Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Headline Of The Week Weak

Filed under: Headline of the Week > Anglophilia > Wacky, Tacky & True

siamesetwins1.jpg

"Unknowing twins marry each other
A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

Ewww! CLICK HERE to read the article accompanying this headline.

Unknowing twins marry each other

A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

The brother and sister, who were adopted by separate parents, were given an annulment after a High Court judge ruled that the marriage had never been valid.

Their identities and details of their relationship have been kept secret, but the Press Association reported that the duo did not find out that they were blood relatives until after they were married.

David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.

He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.

Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."

Alton is concerned that the new bill would allow the biological identity of one parent to be removed from the birth certificate, PA reported, and that there would be no way for the child to know if they had been donor-conceived.

He told PA on Friday: "The state is colluding in a deception. We are opening the door to more cases like this one. One of the most fundamental things of all is to know who you are. The issue here is about human rights.

"A birth certificate that omits any mention of your true origin falsifies your history in a very significant way."

724 comments to “Headline Of The Week Weak”

More comments: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 »

  1. Michiferizm says – reply to this


    101

    FIRST!

  2. Take off the pic says – reply to this


    102

    take off this picture. they are obviously deceased and do not go with the article anyway.

  3. Nicole says – reply to this


    103

    OMG.

  4. Kat says – reply to this


    104

    Take that DOWN!!!!!!!

  5. Lindsey says – reply to this


    105

    um gross….

  6. PINKY says – reply to this


    106

    1st??

  7. izzyb says – reply to this


    107

    Impossible….conjoined twins would both the female or male, not one of each!

  8. K says – reply to this


    108

    thats nasty

  9. G says – reply to this


    109

    "seperated at birth" does not mean they were siamese twins. Moron.

  10. efab says – reply to this


    110

    P… why did you use this pic? It has nothing to do w/ the story. In fact it looks like two unfortunate conjoined twins from the old days when they were doomed to death… they may even be deceased in this pic. It's just a little mean…

  11. 1of2 says – reply to this


    111

    How the hell can that happen? I mean what are the chances???

  12. dudi says – reply to this


    112

    that's just gross

  13. gini says – reply to this


    113

    sounds like the making of a major telenovela

  14. Lindsay says – reply to this


    114

    And the babies don't look dead. They looks floppy and wrinkly, like newborns always do. they just look a little creep cuz they're not in color.

  15. Jessica says – reply to this


    115

    That is such a freaking disturbing picure! Ew! And so what if cousins got married? Nothing new. Just don't have babies.

  16. shanfoo says – reply to this


    116

    that photo is truly in bad taste. but then again, it was posted by a class act. the suffering of children always makes for a great photo post.

  17. Alex** says – reply to this


    117

    thats CRAZY!

  18. Bill Brasky says – reply to this


    118

    Satan.

  19. coco says – reply to this


    119

    It is simply unfortunate. What a difficult time for these people….it is childish to say "ewww".

    and of couse these people have NOTHING to do with donor-conception, but it is being used to make points about the issue.

  20. queen says – reply to this


    120

    No one ever said the 2 people that married were ever conjoined. The article was posted elsewhere on the internet. They did not literally mean "separated" at birth. They meant adopted by separate families you idiots.

  21. July says – reply to this


    121

    Awww that's terrible. Couldn't imagine what I'd do if I found out my boyfriend was my brother!

  22. Wendy says – reply to this


    122

    Highly Unlikely! Cojoined twins are always the same sex. The cells don't split until much later. But identical (or siamese) twins are ALWAYS the same sex. This story has to be fictional.

  23. sunshine says – reply to this


    123

    FIRST!!

  24. CGEEES says – reply to this


    124

    Did you have to put that picture on there?

  25. jollyex says – reply to this


    125

    Don't you think some of the wedding guests should have said something? I mean after all, SOMEONE in that family had to know what was up, right? LOL

  26. please? says – reply to this


    126

    omg. that picture…please remove it. please?

