Home Videos Photos

Wade Robson Reaching Out To The Housekeeper Who Testified That Michael Jackson Abused Him For Help In New Lawsuit!

| Filed under: Legal MattersMichael JacksonSad Sad

wade robson sex abuse housekeeper

As more shocking and disturbing details emerge from Wade Robson's claims that he was, in fact, sexually abused by Michael Jackson for seven years during his childhood and adolescence, it appears that the woman who first spoke of his possible molestation at the hands of the pop icon during his 2005 trial will now be detrimental to this most recent civil lawsuit…even though the choreographer claimed she was LYING back then!

As you may recall, Blanca Francia worked as a housekeeper at the Neverland Ranch, where Jackson resided, back in the late 1980s. During the 2005 molestation trial, she testified that she saw Michael showering with Wade back when he was 7 or 8, and although she couldn't see what was happening because of steam from the water, she heard her boss laughing.

Of course, Wade's testimony at the time disputed pretty much all of that, but now, as he builds his case against MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures - whom he now argues had a responsibility to keep him safe, as they recruited him as a child to begin with - his lawyers are hard at work dissecting the events Francia described, to see if they match up with his more recent account of events.

Furthermore, they are in the process of getting in touch with her, to see if she'll cooperate in the new case!

And we sincerely hope that she will!

Coming to terms with childhood abuse is such a delicate, unbelievably difficult process, and we sincerely hope that this can be resolved with as little pain and as much compassion as possible.

[Images via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

13 Celebs Who Were Arrested When They Were 21 Or Under!!
Celebs Who Died Under Bizarre Circumstances!
10 Reality TV Couples Broken Up By The Spotlight!
Michelle Rodriguez's Bad Girl Past! Arrests, Fights And Why She's A Bad Influence On Zac Efron!
Happy Birthday Lindsay Lohan! Celebrate With Some Of The Worst Moments Of Her 28-Year Life!
Shia LaBeouf’s Most SHOCKING Moments!

60 comments to “Wade Robson Reaching Out To The Housekeeper Who Testified That Michael Jackson Abused Him For Help In New Lawsuit!”

  1. Rosie OH says – reply to this


    1

    You go Gurl

  2. Nucking Clucking says – reply to this


    2

    Why can't they approach her?

  3. Elsie says – reply to this


    3

    Mariano Quindoy and Charlie Michaels also told police how they witnessed Wade molested. I hope he contacts them too.

  4. IDoSomeResearch says – reply to this


    4

    Yeah, because Thomas Mesereau - the defense attorney in '05 - did NOT completely discredit those three ex-Neverland employees after discovering that all three of those people had an axe to grind after they were fired by MJ for different reasons (e.g. stealing from his ranch). And because Blanca Francia did NOT get caught changing her story multiple times according to the demand of the situation!

  5. Dw Stern says – reply to this


    5

    Well we know Mesereau wont be involved in this case
    He will be too busy with the revival of The Golden Girls, he is playing the Bea Arthur part
    of Dorothy

  6. lostyouskittles says – reply to this


    6

    this is pure bullshit. obviously AEG is behind this to lighten up their lawsuit. I've talked to victims of such abuse and i've compared to his interview. he just doesn't fit such criteria and if it weren't for money he wouldn't be suing for any. just let the man rest in peace. he's been through enough alive and people are still trying to tear him down while he's dead. money is all that matters to them, even his family. smh.

  7. SexyMcFabulous says – reply to this


    7

    I can't fathom how some people believe Wade, you're falling for his shit and I find it hard to believe.



  8. 8

    This little f*ck is a total liar.

  9. Will says – reply to this


    9

    Im tired of hearing about this bull. He is only doing this for another shot at fame. Shame on the media for giving Wade so much attention.



