Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Headline Of The Week Weak

Filed under: Headline of the Week > Anglophilia > Wacky, Tacky & True

siamesetwins1.jpg

"Unknowing twins marry each other
A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

Ewww! CLICK HERE to read the article accompanying this headline.

Unknowing twins marry each other

A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

The brother and sister, who were adopted by separate parents, were given an annulment after a High Court judge ruled that the marriage had never been valid.

Their identities and details of their relationship have been kept secret, but the Press Association reported that the duo did not find out that they were blood relatives until after they were married.

David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.

He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.

Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."

Alton is concerned that the new bill would allow the biological identity of one parent to be removed from the birth certificate, PA reported, and that there would be no way for the child to know if they had been donor-conceived.

He told PA on Friday: "The state is colluding in a deception. We are opening the door to more cases like this one. One of the most fundamental things of all is to know who you are. The issue here is about human rights.

"A birth certificate that omits any mention of your true origin falsifies your history in a very significant way."

724 comments to “Headline Of The Week Weak”

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 »

  1. stephanie says – reply to this


    501

    conjoined twins are always identical from the same egg splitting which means they have to be the same sex since they are genetically the same. So this story is BS. Perez you bored? Why post nonsense?

  2. rose says – reply to this


    502

    I can't believe that some people are so stupid as to believe that the photo of the babies is a photo of the couple in question. How stupid can they be?

  3. Tanner says – reply to this


    503

    Take the picture off your website.

  4. Dr.J says – reply to this


    504

    Boycott.

  5. noemi says – reply to this


    505

    i dunno why people are all saying its gross..
    they didnt know they were twins…so they fell i love
    yea its weird but its understandable
    thats sad though
    i hope for the best to become of this situation for both.

  6. Holly says – reply to this


    506

    That picture is disgusting and sad. :(

  7. giacomo says – reply to this


    507

    Not only has Perez showed his utter lack of respect for his readers, but a total lapse in judgement and sense of humor to even think posting a picture of someone's dead babies. Take the picture down for goodness sake! Very poor taste, Perez.

  8. Biologist Here says – reply to this


    508

    Okay, real scientist here…actually people, joined twins can be different sexes…lol…any regular person who's taken bio 101 can tell you that it's all about one egg/dna splitting…ha…BUT sometimes there is more than one egg in the womb and eggs can join! Usually a type of cannabalization scenario takes place. Ever heard of chimeras? Or people finding a dead twin/tumor in their bodies? Very rare but it is documented. So, the point here…jesus people stop with the badmouthing…!!!

  9. ABC-U Later says – reply to this


    509

    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    BoycottBoycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    BoycottBoycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    BoycottBoycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    BoycottBoycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    BoycottBoycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    BoycottBoycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott
    Boycott

    Boycott

    Boycott

    Boycott

    Boycott
    Boycott

    Boycott

  10. mel says – reply to this


    510

    You are a sick fuck. The picture is awful and not even a warning, no, just there, two dead babies. Thanks for putting that image in my head. I hope you get some kind of backlash from this.

  11. raven872 says – reply to this


    511

    Thank you, Cdub! Either someone had a sex change or this is all a load of crap!

  12. PEREZ IS A LIAR says – reply to this


    512

    I was just able to bring up the CNN article. SHAME ON YOU, PEREZ! They were not separated conjoined twins, you moron. You're misleading your readers by posting the fake pic.

    MORON!

  13. meow says – reply to this


    513

    what is with this picture of dead looking siamese twins? siamese twins are always identical, so, they obviously were not SEPARATED literally.

  14. Disrespectful says – reply to this


    514

    What is with this picture? I love your site, come on here many times a day. I'm so sad.

  15. Pissed At Perez says – reply to this


    515

    I normally love your site, but this is disgusting even for you. Dead babies are nothing to joke about, I cannot believe you would do such a thing, are you eve human?
    And you make fun of the way Britney treats kids???

