Home Videos Photos Shop
PerezHilton CocoPerez Brangelina Jennifer Aniston T.Swift Kim K. PerezTV

Michael Jackson's Estate Slams Those Insane Child Porn Rumors!

| Filed under: Icky Icky PooLegal MattersMichael Jackson

no title

We had a feeling Michael Jackson's camp wouldn't keep quiet!

Following the release of alleged court docs detailing Michael's extensive child porn collection, his estate has come forward to slam the supposed findings.

Related: Paris Addresses Those Heinous Reports Against Her Father

According to M.J.'s estate, he never possessed child porn featuring tortured minors in explicit positions or behaviors. Per the singer's reps, the leaked documents are just an extension of a "witch hunt" that all started when the county of Santa Barbara decided to press child molestation charges against the icon in 2003.

Speaking to the Los Angeles Times, the creative's estate explained:

"Everything in these reports, including what the County of Santa Barbara calls 'content that appears to be obtained off the Internet or through unknown sources' is false. No doubt timed to the anniversary of Michael's passing. Those who continue to shamelessly exploit Michael via sleazy internet 'click bait' ignore that he was acquitted by a jury in 2005 on every one of the 14 salacious charges brought against him in a failed witch hunt."

Wow! It's clear Michael's people are NOT here for this alleged slander!

To make the "witch hunt" claim even more credible, a spokesperson for the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office added:

"Some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff's Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff's Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the internet or through unknown sources. The photos that are interspersed appear to be some evidentiary photos taken by Sheriff's investigators and others are clearly obtained from the internet."

Hmm… so is the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office suggesting that some of these reports are fake?

Ron Zonen, a former prosecutor who tried the Jackson case, went on to reveal:

"There were all kinds of conventional porn magazines. Things like Playboy, Penthouse. There was one called Barely Legal. It was a publication that featured young women presumably over the age of 18 but selected because they look much younger. There were photos of nude children but they weren't sexually graphic. They weren't children engaged in sexual activity and there was no child pornography. There were no videos involving children. There were videos that were seized but they were conventional adult sexually graphic material. No children involved."

Very interesting! This account definitely contradicts what Ron allegedly reported yesterday.

The investigator also went on to add that while there were photos of naked children, they were of kids "playing in the stream, climbing trees, nature photographs, nudist colonies, things like that". While that detail is a tad strange in itself, Mr. Zonen went on to explain:

"They came from professional publications. Were they designed for pedophiles or designed as artistic photographic books I can't comment on that."

Well, no matter what you believe, we can all agree that this case is extremely controversial.

So, who do YOU believe?

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , ,

Current NFL Stars Who Were Accused Of Violence Against Women
All The Times Chris Brown Was Delusional About Chris Brown
Worst Reality TV Dads!
Controversial Celebrity Dads!
The Wealthiest Celebs To Ever Seek Spousal Support!
All These Celebrity Couples Broke Up In 2016!