Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Headline Of The Week Weak

Filed under: Headline of the Week > Anglophilia > Wacky, Tacky & True

siamesetwins1.jpg

"Unknowing twins marry each other
A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

Ewww! CLICK HERE to read the article accompanying this headline.

Unknowing twins marry each other

A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

The brother and sister, who were adopted by separate parents, were given an annulment after a High Court judge ruled that the marriage had never been valid.

Their identities and details of their relationship have been kept secret, but the Press Association reported that the duo did not find out that they were blood relatives until after they were married.

David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.

He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.

Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."

Alton is concerned that the new bill would allow the biological identity of one parent to be removed from the birth certificate, PA reported, and that there would be no way for the child to know if they had been donor-conceived.

He told PA on Friday: "The state is colluding in a deception. We are opening the door to more cases like this one. One of the most fundamental things of all is to know who you are. The issue here is about human rights.

"A birth certificate that omits any mention of your true origin falsifies your history in a very significant way."

724 comments to “Headline Of The Week Weak”

More comments: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »

  1. Tanya says – reply to this


    201

    Not possible conjoined twins have to be the same sex. they are from the same egg!

  2. No longer a fan of Perez Hilton says – reply to this


    202

    For fuck's sake Perez take that picture down. Dead babies!!! What the hell are you doing??

  3. CGEEES says – reply to this


    203

    IF YOU HAD A HEART YOU WOULD TAKE THAT PICTURE DOWN AND YOU WOULD NOT HAVE PUT IT THERE TO BEGIN WITH.

  4. OMG That's wrong says – reply to this


    204

    You're crazy and funny and rude and I love every entertaining minute of it. But that picture is just horrifying. It would be pretty hard for you to piss off the fans of your site who are used to almost anything, but it's clear that you've done so by posting that pic. Listen to the people that visit your site. Take it off now.

  5. Lauren says – reply to this


    205

    Not separated at birth SURGICALLY…separated by being adopted by different families. Also, dead baby pics? That's going too far.

  6. Fucking retards says – reply to this


    206

    The kids were separated to different families.. not separated conjoined twins you idiot. You're so fucking retarded.

  7. JR says – reply to this


    207

    Take the pic off!!! My aunt had conjoined twins that died! This shit is not funny, it's offensive!

  8. Donna says – reply to this


    208

    Sorry this must be bullshit unless one of the twins had a sex change, a boy and girl are always fraternal twins and fraternal twins cannot be conjoined. The stories people tell are just whack!!!

  9. nycgirl4ever says – reply to this


    209

    THIS is just another reason why ALL ADOPTEES have an inalienable right - just like EVERYONE that is born has a HUMAN RIGHT to have our own, TRUE birth certificate!!!

    Please - if legislation becomes available in your state to provide OPEN records for adoptees - VOTE YES!

  10. CCC says – reply to this


    210

    Conjoined twins are always identical. Identical twins are always the same sex. Someone is messing with someone!

  11. LOSE THE PHOTO PEREZ says – reply to this


    211

    C'mon… The story is bad enough. Let's not add insult to injury. And #23, you've got problems.

  12. dee says – reply to this


    212

    Re: cdub – perez put up this picture because he took literally the term "seperated at birth" to indicate conjoined…NOW ITS RIGHT OUT THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE…PEREZ IS A COMPLETE FUCKING IDIOT! STUPID…STUPID…STUPID! SHOCKINGLY STUPID…THIS IS POOR TASTE AND MORONIC EVEN FOR YOU…and take this picture down…these are (or were) someone's children.
    You really are a prick, you know…a special place in hell for you, mario.

  13. Nicole says – reply to this


    213

    Perez, normally I look at your shit and laugh, but this just isn't funny. It's sick. You really should remove that picture.

  14. Panda says – reply to this


    214

    It's not possible that they were conjoined twins because conjoined twins have to be the same sex. Just like identical twins.

  15. atariboy says – reply to this


    215

    the married twins could finish each other's sentences and orgasms. :)

  16. Not a Perezie fan anymore! says – reply to this


    216

    Take this pic off man! I have never made a post on your website before but I read it everyday (used to read it everyday) Please take this horrible image off. Dead Bloated Babies!!!! WTF!