    WTF???

  16. michele says – reply to this


    516

    Perez, why would you post such an awful picture of 2 innocent children! Do you want to lose readers?

  17. suz says – reply to this


    517

    That's sad.

  18. jen says – reply to this


    518

    YOU'RE FUCKIN' SICK! Did you need to show that photo? Not at all. Remove it. It's sad. Someone lost their conjoined twins, and you think it's funny?

  19. karma karma says – reply to this


    519

    take the picture down ASSHOLE, it isn't even related to the story

  20. Jill says – reply to this


    520

    I love your site but the picture of the babies needs to go.

  21. Me says – reply to this


    521

    Perez, you stupid, fucking idiot!!!!!!!! I can't believe even you would stoop so low as to post that picture. Those poor babies. You should be ashamed. Why couldn't it have been YOU in their place instead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  22. flucking hilarious says – reply to this


    522

    hell yeah that pic is disturbing!! but that is what he meant to do!! you are a fucking crazy outrageous funny bitch perez!! I love it!!!!!

  23. bridget says – reply to this


    523

    perez the picture is seriously too much….

  24. Stacy says – reply to this


    524

    Unless I am terribly mistaken…siamese twins result from one egg separating and not fully doing so to create an IDENTICAL twin. That would mean they would have to be the SAME sex wouldn't it?

  25. Jodi says – reply to this


    525

    That picture is just….So insensitive. Those babies belonged to someone who loved them. Have you no heart? Is nothing sacred? What the hell is wrong with you? I won't be back.

    This brings low to a whole new level.

  26. jg says – reply to this


    526

    why the fuck the picture, asshole?

  27. UnkleDad says – reply to this


    527

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!INCENST IS BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  28. shirleyB says – reply to this


    528

    Duh, you cant be conjoined twins and be two different sexes…it is impossible…this picture is horrible…get rid of it…poor little girls….I hope those babies are not dead…

  29. sue says – reply to this


    529

    Sorry to do this, perez, but I just emailed Diageo, the makers of ciroc vodka.

  30. Lola says – reply to this


    530

    I cannot articulate how offended i am of this picture. As a woman i feel a particular offence. The thought of having twins and finding out they were conjoined and have them die at birth….it would be devastating. You need to seriously question why your moral perimeters are so incredibly low.

  31. MANDY says – reply to this


    531

    GROSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  32. brangelina_has_aids says – reply to this


    532

    Re: becky

    LOL!!!

    The pic is in appropriate for website like this? You are a fucking idiotic bimbo. As for disrespectful to the dead babies…they're dead. I don't think they fucking care you stupid cunt.

  33. atworkandbored says – reply to this


    533

    this is the most offensive pic you've ever put up!!! it's not right to put up pics of deformed children like this just for entertainment value. celebs are fair game, not innocent kids!

  34. YumYum says – reply to this


    534

    Why in the world would you put a preautopsy picture of conjoined, dead infants on your website? Those babies are not alive and never were. Who wants to look at the sadness and grief that two dead, deformed children represent? Wow- this is so beneath even you, Perez.

  35. Maggie P. says – reply to this


    535

    This photograph is completely offensive and inappropriate. I check your blog daily and I am now ashamed that I do. Remove this photo immediately and do not put photos like this on your blog ever again.

  36. Tami says – reply to this


    536

    You really shouldn't have posted that picture. Shame on you, you sick fuck.

  37. YIIIIICCCCCK! says – reply to this


    537

    YOU SHOULD DELETE THIS THREAD LIKE THE TIME YOU GOT RID OF THE ONE WITH GLORIA ESTEFAN THAT SHE MUST HAVE CALLED YOU ABOUT AND SAID "HEY PEREZ BABY, GET ME OFFA THERE!"

  38. Mike says – reply to this


    538

    What is this, "FACES OF DEATH PART VI?" Get rid of this awful shit!