  27. Tha Dawg says – reply to this


    127

    Little known fact - many sets of Siamese twins, when told 'Go fuck yourself' - actually can! ahahahaha
    Don't get me started, I got a million of 'em.

  28. rosie says – reply to this


    128

    NO way, because only identical twins can be siamese and identical twins are ALWAYS the same sex. duh. look it up bitches!! Educate yourselves!!!

  29. Crystal Baller says – reply to this


    129

    That FUCKED UP picture is absolutely unnecessary. You could fucking warn people. Fuck your web site.

  30. vicizzle says – reply to this


    130

    ewwww. this ppicture is gross. take it down!!!!

  31. Orly Baby says – reply to this


    131

    Duh! The pics of those babies pictured are Siamese twins. The twins in question are obviously faternal twins as they are not of the same sex

  32. jayana says – reply to this


    132

    Perez, shame on you for posting that picture when it has nothing to do with the article you pointed out…shame shame shame on you it's not something that should be put out on display for people to poke and laugh at :(

  33. Orly Baby says – reply to this


    133

    Duh! The pics of those babies pictured are Siamese twins. The twins in question are obviously fraternal twins as they are not of the same sex

  34. Change the pic please! says – reply to this


    134

    EEW wtf is that picture… fucking nasty!
    This pic has NOTHING to do with twins marrying eachother! That pic is nasty and disturbing! You fat bastard! You're so fat and nasty, and have a sick, morbid sense of humor. The more I visit this site the more I realize how insane you are and how you're prob a person who needs to be put away, good lord!

  35. sara says – reply to this


    135

    Conjoined twins are always identical twins. Identical twins are always of the same sex. This phony scenario is IMPOSSIBLE! Maybe you should check your facts! This is extremely distasteful!

  36. Axxcexx says – reply to this


    136

    I dont get how cuban ppl can be so dumb, they are liek the black of the carib. Why in this world would you put that picture???

    Im telling you ppl cuban are the dumbest of the hispanics.

  37. Tha Dawg says – reply to this


    137

    Little known fact - many sets of Siamese twins, actually own Siamese cats! ahahahaha

  38. I KNOW says – reply to this


    138

    WHY WOULD YOU PUT A PICTURE OF DEAD CONJOINED TWINS???????????????????????
    ARE YOU STUPID?, DUMB? , OR ARE YOU JUST VULGAR AND LOW CLASS
    OR ALL OF THE ABOVE!!!!!!

  39. amber says – reply to this


    139

    I just read this article before I came to this site. It's crazy!!!! I feel awful for them.

  40. sarah says – reply to this


    140

    well were they identical? that should've been a red flag…

  41. cw says – reply to this


    141

    Stupid Perez. They weren't conjoined twins - that's not a picture of them as babies. Jeez. Way to sesationalize. Quite a bizarre enough story on its own merits without you adding to it….

  42. Jessalyn says – reply to this


    142

    WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT PICTURE HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING!??!

    also, that is really sad. imagine. you're with someone for a while (i'm assuming) and i'm sure they were intimate. you decide to get married to this person of your dreams and come to find out they are your SIBLING. wow. i'd be traumatized and i think i'd feel a nasty inbred for the rest of my life.

  43. rosie says – reply to this


    143

    I dont know about anybody else, but I see TWO pussies in that pic. its a double baby pussy pic! DANG!

  44. Tha Dawg says – reply to this


    144

    All this talk about Siamese twins - it's tearing me apart! ahahahaha

  45. Kim says – reply to this


    145

    Get the picture off…What are you thinking…fkin idiots

  46. JohnCenaFan84 says – reply to this


    146

    FRIEND 1: ID FUCK YO SISTER

    BROTHER: I DID AN I ALMOST MARRIED HER

    FRIEND 1: WAS HER PUSSAY TIGHT?

