Home Videos Photos

18 comments to “Sarah Jessica Parker Unleashes MAJOR Twitter Fury On Former Pro Mistress After Nasty Tweet About Her Kids Goes Too Far!”

  1. blue says – reply to this


    1

    The tweet said - Sarah J. Symonds ‏@SarahJSymonds 9h
    So now who do these kids look like? Certainly not like @SJP …

  2. Blue says – reply to this


    2

    Sorry, there was a link to photos. It was quite rude.

  3. Fritz says – reply to this


    3

    The children SJP has, are not her own, are they ?
    Her and MS Matt paid some surrogate to bear some children, I doubt SJP eggs were used, at that age I don't think she had any left

  4. REE says – reply to this


    4

    HELLO KIDS ARE SO OFF LIMITS THIS WOMAN MISS BE A REAL DUMB ASS GOOD FOR SJP THIS MAMA BEAR HAS YOUR BACK!!!!!!!!!!!



  5. 5

    So what? #1, one or two tweets max is enough.
    #2 - I did not look much like either of my parents, my hair was strawberry blond and no one that I know of at least on my mother's side of the family has that color hair. As far as bone structure and eye color, mostly take after my mother.
    Why get yourself worked up about it, if the kids do not look that much like you it could be recessive genes going back to grands or great grands.



  6. 6

    Abso luv S J P. And if being a total C * * T was not the aim of Ms. Symonds then she shouldn't have used the @ symbol so the comment would definitely reach her…she took SJP's kindness as weakness –#F A I L



  7. 7

    Re: REE – The facts you bring up notwithstanding, is that not in poor taste to blatantly point out the girls were by surrogate…I thought James-Wilky was hers and Matt's. But I forgive the tw** bc clearly she's done some hard living (look at those sunken cheekbones.)



  8. 8

    my co-worker's sister-in-law makes $68 every hour on the laptop . She has been without a job for 8 months but last month her paycheck was $16610 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Look At This,,,,,,,,, WWW.WORKTIN.ℂOM

  9. Twisted says – reply to this


    9

    My guess is that the comment (made by an "infidelity" expert ) probably insinuated that th e girls don't look like SJP due to the fact that they were conceived via in vitro and carried by surrogate. Perhaps she suggested they were not her eggs and rumors of infidelity that surrounded matthew a few years ago. Just a guess, but that would burn my britches too! Good for you SJP, they are your babies!!

  10. anon says – reply to this


    10

    At least SJP cares for and supports her children. They are her children. She paid for them. The deadbeat mom surrogate ignores her own child. SJP picked the right surrogate. No worries about the surrogate wanting the twins. The surrogate only wanted the money.

  11. SimoneSays says – reply to this


    11

    Re: anon – Before you make nasty comments about a surrogate, you should understand the role. This person did not have unwanted kids that she gave away. She had a contract with Matthew and SJP to "carry" their children to term and be paid for her time doing this. These were the Brodericks' children from the beginning.

  12. SimoneSays says – reply to this


    12

    What kind of "relationship expert" makes mean insinuations about someone's kids? And, at such a young age, a lot of children don't look that much like either parent. This woman is just trying to "stir the pot" and get herself in the news. Sad, desperate attempt to get attention IMHO. Shame on you!

  13. anon says – reply to this


    13

    re: Simon - I have read the standard contract form and understand it. SJP wanted a surrogate that would do the job without conflict and she picked a good one. There have been surrogates that refused to give up the children after birth. My comments about the surrogate are the truth. The surrogate is a deadbeat mom and spends none of her time on her own child.

  14. anastasia says – reply to this


    14

    Love SJP and good for her!! I think one of the girls looks exactly like her and one exactly like Matthew…beautiful girls and beautiful mumma too!



  15. 15

    wow - what a bitch! Some random person tweeted their personal opinion, then she went off on them and even went so far as to use her celebrity status to rally others to bully her? If she can't take critical comments, maybe she should not have taken a job that would put her in the public eye.



  16. 16

    MEOW!! SJP sounds like she's REALLY insecure about her kids not being her biological kids. Maybe she needs to see a shrink if she's gonna get that confrontational about offhand comments…

  17. LizaG says – reply to this


    17

    You go Sarah! Sarah is always such a classy woman so what the other woman stated must have been pretty bad.. I'm on Sarah's side because there isn't a reaction like this unless the woman sat there and stated something awful and insulted her kids. That's where you draw the line.. Sarah is the side I take.. plus this woman is pro mistress.. I'm assuming only because she must have been one herself.. and that shows a lot about the woman's character, plus the deletion of the tweet & not apologizing.. Good for Sarah!

  18. LizaG says – reply to this


    18

    Why do you direct people to these horridly, slow paced and apparent cheap websites that move at a snails pace? This is so utterly wrong and the site itself looks so cheap and gross it looks like some idiot from another country with a 25 year old computer is trying to make some sleezy, cheap website..It stinks. It's making your site look cheap because you're the one who is advertising for them and if you want anything you do to be taken seriously, you need to remove this..Plus 86 the news on the kartrashians, bieber and ther rest of the slimey bunch.. no one likes these losers and it once again makes you look cheap… be a news person who brings in the good upstanding news about A listers not porn crap loser junkie idiots.. A great deal of people feel this way…