  39. Jennifer says – reply to this


    539

    I know its been said already but you eed to know that you have disappointed your fans by using his picture. Those babies are most certainly deceased and you put them on an entertainment news site. Wrong, so wrong of you and I'm sure that some people that read your site are now questioning your moral ethics. It one thing to post pictures and stories of celebs but this is wrong. They are someones children. You owe us all an apology.

  40. Jennifer says – reply to this


    540

    I know its been said already but you need to know that you have disappointed your fans by using his picture. Those babies are most certainly deceased and you put them on an entertainment news site. Wrong, so wrong of you and I'm sure that some people that read your site are now questioning your moral ethics. It one thing to post pictures and stories of celebs but this is wrong. They are someones children. You owe us all an apology.

  41. Me says – reply to this


    541

    I, too, have complained to your sponsor, the makers of Ciroc Vodka. I hop they pull their support of your website.

  42. Ciroc Ad says – reply to this


    542

    Re: sue

    I did the same!!! Ciroc will forever remind me of 2 dead baby girls who did at one time live as evidenced by the bowel movements they passed sometime before they died. SICK SICK SICK!

  43. Sam says – reply to this


    543

    hahahahahaha

  44. Jessica says – reply to this


    544

    As an adoptee that is a product of a closed adotption and someone who promotes access to birth records and reunions, this is something always in the back of my mind. Stranger things have happened, right? This is probably as extreme as an outcome that I can imagine for records not being shard and open. Luckily they didn't have children.

    How sad.

  45. meli_melo says – reply to this


    545

    Completely unnecessary picture Perez.

  46. Amber says – reply to this


    546

    they weren't not conjoined twins! now THAT would be weird…

  47. Amber says – reply to this


    547

    they weren't conjoined twins! now THAT would be weird…

  48. SheShe says – reply to this


    548

    I SMELL A REALITY SHOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BUT FOR REAL THOUGH THAT HAS GOT TO BE SO BAD, YOU IMAGINE THEY HAD TO HAVE SEX! MAKES ME WANNA CRY!

  49. Marge says – reply to this


    549

    I also emailed a complaint and request that they remove advertising until the picture is removed and an apology is given. Please take this down Perez.

  50. narda says – reply to this


    550

    it doesn't say CONJOINED twins! it just says "twins separated at birth." which means, they were adopted by different families…you frickin dopes…great pic perez…luv it…and love you!! :-D i'm so sick..lulz…

  51. kindersurprise says – reply to this


    551

    Perez, please take that picture down. It's highly innapropriate and makes me sad to look at it. That's a sick thing to do. Please take it down.

  52. kindersurprise says – reply to this


    552

    Perez, please take that picture down. It's highly innapropriate and makes me sad to look at it. That's a sick thing to do. Please take it down.

  53. you know says – reply to this


    553

    OMG!! plz take the picture out!!! its horrible and insulting…

  54. weird says – reply to this


    554

    did they kiss?? eww did they get "together" uhhh god. the trauma!!!

  55. kelly says – reply to this


    555

    why not take the picture down and replace it with angelina jolie kissing her brother?

  56. Katy says – reply to this


    556

    SO FUCKED UP….even more than Brit!!!!!

  57. Katy says – reply to this


    557

    SO FUCKED UP….even more than Brit!!!!!

  58. Katy says – reply to this


    558

    SO FUCKED UP….even more than Brit!!!!!

  59. Jartgo says – reply to this


    559

    Bullshit!!! Conjoined twins are identical twins whose bodies became joined in utero…therefore they are the same sex.

  60. Kortni says – reply to this


    560

    That is gross…seems like an episode of Law and Order: SVU. Marrying your brother or sister…NASTY!!!

  61. Angela says – reply to this


    561

    That picture is really sad Perez. You should warn people before you post stuff like that…I was shocked. Take it off please?

  62. Kelly says – reply to this


    562

    Take the Picture Down!!!!

