Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Headline Of The Week Weak

Filed under: Headline of the Week > Anglophilia > Wacky, Tacky & True

siamesetwins1.jpg

"Unknowing twins marry each other
A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

Ewww! CLICK HERE to read the article accompanying this headline.

Unknowing twins marry each other

A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

The brother and sister, who were adopted by separate parents, were given an annulment after a High Court judge ruled that the marriage had never been valid.

Their identities and details of their relationship have been kept secret, but the Press Association reported that the duo did not find out that they were blood relatives until after they were married.

David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.

He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.

Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."

Alton is concerned that the new bill would allow the biological identity of one parent to be removed from the birth certificate, PA reported, and that there would be no way for the child to know if they had been donor-conceived.

He told PA on Friday: "The state is colluding in a deception. We are opening the door to more cases like this one. One of the most fundamental things of all is to know who you are. The issue here is about human rights.

"A birth certificate that omits any mention of your true origin falsifies your history in a very significant way."

724 comments to “Headline Of The Week Weak”

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »

  1. hello?!?! says – reply to this


    401

    PRERZ! GET A BRAIN! IF THEY WERE CONJOINED, LIKE U SEEM TO THINK BECUASE U POSTED A PIC OF CONJOINED TWINS, THEY WOULD BE IDENTICAL! DUH! I KNOW BECAUSE I HAVE READ ALL ABOUT IT BECUASE I HAVE ID GIRLS. SO MAYBE CHANGE THE PIC? THEY WERE ADOPTED OUT SEPERATLY AT BIRTH! NOT CONJOINED!! SOMEONE NEEDS TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL!!! LOL

  2. You've crossed the line, Perez says – reply to this


    402

    That pic of conjoined infant twins is just repulsive. Those are CHILDREN and you're making a mockery of their conjoined-bodies. Furthermore, the pic doesn't even match the story. Were the twin conjoined (attached) or just twins "separated" at birth? S

  3. Nonny says – reply to this


    403

    I love you perez your the best big queen i know but seriously, that picture is disrespectful, these were somebody's children abd it's not funny, please take it down and go back to being the nice (slightly bitchy) guy we all know and love.

  4. Tiia from Finland says – reply to this


    404

    Dear Perez, take this picture off. Those babies are dead. This picture has nothing to do with the article.

  5. mia says – reply to this


    405

    They can move to Kentucky & live a normal life together. ;)

  6. kikidee says – reply to this


    406

    this picture is just wrong. you really should take it down.

  7. adrienne says – reply to this


    407

    HOW COULD YOU POST THIS PICTURE? I work in a Neonatal ICU and I deal with tragedy everyday, posting this picture is a slap in the face to anyone who has had to deal with a miscarriage due to congenital anomalies. Such poor taste, SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!

  8. CUTIEKAZ says – reply to this


    408

    OH MY GOSHHH!

  9. hushdolly says – reply to this


    409

    Urgh - the accidental twin love-in I can handle, but the pic of the dead babies is feckin disgusting - what were you THINKING? Nearly lost my lunch over their dirty bottoms…

  10. jennie says – reply to this


    410

    you should absolutely not be showing pictures like this on your website. there is something seriously wrong with you.

  11. leah says – reply to this


    411

    Angelina Jolie and her brother publicly french kiss and go on with a regular brotherly-sisterly relationship… so I'm sure these twins can too.

  12. Nicolette says – reply to this


    412

    I'm well read in memento mori and photographs of the dead and these babies are dead. The one on the right went first, obviously, and conjoined twins cannot live without the other. Also, it's an old photograph, probably old enough that the parents aren't going to see it and press charges. Shame on who ever wrote this.

  13. kaya says – reply to this


    413

    Wow, you are sick and twisted. Why did you post this disturbing picture?

    Good grief.

  14. Nicolette says – reply to this


    414

    Oh yea, haha, and conjoined twins are always identical, meaning they have t be the same sex.

