's so cheap by French photographer.i hope she sues and win the case.

  30. Bertram Djukic says – reply to this


    If the British establishment showed similar passion in debating their two recently waged wars, hundreds of thousands of innocent people might still be alive. A little perspective, we're talking A possibly B cup here…

  31. kkate says – reply to this


    they were in a hotel (their relatives' property), so I think in a public space.

  32. UK TAX PAYER says – reply to this


    well its the least she could do, after all we all pay for their high flying lifestyle with our taxes. Lets not forget they live in the limelight and use the media when they want. Go on Kate 'Get em out!!'

  33. PotatoBug says – reply to this


    who gives a shit. they are just breasts.

  34. stacy says – reply to this


    This is why bikinis have tops. She should try wearing one when she's outside.

  35. Santa says – reply to this


    Maybe, this will be what it takes for the taxpayers in the UK to do away with royalty! What is so Royal about bleeding the citizenry?

  36. anuk says – reply to this


    I hope she sues the crap out of that photographer. She was on private property and he/she invaded her private moments. Why can't people leave them alone? They are just like any newly wed couple just.with royal titles. They are still two people in love and the nutso photographers only care about money. I bet if someone started filming their lives Daily they would hate it.

  37. papaq says – reply to this


    now we know what a ROYAL FLUSH stands for.

  38. shay says – reply to this


    It sucks that she can't even go naked behind close doors, but paparazzi's are desperate and boundaries isn't in their vocabulary. Feel free to run naked but if your this highly publicize don't put yourself in that position. Curtains close or not, I don't even walk around half naked or otherwise in my own home b/c there are creeps in the world.

  39. sara says – reply to this


    1) Private Property
    2) EVERYONE goes topless in Europe.
    People need to get over this.

  40. spohie says – reply to this


    The Lord who owns the property is NOT a relative, just a man who was given or inherited a title at some point. Re: sara – Everyone does not go topless or nude in Europe, it”s a misconception of the Americans. It does happen, but it is odd to see, it is not the norm. Nipples are also prone to sunburn [as are the soles of the feet] so i hope she smeared the spf 60 on! Mon dieu! Majorly embarrassing. Also i don't think they are "madly" in love, they have been together on and off for over ten years, i think they have a very solid relationship based on friendship and understanding and will go the distance together. I think they love each other, but aren't in love as you are for the first 18 months or so. Will's needs a top too!

  41. annon says – reply to this


    Two words come to mind…Poetic Justice!!!!!…Maybe three…sweet poetic justice.

    May her soul rest in peace..Amen

  42. who cares says – reply to this


    Hey William in Raleigh I got news for you American's are a minority in wearing bathing suit tops - if you ever travel to Europe, the French coasts - Canada, Italy and so many more places most woman sunbath topless - so don't blame the invasion of privacy on Kate, she should be able to sunbath any way she wants and and any where the way she wants to without having her picture put on the cover of a magazine. I have to add that she looks fabulous - at least it's not some grossly unflattering picture!! William you need to get out of Raleigh and go see the world….

  43. iluvkate says – reply to this


    kate is sooooooooooo hot

  44. VotersOfNY says – reply to this


    If you don't want anyone to see you naked (or take pictures) DON'T TAKE YOUR CLOTHES OFF IN PUBLIC.

    Simple isn't. Not rocket science. Let me see. How many times have I been naked in public. Counting…..Oh that's right. NONE.

  45. Ummm No says – reply to this


    Re: iluvkate – Ummmm most women in Canada do NOT sunbathe topless.

  46. funnyman says – reply to this


    1st prince harry, now kate next the queen will be getting her kit of. :)

  47. 47

    Many women do sunbathe topless in Europe, usually on fairly private beaches but it's not at all common in the U.S. unless it's a nudist beach. But the point is that unfortunately for the young royals, they may have to be more circumspect. I don't remember ever having seen Queen Elizabeth doing anything ever out of character for her role as Queen in public and being photographed that way, not ever. Personally, even in my own home, if I'm changing clothes and going from room to room, I avoid going close to open windows, and I'm not famous or being followed. If I were, I'd be a dozen times more cautious. Maybe Kate, as regale as she is in public should try to be more modest even in private moments until she is inside with the doors and windows firmly locked and curtains drawn.

  48. Beni says – reply to this


    Filthy swines! I don't get it? If we as the public went snopping around and taking pics of topless women and bottomless men ( oh dear :-) we'd be arrested! How can this rubbish be allowed? Way too much money involved for these dirty grubs!

  49. 9gag says – reply to this



  50. Fudsy says – reply to this


    If I had enough money I'd pay someone with the same ruthless energy and self-licensed impunity this photo-maggot obviously possesses to get out there and doggedly interfere with their life, not so much to avenge Kate and William, more to find out what form the plea bargaining would take to put an end to it, for a start, whilst crying into cold chips at their latest stake-out what words would photo-maggot be composing to describe the ordeal ? Now that would make a great story for a shat-mag competitor; do it, it's in your readers' interests after all (once you tell us that it is, that is).

  51. Jeremiahisafool says – reply to this


    Re: Jeremiah – How about spelling and grammar? Retard!

