Home Videos Photos

Justin Bieber Detained For Questioning At LAX!!! Get Deets On His Two-Hour Interrogation HERE!!!

| Filed under: CanadialandLegal MattersJustin Bieber

justin bieber lax detained questioning two hours tokyo air singapore

Ruh-roh!

Justin Bieber flew from Tokyo to LAX today, but U.S. officials aren't exactly welcoming him with open arms!

Sources and eyewitnesses say U.S. Customs officials detained him shortly after arrival on Air Singapore and they've been questioning the 20-year-old Canadian for well over two hours inside one of the terminals!!

Whoa! Is this bad news for Biebsy!?

We know he's allegedly broken a few drug laws in the past, but is this intense and prolonged questioning be related? Did they think the Boyfriend singer was smuggling drugs into the U.S.? Hockey jerseys? Molson Ice?

Is this the opening salvo in our nation's inevitable war with our neighbors to the north?

Or maybe this is just standard operating procedure when TSA finds so many red flags on one young man's record!

Either way, we'll keep you posted as we learn more!

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Email this  »
Celebrities Accused Of Sexual Misconduct!
Wet Celebs! Look At These Stars Hot And Their Wettest Pics!
Fleshback Friday - 2014 MTV EMA Nominees
Celebrities Wearing Rock Band & TV Show T-Shirts!
These Stars Should Switch To Bruce Jenner's Flowing Locks!
The Top 10 Scariest Celebrity Stalker Stories!

12 comments to “Justin Bieber Detained For Questioning At LAX!!! Get Deets On His Two-Hour Interrogation HERE!!!”

  1. NoOne says – reply to this


    1

    As a Canadian, your writing in this article disgusted me. If he if flying from Tokyo to USA, why the eff would he smuggle hockey jerseys and beer? Just because he's Canadian? With that logic, I should only drink maple syrup and ride a moose. And no, it's not a joking matter that USA and Canada would go to war over some punk kid. Literally the stupidest article.

  2. teeter totter says – reply to this


    2

    He can expect this treatment in the future until he takes care of his various lawsuits.
    Also read his bus and crew were waiting for one hour or more outside of the terminal, now don't know about the rest of you but if I'm dropping off someone at LAX and do not move out of the white zone in five minutes or less get threatened with a ticket. Maybe they were in a nearby lot, who knows?

  3. Jane says – reply to this


    3

    NoOne - I think you should stick to your maple syrup drinking and moose riding… .We all know that is all they do in Canada. You don't fool me… I'm a belieber.

  4. j says – reply to this


    4

    I really hope that he gets deported.

  5. hana says – reply to this


    5

    singapore airlines… #represent



  6. 6

    Re: Jane – You're a moron, you mean.

  7. umm.. says – reply to this


    7

    Re: j – what does him getting deported have to do with your life? Is it going to help you get a job, or pass a test? Whether he's in America or in mars it will still make no difference in your life. If you don't like him don't click on articles that talks about him. If you do that, trust me, it will be as if he doesn't exist

  8. Hmm says – reply to this


    8

    This is normal, i think, because of his pending criminal cases.
    He's got to focus on not drugging himself up, everytime he has problems, and break any drug cycles he has atm. Short term gain, long term disaster. Stop looking for instant gratification.
    And he really needs to stop the weed. A Harvard study, coming out, questions the benefits of Marajuana, on the brain. I'd bet anything dope is partly the cause of many of his poor decision making. He's gotta get off every drug, and live in reality, so he can continue to make progress. He's definitely improving though.
    Also, he must be taking, growth hormones, or something, because his pecks looks like their turning into gynomastia, which occurs, from taking this. He needs to get off it, as they can increase anxiety, depression, and aggressiveness.
    Clean Slate, and he'll be ok.

  9. DamageYourBrain says – reply to this


    9

    Has Biebs, damaged his brain ? IT'S COOL TO DAMAGE YOUR BRAIN !
    "According to a study to be published Wednesday by Harvard, MGH and Northwestern University, casual smoking of marijuana can result in brain alterations that ultimately affect the regions most associated with emotions and motivation. According to a report by Reuters.com, the significance of the study hinges on the researchers’ focus on casual users, rather than most other cannabis-related work that tends to target heavy and chronic pot smokers."

  10. ExcessiveDopeUse says – reply to this


    10

    "What we're seeing is changes in people who are 18 to 25 in core brain regions that you never, ever want to fool around with," said Dr. Hans Breiter, the study's co-author and a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Northwestern University, according to the Reuters report. "Our hypothesis from this early work is that these changes may be an early sign of what later becomes amotivation, where people aren't focused on their goals.”

    ITS TOTALLY NORMAL DUDES, TO DAMAGE YOUR BRAINS. EVERYONE ELSE DOES. WHAT DO WE NEED OUR BRAINS FOR ?? DECISION MAKING IS SOOO OVERRATED, WE LOVE TO MAKE A FOOL OF OURSELVES, IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

  11. you're an idiot! says – reply to this


    11

    Re: ExcessiveDopeUse – you, sir or madame, are an idiot! I do not smoke marijuana, but my husband does, and he is very motivated and works very hard. Motivation and laziness are both taught at home. A study doesn't necessarily mean something is labeled true or concluded. Your argument is invalid.

  12. Ironic says – reply to this


    12

    If you bothered to read the study, it talked about 18-25 year olds, so i'm unsure how old your husband is. A meta-analysis of the results, can't be conducted yet, because there isn't a lot of research within this age group, for casual users.
    Refuting a statistically significant, peer-reviewed study, because your husband is motivated, and works very hard, is commendable, but it is ironic, to call me an idiot, when you refute evidence with a sample size of one, based on personal experience.

    My argument is not invalid, simply because of your personal experience. This is not a qualitative study where we are basing arguments based on negative case analysis, and invalidating hypothesis simply because of experience and observation.

    Now please, go argue with someone, with a similar educational background, before you make yourself look more foolish. Go learn, before you argue grasshopper. Clearly you lack any basic understanding of statistics, given your line of argument.