  10. 10

    Wade said he never came forward with his claims because he "was scared psychologically and emotionally completely unable and unwilling to understand that it was sexual abuse."
    "This is not a case of repressed memory," he insisted. "I never forgot one moment of what Michael did to me."So at the age of 22 when he defended MJ in the trial under oath,and in later interviews after MJ's death,when he called MJ a great human being with the innocence of a child,he still did not know what sex was??LOL

  11. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    11

    Look…the duedewas a young kid, he was mesmerized by all the candy and toys Wacko bought him…he had all that fun. When he did testify for him, he felt beholden…he had a young mind. Now, he is realizing he was wrong in denying that wacko played with his peen…Wacko obviously liked young meat…wACKO'S generation had to do things that way…back in the day, being a 'mo, particularly a black 'mo, woulda been the death OF his career, no matter how talented he was. So….Wacko likely felt this guy up, and some were privy to it, but money and power silenced them - at least at the time. Ain't right for a grown man to be with young boys all the time..just ain't right !



  12. 12

    About the housekeeper…in her deposition in 1994 Blanca Francia said she saw only ONE image behind the shower door - that of MJ. Since he was laughing she BELIEVED that there was someone else there but she did not see any other figure except Jackson. Why he was laughing we don't know - the radio was on and he could hear something on the radio which made him laugh.
    Ten years later, at the 2005 trial Blanca Francia suddenly remembered the story "so well" that she added some fictional details to it, however Thomas Mesereau quickly refreshed her memory about her previous deposition. So in 2005 Francia was blatantly lying.
    But even this is not all. The picture of the shower shows that Blanca Francia could not see anything even in theory as even when the door is WIDE OPEN, you CANNOT see the shower, or see just a VERY little part of it.
    More FACTS: the maid admitted under oath that she had been paid by certain media house for her story. The testimony of more than 400 witnesses over a 13-month long investigation span along with evidence was presented to 2 grand juries in ’94 both of which refused to indict MJ as they thought the charges were false
    Surprisingly,the public doesn't trust what people say under oath,but believe it completely if those "stories" were sold to the media or were part of civil suits,i.e.damages claimed.

  13. Be-Atch says – reply to this


    13

    The housekeepers always know…they always know. Lord, the tales Demi Whore's maid could tell !

  14. Sassy says – reply to this


    14

    Wade's accusations are coming on the heels of the Jackson family's lawsuit against AEG, and it has been reported that AEG will be using the fact that Michael was charged with molestation as a part of their defense in court. Therefore, the timing of Wade's allegations is just plain suspect to me. Are all of these people in cahoots, or what? Is this all a part of some elaborate plan or set up so that AEG can fight and win against the Jackson family in court? I mean, WTF is really going on here? I'm sorry, but I am not buying any of this. The timing of it just plain stinks. This whole thing reeks of BS!



  15. 15

    Sorry, Wade. You shot yourself in the foot with this one. If you really and truly were molested, you should have said something sooner, then your credibility wouldn't be sh*t now. Don't look for sympathy from me

  16. Just kidding Folks says – reply to this


    16

    Hey, sometimes the best things come in small packages…!



  17. 17

    Re: Be-Atch – Says the conspiracy theorist who always insists everyone featured in a picture on this site are f***ing. Seriously, every time there's a picture of two people on this site, you can scroll down in the comments section and there you are insisting they're secretly sleeping together. You always assume the more scandalous option is always the truth.

  18. Should Be Grateful! says – reply to this


    18

    Who was in charge anyway? Didn't he always treat them well? Perhaps it's the parents that only sue, not the adults that worked for him!

  19. Melissa says – reply to this


    19

    stop tlkin bout michael damn yall just stupid he never ever did any of that stuff

  20. Southie says – reply to this


    20

    Nah, wrong place, wrong time, wrong guy. These facts are not facts because they never materialised.

  21. Really says – reply to this


    21

    This Wade guy should grow up and deal.

  22. NealandTim says – reply to this


    22

    Where there is smoke there is fire. For some reason people are scared to speak against MJ. He was brought up on charges like this more then a time or two… so there has to be something to it. I believe MJ is a child molester. Its too bad hes not here to defend himself.



  23. 23

    Just an innocent shower between a 7 year old boy and, at the very least, a wacko, weird , perversion-driven adult male.