  15. Nicolette says – reply to this


    415

    Oh yea, haha, and conjoined twins are always identical, meaning they have t be the same sex.

  16. sarah says – reply to this


    416

    Dude, fraternal twins can't be conjoined. Sounds like one of those B.S. apocryphal stories politicians are always inventing.

  17. Shannon says – reply to this


    417

    Whats that really the best picture of twins that you could find? gross.

  18. LEE LEE says – reply to this


    418

    [re=1244587]Re: CUTIEKAZ[the/re

    the pic was really offensive. perez, i lost a full term infant last year and the fact that you would put a pcture of dead babies on yoru site is extremely offensive to me and every other bereaved parent. pls remove it as it has NOTHIng to do with the story.lyou have really gone too far this time. if you had your own child die in your arms and had to bury it and the only way you could visit your child was by visiting their tiny grave like i do every week, you would know what i mean……..PLEASE REMOVE THAT PICTURE

  19. take pic down says – reply to this


    419

    perez you are a piece of shit, take that pic down, bitter you will never be able to have kids b/c you are a queer, fat loser

  20. Renee says – reply to this


    420

    Perez
    Get a hold of yourself…stick with celebrity gossip…take the sad babies OFF, that's so wrong…!

  21. You fucking prick says – reply to this


    421

    You fucking bastard. Take this picture down, it's beyond offensive.

  22. Tammy says – reply to this


    422

    That is the most horrific photo I've ever seen. What relation has to the article?? Please have a heart and take it down…I mean…these were somebody's babies, it' sad and disrespectful.

  23. Melanie says – reply to this


    423

    Take down that picture now. It's offensive and totally inappropriate. Also, it has nothing to do with the story. You've really crossed the line.

  24. janey says – reply to this


    424

    I can't believe you would post a picture of dead babies on your site. This crosses the line and not in an amusing way.

  25. bunsen says – reply to this


    425

    Perez, I luv ya, buddy, but there was absolutely no reason to post that picture.

  26. CHRIS says – reply to this


    426

    THIS IS COMPLETLY DISTURBING PICTURE PEREZ OUT OF ALL THE ONES THIS NEEDS TO BE REMOVED

  27. Paige says – reply to this


    427

    You sick fuck, take that picture down of those dead babies. I can't believe anyone would think that is funny. I hope you BURN IN HELL !!!

  28. woman says – reply to this


    428

    why the fuck would you put a picture of those poor babies on, that's not anything to laugh at? why not put picture of some hillbilly kissing cousins or something. That's sick, even for you Paris!

  29. Karen says – reply to this


    429

    I have become your fan as the time goes on.. BUT TAKE THAT PICTURE DOWN! Its is utterly disrespectful, and right now I am extremely PISSED AT YOU.

    ESO SIMPLEMENTE NO SE HACE!!!! Por favor un poco de respeto.

  30. CalLie says – reply to this


    430

    That's impossible, PEREZ!
    -
    Conjoined twins are from the same fertilized egg, therefore, they must be the same sex.
    -
    They were simply TWINS, separated at birth, NOT CONJOINED, Dweeb.

  31. stijn says – reply to this


    431

    that's so cool, i hope they are happy.

  32. Kelly says – reply to this


    432

    The picture of the conjoined twins is offensive and insensitive. I love this web site, don't get me wrong, but you really have no class if you keep this pic up.

  33. leelee says – reply to this


    433

    pLEASE REMOVE THAT Picture—- as a bereaved parent myself, i am extremely offended. those were someones children. you really are an idiot for posting it.

  34. leelee says – reply to this


    434

    pLEASE REMOVE THAT Picture—- as a bereaved parent myself, i am extremely offended. those were someones children. you really are an idiot for posting it.

  35. maddie says – reply to this


    435

    ew. stick w/ the celeb gossip, perez

  36. please Perez!!!! says – reply to this


    436

    What Has the fucking picture to do with the story….. ? (no offense to the babies intended)

    Perez you are very disrespectful!!!!!!