  52. Smarty Pants says – reply to this


    To the Douches of Cambridge

    1) English tax dollars are paying for your "private" vacation. Keep your clothes on when outside.

    2) Just leave. Your self-entitled behavior shows what a waste of money it is to have royalty to begin with.

  53. Fudsy says – reply to this


    Jeri yaw probbly right to kwestion that, didja get the ppoint tho

  54. nwanma ezeugo says – reply to this


    This is outrageous! Totally unacceptable! Closer magazine is definitely going down the drain! Poor Kate its so traumatising but gosh is she one strong young duchess!

  55. slim6744 says – reply to this


    I don't KNOW if they've EVER done a "day's work" all their lives, so…these "glorified stalkers" are NOW making them WORK to clean up their image!

    There's nothing better than to SALIVATE about scenes of imperfection from people who continue to show the world that EPITOME of HYPOCRACY called the ROYALS. If they had wanted PRIVACY…..they would have rented a home, with GUARDS outside to make sure that those "glorified stalkers" are KEPT AWAY!

    Just what is the END PURPOSE of being a ROYAL……anyway? Reminds me of REPUBLICANS who say to the AMERICAN people…." I've got my PRIVILEGE…..where's yours?"

  56. R N says – reply to this


    Get off your high horses. If someone is stupid enough to be out without proper clothing then they deserve to be pictured. I mean, come on.. I'v got enough sense to not lay on my balcony naked, why don't the royals? If this would have happened with any other celebrity then it would have been ok, but oh no it is the future queen of england. Do you realise that the UK is the only place where everyone is still hanging on to this. Across the globe people have seen the pictures and moved on to their respective lives and daily duties.

  57. Duh62 says – reply to this


    Re: spohie – What the fuck are you talking about? People have no issues going topless here! It's not an american misconception! you should come over and judge for yourself and not sit behind your screen thinking you know Europe! They have a right to thier privacy and yeah, paps suck! They were on exclusive grounds and that should have been respected. But with trash magazines like Closer, what's there to be surprised about. In other words, don't talk about what you don't know! Que du connerie va!

  58. Duh62 says – reply to this


    Re: VotersOfNY – You must be seriously stuck up in the arse then ma pauvre. Get a life and stop judging others.

  59. Leon says – reply to this


    Yes, this is a gross invasion of privacy. However, given their "status" what were the royals thinking? Kate is probably the most photographed woman in the world and will be followed everywhere she goes.

  60. michael says – reply to this


    yep, if these royals are stupid enough to hang around naked of course the paparazzi is going to take pictures, that's their job.

  61. michael says – reply to this


    if these royals are so stupid to go naked on the pool, let the paparazzi take pictures of them, that's what paparazzi does, takes pictures.

  62. Michelle says – reply to this


    the media can be so stupid. She's a young attractive woman who was on a PRIVATE holiday with her new husband. Give them a break, I think if we were on a private holiday in Southern France we would be doing the same thing! It's really none of our business.

  63. 63

    guess the smug smiles over harry are now gone..

  64. Kerry says – reply to this



  65. 65

    I dont see what all the fuss is about, wow Kates showing her boobs lol, Iv seen the pics on On the profile KateM-boobs, I dont see why u guys go mad over her, I think my are bigger and alot more firm lol, take a look, shes over rated I think but eveyone to there own I spose.

  66. 66

    Re: kerry162 – www . sexigirls . co . uk

  67. 67

    I dont see what all the fuss is about, wow Kates showing her boobs lol, Iv seen the pics on www . sexigirls . co . uk On the profile KateM-boobs, I dont see why u guys go mad over her, I think my are bigger and alot more firm lol, take a look, shes over rated I think but eveyone to there own I spose.

  68. Douggieboy says – reply to this


    Re: Pacific Ocean Gal – Where were the security people. The camera could have been a high power sniper rifle.

  69. Douggieboy says – reply to this


    What happened to the so called security team ? The camera could easily been a high powered sniper rifle.

  70. andrea says – reply to this


    one of the reasons I thank God I am just a common person non-famous in the world. I would hate to live like this

  71. fawzia says – reply to this


    Re: Molly – yes molly soo well said..i totally agree with you!!! Im for one not in agreement with us paying for any of them!!! we all work soo friggin hard all of our lives..we struggle to pay bills..and very little time to enjoy ourserlves if any time!!! So they shud just swollow their royal ass and put up with the 'trauma' coz were paying for the show!!

  72. Nevl from Oz says – reply to this


    Isn't their a peeping tom law in France. I hope they sue the photographer, the editor and owner of the magazine. 1 billion euro each should do nicely.

  73. 73

    Re: kerry162 – its free to join and view profiles :)

  74. 74

    She has great nipples

  75. 75

    Re: Prince Charming – here here

  76. aaa says – reply to this


    she should know she is in bikini afterall why did she remove so called bras they r verily covered in the first place for formality. but to her that is b=not enough. stupid move. taxpayers 9 welfare) pay for your modesty otherwise what is the use of having royals around it is for museum purpose so keep it that way u r paid for that kate and all of u royals on welfare .

