Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Kim K. Teen Mom Selena Jennifer Aniston PerezTV

Italian Tabloid To Publish Nude Kate Middleton Pics!!

| Filed under: Icky Icky PooRoyals RoyceLegal MattersKate Middleton

Just when we thought the royals were in the clear, things have taken an unfortunate turn.

As we reported earlier today, the topless Kate Middleton pics published by French tabloid Closer were removed from the magazine's website.

However, despite a public outcry and a lawsuit filed by the royal family, it turns that an Italian tabloid has decided to take it upon themselves to release the photos.

Chi, which is also owned by the same company that publishes Closer, will run a 26-page spread next week with the headline, "The Queen is Nude."

And as for whether or not editor Alfonso Signori is concerned that the royal family will go after him, he claims that the pics are now part of public domain, adding:

"I don't see anything morbid or damaging in them. Chi pays attention to respecting people's dignity. I don't think they hurt Kate's image."

"Respecting people's dignities" by publishing nude photos of them from a private and secluded moment? Hmmm, not too sure we believe that.

Meanwhile, Prince William is already working hard, figuring out "all appropriate responses" to Chi's tasteless actions.

We hate to say this, but the damage is already done. This might be a losing battle… but, boy does it turn us on to see William fight for his woman!

[Image via WENN.]

Consent In Film: Classic Movies That Are WAY Disturbing In Retrospect!
Epic Side-Eye Hall Of Fame!
All The Celeb Babies Expected In 2018!
Trump's 10 Worst Tweets Of 2017!
12 Days Of Perezmas: 6 Messy Custody Battles
12 Days Of Perezmas: 12 Celebs Exposed For Alleged Sexual Misconduct

51 comments to “Italian Tabloid To Publish Nude Kate Middleton Pics!!”

  1. 1

    Perhaps the ROYALS should keep their clothes on.

  2. MB says – reply to this


    Why are people so obsessed with nude royals?

    Kate's not a bad looking girl, but I catch myself looking at her legs and feet, and as soon as I remember she's a royal, I snap right out of it.

    Being a royal is not a bad thing, it's not gross, it's just a turn off. I can't be turned on by William's wife's feet. He's too good of a dude.

  3. ak says – reply to this


    According to a paper, the pap took the picture over a kilometer away - who can protect themselves from that? Besides - everybody are entitled to privacy, particulary on private property. Just because you're in the public eye, it doesn't mean that the public owns you, and are at liberty to humiliate you, while you have nothing to fight back with, because the damage is done. Some people should look up the meaning of the word schadenfreude.

  4. 4

    i am beginning to understand why there is a taliban…and why muslims hate us.

  5. seriously? says – reply to this


    Dude, you have posted countless candid nude photos of celebrites over the years. Why was that OK but this wasn't?

  6. 6

    they are breasts for goodness sakes!

  7. Miss Kiki says – reply to this


    If Kate doesn't want nude photos leaked, she needs to keep her fucking top on!

  8. 8

    Um these photos were taken by someone who went to a lot of effort to invade their privacy. Kate didn't do anything wrong. She was sunbathing with her husband on what is supposed to be acres of PRIVATE PROPERTY. Not flaunting her chest in public.
    Kate's not the wrong one, the creepy stalker photographer is.

  9. boston61 says – reply to this


    Women look so much prettier with their clothes on. IMHO

  10. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    WHAT is wrong with you, idon'tbelieveyou …? Going 'au naturel' is common in Europe….you see BIG tits, liitle tits, in-between tits, floppy tits, old tits, sagging tits, mosquito-bite tits…ALL FOR FREE ! Check out yer beaches, even in your religious Catholic countires. Literally, is is a BIG BOOBS BONAZZA !

  11. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    BTW, the Royal 'tits' are just 'meh'…she is a skinny girl, after all…………………..

  12. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    At least she doesn't shop at TITS 'R' US, or 'TITS TITS TITS' like a lot of HollyWood actresses do ……

  13. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    I understand after having seen the photos, Lindsay HoHan has sent her a love note, asking to meet her ……………..

  14. MB says – reply to this


    Re: sick_girl – I agree. I have little tollerance for this type of scumbag and I understand more than I should as an average guy, what it's like to be stalked by human pieces of shit garbage.

  15. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    Wonder if there are any photos of the Royal wee wee …? His SCHONGLINESS ?

  16. Be-Atch says – reply to this



  17. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    I wonder how much the National Enquirer will pay for pics of the Royal Tits … ?

  18. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    I know people who know people who know people who know the Queen, and they say she is really pissed over all of this … !

  19. Be-Atch says – reply to this



  20. 20

    Hard to feel sorry for her. They live an incredibly lavish lifestyle, off the backs of the middle class. There is always the possibility that you will be photographed, so keep your clothes on! It's pretty simple!

  21. Me says – reply to this


    Kate, it's ok…..let them rant!. Go for it, get some sun!

  22. marcella says – reply to this



  23. 23

    Who cares! LOL I'm serious royals or not they're human too, big deal its just nudity. They should publish the pics!

  24. Hippo Crit says – reply to this


    …and this is different from what Perez does… how, exactly?

  25. 25

    These people are plain evil!

  26. 26

    Re: seriously? – He turned a new leaf a few years ago. He doesn't anymore.