    Perez dont be "amarillista" be a little more professional PLEASE!!!!!!

  37. Amber says – reply to this


    437

    I read this article this morning, and it's really interesting (and sad), but the picture of the babies is not only completely irrelevant, but also in poor taste. I'm a Perez fan, but this is disappointing.

  38. Rebecca says – reply to this


    438

    dont you think that they would be like, woowww we look kind of alike…. and we were both conjoined twins…. hmmm? lol

    pretty interesting and graphic.. thanks perez. i love it! lol ~~

  39. disrespectful says – reply to this


    439

    i have never felt the need to comment here but…as many of your readers have already suggested…the picture is offensive. Not cool.

  40. disrespectful says – reply to this


    440

    i have never felt the need to comment here but…as many of your readers have already suggested…the picture is offensive. Not cool.

  41. Mahlon says – reply to this


    441

    This story is medically unsound. Conjoined twins are always identical twins. Identical twins are the result of one embryo that splits, they are conjoined when the embryo does not completely split. Therefore the twins being from one embryo would be the same sex.

  42. adi says – reply to this


    442

    it's not gross, they didn't know! how sad to think you find love and no love now!

  43. Karen K says – reply to this


    443

    WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?!?! THAT IS A PICTURE OF SOMEONE'S POOR DEAD BABIES!!! TAKE THAT GODDAMN PICTURE OFF YOUR WEBSITE!!!!!!

  44. ShiTneys Beers says – reply to this


    444

    ITSTATERTOTANDSMALLFRY, BITCHES!

  45. Karen K says – reply to this


    445

    WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?!?! THAT IS A PICTURE OF SOMEONE'S POOR DEAD BABIES!!! TAKE THAT GODDAMN PICTURE OFF YOUR WEBSITE!!!!!!

  46. brynderella says – reply to this


    446

    Re: AMBIEPANTS – I agree - I'm not coming back here if this picture isn't removed. It's one thing to "make fun" of people who knowingly get into a business where their lives aren't really personal anymore - the price of being in the public eye - but these babies were obviously stillborn and it's just heartbreaking and in poor taste.

  47. Kristi says – reply to this


    447

    Re: AMBIEPANTS

    I agree!

    Perez, you are about to lose a lot of viewers! Do the right thing and remove the picture!

  48. renee wildflower says – reply to this


    448

    oh my goodness some of you are so stupid!!! he meant separated like not in the same place……not conjoined!!!! This picture is of 2 femail (ocbiously dead) conjoined twins. Honestly perez…..you couldnt have found a less grotesque pic to put up than 1 of a couple of dead babies…….not very tasteful. Also, conjoined twins come ony from the same egg so they have to be the same sex…you people asking about scars……..there would not be any if they were not both boys or both girls. If you read the story, you will see they were a male and a female!!!!

    serriously perez, take the pic down or atleast put a warning on it or something…….its sad for someone who has actually seen a dead child

  49. Norwegiangirl says – reply to this


    449

    You should have chose another picture for this article. I think it's disrespectful of you to use the kind of picture you did :( Mother of two

  50. superanimatrix.com says – reply to this


    450

    Ow my gosh couldn't you have gotten a better picture than this ? Anyways, brother and sister marrying one another is a disgrace and unlogical. How sickening ? Check this out and watch all 6 episodes of Late Night with Celebrity Host at www.dumb.com/celebrityhost/
    www.dumb.com/celebrityhost/
    www.dumb.com/celebrityhost/

  51. mapelsyrup says – reply to this


    451

    Perez, that picture you put up is fucked up!!!! don't you have any respect for babies!!!

  52. emily says – reply to this


    452

    that pic was misleading! i assumed that that was the child they twins had that came out retarded because they were blood relatives! now ive read it, i am disappointed

  53. up in arms says – reply to this


    453

    Flood his inbox - Perez@PerezHilton.com Who knows if he actually reads these comments….