  77. backyard landscape des says – reply to this


    Thanks , I have recently been searching for info approximately this subject for ages and yours is the best I've found out till now. However, what in regards to the bottom line? Are you certain in regards to the supply?|What i don't realize is in fact how you're now not really a lot more neatly-preferred than you might be now. You are so intelligent.

  78. solmaz tanoutasi says – reply to this


    kate middeltons a real princess no matter how they want to change her image wint matter . she married a orince . solmaz tanoutasi

  79. JohnHardyWalmsley says – reply to this


    I think the nude photos of Kate remind me of my wife, but as time goes by they droop just like all middle aged personss.

  80. elliot says – reply to this


    Good! Those damn royals annoy me so much, we should do what the french did!

  81. madmanc says – reply to this


    I can see both sides of the argument, yes it was private property but she should still have the mind to keep them covered up no matter how nice they are………personally i think they should just put this down to experience & make sure that if she is to uncover her boobs again then she makes sure she cant be seen by anybody…..it's that SIMPLE :)

  82. debi says – reply to this


    WHO CARES !!!!!!

  83. Les Butler says – reply to this


    What kind of security do they have??? They should just be thankful that she was shot by a photographer rather than a sniper.

  84. Pirulin says – reply to this


    I understand the missgivings; however, the world is changing fast.
    See for yourself:

  85. zanny says – reply to this



  86. billy says – reply to this


    Re: williaminraleigh – youre a dimwit

  87. Don says – reply to this


    Re: Molly – Are you nuts, Molly. Give the Royals a break.

  88. mike says – reply to this


    who gives a f#$%…if you are in public spot light then it comes with the territory..oh well…and anyways …the royal family …screwed many many countries …enslaved them and stole their riches and land …now they want sympathy lol

  89. toc says – reply to this


    Muy interesante, la verdad es que hay mucha gente preocupada al respecto. Seria bueno poder ampliar un poco mas de información para los distintos tipos que conocemos y que pueda servir mas de ayuda. Un saludo

  90. King Zuma says – reply to this


    Perez, Are you Gay ? cuz I wanna fuck u !!

  91. thamtu, tham tutu, tha says – reply to this


    I believe that is among the such a lot important information for me. And i am glad studying your article. However want to statement on some basic issues, The site taste is ideal, the articles is in point of fact great : D. Just right activity, cheers

  92. ann says – reply to this


    at first i had trouble differentiating kate and williams because kates boobs are soooo small

  93. Rach says – reply to this


    Isn't that voyeurism? Which is completely disgusting and illegal. I don't see how someone could possibly get away with that.. If a random person published pictures of someone they were spying on while they were changing; then they would be criminaly charged. This is absolutely no different. These perverts publishing/taking these photos are complete idiots to think they can get away with something like this.

  94. candy says – reply to this


    She is an embarrassment. Why would you sunbath at all. She is suppose to be a role model not a mole. Has she ever heard of "SKIN CANCER" caused by the sun. As usual, its a first world problem. Remember kate, your whole pathetic scandal has cost millions all over the world. Feel for those starving children you have taken money from, because you were ashamed of people seeing your body. What is the matter with rich people? You are an embarrassment to women and all that we have fought for and tried to accomplish. Its too late anyway, everyone has seen your body…so what was the point? So you could get more attention? Seems to be your motto!!! As for your husband…he should have known better…..typical man!

  95. wonny says – reply to this


    yes, I do totally agree with you. She must expect that the paparazzi would be around to get the shots of her and him anywhere. I'm sick of their campaign for their privacy. They live luxuary lives on our tax payers and dont actually work to get this high paid but they can use the power to win over this case even outside the Uk,,it's not fair.. She should behaves like a loyal too and learn the lessons from Princess Diana, esp,showing off her time and work to the country not only her face and travelling live luxuraious live on our tax payers and this should apply to all royal family!! only Princess Diana will never been forgotten!!

  96. Martin says – reply to this


    i like page three of the Sun.A lot of people like tastefull nudity ,but, At one mile away with a high power lens this is an obvious invasion of privacy.p.s.where can i get a copy. M

  97. free porn says – reply to this


    Great paintings! That is the type of information that are meant to be shared around the web. Disgrace on Google for not positioning this put up higher! Come on over and talk over with my website . Thank you =)

  98. nick says – reply to this


    a private place is private place. the paparazzi did not go to them; he was on public road.
    just like ´'Buckingham palace' is a private/residential, it happened some years back has happened burglary, but, who is to blame, the bandit or the queen?

  99. nick says – reply to this


    Re: Prince Charming
    a private place is private place. the paparazzi did not go to them; he was on public road.
    just like ´'Buckingham palace' is a private/residential, it happened some years back has happened burglary, but, who is to blame, the bandit or the queen?

  100. Scottypoo says – reply to this


    Well. actually, I WANTED TO SEE HER TITS! Yeah, they're starting to droop "pancake style", but the nipples are those little reddish brown ones that the prince probably likes to suck. I was just hoping for "silver dollar" types or maybe even PUFFIES ! Ohhhhhh.

More comments: [1] 2 »