    BROTHER: YO MOMA'S PUSSAY IS TIGHT BITCH

  47. karen says – reply to this


    147

    I am guessing the picture is a joke. Separated does not mean they were conjoined. It means they were put up for adoption to different families.

  48. zoe says – reply to this


    148

    There is no way conjoined twins could be different sexes….Idiots.

  49. Robyn says – reply to this


    149

    First, you cannot have conjoined twins that are fraternal like boy/girl. They must be identical when the egg does not fully seperate!! you guys are idiots.
    They were more likely born normally and then adopted to different parents.

  50. Lynn says – reply to this


    150

    I'm not offended or anything, because I'm not an insecure, sheltered idiot, but yeah, that picture is kind of extreme for this entry. Heh. I'm not gonna
    demand you take it down though because this is your site and you can do
    what you want with it.

  51. Ash says – reply to this


    151

    This story is so sad. They deserve to be left alone. Their in my prayers!

  52. Ash says – reply to this


    152

    This story is so sad. They deserve to be left alone. Their in my prayers!

  53. Tha Dawg says – reply to this


    153

    Little known fact - many sets of Siamese twins, after being separated, find it mirthful and whimsical to say 'Would you join us for dinner'! ahahahaha

  54. littlestich says – reply to this


    154

    Perez - I don't mind you being rude - I rather enjoy it. And hey - you're not the classiest guy around - but you're fun. HOWEVER - this picture is upsetting and beyond tastless. Please - take it off. Its not funny or amusing…its sad. I hope you are a better person than to keep this photo posted.

  55. this is awful says – reply to this


    155

    I feel for this couple, and I'm disgusted that you would post a picture of dead babies to accompany the story.

  56. Natalie says – reply to this


    156

    ewwwww! why did you have to put up that disgusting picture??!!??

  57. Tim says – reply to this


    157

    I appreciate the quirky article, Perez, but posting a picture of deformed, and apparently dead conjoined twins is going way too far. It needs to be removed, buddy.

  58. dina says – reply to this


    158

    Perez, those babies are dead, you're horrific for posting them…shame on you…remove them, immediately you pig!!!!!!!!!!!!! that is beyond offensive and has NOTHING to do with the headline. I'm terribly offended!!!!!!!!!

  59. Cindy says – reply to this


    159

    this is a horrible piucture to post. what is the matter with you? take it down!

  60. BBGUN says – reply to this


    160

    Not only is this pic confusing the hell out of the dumbasses who actually think the article is about CONJOINED twins, the pic is totally tasteless. Take it down, lardass!

  61. grieving mother says – reply to this


    161

    This is awful! Please have some respect for those of us who have lost children. Two years ago, I lost my conjoined daughters - the worst moment of my life. I look to you for some light-hearted fun diversions about celebrities - not inappropriate, gruesome photos that have nothing to do with the story. Please keep that in mind when posting stories and photos.

  62. lily says – reply to this


    162

    ugh this fucking picture has nothing to do with the twins in this article

  63. Lucy says – reply to this


    163

    These conjoined twins are dead! I can't believe you would put up a picture like this. I am a medical student, and a fan of your website, this picture disgusts me and makes me not want to be a fan of yours anymore. Please take the picture off! It is disgraceful!

  64. Candy says – reply to this


    164

    Dead Baby pictures are always funny…
    But if they were conjoined don't you think they would have noticed that they had matching scars?

    Perhaps the picture is to illustrate what might happen if the brother and sister were to procreate.

  65. jess says – reply to this


    165

    are those babies dead? Take that shit off there, please!

  66. Ur Wrong says – reply to this


    166

    Duh, stupids. That picture is of 2 GIRLS. CONJOINED TWINS HAVE TO BE THE SAME SEX. They come from the SAME egg that splits. So, either they're just regular twins or the story is false.

  67. josh MOTHER FUCKING PRINCESS!! says – reply to this


    167

    OMG STOP DOING THAT STUPID ASS FIRST SHIT! AND THAT PICTURE ISN'T THAT GROSS? Y'ALL SHOULD FUCKING APOLOGIZE FOR CALLING THEM GROSS NOT PEREZ! ANYWAY…. PEREZ DO ANOTHER REACTION TO 2GIRLS1FINGER.COM!!!!! LOVEEEEEE

  68. Jimmy Mac says – reply to this


    168

    interesting story with a sick picture of someone's babies who look deceased. you're an ass perez. take the picture down. it has absolutely nothing to do with the story you sick fuck. i usually love your sense of humor, but this goes too far and isn't even funny.

  69. Michele says – reply to this


    169

    What kind of horrible picture is this?? I have never posted here & I have never been offended by anything written or shown on this site (I have read your blog daily for the last year), but I'm not sure what you are trying to convey with this picture. It is HORRIBLE! Are these children dead? If not, they have a serious birth defect that is not funny. The twins were separated by adoption, they were NOT conjoined, so this is unbelievably cruel to show this picture. Please consider taking this picture off the site. Thanks.

  70. cdub says – reply to this


    170

    This pic is really misleading…if you read the real article, the twins were placed in separate homes after they were born (as individual, fraternal twins) and raised apart, not separated like conjoined twins. You never know it might happen a lot…after all, people who live together often grow to look alike — and fraternal twins sometimes don't look alike at all.
    Rule #1: do NOT get your news from perezhilton.com!! :-)

  71. Lisa says – reply to this


    171

    Re: runnergal – They werent conjoined twins.

  72. Iris says – reply to this


    172

    TAKE THAT PICTURE AWAY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Those baby's where somebody's children and I think that is a very personal picture. So please post something else.

  73. Karla says – reply to this


    173

    your picture is bad, and its of two girls. Perez if your going to post something get a pic right or leave it out!!

  74. Rich says – reply to this


    174

    This picture is entirely inappropriate. Perez, could you not tell that these poor conjoined twins were dead and starting? I am a fan of yours but the use of the picture makes me think twice about that. I am requesting that you take this picture off. It is disrespectful and disgraceful. Absolutely sick!

  75. ben says – reply to this


    175

    looking good

  76. CGEEES says – reply to this


    176

    PEREZ TAKE THE FUCKING PICTURE OFF. wHY ARE YOU EXPLOITIONG THOSE POOR BABIES. yOU ARE OBVIOUSLY SICK. tHAT IS A VERY GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING PICTURE. yOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A VERY VERY VERY SICK MIND TO EVIN CONSIDER PUTTING THAT PICTURE ON THERE. yOU MUST BE DEMENTED THAT IS THE MOST HORRIBLE THING THAT I HAVE SEEN ON THIS SITE. TAKE IT DOWN NOW OR YOU WILL LOSE A LOT OF READERS. SINCE WHEN IS A PICTURE OF DEAD BABIES SUPPOSED TO BE FUNNY. YOU OBVIOUSLY NEED COUNSLING OR SOMETHING. TAKE IT DOWN TAKE IT DOWN

  77. Sandy says – reply to this


    177

    Terrible pic, I don't understand you today Perez, you are usually FOR the children and show respect and caring. Those babies in the pic are dead and not related to the story at all.

    This isn't like you. :-(

  78. CGEEES says – reply to this


    178

    THOSE ARE CHILDREN.HUMAN BEINGS AND DESERVE RESPECT.TAKE IT DOWN

  79. Melissa says – reply to this


    179

    Why the picture? Unless one had a sex change operation. Conjoined twins are always the same sex.

  80. CGEEES says – reply to this


    180

    TAKE IT DOWN

  81. j says – reply to this


    181

    that's gay

  82. KATE says – reply to this


    182

    You cannot be two different sexes if they had to be "separated". This cannot be true biologically!

  83. MMMMM says – reply to this


    183

    Just because the picture is of conjoined twins does not mean the article is as well…
    People, learn to read before you judge by the picture….
    Then again, I don't understand why Perez post this picture up considering it has nothing to do with the article…However, the picture also shows that there is NO GOD…..

  84. kate says – reply to this


    184

    Why the fuck would you put that picture up Perez? That's just sad…really sad.

  85. Isabelle says – reply to this


    185

    Perez, sometimes you're just too much. What does the picture has to do with anything? You can be disgusting Perezito.

  86. Michele says – reply to this


    186

    Perez, You really need to take that picture down - As a Mom of 4 boys (a set of triplets & one with a birth defect), I looked at the picture again & I am completely saddened & offended by this picture. I find you extremely funny & have never been offended, but this is awful. Please take it down & apologize to your readers. Thanks.

  87. Ambiepants says – reply to this


    187

    This is not cool. Concesus says take the picture down. I agree with that.

  88. CGEEES says – reply to this


    188

    REMOVE IT NOW.

  89. ag says – reply to this


    189

    Eres un puerco por ensenar esta foto. Que abburido tienes que estar para poner una historia tan triste y desafurtunada como esta. No es nada chistoso, no es nada de entretenimiendo y no tiene que ver nada con la farandula de hollywood. Yo siempre vengo a esta website para leer lo ultimo en noticias de HOLLYWOOD..NO DE BEBES DEFORMADOS…ESTAS COMPLETAMENTE FUERA DE SITIO. AND FOR ALL OF YOU WHO THINK THIS IS FUNNY..HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF THAT WAS YOUR CHILD BORN LIKE THAT, HAVE SOME DAMN RESPECT. IM SURE YOUR PARENTS MUST HAVE TAUGHT YOU ATLEAST AN OUNCE OF IT.

  90. CGEEES says – reply to this


    190

    TAKE THE PICTURE DOWN. WAY TOO OFFENSIVE.

  91. yer says – reply to this


    191

    lol
    can't blame them… they didnt know..

  92. Lisa says – reply to this


    192

    Re: k.c. – It would be you British, not Britains… DUMBASS.

  93. brian says – reply to this


    193

    What the fuck man! Did you google dead decomposing conjoined twins???!!! You should be ashamed. You should totally take these pics off dude! Think of the mom!!!!

  94. thats stupid says – reply to this


    194

    wouldn't you think.. hmmm i was adopted, i dont know my birth parents
    and wow my future husband/wife was adopted and has the exact same birthday as i do, i might want to look into that!

  95. duh says – reply to this


    195

    Re: runnergal – hum, you are definately at the bottom of the gene pool. Seperated at borth means..sent to different families,moron. Conjoined twins are always the same sex, these are obviously fraternal twins.

  96. CGEEES says – reply to this


    196

    PEREZ!!!!!!!!!PEREZ!!!!!!!!!!!PERZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!PEREZ!!!!!!!!I AM BEGGING YOU TO TAKE THAT PICTURE OFF OF THERE. PLEASE IF YOU HAVE ANY COMPASSION AT ALL TAKE IT OFF.

  97. READ the story, fools says – reply to this


    197

    I can't believe how many people are commenting without reading the story. The story is NOT about the babies pictured (who yes, are of the same sex… so no, you dumb people, they male/female twins would NOT have a matching scar… did any of you finish school?!). It's about an actualy FRATERNAL twin set from the UK.

    Y'all are nimrods. ’nuff said.

  98. gigi says – reply to this


    198

    they are called fraternal twins. don't any of you have an education?

  99. CGEEES says – reply to this


    199

    THINK OF THOSE POOR CHILDREN PEREZ. THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT.TAKE THE PICTURE DOWN!!!!!

  100. Sammie says – reply to this


    200

    OK Perez, almost 200 comments and the pic is still up! Please take this picture off. Dead Babies with genital bloating is Bad Taste!

More comments: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 »