Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Swift Trump Kylie #ProudOfLouis PerezTV

Wall Street Journal Reviewer Is BANNED On Broadway After Admitting She Only Stays For Half Of The Shows!

| Filed under: Broadway BabiesWacky, Tacky & TrueGIFs

Broadway reviewer is banned from shows after flaunting her indifference

This is pretty darn unprofessional, and frankly kind of despicable.

In a recent Wall Street Journal column titled Confessions of a Broadway Bolter, theatre reviewer Joanne Kaufman admitted that she typically only stays for half of a show… and then leaves! But she still reviews them anyway!!! She explains:

"I'm embarrassed by how unembarrassed I am to admit that the very next night, I took early leave of The Country House, and the following night of It's Only a Play."

And those are only a couple of plays that she names.

[ Relate: Perez Reviews: 'On The Town' ]

Well, the Broadway community is obviously — and rightly — outraged by this admission. So much so that theatrical press agent and president of O&M Co. Rick Miramontez wrote a scathing letter to the WSJ, which they predictably did not print.

But it didn't matter because people got ahold of it anyway.

Rick explained that Joanne won't be welcome at any show he represents anymore — and that's a LOT! He went on to ask pointed questions like:

"Would a fine art writer only peer at half a canvas before deciding she's bored and it's time to move on? Does a music reporter think he can make an informed decision on an album if he only listens to a couple of tracks? Why would we accept such sheer laziness from our theatrical press?"

Exaacctttlllyyyyy!

We're not sure why Joanne felt like she should admit this huge shortcoming of hers. If she doesn't like the theatre, then don't make a career out of reviewing shows! It's as simple as that!

You can ch-ch-check out Miramontez' entire letter (below), and we highly recommend that you do!

Dear Editor,

Those of us who happen to love theater and happen to live in New York City are lucky enough to have access to the greatest stage scene in the world. I have been representing plays and musicals for more than three decades, and in my role as press agent I have handed out tens-of-thousands of free tickets to members of the media. While the general public plunks down hard-earned money for the pleasure and privilege of witnessing the world's greatest stage talents flaunt their craft on Broadway, members of the press corps are traditionally given pairs of "press tickets," gratis. The face value that any given production gives away to the media during designated press performances around the time of its opening is somewhere in the vicinity of $200,000. The hope, of course, is that those free tickets will yield coverage, and that coverage will convince the general public to plunk down said hard-earned money. But there is no agreement, tacit or otherwise, between the productions I represent and the members of the media I invite that coverage will be forthcoming. There is, however, a tacit agreement that these works will be considered, thoughtfully and seriously, in their entirety by those who accept the tickets.

So when your columnist, Joanne Kaufman, penned her piece entitled "Confessions of a Broadway Bolter," in which she boasts about the sheer number of times she skips out of the theater at intermission (trying, she tells us, not to get "spotted and caught out by the press agent who provided me with the tickets in the first place") I couldn't help but feel a bit like a chump for having accommodated the woman so many times over the years. Certainly every audience member, paid or comped, has the right to form whatever opinions they might about any production they see, but I don't think it's too much to expect those who attend on press tickets stay for the duration. Would a fine art writer only peer at half a canvas before deciding she's bored and it's time to move on? Does a music reporter think he can make an informed decision on an album if he only listens to a couple of tracks? Why would we accept such sheer laziness from our theatrical press?

"Joltin' Joanne" Kaufman makes it sound like an unbearable hardship to have to sit through the entirety of a Broadway show. As the overwhelming majority of her colleagues manage to sit through (and often rave about) the very shows she bolts from, I have to think that this is less a reflection of the quality of the works and simply indicative of a woman who loathes the art form. It seems to me that a theater reporter who hates theater would be well served to find another beat.

Well, let me be the first of what I hope will be many press agents to unburden Joltin' Joanne from her hardship. She will never be invited to another show by my office. If she deems a show of ours worthy enough for her (fleeting) attention, she is more than welcome to call us to arrange tickets – but she had better have a credit card handy.

Sincerely,

Rick Miramontez

President, O&M Co.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Movies With REALLY Dark Original Endings!
9 Times Justin Bieber Lashed Out At His Fans!
Halloween Costumes EVERYONE Should Avoid This Year!
Love, According To Britney Spears!
25 Times Amber Rose Gave The Most Badass Pieces Of Advice
10 Biggest, Best, & Craziest Fake Peens In Film!

2 comments to “Wall Street Journal Reviewer Is BANNED On Broadway After Admitting She Only Stays For Half Of The Shows!”



  1. 1

    I can listen to a few tracks of a album and know if I like it or not. I can watch part of a movie and know if it sucks or not.



  2. 2

    My Uncle Aaron just got a new white Buick Regal Hybrid by working part time at home online… why not find out more…………………………..WALLETPROFIT.COM