Home Videos Photos
| Filed under: DrakePhilip Seymour Hoffman

This situation is waaaay more complicated than it ever should have been. Seriously, Drake just shouldn't have gone after the late Philip Seymour HoffmanRead more…

Email this  »

6 comments to “Drake Thinks You All Misinterpreted His Anger! He Was ONLY Shading Rolling Stone Not Philip Seymour Hoffman!”

  1. ... says – reply to this


    1

    Seriously Perez, he had said nothing wrong "as such" to Phillip Seymour Hoffman!
    All he said was: that he would never again trust "in the magazines", because they give up their previous topics to replace them by subjects of last minutes.
    Let us make no bones about it: They do this only because this kind of journalism sells much, even if this is done on the misfortunes of others.

    Despite all this, it remains that Drake seems to be an impressive specimen of selfishness!



  2. 2

    Maybe if he got his holier than thou head out of your a$$ you wouldn't have to deal with your ego comments.



  3. 3

    So, in essence, he's saying "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, I WANTED TO BE ON THE COVER GOD DAMN IT! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" - One, he didn't write that "apology". Some PR people did. He has a 9th grade education, so there's that. Anyway. He only wanted the interview in RS IF HE WAS ON THE COVER. What he doesn't realize is that he can't always have his milk and cookies like the little bitch silver spooner that he is. He's so fucking mediocre anyways. LOL. "Drizzy" His name is fucking Aubrey. AUBREY FROM THE HOOD! R O F L

  4. R.T. says – reply to this


    4

    It wasn't his call, RS operates for revenue, but I can see where he would have been disappointed. Thinking you're going to be on the cover of a major publication for months (Drake's business is all about promoting his work, too) and then having them snatch it away from you. Why didn't they just do a double/flip cover. Didn't they do that with Naya Rivera and Lou Reed when he died?

  5. gawd says – reply to this


    5

    k perez, can you not read? He didn't say the mag didn't tell him (which they probably did) he said he wasn't offered the option of pulling out his article. And yes, to all the people commenting, of course he wants to be on rolling stone, who wouldn't? Also perez, he said he was quitting mags because of being misquoted on kanye. This is something that happens every day and it actually makes me lol on a regular basis how many quotes are taken out of context (especially on Perez).
    To adg100 - Of course he didn't write the apology; if you think anyone in entertainment writes anything than you're crazy. Also, he completed highschool either this past summer or the summer before (can't remember the date), get your facts straight. I understand if you think he's mediocre and don't like his music, fine. But to comment on someone's name, why just why? Btw, again, most people in show business have show names - why do you think it's a real world?

  6. ? says – reply to this


    6

    Re: michellt – are you frigid?..

    someone who wishes you the best.