Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Khloé Selena G. Meghan Markle T. Swift PerezTV

Jennifer Aniston NOT Pregnant, Reps DENY Rumors!

| Filed under: Jennifer AnistonBaby BlabberLove LineJustin Theroux


Awww and we wrote a letter to Santa Claus asking him to make sure THIS Jennifer Aniston pregnancy rumor was true!

Damn you, Santy!

After yet another report surfaced alleging that Jenny Jen was carrying a bundle of cuteness in her belly implanted there by future hubby Justin Theroux, her representatives felt the need to clear some things up…

Jennifer Aniston is NOT pregnant.

Her reps eloquently stated:

"It's crap!"


Ah well, we guess those Fifty Shades of Grey baby-making sessions aren't going so well?

Perhaps Jen just needs to pay a visit to Kate Middleton and give her budding royal belly — which is obviously magical and grants wishes — a big ol' rub…

We're sure she'll get pregnant THAT way!


[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Celebs Who Quit Acting For Really Good Reasons!
Celebrity Couples With Opposing Political Views!
Justin Theroux, Matthew McConaughey, And Even Donald Trump -- All The Forgotten Cameos Of Sex And The City
Selena Gomez & Other Best Dressed Celebs Of The Week!
These Celebs Have All Kindly Officiated Weddings!
Channing Tatum & Jenna Dewan Tatum: Through The Years!

23 comments to “Jennifer Aniston NOT Pregnant, Reps DENY Rumors!”

  1. 1

    She is in her mid-forties. She has probably unable to conceive naturally now, and it may even be too late to conceive with medical intervention. If they do want a kid, they may have to adopt, or use a surrogate. Or Justin can simply find someone younger.

  2. 2

    Is there a reason you think every woman wants to be or get pregnant? Here's a bit of news for you, retard: There are lots of women out there who do not want or do not like children, and who do not aspire to motherhood. It is distinctly possible that Aniston is one of those women. It could also be that if she has one, fine; if not, that's fine too. For her, having a child may be something that she's okay with not doing if it doesn't happen. Do us all a favor, you stupid pheggot, and do NOT use a surrogate to have children. The world does NOT need your gene pool continued. It's defective and intolerable enough. We don't need or want another YOU.

  3. 3

    Re: rosebud99 – On the other hand, there are those in their 40s and 50s who have no conception issues at all. Aniston may not be that interested in being a mother; Theroux may not be that interested in being a father. This may not be about the mythological biological clock. But each time this topic comes up, you say the same thing. Do you have conception issues of your own that have made you bitter? Seems that way … and no, I don't care. That was a rhetorical question.

  4. Leslie says – reply to this


    Good Lord, when are these trash magazines going to stop saying she's pregnant. They've been wrong more than 200 times before.

  5. 5

    Re: Pansy Hunter – You are right, maybe she has no interest in having a child. But I disagree with you about women in their 50's having no conception issues - having a child without medical intervention at that age is extremely rare. And the majority of women in their 40's who try to conceive have difficulties. Any pregnancy after the age of 35 is medically considered a geriatric pregnancy - and risks of complications are much higher.

  6. shanghai says – reply to this


    Wish they would stop putting this pressure on her with all the rumours. She is a bit old to concieve so a baby may never happen for her. And totally agree with other comments that some people do not want children and are happy just the way they are.

  7. 7

    I never thought she wanted children. Any one that has as many OCD traits as she does and likes eveything just so would never risk anything that made a mess of her tidy, boring little worl.

  8. 8

    my sister is her age and just had a baby — be it on the floor but ok– long story

    anniston clearly doesnt want a baby or she wouldnt waste all her child bearing years with losers who wouldnt impregnant her yet manange to impregnant other woman easily enough

  9. 9

    If she wanted a baby, she would have one by now. She would have had one on her own, or adopted, or used donor sperm, and/or hired a surrogate….etc. When women really want a baby, they do everything in their power to get one. And she has the resources to make any of the above happen.
    And for the record, I have done research on many different families from the 19th century for genealogy purposes, and it was not at all uncommon for women to get pregnant and have healthy babies even up to the age of 45. Both great great grandmothers on either side of my family had babies when they were 43 and 44. I am not saying it was extremely common, but certainly not a "rare" thing.

  10. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    Ummmmm she is OLD. Her egss are likely drier than Palm Springs ! IF she did manage to have a kid naturally, it would likely be retarded…think 'Nicky Hilton' ….. WOULD SHE BE CRUEL ENOUGH TO DO THAT TO THE WORLD …. ?

  11. OhPlease says – reply to this


    She wouldn't be the first woman to get pregnant at her age. If she really wants kids there is always the surrogate route or adoption. With her money if she wanted one she could have one.

  12. boston61 says – reply to this


    They will probably rent a poor desperate woman's womb like Guilianna and Sarah Jessica did.

  13. teeter totter says – reply to this


    Wish them both the best whatever they decide. I ended up not having children because I was not willing to sacrifice enough for their needs. If I wanted to take off for a long weekend and had to cancel because the kid got sick, I would not be happy. So it is probably for the best, since I can be a bit selfish.

  14. Shell says – reply to this


    For all anybody knows, Jenn had her eggs frozen a long time ago. That is the thing to do in Hollywood these days. They can easily still have at least 1 child…and WE would not even be aware of it if the process and surrogate were kept on the DL.

  15. JenniferTheroux says – reply to this


    Years ago, Dear Abby published study where 70% of her respondents said if they had to do it all over again, they would not have children.

    I'm 56 and have funky genes so I did society a favor, lol. Wish all those baby mamas and daddys out there did the same. Who would want to be Nahla Aubry??

  16. 16

    isnt there a pill for this sort of issue?

  17. 17

    my neighbor's half-sister makes $77 every hour on the laptop. She has been laid off for six months but last month her check was $17815 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Here's the site to read more. WWW.ASK22.COM

  18. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    Does any one actually believe that she is f*cking this Fug Dude … ? He is a fruit, no ? I mean, she is an airhead, and likely would produce a kid that, well, lets us just say is ' not right' …Just say'n.

  19. 19

    She's too vain to ruin her figure…she'll either rent a woman or cash out on her "acting" career and then give birth

  20. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    Her give up acting ? ! ? ! She would NEVER give up the chance to, yet again, play the Rachael character in a movie ……….LOL ! Sorry, but she REALLY IS a One Trick Pony !

  21. Sallyann says – reply to this


    Does anyone remember a woman gave birth to a normal child at age v67 yes you saw right 67 so what the hell are you on about when Jennifer is 43. She actually had 2 miscarriages to the pothead Pitt. At least she is not trapping Justin with a heaps of uncontrolled little twerps who throw food around in Restaurants like her nemesis. At least Jen's children will be clean and bath regularly and wash their hands after toiletting not like her nemesis

  22. Laura says – reply to this


    Why is everyone here so hellbent on her getting pregnant?! Not every woman wants to be a mother, especially when they have a demanding career and making millions in the process. Now stop being so nasty and go tend to your children.

  23. 23