Home Videos Photos

11 comments to “Fergie Takes A Stand To End All Gender-Based Violence — But First, A Selfie With The White House!”

  1. moggeeeel says – reply to this


    1

    This is a sexist cause. Humans should be fighting to end ALL violence against ALl humans not just against girls who arent even the biggest victims of violence (males are). But, once again, white females have proven she doesnt care about her white male babies. To white mommies, we arent as precious as her daughters. We arent as smart as her white female babies. Her white male babies dont become "cougars" when we age unlike her precious white daughter baby. Us white males become creeeps that females should be avoid. Whtie female doesnt fight to get chubby fat male babies into modeling. Male babies arent special. And so what if white women's male babies are victims of violence. We arent precious like her daughters. We are just…. white males. Our sister is waaaay more special.
    My only point is… stop with the one way bullshit, society. Most victims of violence are males and a large percentage of violence against women is committed by women. End ALL human violence. Not just some of it against SOME people.

  2. Teresa Andrews says – reply to this


    2

    Re: moggeeeel – So what are you doing to end violence against anybody? And FYI, the biggest perpetrators of violence against anybody are men.

  3. Moggeeeeel says – reply to this


    3

    Re: Teresa Andrews – Yes i know. Most perpetrators of violence are MEN. Most sexual abusers of children are MEN. Most sex predators are MEN. Most serial killers are MEN. Most inventors are MEN. OOOOOOOPs. that last sentence was sexist.
    What am I doing to end human violence? I believe the only way to reduce human violence is thru proper eugenics. Unfortunately, humans dont believe humans can be bred for desirable or undesirable traits. we dont believe we are animals. We dont believe we can breed violence out of us like we did with dogs. So, for as long as humans are in denial and dont teach females how to breed and with whom … there is NOTHING humans can do to end violence. I believe violence is caused by genes. I believe mother nature appointed males to be protector and gave us the aggression genes to facilitate that end. And those genes run amuck just like cancer genes.

  4. Moggeeeeeel says – reply to this


    4

    If you take 20,000 women who breed with naturally muscular testosterone laden jocks and 20000 women who breed with wimpy high IQ nerds and compare their children as adults… I guarantee the first group will have raised more violent convicts. I just have no way of testing that theory. It all boils dont to proper breeding. But "proper breeding" is the most politically incorrect phrase a human can utter in this world.

  5. moggeeeel says – reply to this


    5

    Re: Moggeeeeeel – dont =down

  6. Cleeto says – reply to this


    6

    Re: Moggeeeeel – Sit your dumb ass down. Eugenics? Congratulations, you are spouting ridiculous theories that are unproven and immoral. Selective breeding for certain visible characteristics does not necessarily produce the same 'desirable traits' in their progeny in human beings. There are recessive genes, there are learned responses, cultural conditioning and different factors determining which genes are turned on or off in the offspring.

    This is NOT a sexist cause, it is one particular cause to end violence against a group that has been historically (and currently) marginalized and a group that has been over represented as victims of sexual abuse, domestic abuse, spousal abuse and murder. The violence women experience is often different to that a man experiences. Men are represented in violence statistics for different reasons than women are - thats why it's a good idea to actually tackle these issues SEPARATELY, because the methods of dealing with it are different.

    However, you are just an uneducated moron who spouts biased and unsupported bullshit on the internet. If we were getting into selective breeding, and culling of the human race - you'd be in the groups being culled, and you certainly would not be picked for selective breeding. Your diatribes reflect ignorance and low education levels, misogynistic and prejudiced tendencies. You are very low on the human totem pole, somewhere between pond scum and manure.