  63. amber says – reply to this


    563

    Wow, that is crazy… but what is disgusting, is the picture you used to highlight the story… yuck!

  64. lori says – reply to this


    564

    Conjoined twins can not be opposite sex. They are Identical females or males.

  65. Remove Picture says – reply to this


    565

    THAT PHOTO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS STORY. WHY IS IT BEING SHOWN? YOU SHOULD REMOVE IT, SERIOUSLY. *shakes head* LOW FOR EVEN YOU.

  66. wtf says – reply to this


    566

    I hope you have permission from the MOTHER of those poor dead babies to parade them on this website for what you quite obviously thought was entertainment value you sick fuck.

  67. migizi says – reply to this


    567

    Re: Candy – dead baies are funny huh? Maybe yours will die now and you can laugh your ass off. stupid cunt.

  68. wtf says – reply to this


    568

    and to be frank i am outraged and appalled that despite all these comments showing how distressing people have found this picture you have neither apologised nor removed the pictures. you are officially scum. its actually unbelievable. also seriously i cant imagine you having permission to use this photo. these were someones babies. if i was the parent and i found out photos of them had been used in this way i would be suing your fucking fat arse off.

  69. karen says – reply to this


    569

    #17 - karma - im pretty sure those babies are dead.. and i also find this extremely offensive as my beautiful baby boy Jaxson was stillborn in sept 07 at 39 weeks… TAKE THAT PICTURE DOWN…

  70. gig123 says – reply to this


    570

    Why must you post a picture like this? I very much enjoyed your blogs but now I've come to understand that you have no heart at all. I'm even ashamed of coming to your website. You don't do this for entertainment anymore, rather to further yourself in this materialistic world. You are UGLY.

  71. Jenna says – reply to this


    571

    are you sure it wasn't Heidi and Spencer?

  72. BobC says – reply to this


    572

    Perez, Ill be the first to admit I can be a real prick. But this is pushing even my limits. Dead babies? How dare you exploit those poor souls who suffered from their first breath. How dare you hurt so many people like this–you have NO idea. Are you incapable of empathy, Perez? Think of Teddy and how you'd feel if someone posted his dead pic.

  73. Two Goofballs says – reply to this


    573

    Re: Phillie – Generally? More like always.

  74. not a fan anymore says – reply to this


    574

    Wow. I was a big fan. I won't be coming here anymore.

  75. LISA says – reply to this


    575

    Have you thought about the pain you have caused people and obviously don't care about? People are pleading with you to have a heart, for goodness sakes! I will never come back to this site. I am offended for those babies who were someone's children and I am offended as a parent. I am particularly sad and pained that there are a number of parents who come to your site who are at this moment having their hearts broken all over again when they were subjected to seeing dead babies. If I were a bereaved parent I would so fucking sue your ass. This is NOT what people who come to an entertainment fluffy site expect to see. Pics of DEAD babies are not cool. You suck in the worst way.

  76. perhaps says – reply to this


    576

    Perhaps perez (mario) should have died at birth. Along with anyone who finds this travesty of human decency amusing.

  77. TAKE IT DOWN says – reply to this


    577

    as a mother and as someone who has studied medicine, the picture you posted for this article is truly distressing. it is one thing to poke fun at adults, but to use photographic documentation of such a tragedy is absolutely unacceptable. you should be ashamed of yourself.

    And in agreement with a previous comment, i think this is just a good solid clue that i need to stop wasting time on your maliciousness and grotesque gossip.

  78. mamacita says – reply to this


    578

    This photo is so sad and offensive, I don't see how someone with a conscience could publish it on their site. I read this site for the celebrity gossip. I don't want mean-spirited actions like this one in my life. I'm through with perez hilton. Shame on you.

  79. Boyucott Perez and Ciroc says – reply to this


    579

    Please send email ot the advertiser that is the wallpaper behind this offensive photo to share your disgust over his lack of response to the hundereds of requests to remove this photo - if perez won't listen to his reader, maybe he will to his sponsors.