  54. EP says – reply to this


    454

    Perez, this photo is in terribly poor taste. People who have lost babies could be really hurt by seeing this. Please take it down.

  55. melissa says – reply to this


    455

    Please take the pics of the babies off, they are obviously dead. PLEASE take it off….

  56. Poor Taste says – reply to this


    456

    Normally I am behind you guys and LOVE the site, but I think this is in poor taste, you have to have at least a little respect

  57. Jessica says – reply to this


    457

    This is entirly un-possible, I'm not the best a biology but I know that twins that need to be seperated will have the exact same DNA and gender is kinda a big thing with that! it would be possible for ferternal twins to do something like this but it would have to be a gay couple for this to even work! Not to mention wouldn't they notice their scares match up perfectly! Common people get a clue!

  58. ***ONLY N UR DREAMS*** says – reply to this


    458

    Perez what were you thinking you as an adult and a child of someone u should have enough repect for other people and these children. I cant believe that you have posted such an explicet picture like this on your site. You would think that you would have a little more brains then that. Your picutre has nothing to do with the article that you have posted up. YOU SHOULD REALLY TAKE THAT PICTURE DOWN. I'm almost positive that if you have kids and something like what you posted happen to them and their picture was placed for thousands to see you would be upset and please don't say that you wouldn't the death of these kids..babies are very touchy and hard for their family but yet you have no consideration for them how cold hearted are you!!!!! I hope that you pull your head out of where ever it's at and take this picture down. Find something better to do rather then upset tons of people!!!!

  59. WHO:? says – reply to this


    459

    ewwwwww thats just wrong. Imagine doing it with ur siblings?!?

  60. Candi says – reply to this


    460

    Be NORMAL!!! take down your baby photo.

  61. Ratbag says – reply to this


    461

    Perez why show pictures of dead babies?

  62. Beevs says – reply to this


    462

    What's with the picture?! That's pretty twisted.

  63. Naomi says – reply to this


    463

    That's messed up! Anything is possible I guess.

  64. Me says – reply to this


    464

    Love your website mate, but that photo is fucking unnecesary

  65. Carol says – reply to this


    465

    For God's sake…Perez…. how absolutely appauling that you would choose this picture… it sickens me that you have taken such a sad situation as those two babies were born with and are exploiting it on a story! Who cares about the twins marrying each other… the picture is in extremely poor taste with no relationship nor value to the story. Take it down. You are better than resorting to this kind of crap.

  66. KiwiGirl says – reply to this


    466

    Take that photo off. How disrespectful to the spirit of those children (who are obviously dead). There is a line Perez and you just crossed it. Those are someone's babies………….

  67. Amy says – reply to this


    467

    Dear Perez,

    I am a long time fan of your site and read it every day. This is the first time I have felt the need to post a reply to one your posts. I can't believe this picture! There is absolutly no reason to post this pictures, of what seems like dead babies. It's in the worst taste I have ever seen and should be removed. Who ever did this should be ashamed, I'm assuming this is a real picture! Those are someone's children. Please take it down.

  68. Dr.J says – reply to this


    468

    Yeah…the one on the left is you. Perez.
    You ARE worse than Britney to put this shit on here.
    Fuck man…don't you recognize a double- standard when you see one?
    I hope someone carves up your dog.

  69. Alanis Morissette says – reply to this


    469

    For all of you who think these people were literally separated at birth, you are complete retards. Stupid Americans.

  70. maiden says – reply to this


    470

    This is the last time I look at this site! You have fuckin dropped to a new low PEREZ!!!!

  71. sad says – reply to this


    471

    A picture of dead babies is crossing the line. I'm a fan, but this is really offensive.