  7. Moggeeeel says – reply to this


    7

    Re: Cleeto – dumb ass? my IQ is pretty high and its high because my mom bred with a 160 IQ man (in theory). "ridiculous theories that are unproven"? … genetic science is unproven? its the closest thing to TRUTH that humans have (we cant all believe in cloud dwelling deities). Scientists have LONG since found that aggression is genetic. Now that that is established.. it next follows that humans can be bred for violent traits or non violent traits. We breed animals all the time. Its just not "offensive" when when we breed horses. I believe that humans are what we breed ourselves to be. If we are violent.. its because we bred ourselves for that. I believe the reason jews have the highest IQ's in europe and certain asians have ultra low homicide rates (hong kong etc) is because they bred themselves for those gifts (unintentionally and subconsciously) and i believe that ANY group of people (all humans) can do the same thing but first they have to accept that they can.

  8. Moogeeeeeeel says – reply to this


    8

    Morality is a matter of opinion. I dont happen to think its immoral to tell my sisters/daughters "only marry rich educated business owning males" (if you know whats good for the family tree) because I've researched the offspring of the upperclass (IQ, education etc). I've determined that to be good eugenics. I never used the word "culling". Thats your word. Culling implies murder. Of course eugenics is immoral when you choose words like "CULLING" to describe it. Selective breeding and murder arent the same thing. As far as i'm concerned, its immoral to NOT teach humans proper eugenics when you consider how violent humans can be when not properly bred. We owe future generations the best gene set we can give them. But we dont know that.

  9. Moggeeell says – reply to this


    9

    "This is NOT a sexist cause, it is one particular cause to end violence against a group that has been historically (and currently) marginalized and a group" <— the biggest victims of violence are black males and they too have been historically marginalized. Why isnt this a move to help end violence in the hoods and ghettos? Because… they are just males. Not PRECIOUS like white female. (ok.. if its not a sexist cause. ITS A RACIST ONE. In my sarcastic opinion.). " it's a good idea to actually tackle these issues SEPARATELY, because the methods of dealing with it are different." Violence is violence, bro. "humans. Stop being violent against humans"". Why overcomplicate things? humans only have an average IQ of less than 100 (because we didnt breed ourselves for higher). They cant handle overcomplication. SImplicity works best: "humans.. stop the violence against humans". "nah.. I dont like that. how about we just focus on violence against WOMEN"….. "and when are you going to focus on males?" …"what? dont distract me. they arent special"
    PFFFFFT

  10. mogggeeeeel says – reply to this


    10

    "However, you are just an uneducated moron who spouts biased and unsupported bullshit on the internet."… I have the ENTIRE FIELD OF GENETICS behind me. There is nothing UNSUPPORTED about genetics. Its the closest thing to truth that humans have ever achieved. And I am not uneducated. I believe i went to college. I seem to recall that torment and agony. Yes, i dropped out in my last year to focus on my business and never returned because I make eternally more money as a net entrepreneur than I ever could in the field of chemistry.

  11. MOgggeeeeel says – reply to this


    11

    "your diatribes reflect ignorance and low education levels, misogynistic and prejudiced tendencies. You are very low on the human totem pole, somewhere between pond scum and manure."…….. if your IQ was just 30 points higher.. you would have seen the paradox that this statement created. You know that I am a eugenicist. That is established (and I dont deny it). And then you called me "misogynist". Your IQ was not high enough to detect..the paradox your brain created so, as usual, us higher IQ humans have to HELP you: I am a eugenist THEREFOR … i believe in breeding with the SMARTEST, STRONGEST, HIGHEST IQ and MOST EDUCATED female I can possibly attract. Nobody values smart educated strong women more than eugenists. I didnt just choose my girlfriend because she is sweet and cute. I chose her because her IQ is ungodly. High IQ males need high IQ females. Does that mean that our kids WILL have high IQ's? nope. The best i can do is INCREASE the oddds of it occurring. "You are very low on the human totem pole, somewhere between pond scum and manure." <==== yet you believe in a human totem pole and that people can be low on it. So do i. The only difference is that I think females should avoid breeding low down on the pole (if possible). You think females should breed down there. A subtle difference between you and i