    The email address is Corporatecitizenship@diageo.com

  80. nebraskagrrl says – reply to this


    580

    that picture is fucking disgusting.

    Being separated at birth does not necessarily require surgery. It means the children were adopted by different families at birth.

    that picture is fucking gross.

  81. KrissyK says – reply to this


    581

    I mean…did they still wanna be married after they found out or what?? Lol, sad

  82. You are selfish and heartless says – reply to this


    582

    Tears are streaming down my face. This photo has resurfaced years of buried pain from the two babies I lost to genetic birth defects. I will never visit your site for the rest of my life and I'll make sure everyone I know does the same. I take comfort in knowing that you can never procreate. Darwinism at its best. Enjoy your meaningless life with your temporary cash as you attempt to validate yourself in this world. I'll be contacting your major advertisers. Goodbye.

  83. L says – reply to this


    583

    Please take that picture down. I don't see how it is at all related to the story. It is incredibly disturbing and shocking to see, and far worse than anything you post under "if you are easily offended". I don't understand why you didn't post a warning. Even if there had been a warning about this picture it would have sickened me to see it used in this way.
    The conjoining babies in this picture are dead. I can only hope that only reason this picture was taken (probably a very long time ago), was for medical instructional purposes. To post this on a celebrity gossip site is macabre and disturbing.

  84. lauren says – reply to this


    584

    gross… but i feel bad for them.

  85. summer says – reply to this


    585

    Perez,
    your hard core fans have been behind you throughout all
    Kinds of controversy. You reciprocate the favor by disrespecting us with such an inconsiderate picture. Those babies are helpless, naked and dead. I used to think you were pretty clever and cool in your own way. Now I kinda think you would do anything for a dollar. But hey, I'm sure the pedophiles like this crap!

  86. Beyond Disappointed says – reply to this


    586

    Perez - what a complete and total disappointment. I've been a loyal reader for over a year, at least once a day, sometimes several. I'm a parent though - of two little boys and have also lost two pregnancies. What would possess someone to post a picture of these poor children? Do you see the pain on their faces, even in death. It is truly sad. What is disappointing is that you seem to support exploiting their pain and death. There are lines in this world and Perez you crossed a big one. All of us make mistakes and you do have an opportunity to fix this situation. Until then, I cannot in good conscious support your business.

  87. The only queen you are is a BITCH says – reply to this


    587

    There is something mentally wrong with you mate. I've thought it for a while but this cements it. You have no conscience. Your love for Amy, Santa and the elfs has warped your humanity. Your a zombie perez. That's real great about Nicole and her baby but seriously who cares. We care about the pics above. Her "princess" is not a princess. She said it herself…see was on all fours, someone came up behind her and next thing she knew she was pregnant. That's real class.

    The only joined twins I know are you and Jason Davis. You found each other too. The Pigman and the Goatman. May you live happily ever after. Humpty Dumpty fell but you know it's not that they couldn't put him back together again…they just couldn't care less. Exactly how I feel. Take the Vain Brigade, Mayer, Santa, Paris and co and do us a favor - shove it. Anyone that thinks Paris Hilton is a nice person -as I just heard you say on a radio program needs to be committed and institutionalized much more than Brit.

  88. Andy says – reply to this


    588

    You have hit the the low of all lows. Disgusting.

  89. Jennifer says – reply to this


    589

    Re: puss

    I thought they'd all be interested so I sent emails, including the link to the pic, to every one of them, other sites with links to this site, and also to a few media outlets. I hope this sick puke is forgotten soon and left to wallow in his own muck.