  72. Beth says – reply to this


    472

    you guys seriously need to put your thinking caps on…conjoined twins are genetically identical, and are, therefore, always the same sex…this picture doesn't match the story…it shows "conjoined twins" but states "were separated at birth"…this is just a case of shady journalism

  73. WTF?????? says – reply to this


    473

    WHAT THE FUCK is wrong with you Perez? Why are you so shamelessly showing a picture of two dead babies. You're a sick fucker. My god!!!

  74. KiwiGirl says – reply to this


    474

    There are a lot of people in this world who think that GAY people don't have the right brain and sensitivity to raise children (or even be trusted around them). As a Lesbian I am fucked off that by posting that photo you have just given those people confirmation of what they believe. Don't forget who you are representing Perez.

  75. Romny says – reply to this


    475

    That is disgusting, posting pictures of dead mutilated looking babies. You should have not put this picture up, and if so at least done the decency of putting it under the "warning if you are easily offended category”. This picture has nothing to do with the story except it has twins in it, but the story never had any remote tie in with conjoined cleft lipped dead babies. The story is also humilating and has nothing to do with a celeb gossip, this is pretty low perez, even for you. Please remove this photo.

  76. L says – reply to this


    476

    GROOSSS . I hope they weren't sexually active , HAHA

  77. MOMOF2 says – reply to this


    477

    Perez I'm a HUGE fan, but that picture is too much! I fail to see the humor in the suffering of two innocent babies. PLEASE take it down.

  78. harley says – reply to this


    478

    Please take that picture off - I miscarried conjoined twins and this is in extremely bad taste.

  79. misu says – reply to this


    479

    This is my first time posting a comment and will be my last.
    I've loved your site, your quirky comments and your snappy and caustic take on celebs. I come on here at least once a day. As of today, I'm done. Like someone else posted early, this is totally out of character for you, two dead babies? Really. And after all the pleading from your faithful visitors you refuse to budge? Remeber how you got here and who made your site - these visitors. So as a human with HUMANE instincts, I won't be visiting anymore. I know losing one "fan" won't break your heart, but that picture you posted broke mine.

    Ciaobella.

  80. U WENT TOO FAR says – reply to this


    480

    These two babies, whoever they may have been, had a mom and a dad . And those parents lost their children, and it probably fucked up their life. And here is Perez, the fucking american low class prick, has no respect for anything, puts their children on his site. Like Nothing! Like they're nothing! Selfish asshole. Don't you get enough hits, even without posting stuff like that??

  81. KiwiGirl says – reply to this


    481

    There are alot of people in this world who think that GAY people do not have the right brain or sensitivity to raise children (or even be trusted around them). As a Lesbian I am fucked off that by posting that photo of dead conjoined babies, you have just given them confirmation of what they believe. Do not forget who you are representing Perez.

  82. Vet says – reply to this


    482

    I don't belive it for one bit. Whenever you meet someone, you find out who they are and if they are both adopted. But if they were seperated wouldnt they have supsected something when they had sex? Well, then again they might have obstained from sex.

  83. Jess says – reply to this


    483

    Eww that's nasty ew they probly slept together how nasty would that be to sleep with ur sister or brother lol

  84. Marge says – reply to this


    484

    I agree with many posts here…..although I love ya Perez the picture is truly heartbreakingly sad and should be removed immediately. Please do this.

  85. TAKE THE PICTURE DOWN says – reply to this


    485

    YOU'RE SICK! take that picture down!

  86. Bibi says – reply to this


    486

    The photo and the story have NOTHING to do with each other.
    They have kept the identities of the couple secret. Twins, not conjoined!!
    Everyone knows this site isn't ever going to win a pulitzer, and that's fine.
    Your judgement was clearly taking a sabatical when you posted that photo.
    You need to take it down. THAT was the best you could do??

  87. Tracy says – reply to this


    487

    Ok the story is disturbing enough but for god sake why that awfull photo Perez. We love ya but thats not funny.

