Home Videos Photos

Twilight Star Pulls An Anne Hathaway: Cameras Catch Elizabeth Reaser's Vaginal Goods!

| Filed under: Yummy Yummy ScrewFilm FlickersOops!SIGHtingTwilight

Elizabeth Reaser vagina monologue upskirt panty shot twilight esme cullen censored

And this time it's not even Taco Tuesday!

When Catwoman flashed her pretty kitty earlier this week, who knew she'd be starting a trend?

Yesterday, while doing a press event in Hong Kong, Twilight's Elizabeth Reaser flashed us a look at her sesame beef curtains!!

Whoa! That's way more of Edward Cullen's, um, point of origin than we ever thought we'd see!

The uncensored pic is definitely NOT SAFE FOR WORK, but, for those of you looking at new jobs anyway, ch-ch-check out Elizabeth's womanhood in all of its sparkling glory…AFTER THE JUMP!!!

Elizabeth Reaser vagina monologue upskirt panty shot twilight esme cullen UNCENSORED

Wowzers!!

We're honestly not sure whether we're looking at a pair of nude-toned panties or the lady's baby dispensary, but, either way, we hope she's not too embarrassed!

Mistakes happen!

[Image via Getty Images.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Email this  »
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay -- Part 1's Fiery Promo Tour! All The Fierce Red Carpet Looks!
Chris Hemsworth Is People's Sexiest Man! Gaze At The Gorgeousness That Is Thor HERE!
Wet Celebs! Look At These Stars Hot And Their Wettest Pics!
Top 10 Funniest Moments From The First Dumb & Dumber!
Retail Ruckus! 12 Items That Had To Be Pulled From Stores For Offending Customers!
Horror Movies And Their Remakes! Which Is Better?

30 comments to “Twilight Star Pulls An Anne Hathaway: Cameras Catch Elizabeth Reaser's Vaginal Goods!”



  1. 1

    That's skin colored underwear, you moron.

  2. YouCannotFixStupid says – reply to this


    2

    1) Those are flesh/nude-tone underwear. Not a big deal AT ALL.

    2) The joke about "Edward Cullen's point of origin" would be funny if it were at all clever (it isn't), or if vaginas were going around turning fictional characters to vampires (they are not).

  3. tempe says – reply to this


    3

    Even if her private parts were exposed a true decent gentlemen would NOT show this photo. It's called "chivalry" Perez which in this case you don't have any. It seems that everytime a woman trips Perez with glee makes it worse for her.
    Shame on you.

  4. boston61 says – reply to this


    4

    She has undies on. Not the same thing.

  5. kgkyugh says – reply to this


    5

    Re: boston61 – well said

  6. kgkyugh says – reply to this


    6

    sorry that was meant to be in reply to tempe but agree with boston61 anyway

  7. Arrora says – reply to this


    7

    At least she had enough sense to wear underwear!



  8. 8

    She's got the EXACT SAME TWAT as Barbie does…



  9. 9

    Do you have any respect for women at all?



  10. 10

    And??? You never seen women's underwear before? Oh wait.. you didn't.

  11. michy says – reply to this


    11

    least shes wearing underwear. so nope not the same thing

  12. michy says – reply to this


    12

    and her pretty kitty about Anne? AND SESAME MEAT CURTAINS.you are sick



  13. 13

    She's so pretty; Love her!



  14. 14

    Again. Repeat after me: the vagina is INSIDE a woman's body, not outside. To see her vagina, you would have to spread her legs real wide. (And she is wearing skin-colored underwear.



  15. 15

    It looks to me like she is wearing underwear, which makes this a non issue. Other girls in hollywood should take note: Exposing your undies is WAY better than exposing your actual vag.



  16. 16

    This post is pretty sick. The choice of words is foul.



  17. 17

    1. Flesh colored panties
    2. That is not Edward Cullen's "point of origin" you moron..his character was her "adopted" vampire son..way to do your research.

  18. Tim says – reply to this


    18

    You are acting like a deviant, get help sick fuck

  19. Oliver says – reply to this


    19

    Note to these dumb bitches:

    WEAR SOME FUCKING UNDERWEAR, STUPID K U N T S!
    (However, I suspect these attention hungry flakes just want some attention, and go panty-less for kicks. How fucking desperate do you gotta be?)

  20. Oliver says – reply to this


    20

    Oh yes, I can see it now. This chick is wearing underwear.

    In that case, I'll adjust my comment ever-so-slightly.
    If you're facing a camera, and you're wearing a mini-skirt, … no wait. WHY wear a mini-skirt if you're gonna be facing a camera? WHY cross your legs in a goddamned mini-skirt, and then complain when people comment about your snatch… covered or not?
    Give me a break.
    And on that note… does one wear flesh-toned panties in order to make people SUSPECT one of going without underwear? And therefore, get some attention out of it?
    Hmmm.
    Still seems like it's all about the attention.
    And for that, I still gotta say: fucking k u n t s.

  21. Oliver says – reply to this


    21

    And for those who might comment on my perspective:
    Nope, I don't hate women. I love women. Women who don't feel the need to parade their body parts around on television for the attention. Women who don't feel the need to wear skimpy fleshcoloured panties under their super short skirts to get people wondering, just in case some slime-bucket takes their picture.
    I happen to love women who don't feel the need to "let it all hang out," or as this pig fucking Perez says: display their "vaginal goods."
    THOSE bitches are fucking stupid.

  22. drewkin says – reply to this


    22

    I just actually read a review on their outfits for the red carpet premier, on the Revel Life Magazine.
    therevellife.com/the-twilight-saga-breaking-dawn-part-2-world-premier-at-nokia-theatre



  23. 23

    did they learn nothing from basic instinct .. u cross u legs in a short dress morons…



  24. 24

    Sesame meat curtains? Um, okay……



  25. 25

    She's wearing undies!

  26. ndeye fatou ndfour says – reply to this


    26

    i don t like

  27. Jessica Stacy says – reply to this


    27

    I agree..you can't really tell from this pic. Also, I agree if a photo like this is noticed on your camera it should be deleted unless you have consent from the person the picture is of. But how about there be a rule from here on out….If your dress is above knee length (just to be on the safe side) wear some lineless undies?

  28. bebe says – reply to this


    28

    Baby dispensary!!! Baaahhhaahahahaha! that is too funny.

  29. sabine says – reply to this


    29

    another nast slut! what is up with these assholes not wearing underwear? nobody wants to see their shit! hollywood is going to the dogs - big time! all these hors and sluts and biches, cheater and cock suckers need to be put on an island and shot!

  30. Bea says – reply to this


    30

    Re: overthere

    Thank you! I am SO TIRED of people referring to the vulva as the vagina.