  17. JUST WRONG!!! says – reply to this


    217

    PEREZ! PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR "VALUED" READERS AND CHANGE THE PIC. THAT PIC IS SO OFFENSIVE AND WRONG. I'M NOT AS BOTHERED BY THE STORY AS I AM THE PICTURE. PLZ PLZ CHANGE IT!

  18. Just BeingMe! says – reply to this


    218

    YOU ARE ONE TWISTED F*** Perez.. You knew Damn well when they said separated they did not mean conjoined IDIOT!. You're just a Moron. Who is More OFF than ON..

  19. Maria says – reply to this


    219

    I'm so glad they found eachother

  20. crap-tas-tic says – reply to this


    220

    Those babies are dead. That's just awful. You've shown a whole new side of evil here Perez. What a shame.

  21. danielle says – reply to this


    221

    honestly, i am such a huge fan, but that picture is unnecessary and disgusting. very disappointed in you, perez! dead babies are not funny

  22. skiprat says – reply to this


    222

    please take that picture down you sad sick fuck. jesus christ, those are someones kids regardless of how old the photo is, have a little respect you stupid fat self-absorbed cunt.

  23. Jenny Lo says – reply to this


    223

    Perez, really! That pic is over the top. I really think it's unnecessary. Don't make me stop reading your site!!!

  24. alexis says – reply to this


    224

    THANK YOU! Only logical person in the whole mix…you are exactly right!

  25. maria says – reply to this


    225

    the pic is better then the story, leave it up!

  26. maria says – reply to this


    226

    the pic is better then the story, leave it up!

  27. nise says – reply to this


    227

    Does that photo even go with the article Perez? If not, that is rude and disrespectful to post a photo like that on a blog that a lot of people read.

  28. WTF?! says – reply to this


    228

    OMG KILL YOURSELF PEREZ!!! WTF???

  29. CGEEES says – reply to this


    229

    TAKE THE PICTURE DOWN AND MAKE AN APOLOGY!!!!!

  30. Skip says – reply to this


    230

    That story is interesting but THAT PHOTO is HORRIBLE! How insensitive! Obviously uploaded by a NON-PARENT….What a sin!

  31. Sue Smith says – reply to this


    231

    Seperated at birth does not mean they were conjoined AT ALL. Conjoined twins can ONLY be the same sex…never ever opposite sex. The picture above is not representative of what happened. The boy/girl twins were adopted by two different families hence the seperation.

  32. ToO FAR PeReZ!!! says – reply to this


    232

    *** please remove the picture***
    I didn't realize we were now on rotten.com for a latest celebrity/gossip/news!!! Come on P you could have done better

  33. crap-tas-tic says – reply to this


    233

    You know Perez, this isn't "rotten.com." I don't think I will be visiting your site EVER AGAIN after seeing that picture. By reading some of the other poster's comments I don't think they will be either.
    Have a nice life buddy. You really crossed the line this time.

  34. Samantha says – reply to this


    234

    Why the sick pic Perez?? There's no need to have a pic of 2 dead babies to make your point!! Please take the pic down.

  35. Weasel1313 says – reply to this


    235

    Wouldn't they look alike and maybe realise…mmmm maybe we are related!?

  36. SHITTY BEEF says – reply to this


    236

    Re: anal douche

    ahahahahahahahahahahaha you funny fucker ahahahah lmao

  37. naisha says – reply to this


    237

    why in gods name would you post such a picture?

  38. Bye, Perez says – reply to this


    238

    That picture should not be up there, Perez. Incredible. I am done with you.

  39. Disgusted says – reply to this


    239

    What a twisted freak Perez is. I have already sent the link to this picture to the drudge report asking that they not advertise this site any longer, and also to one news source, and I'm just getting started. Sick pervert. How sad.

  40. Lily says – reply to this


    240

    I, too, married my brother. We had one set of twins, giving them both up for adoption. Years went by and I met this wonderful man, younger than myself. We fell in love and got married. Come to find out I married my son. So my son was my husband and my ex husband was my brother, also making him my new husbands father.
    Get it ????

    LMFAO !!

  41. K says – reply to this


    241

    LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE YOU PEREZ, BUT THAT PICTURE IS JUST IN POOR TASTE.