  27. 27

    These two know that the paparazzi follow them everywhere so why is she taking her top off in public where she could possibly be photographed? what an idiot! Besides she has no breasts to speak of, I personally think she looks anorexic

  28. 28

    Re: michellt – He turned a new leaf? What for? Gossip, is by nature,not very nice stuff. If you don't like gossip, why are you here?

  29. 29

    Bitch ain't got no shape and her titties look like pancakes. Only William would wan't to put his butter spread on that.

  30. skjasdf7 says – reply to this


    Protect your rights online! Do not be squished by the leaders! Support the GNAA at irc.hardchats.com #GNAA

  31. dee says – reply to this


    It was the French who took the pictures. USA is awesome!!!!

  32. 32

    so i guess now harry is off the hook now the royal melons are on show…who woulda known she was a dirty girl …

  33. 33

    Re: marcella – lollllllllllhahahaha

  34. 34

    ok i googled middletons tits and saw them she has dark nipples and average prob b cup tits.. rubbing lotion on will so between googling harry naked and middletons tits we almost have the trifecta now we just need wills package which i googled but so far nada…

  35. Rachel says – reply to this


    Kate is a grown woman and knows exactly what the lengths the papz will go to for a photo. I have little sympathy for her - she should have kept herself covered up if she didn't want this. It is sick that they're comparing the pics to Diana, they just using that for the sympathy vote. What is the big deal other than her immense embarrassment? She has boobies like everyone else - so what. If she can't handle this then she should keep her bikini top on. All this for a streak free suntan. HA! I guess she doesn't do fake bake then? On a serious note, there are far more indecent and improper images on the internet and it is a great shame the same outrage and outcry by the public isn't shown to stop such images circulating on the internet.

  36. Clamidia Staines says – reply to this


    For the best pic of Kate Middleton's t*ts visit

  37. 37

    I honestly can't believe people are blaming Kate. She was on PRIVATE property with her husband. She wasn't out on a boat or on a beach or anywhere else, she was alone, in private with her husband. I know my ex's place had a big backyard and his deck was set up that no one could see on it, I'd take off my top sometimes to sunbathe when it was just the two of us at home…I know I'd be entirely disgusted if I found out someone had climbed a tree or something else nuts to get a picture of me.

    Also, how low has we as society come that women are now judging other women's breast…knowing full well there's little control over how they look. That just saddens me.

  38. leo says – reply to this


    PEREZ is such a freaking hypocrite! he posts nude photos on his sites ALL THE TIME!

  39. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    William to Kate, as he is screwing her: ' Ya got no tits, and a tight box !' Kate: 'Get off my back ! ! ! ' Lolololol ! See…he was ACTUALLY screwing her up the a– ! ;)

  40. Be-Atch says – reply to this



  41. do it yourself landsca says – reply to this


    Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact used to be a amusement account it. Glance advanced to far added agreeable from you! However, how could we communicate?

  42. nevermind says – reply to this


    The French took the pictures, of course…they are always the "first" when it comes to nudity. That's what they're known for period and the so called Italians!!! No class…anything to do harm they will!

  43. kazi says – reply to this


    hi very good

  44. Sue says – reply to this


    Re: seriously? – I think thats a little extreme mind - Because european papers picture Kate topless you think its ok for the taliban to kill the english and americans….get your head looked at you complete idiot!!!

  45. Sophia says – reply to this


    I am rather disturbed by the comments saying that Kate should have never taken her top off is she didn't want to be photographed. Does that also mean she should remain fully clothed at all times when she is intimate with her husband because it's possible someone will break in and have a camera handy? I think this is ridiculous. Not only was she on PRIVATE property, but she was alone with her husband. The pictures taken were from a great distance. So not only were they spied on, but her privacy was completely infringed upon when pictures were captured of her without her top on. This is disgusting. The fact that there is even a market for this sort of thing is disgusting. Just because she married a prince doesn't mean that with that comes the right to people completely deny her the common decency that other people receive. She did nothing to deserve this. The pictures themselves aren't even scandalous by nature. I'm sure if any of you morons were vacationing on a secluded property by yourself and had some psycho photograph you, you'd be outraged and cry big ugly "woe is me" tears.

  46. joseph says – reply to this


    whats the big deal. there are still lots of dictators in AFrica and Indian Ocean going about business as usual. this is news. Why dont you leave those people alone. Cheap journalism thats what it is.

  47. 47

    I have problems with fake "standards", where did Adam & Eve get clothes? Where did God tell them to wear them? Why should Kate wear a Bra? It's her choice, grow up!

  48. 48

    And who owns these magazines? Is it not the Prime Minister of smut, Mr Berlusconi?

  49. GotTheTeeShirt says – reply to this


    Boobs, Tits, Breasts, Baby Take-aways, call 'em what what you will. Big ones, average ones, one bigger than the other ones, little ones hardly there at all ones. Surprise, surprise! About one half of the world population have….a pair of tits! And… everyone has a bum….AND the other half of the population has a nut or two, and a willy! WOW! For fucks sake, get a life!

  50. valentina says – reply to this


    idiot: it's ALFONSO SIGNORINI!! And he just said something right: the pics are public domain, I think the "duchess" knew there was a bunch of paparazzi, you can get it from the way she adds the camera… moreover she went topless in a hotel that was very very very close to public roads… she's just a seeking attention bitch

  51. valentina says – reply to this


    Re: Be-Atch – where do you see a bonazza? I see a very very very small boobs seeking attention bitch… her face looks like a 40 years old woman's one