Drama, drama, drama.
Amber Rose Faces Backlash For Suggesting Women Seduce Their Significant Others To 'Get Anything You Want Out Of Them'
Uh oh. Amber Rose is feeling the heat for her latest interview!
In the newly released article, the 32-year-old model and author talked to Time to promote her new self-help book, How To Be A Bad Bitch — except some of her advice has people up in arms!
Speaking on how she dealt with her own money problems, the platinum beauty revealed:
"One of the biggest financial mistakes that I ever made was making a lot of money—I wanna say I made $1 million in 2011—and I spent all of it. And then after that, I had to pay taxes, and I did not have money for the taxes, and I was like, ‘I cannot believe I did this.' And I really had to start over … I know a whole lot of people that don't pay taxes. And it comes back to bite you in the ass. Trust me. So I did pay all my taxes off, and I feel amazing."
"As women, we're fortunate enough to use our seductive skills in order to be able to get money from our significant others. I also talk about seduction in the book. A lot of women don't know how to seduce a man. It is extremely easy once you get to that point, and you can get anything you want out of them. And I know it might sound messed up, but once you get to that point, it's not using. It's not using a man, it's literally getting what you want by any means necessary."
The SlutWalk founder is a self-proclaimed feminist so it's easy to see how maybe she's giving out mixed signals here.
Though she did clarify her comments on Twitter on Thursday, explaining:
Lol y'all are so Corny So it's wrong to ask ur "Significant other" (The person u care about) to help u financially so u can reach ur goal? 😒
— Amber Rose (@DaRealAmberRose) November 12, 2015
It could be there are still people who view the momma as "gold digger", and that could be why she's feeling all this backlash from her advice.
It's hard to say how to interpret her comments!
But what do U think?? Do U agree with Amber or is she totally wrong??
[Image via WENN.]