    I am a mommy and that picture breaks my heart!

  42. P.D. says – reply to this


    242

    This is my first time posting Perez…..PLEASE TAKE THIS PICTURE DOWN. It sad and completely tasteless.

  43. mama0428 says – reply to this


    243

    Is that picture REALLY necessary???????????????????????

  44. Me says – reply to this


    244

    Perez, I love your website but you need to take that picture down. In no way does that picture represent the story at hand. It's heartbreaking that you would chose to put something like that on your page. Not to mention, very offensive and sad. I am beginning to think that your so called "celebrity" is getting to your head and you are no longer thinking with it but instead your ego! Please take it down.

  45. Laura says – reply to this


    245

    That's so sad. That must be heartbreaking.

    Take down the picture, Perez. Seriously.

  46. $LOKI$ says – reply to this


    246

    First off this is entirely sick that people could have their entire history hidden from them so much they marry a twin, and twins dont all look alike that goes out to loves brit brit, and thats #$@%'d up man, Im a twin and i couldnt imagine not meeting my sister until later on in life, they never should have split them up in the first place, my sister is my other half, I can't even beleive this has happend

  47. Carolina says – reply to this


    247

    Perez, I usually dig your sense of humor, but this picture is in extremely poor taste. You are exploiting pictures of someone's children's birth defects. I can't tell, but they might even be possible deceased which makes your poor attempt at humor even more disgraceful. Why would you think this even remotely funny?

  48. mimi says – reply to this


    248

    Come on why the pic… thats not you Perezito

  49. Y says – reply to this


    249

    Re: READ the story, fools
    uh, we DID read the story you stupid fucking moron. PEOPLE ARE MAD
    ABOUT THE PICTURE.
    FUCKING RETARD!!!!!!!!!!

  50. CGEEES says – reply to this


    250

    WHY DONT YOU LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE WHO READ THIS SITE AND MADE TOU WHAT YOU ARE AND TAKE DOWN THE PICTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  51. WTF says – reply to this


    251

    The position of the rep in the House of Lords makes no sense - what about sperm donors? I bet there are a couple half-siblings out there who are married, who have the same sperm donor daddy.

  52. butt stab says – reply to this


    252

    The next time you make an appearance in Chicago I will track you down and slap you like the bitch that you are! Then I will kick you in the nuts so hard, they will loge themselves in your throat!
    That picture is beyond poor taste.
    I am going to put a voodoo hex on you. TRUST ME they work!

  53. catherine says – reply to this


    253

    This picture has no reason to be here.

  54. Matthew says – reply to this


    254

    An ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE! situation to be in which can only be an complete nightmare. Its no wonder the people involved felt a connection - they shared the same womb together. The side issue here is this photo attached is disrespectful to all parties involved and is in very, very bad taste. Perez - is this the only pic you could find?

  55. Chlulita says – reply to this


    255

    That's some Destiny type shit… Damn!!!!!

  56. Ben says – reply to this


    256

    Take the picture off!!!!!!! How many people have to ask you? You put up a picture of dead decomposing babies with their genetalia showing!! That is sick man!

  57. 2344 says – reply to this


    257

    thats so cruel omg shame on u
    karmaaaaa i feel so bad for them
    i dont understadn i mean aking fun of celebs is alright but this level of curelty is just beyond

  58. SheGotFlavor says – reply to this


    258

    The picture of two very DEAD conjoined twins has absolutely nothing to do with this story.

    A) They weren't conjoined.

    B) You must have one really sick sense of humor to post a picture of babies that are obviously dead.

    C) I always assumed you were pedophile from your many post on a genre out of your age limit but this kind of tips the scales.

  59. Sonya says – reply to this


    259

    Come on, the pic? Tasteless. You really should take that down.

  60. Heather says – reply to this


    260

    PLEASE take down that picture! That's a bit too much to see….make comments as you wish but take down those babies please!

  61. Leah says – reply to this


    261

    Ick! Disgraceful pic!! Take it down Perez!

  62. S says – reply to this


    262

    Not a true story. conjoinded twins are the same sex so they could not be a boy and a girl. Now if by 'separated' they just mean adopted into different homes that's different and the pic attached to story is totally inappropriate.