  90. chers says – reply to this


    590

    oh that's sad…but the pic is gross

  91. Shannon says – reply to this


    591

    Dear Perez,
    I don't know if you are aware of this, but that photo is widely used to demonstrate the fact that cojoined twins can be born where one twin has died. If you look at the photo, the twin on the right has passed away, whilst the twin on the left seems to still be alive.
    I find the wierd as amusing as everyone esle, but putting up photos of dead children is too much even for perezhilton.com. Can you take it down, please?
    I can only assume that you didn't fully understand the photot before you posted it.

  92. April says – reply to this


    592

    I find your words offensive

    who gives a shit if he posted a picture of simese twins? whateves!

  93. jess h says – reply to this


    593

    perez u insenstive prick those are somebody's children…. shame on u

  94. RESPECT CHILDREN says – reply to this


    594

    What a heart. Or, let me rephrase, you have no heart. I can just see it. You sitting there laughing at all of your readers because you have managed to piss off people and get some ire up. You and your blue, purple, pink whatever stupid hair eating your boxes of ding dongs and twinkies. You say you care about babies and such, oh and you "care" about your readers. You know what you big assed punk - you suck and you have no heart. They way you have shown your true colors and basically flipped off your readers is something else. Beyond that, I can't tell you how appalled I am that you have left that photo up of those poor babies. Those are someone's babies! They are not for your exploitation or for your fun or profit. I will NEVER again come to this site. You truly are spreading bad seed everywhere and the sad thing is you probably don't give a rat's ass. Your time is coming up for your fall. It is very shameful that you show how some "humans" are. There are parents here that have lost babies and they painfully told you - yet you did nothing to remove that picture. How wonderful that you gleefully say three celebs had babies today but yet you exploit these poor children. To all the parents out there that have been hurt by this blue haired giant smurf, I send you hugs and only wish I could make your pain a bit less. You will be the ones in my thoughts. Again, I will never be back on this horrid site again. (yeah,like you really care)

  95. Done says – reply to this


    595

    Readers - if you click on the ads (I know, that's what they WANT us to do, but…), then click "contact us," you can write Perez's sponsors an e-mail telling them that Perez has posted offensive pictures of dead babies on his site, that you find it disgusting and that you wanted to notify them that you'll no longer be visiting his site and consequently, THEIR sites. Let them know that you hope they'll make the right choice rather than one driven solely by revenue.
    I know a lot of people are saying they'll never come back (but will need their trash talk again within a few days), but I honestly will never come back here. It's obvious what Perez thinks of us considering he's ignoring our VERY sincere pleas. He's just not the "deep down he's a good guy" we thought he was I guess!

  96. :( says – reply to this


    596

    how could u be so god damn heartless those are somebodies daughters u have hit an all time low with this one i will not be visiting this site anymore u discust me!! i hope to god the parents dont visit this site actually i hope they do and sue u for all ur worth…

  97. RealityCheck says – reply to this


    597

    You're an idiot– "separted at birth" doesn't mean they were co-joined twins. They were separated by being adopted by two different families. You'll do anything for a gross headline.

  98. Danie says – reply to this


    598

    Um, conjoined twins would have to be identical. To say that there was one male and one female just doesn't make any sense to me. They're joined because they didn't seperate completely….but came from the same little egg and spermie. o.O Just sounds like a crock of shit to me.

  99. disappointed in you says – reply to this


    599

    I *had* hoped that you'd take the near-unanimous reader response to heart and remove the photo. Apparently not. I hope your obstinance backfires. Too bad, though, as I loved the fact that a latino gay man had achieved such fame and popularity. I for one will try very hard to break my filthy, pointless time-wasting habit of visiting your site. Many other things to focus on (our country is at war, for example.) I'll let Ciroc and Mr. Puffy in on my disappointment too. Hope you lose some cash this foolishness.

  100. elizabeast says – reply to this


    600

    wow, this would be a great story IF IT WERE TRUE. it's completely made up and i'd be surprised if it's not on snopes by now.

    as for the picture, i don't know, it didn't faze me. i was really quite surprised so many people were offended by the picture more than bad journalism.

    check your facts you fat fuck!!!

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 »