  24. Jenny says – reply to this


    24

    I think Wacko Jacko did bad things to kids. I mean, come on! Where there's smoke there's fire. Wade is probably telling the truth.



  25. 25

    I think it's highly probable MJ was molested as a child. MJ's nephew, Taj, just disclosed that he was molested "By an uncle on my mom’s side of the family when I was a kid.” Taj defended MJ; he doesn't believe MJ was a child molester. However, if Taj was molested by a relative, it's possible MJ was molested by the same relative. I think Wade may be telling the truth.

  26. J. says – reply to this


    26

    Re: popnpolitics – Sorry to break it to you, but MJ could NOT have been molested by the same relative that molested Taj. Reason? Taj clearly stated it was a relative on his mother's side. Taj's mother, to MJ, is the wife of his brother, Tito. How was MJ supposed to have even met his brother's future wife's siblings before his brother even met his own wife? Also, even if MJ WAS molested as a child, that cannot serve as an evidence of his guilt, just because of a popular belief "the abused abuse"; if that logic was always the case, then that is like saying all child molestation victims should be locked up because they are sure to molest a child once they grow up!



  27. 27

    Maybe if he would quit reaching out, there wouldn't be a problem to begin with.

  28. Paul says – reply to this


    28

    "Coming to terms with childhood abuse is such a delicate, unbelievably difficult process, and we sincerely hope that this can be resolved with as little pain and as much compassion as possible."
    I'm sure the money will help…

    It's false claims like this Wade Robson, who make it harder for REAL victims of sexual abuse to come forward.
    This pothead should get a job if he's low on cash. Not sue a dead guy whom he's been defending for the last five years in court and before many cameras.

  29. Paul says – reply to this


    29

    Re: mjtheultimate – basically if he says that in court, they can take him straight to jail for lying under oath.

  30. nz! says – reply to this


    30

    Cant yall let Mj rest in piece i mean he did not touch those kids
    twice he was accussed,once he was found not guilty and as for the first one the stupid kid said after Mj died his father made him tell all those lies,look it up.
    why all after all these years would he come out with this crap at the same time theres a lawsuit happening with AEG,utter bullshit.Leave MJ alone for god sakes

  31. Jesse says – reply to this


    31

    Re: lostyouskittles – You know nothing. What 'citeria'? I'm sick of paedophile sympathisers on these blogs

  32. Jesse says – reply to this


    32

    Re: Be-Atch – Smartest comment here

  33. Rachel says – reply to this


    33

    As a parent of 3 young kids - my first question is….. WHERE WERE HIS PARENTS? Why did they allow a 7 year old child to stay the night with an older man? And for 7 years??? I don't care who the celeb is I would NEVER allow my 7 year old to stay with a single man for years. Smelly Fishy to me. I believe lawsuit is timely…. but I don't exactly think it's a lie…. I never believed that he was innocent…. was always something "strange" with the stories.

  34. micw says – reply to this


    34

    2003-defended michael
    2005- testified in jacksons defense
    2013- changes his story.
    guy is full of shit he was 20+ when he defended michael

  35. HIba says – reply to this


    35

    well, let me break it to yet again, that jordy chandlet the guy who claimed that he was molested before, admitted later on that he had lied for his father!! how can u guys deny it?! People r going with the same kind of offense to make ppl think "where ther is smoke, there is fire". but there is no smoke. jordy chandler admitted that he lied. so this is just a new case where this syupid wade guy is lying!!

  36. Debra says – reply to this


    36

    This is just sad. This man can't even rest in peace because people are still after his money and he is not even here to defend himself. This man has children and family that is still grieving his death and now they pulls this. The people in this world are getting worser by the day. All the thing he did for children and as much charity work that he has done, this is what he gets in return? Just reading this comment make me sick to think that people are really this sick minded. Wade should have said something years ago, and if he wanted justice, wouldn't putting Michael behind bars be the ideal? We all know this can't happen now. Even if he was alive, this would be more about getting money than anything. This is bull and everyone knows it. Leave this man and his family alone please.

  37. lostyouskittles says – reply to this


    37

    Re: Jesse – i know more than you that's for sure. body language speaks volumes and you'd have to be a complete idiot to dismiss it for your imaginary beliefs. i would never sympethize with a molester of any sorts and i only speak what i know. i'm tired of mouthy people such as yourself who speak like they're god and see everything.



  38. 38

    I'm just wondering why he lied on the stand?
    or is he lying now?
    Either way he is a liar!
    When the trial was was going on, that was the perfect opportunity for him to come forward.
    Michael is no longer here to defend himself, and all this guy wants is money.
    If he was molested by Michael. how could he keep quiet and defend the guy?

  39. caroline redbrook says – reply to this


    39

    This case and that of accused pedophile, Sylvain Kustyan, stress the need to apprehend these menaces to our innocent children ASAP before they wreak decades of depravity. Kustyan has been formally charged with two counts each of 1st Degree Sodomy and 1st Degree Sexual Abuse of a ten-year-old little boy. Unfortunately, Kustyan fled the US before the arrest was made. Kustyan is currently on the lam and thought to be in Europe.

  40. unknown says – reply to this


    40

    I agree 100 % they are paying him to say that now
    Also if you think about the other acusations. Who would take a settlement on a case so serious. If something did happen thats like selling your child. What loving parent wouldnt stop until the person is put away for.good. its just another plot to hurt michael jackson image and get money.



  41. 41

    Re: Be-Atch – Wade was young only when he defended MJ in his deposition in the 90s,when the alleged abuse must be going on as he claims.He says he is coming out now only because it's only now that he realizes that it was sexual abuse.So you mean to say that at the age of 22 when he defended MJ in the trial,he still did not understand sex?After MJ's death he spoke a lot about MJ calling him a great human being with the innocence of a child who was tortured by the world,so reaching his 30s he still did not know what sex was?Is it that he just learned about the birds and the bees and realized "This is what MJ did to me when I was a kid!"??Are you seriously so desperate to prove that MJ was a pedophile that you promote this preposterous tale?



  42. 42

    Re: Jenny – FBI dogged MJ for 15 yrs and according to their investigation details released in 2009 under Freedom of Information Act,not even one evidence was ever found to relate MJ to pedophilia.DCFS thoroughly interrogated MJ,the accusers and the witnesses for over a decade and released a public statement in 2009,that MJ did not fit the profile of a pedophile and the accusers had no credibility.Sorry your thoughts don't match evidence.



  43. 43

    Re: caroline redbrook – Don't compare any other case with MJ's where not one single evidence was ever found that could prove the guilt even though more experts were put to the task than any other in history



  44. 44

    Re: NealandTim – MJ was an easy target.Once his insurance company settled the civil suit,people saw accusing him as an easy way of earning millions.Even if you lose the case think about all the money you can make simply giving interviews or writing a tell-all-book.It was easy for people to believe such a thing because he had the image of a strange and mysterious guy and of course surrounded himself with kids.



  45. 45

    Re: Rachel – Because MJ was never alone with the kids.Entire families would hang out in his bedroom which was 3200sq ft in size,like a duplex and had an open-door policy.Read court transcripts in Aphrodite Jones' book Conspiracy and everything will be clear to you

  46. jay says – reply to this


    46

    best way to know is 2 view those children anus holes 2 c if there are scars and if the hole is loose by a medical examiner because these claims are fishy 2 me

  47. J. says – reply to this


    47

    Re: Jesse – Typical of the slow-minded to resort to mindless insults sans any trace of critical or constructive thinking. If you believe Jackson was a molester, at least structure your comment with evidence and support instead of using the logic of "he's a pedophile for sure, I know I'm right and y'all should believe me". Of course Be-Atch's comments seems the smartest to you, it's the only one that's short enough for you to be able to read and comprehend.

  48. J. says – reply to this


    48

    Re: jay – As much as I believe in Jackson's innocence, that would not prove anything (I'm not sure if you're being serious but I'll respond anyway). The accusers claim there was "fondling", "touching"… but not penetration (which is very convenient, as 1) there is no physical evidence to discredit their lies, 2) they would not have to act out as much trauma and 3) it would not be as detrimental to their public image (because SOME people may have prejudice against sexual assault victims, as outrageous as this may sound).

  49. natti says – reply to this


    49

    he was probally touched up but not by MJ lol hes a deluded guy who just needs to go away!!



  50. 50

    This is complete bullshit. You come out after he's dead with lies? It's so sad to see how people treat him. Even his own family. All everybody wants is to get money out of him and he's DEAD! Let the man rest in peace. Greed, greed, greed.

  51. Very82 says – reply to this


    51

    Blanca Francia has demonstrably made false statements in the past. In a deposition under oath she even admitted that she lied and that she NEVER saw Jackson under the shower with a boy. She even told the media that Jackson "bleaches his skin because he does not like being black and he feels that blacks are not liked as much as people of other races". However, you only have to look at the autopsy report to prove that this is completely false because Jackson suffered from the skin disease vitiligo.

    If you check the current accuser Wade Robson you can quicky find that statement from him: „ […] This time though, I really don't care if I'm hurting anyone. The only two people who matter in all of this is Britney and me. I don't care if I'm going out with a reputation as being a "girlfriend stealer" or "celebrity whore". Doesn't matter to me. Any press and publicity you give me is good for my career and pads my pockets.”
    Of course, he stated that in another context, but you can clearly see what is important to Robson: money and publicity.

    It is unethical that these persons get a forum to spread their allegations against Jackson who cannot defend himself anymore.

  52. Jen says – reply to this


    52

    How much did AEG pay you "Ladyboy"??????

  53. Darnell Hurt says – reply to this


    53

    First off, in her deposition in 1994, Blanca Francia said she saw only one image behind the shower door - that of MJ. Since he was laughing she assumed that there was someone else there but she did not see any other figure except MJ. Years later at the 2005 trial, Francia suddenly remembered the story "so well" that she added some fictional details to it. However, Tom Mesereau quickly refreshed her memory about her previous deposition. So in 2005, Francia was blatantly lying. There was also a picture of the shower that showed that Francia could not have seen anything even in theory as even when the door was wide open, you could not see the shower except for perhaps a very small part of it. In addition, she admitted under oath that she had been paid by certain media outlets for her story.

    Secondly, if he is suing MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures on the grounds that they failed to protect him, then why does he not appear to have taken any action against his mother considering that she had more of a responsibility for his safety than any of the other parties being sued? After all, his mother continuously approved, trusted, and defended Michael and his relationship with her son in her testimonies in 1993 and in 2005 during the trial.

  54. Darnell Hurt says – reply to this


    54

    If Wade is to be believed, then I’m sure his mother’s continuous approval, trust, and defense of Michael and his relationship with her son (even after Michael was accused of and investigated for child molestation in 1993, because what. responsible parent would allow his or her child to associate with someone accused of child molestation unless he or she knew that that person was innocent) helped make it possible for the alleged abuse to occur thus showing her to be an unfit parent and thus making her culpable for Wade's alleged abuse.

    Even though Wade's mother may not be liable considering that he is now an adult, she's still culpable for his alleged abuse. Even if she were to now say that she said the things she said in Michael’s defense for reasons other than it being the truth, not only would she have perjured herself (destroying her credibility just as Wade has despite the fact that the statute of limitations has run out), but she’d still be culpable for her son’s alleged abuse.

  55. Darnell Hurt says – reply to this


    55

    Forgive me if I sound naive, but if Wade's mother can't be held legally accountable for his alleged abuse, I'm curious to know why can parties like MJJ Ventures and MJJ Productions be held responsible considering that it was through Wade's decision (with his mother's approval and acceptance) to personally associate with Michael outside of the confines of his business relationship with the pre-mentioned parties that he was allowed to be made vulnerable to any alleged abuse by him?

    Anyways, if Wade truly wants to make those who were responsible for protecting him answer for their alleged failure to do so, would it not make sense for him to take at least some kind of action against his mother? In my opinion, if Wade is being truthful about not making his accusations for money (as he alleged during his interview on the Today Show - despite the fact that, as previously said, he filed both a creditors claim and a civil lawsuit) and wants to hold the parties who were responsible for protecting him accountable for his alleged abuse, then the fact that he's willing to play the blame game and point fingers at these other parties and yet not place blame where blame is due in regards to his mother is very telling of what his true motives are in my opinion.

  56. lulu212 says – reply to this


    56

    Exactly!!!

  57. Lulu212 says – reply to this


    57

    Before you declare Wade a liar, stop to think about it. Enough with the wacky conspiracy theories! MJ wasn't the only celebrity. How many times does an INNOCENT man get accused of child molestation without ANY evidence being true. Research abuse victims, Wade was under MJ's spell in 2005 and with an immature mind. Abuse victims can take YEARS if they EVER do admit it, don't crucify him! Look at what you're defending: multiple child molestations!!!!

  58. lulu212 says – reply to this


    58

    Great point! I've wondered about this, too. I DO believe Wade. I'm not naive either, I just can't rationally explain this anymore and it's NOT ok for society to crucify an abusive victim in defense of their fallen idol. It's getting pathetic. Back to your point, I just cannot fathom the mother in this situation! Again, I believe him, and it DOES lead me to want her to be held accountable somehow, too. What SANE mother sends her 7 yr old son off to another COUNTRY with a LONG TIME suspected CHILD MOLESTER? There is just nothing that would condone this. True, MJ was the perpetrator and should finally be held accountable. Also, she put her son's life in his hands and should be held accountable for what appears to be a beyond a disgusting amount of fame, money and glamour seeking, IMO.

  59. J. says – reply to this


    59

    Re: lulu212 – Haha, I like how you high-fived yourself by calling your own point a "great point!" :D Well, before YOU declare Jackson a molester, stop to think about this: how many celebrities - or any individual, for that matter - continually donate a significant part of his income to charities and hospitals, visit hospitals on a regular basis despite being one of the busiest stars in the world and even take thousands of children to his own private house where they could enjoy themselves by going on rides, cinemas, trains, or even inside his very room. I personally cannot name another celebrity who was as susceptible to such allegations, having devoted a huge part of his life to help and support millions of children around the world. You have to realise that you can't use the same criteria you'd use for the others to Michael Jackson. You have said it yourself that there was NO evidence that was true in this case. This was after the whole of British and American media, Tom Sneddon and his fellow prosecuters, as well as the FBI had tried their best for years (and this is a proven fact - search the reports, they aren't that hard to find) to find any evidence that showed any signs of Jackson being a criminal. So what's the issue?

  60. J. says – reply to this


    60

    Re: lulu212 – Yes, you're right, abused victims can take years to admit being molested. But he has specifically stated himself that he only realised what Jackson had done to him a couple of years ago. Now, a couple of years ago - even as late as early 2012 - Robson was defending & supporting Jackson's legacy. He did not say he was hiding the fact, as you suggest; he says it had not dawned on him what Jackson had done until a couple of years ago, though, in 2005, he was clearly old enough, as a man in his twenties, to have realised it already. Researching about abuse victims won't get you anywhere. Please know that the people at the court, as well as psychologists, know so much more than you do; if they thought what you try to claim as evidence, indeed, was a reliable evidence, and if those could act as definite indicator of molestation, they would have used it at the court. Don't YOU crucify the innocent man, who has been the victim of false allegations for 2 decades. Sure, it's not okay to cruficy an abused victim. What makes you think crucifying that "fallen idol" in defense of an opportunistic liar is any better than what you criticise the others of doing? Please, see the fallacy & hypocrisy you're committing. If you want to appear critical and persuasive, at least bring in some real evidence or a convincing, logical argument instead of trying to appeal to people's emotions to evoke guilt in them for defending Jackson.