  63. fist says – reply to this


    263

    Re: Lynn – I got my fist greased up and ready BITCH. I will reach in your ass and RIP YOUR BLACK HEART OUT! You are a stupid CUNT!!!
    Offended?

  64. Kristi says – reply to this


    264

    Perez,
    Why would you post a picture of those poor deceased babies???? Where is your compassion? :(
    Please take it down.

  65. why? says – reply to this


    265

    really sad and depressing picture…..that is one picture I wish I did not see and I find it disturbing…..please think of the people who enjoy visiting your site…..many are mothers (and fathers)….but especially the moms out there…ones who may have lost babies…it is offensive to have to see this pic…..did not expect this from you…..not cool……

  66. WTF says – reply to this


    266

    Also, all of you who find the picture he uses "shocking" and "offensive" are kidding yourselves. He puts it up for a reason, and that reason is traffic. You're on his site, you clicked on the link to get to the comments - more money for him.

    Of COURSE he's going to use pictures that you find offensive, and laugh all the way to the bank at how "offended" and " "disturbed" and shocked" you are.

    The best part is that you will all be back on this site tomorrow for more.

  67. Jen says – reply to this


    267

    Take down the PHOTO Perez…Not much phases me but this is truly OFFENSIVE!

  68. Judy says – reply to this


    268

    People usually like they way they look, so they are attracted to others with similar physical characteristics.

  69. CGEEES says – reply to this


    269

    AS A MOTHER I ASK YOU TO PLEASE REMOVE THAT PICTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HAVE SOME RESPECT FOR THOSE CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  70. Paco says – reply to this


    270

    What are the chances of finding your twin and then marrying them? If you were adopted, do you even think about that you could be dating a sibling? I guess that would be in the back of your mind, but what are the chances?!

    The story, if it's true is really interesting, but the picture has nothing to do with it. It is terrible that you would have this picture accompanying this story. Very poor form, Perez.

  71. me says – reply to this


    271

    please take down that picture.
    those poor babies.

  72. Jackie says – reply to this


    272

    Please take down the picture of the dead babies! Being a mother myself I couldn't imagine such a thing. I am totally horrified by this!

  73. Disgusted says – reply to this


    273

    Ok, please take down that disgusting picture, dead babies are not funny!

  74. CGEEES says – reply to this


    274

    IT IS SO HARD TO BELIEVE THAT YOU WILL NOT TAKE THAT PICTURE DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  75. anne says – reply to this


    275

    Okay, that is it for me. Dead baby pictures? Will you stop at nothing to get attention Perez? You are one sick fat puppy. I am logging off and I am NEVER checking your page again. People; DO THE SAME - this is too sick!

  76. Lisa Lou says – reply to this


    276

    perez…please take the picture down!!! it is very offensive and clearly your readers want you to remove it. do the right thing please. for once. you have crossed the line here.

  77. UGH! says – reply to this


    277

    PEREZ HOW COULD YOU! I love your page and I get a kick out of it everyday, but I almost just threw up my lunch over here! That's really wrong and I'm dissapointed….

  78. Dana says – reply to this


    278

    Seriously Perez, this picture is beyond inappropriate and you are a very sick…thing. You're a waste of life.

  79. Witch says – reply to this


    279

    Perez take this picture off, please! It's distasteful and offensive. For goodnes's sake these are dead babies!

  80. Jess says – reply to this


    280

    Kind of doesn't surpise me…there's a term, genetic sexual attration, which often happens between relatives (half-siblings, cousins) that meet as adults. Cultural taboo usually sways anything from happening but when they don't know or are adopted… Sad that this happened. I feel for them. By the way Perez, that pic is disgusting.

  81. abby says – reply to this


    281

    There is no reason to post a picture of someone's obviously dead babies. And for the people who are too stupid to realize this, the twins weren't conjoined nor identical. This picture should be taken down.

  82. CGEEES says – reply to this


    282

    YOU DISGUST ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  83. Donna says – reply to this


    283

    It's disturbing but not as disturbing as the picture you chose to depict the article.

  84. What the hell is wrong with you says – reply to this


    284

    Your last few posts have been quite extreme there P-Nasty. What's the deal? And yes, that pic is a little too much

  85. jman says – reply to this


    285

    no class perez…none! the pics seem to show 2 babies with vaginas! I think its all a gross hoax, knowing the low class brits!

  86. Tracy says – reply to this


    286

    Get that picture off! They weren't conjoined, you snag!

  87. Kat says – reply to this


    287

    Perez,
    Conjoined twins (like you have in the picture) are always SAME sex; not that gay marriage doesn't happen, but it's a little misleading after reading the story about a man and a woman.

  88. ... says – reply to this


    288

    How 'effin sick are you to put up that picture? At least put up a warning or something, that's EXTREMELY offensive.
    Please, take it down. Please..
    I love your site, but I don't think I want to come on here if there are going to be pictures like THAT put up.

  89. Cindy says – reply to this


    289

    THIS IS TOTALLY BOGUS!!! Conjoined twins are ALWAYS the same sex. Whoever wrote this article is a total con. Where did you get this, the enquirer?

  90. whatever says – reply to this


    290

    Perez and all you other fucking morons, when they say SEPARATED AT BIRTH, they meant they were given to different sets of parents. These 2 were NEVER conjoined and stupid fucking perez's picture is just adding fuel to the fire. There was no sex change or anything, they were a man and a woman, they were NOT conjoined…this story has been on other sites.

  91. Jill says – reply to this


    291

    I have to chime in too and say this picture is totally inappropriate and offensive. It's also very sad and exploitative. Please consider changing it or taking it off immediately Perez.

  92. LISA says – reply to this


    292

    Perez, you should take that picture down. It is HIGHLY disrespectful to those obviously deceased babies and to their parents. Don't you have a heart? Shit,do you even read what your "faithful reader" say? Do you need the money THAT bad to post dead baby pictures just to get "clicks?"? What about the parents that have lost children/babies? Do you know how much you have affected them for not only today but maybe a long term effect? Money in your pocket is NOT worth hurting grieving parents out there. Think of all the pregnant parents out there who are now scared shitless with the thought of seeing dead babies. For goodness sakes, take the picture down. That is so uncool and wrong. You really should say you are sorry… but oh.. yu probably won't because you are all high and mighty now. Ask yourself - if someone runs over Teddy (your dog) would you want those pictures up for all to see? Imagine how parents feel seeing this. Very, very tacky.

  93. heyyall says – reply to this


    293

    Perez, you have sunk to a new low. And not in a funny way. Posting pics of dead babies with birth defects puts you in the crazier than Brit category, and almost as low class. What's wrong with you?

  94. Danielle says – reply to this


    294

    Perez, I love you dearly and am on your website at least a dozen times a day..but please take that picture off…that is so not a "seperated at birth" picture..that is clearly a "conjoined picture"..still love ya though..muahs

  95. take the picture down says – reply to this


    295

    what were you thinking? Posting photos of dead babies, or if not dead, than babies with serious birth defects is appalling. I look at your site way too much, much to my shame. But, this is too much. I'm hoping this the the cold turkey I need to stop wasting my time here.

    by the looks of the comments, I'm not the only one who is baffled by your lack of taste/sensitivity. It'd be a smart move on your part to apologize. doubt you'd do that, but at the very least take down this photo immediately.

  96. Disgusted says – reply to this


    296

    I LOVE your site Perez but that picture has GOT TO GO. Seriously. I love tacky, rude and outrageous as well as the next celeb drama HO. But that picture is WAY over the line!! Please remove it.

  97. puss says – reply to this


    297

    I'm sure your advertisers will be thrilled to see their products next to dead babies.

  98. Poohonyou says – reply to this


    298

    Ummm…conjoined twins cannot be of the opposite sex! DUH! Plus you can see two vaginas in the picture.

  99. CGEEES says – reply to this


    299

    REMOVE THE PICTURE PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  100. Lozenge says – reply to this


    300

    I feel so sorry for them, imagine falling in love with someone to find it was morally wrong on say so many levels, and then to have your shame displayed to everyone you know. =[

    And you're naturally attracted to people who are as attractive as you are which is probably why they ended up together. =P

More comments: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »