Home Videos Photos

19 comments to “Kim Kardashian Is Back On Twitter Without Any Mention Of Baby North!!”



  1. 1

    kimmode just wants to get back whoring around, business as usual!



  2. 2

    What did you expect? You really think she is going to be hands on with this child and not pawn it off on a live-in nanny?



  3. 3

    All mention of the baby will come to the highest bidder. Keep the baby hid until everyone just can't wait…just like Tom Cruise did with Suri.

    @pink mafia…she has a 24/7 nanny nurse



  4. 4

    The nanny has her.



  5. 5

    the baby is probably not as "beautiful" as all have said and shallow Kim is having a hard time even accepting she gave birth to something she does not deem perfect. but trying to pretend it away isn't going to work. besides, did anyone truly believe this whore would actually be excited about something besides herself?



  6. 6

    I heard Kim searched desperately for her baby's receipt of purchase, found it, and returned the baby to her black-market baby broker; motherhood was just too much for her to deal with and Kanye being gay, and People magazine not offering millions for photo rights.

  7. mktb says – reply to this


    7

    Lmao this is so pathetic. So moms aren't allowed on social media site anymore?? Fuck outta here with that. Do you people not know how much newborns sleep? Do some research before you start spewing your ignorant bullshit.

  8. Dobbie says – reply to this


    8

    Please consider the name MIKANYE that's Kim backwards with Kanye inside. :) ))



  9. 9

    Is Kim STILL pretending she was pregnant?

  10. Insouciant says – reply to this


    10

    Re: PorshaJo – I bet you're ugly and has self-esteem issues. You feel better now after tryna to tear down a baby. Ok…continue



  11. 11

    She's just trying to attract attention for the very fact that she's not brining it up. sheesh,

  12. Brittany says – reply to this


    12

    I hope everything is alright with the baby? Has anyone considered a birth defect or genetic problem could be a reason a normally public person is remaining so private? Here is hoping all is fine and they are just having some downtime.



  13. 13

    maybe rumpelstiltskin took it



  14. 14

    im more surprised its not a puckered up face shot of her freshly out her make up room WHAT BABY? oh yeah that one

  15. sue says – reply to this


    15

    PorshaJo : This would be something that you can expect from this shallow cow. i bet she has many regrets now and dumbo kayne looks as miserable as ever. the only one happy here is old hag jenna she thinks this kid is going to keep her talk show afloat.

  16. shishi says – reply to this


    16

    " life wouldn't be the same "? your sister is not dead.

  17. bella says – reply to this


    17

    Why would kim be tweeting photos of her child for free???? she may want to keep this baby to herself for a while but Momma Kris will soon be hawking the photos to the highest bidder to start making that money….. just you wait and see…

  18. Special Effects says – reply to this


    18

    There is no baby you fricken idiots.
    You really are stupid people.

  19. krr says – reply to this


    19

    Kim k has 2 baby nurses, that makes her an incubator not a mother. Bet she's never even changed a diaper.