Home Videos Photos

Spiderman SHOCKER! Shailene Woodley Cut From The Amazing Spider-Man 2! No Mary Jane!

| Filed under: Film FlickersShailene Woodley

shailene woodley set spiderman doodle 450

The AMAZING Shailene Woodley will NOT be in The Amazing Spider-Man 2!

She was tapped to star as Mary Jane Watson and had already begun filming scenes with Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone. Now producers have decided to hold off on getting the red-head up on screen with Spidey. So what gives?!?

Shailene told Entertainment Weekly:

"Of course I'm bummed. But I am a firm believer in everything happening for a specific reason."

Even though there's no room for MJ in next year's blockbuster, it sounds like Shailene COULD be back for The Amazing Spider-Man 3 or 4. She explained:

"Based on the proposed plot, I completely understand the need for holding off on introducing [Mary Jane] until the next film."

But will it be Shailene playing Mary Jane or will we see someone else take the role? After all, Shailene has a SUPER busy year ahead of her, now that she'll be starring in the YA science-fiction thriller Divergent.

What flick would you rather see Shailene in???

[Image via TNYF/WENN .]

Tags: , ,

Awkward! These GIFs Of Celebrities Dancing Will Make You Cringe AND Giggle!
Books That Should NEVER Have Been Made Into Movies!
Former Co-Stars Who Put Each Other On Blast!
Before They Were Liars: Check Out The Pretty Little Liars Cast Then and Now!!!
Hottest Movie Sex Scenes Of All Time!
The Most Inspiring Movie Quotes From Robin Williams' Best Characters!
Email this  »

10 comments to “Spiderman SHOCKER! Shailene Woodley Cut From The Amazing Spider-Man 2! No Mary Jane!”

  1. UmAnyways says – reply to this


    1

    This is F****KED UP!! haha there' sno way to sugar coat it!! If they didn't want a Mary Jane in their new Spiderman movie then why cast an Golden globe nominee as Mary Jane and have her film then in the middle of production say Oh we change our mind! That's F**KED UP and this only makes her fame bigger and Spiderman franchise douchier!



  2. 2

    considering what a horrible actress she is, it's not surprising, and i'm shocked she has made it as far as she has

  3. Joe says – reply to this


    3

    Re: UmAnyways – Douchier? You sound uneducated, rather don't speak.

    They're pushing for Mary Jane in the third Spider-Man movie. They obviously liked the chemistry in the first movie, so they're trying to drag it out a little further.

  4. SHAQUA says – reply to this


    4

    Re: lionhearte – are you a actor to judge other actors that work their butts day and night to get a job. Shut up! Cause I bet you wouldn't say that to the actresses face. Also if she were in the movie I bet you'd still watch it

  5. Sharice says – reply to this


    5

    They need someone that would have good chemistry with Andrew like Emma Stone does. I just couldn't see the two of them together and becoming a believable couple.

  6. Emily says – reply to this


    6

    I always felt that Elena Satine could portray the character better. Woodley's version of MJ would've been more like Dunst's damsel in distress portrayal of MJ.

  7. Brett says – reply to this


    7

    I approve. I never liked her being cast as MJ. Would prefer a more suited MJ. One that actually looks like she has a wild side, not some prissy looking girl from teenage drama shows. Plus theres already too much new characters being added to the second movie. If they plan on doing 4 movies, then leaving MJ for the last 2 is fine. I hope they recast it though.

  8. Jess says – reply to this


    8

    Sooooo happy!!! She can't act.

  9. Lily says – reply to this


    9

    I don't like her for MJ. I think Emma Watson or somebody along the lines would be better honestly. Has she ever been in a movie? Honestly I don't know if she has.

  10. Stacy says – reply to this


    10

    I don't want her to be put 'on hold'! I think they should recast her for somebody else.); I hope they don't ruin the movie like they usually do when they make sequels.