  88. Lisa says – reply to this


    488

    That photo is in bad taste ….. Lift your game Perez

  89. Maree from Oz says – reply to this


    489

    This type of scenario is exactly why all children need to know who their biological parents are, whether their birth is a result of sperm donation, egg donation or adoption! I think that if a couple needs to use donor eggs or sperm, they should come from family members (who are not blood relatives, obviously) so the families can keep track of the child and know there is no danger of them growing up to marry a relative!

    How awful for these people - I hope in time they can come to terms with their relationship as brother and sister. This situation was in no way their fault.

  90. Nike says – reply to this


    490

    has anyone else realized that this cant be true??
    identical twins are, well, IDENTICAL.
    fraternal twins were never attached to need to be separated..
    unless someone got a sex change…

  91. megan says – reply to this


    491

    this is totally impossible. conjoined twins are always identical–that's why they're conjoined. the embryos didnt separate completely. there is no way conjoined twins would not be of the same sex.

    stupid.

  92. Marge says – reply to this


    492

    Re: misu – Amen

  93. pickles rock! says – reply to this


    493

    Obviously these two were meant to be together..lol

  94. BAN PEREZ! says – reply to this


    494

    I SAW THIS EARLIER TODAY AND THOUGHT FOR SURE P-NASTY WOULD TAKE THIS SHIT DOWN OUT OF RESPECT FOR HIS READERS. SO RUDE, SO THOUGHTLESS, SO TASTELESS!!! MAKES ME f***ING SICK!!!! GIVES ME ANOTHER REASON TO BAN THIS USELESS SITE FROM MY LIFE! ALL THESE ADS (CIROC, GAY ADS, ETC) PAY FOR HIS FAT ASS TO LIVE A FANCY AND FRUITY LIFE LIKE A KING…THANKS TO US, HIS READERS!!!! I SAY BAN THE SMELLY FRUIT & KICK HIS ASS BACK TO FLIPPING WHOPPERS!

  95. Shakita says – reply to this


    495

    Very sad to come to read something and find a picture like that. Perez you are going to boil in heaven. You really are a poor excuse of a human being, you actually need to use a picture like that to get attention??? Pathetic.

  96. JK says – reply to this


    496

    AS MANY PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY STATED, THEY WERE NOT CONJOINED…THEY WERE JUST SEPARATED AT BIRTH…MEANING ADOPTED BY 2 SEPARATE FAMILIES. JESUS, YOU'RE MENTALLY ILL.

    THIS PICTURE IS CLASSLESS. DON'T YOU REALIZE THOSE BABIES ARE DEAD?? SERIOUSLY, PLEASE TAKE IT DOWN AND ADD SOME SORT OF EXPLANATION/APOLOGY.

    I'M A FAN OF YOUR WEBSITE, BUT THIS IS BEYOND WORDS.

  97. Katrina says – reply to this


    497

    Ok- I come to your site everyday because I love to read all the headlines. I think you have gone too far this time with the baby picture. Have a heart. You need to take this picture down. This one is not funny at all.
    Signed,
    Very disappointed

  98. KARMA.v says – reply to this


    498

    this is too much and is very cruel
    ppl like u rlly dont deserve nothing its so sick and u isgust me i usually visit ur blog every day and i thin sometimes ur mean but ive never felt this way
    but o well
    KARMA..
    how could u laugh at that or evn say eew omg u ppl are so so so wrong id i ever see something like this on here i will leave and never ever come back actually i dont want to come back but i just like to hear some gossip

    i thought u wre ncie how could u
    at least apologize or u will pay..

  99. Alexa Rae says – reply to this


    499

    That picture is seriously fucked…that needs to be changed.

  100. tamzin says – reply to this


    500

    you've gone too far. take the pictures of the dead, deformed babies down! if you can READ, then you'll see that the story was related to the person who told it by someone he refuses to name. there's no proof it even happened! wtf is wrong with you?

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »