Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Headline Of The Week Weak

Filed under: Headline of the Week > Anglophilia > Wacky, Tacky & True

siamesetwins1.jpg

"Unknowing twins marry each other
A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

Ewww! CLICK HERE to read the article accompanying this headline.

Unknowing twins marry each other

A set of British twins who were separated at birth went on to marry each other without realizing they were related, the UK Press Association reported Friday.

The brother and sister, who were adopted by separate parents, were given an annulment after a High Court judge ruled that the marriage had never been valid.

Their identities and details of their relationship have been kept secret, but the Press Association reported that the duo did not find out that they were blood relatives until after they were married.

David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.

He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.

Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."

Alton is concerned that the new bill would allow the biological identity of one parent to be removed from the birth certificate, PA reported, and that there would be no way for the child to know if they had been donor-conceived.

He told PA on Friday: "The state is colluding in a deception. We are opening the door to more cases like this one. One of the most fundamental things of all is to know who you are. The issue here is about human rights.

"A birth certificate that omits any mention of your true origin falsifies your history in a very significant way."

724 comments to “Headline Of The Week Weak”

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

  1. perezisgoingdown says – reply to this


    701

    PLEASE DO NOT CLICK ON THE ADS to report him to the sponsors. Get their email some other way, PEREZ GETS PAID EVERYTIME YOU CLICK!

  2. jaz says – reply to this


    702

    Perez that picture is disgusting. wtf?

  3. You are all idiots says – reply to this


    703

    Re: cdub – Um, science professor? Maybe you should read the article. It didn't say conjoined twins it just said twins separated at birth. I would think a scientist could pick up on that. The pic is just there for shock value…on that note–if anyone is offended by it, go somewhere else cuz you're stupid. Perez–you're the shiz.

  4. Emilllyy says – reply to this


    704

    Re: cdub
    hmm goodpoint but maybe their gayy

  5. Marissa says – reply to this


    705

    gross
    hope they belived in sex AFTER marrige

  6. karma says – reply to this


    706

    email the sponsors and tell them you are boycotting the site because of this tasteless picture!

  7. jackiecanadawhore says – reply to this


    707

    ok yeah so seeing as those twins inth epic both had vaginas…this is a frarce..nice try tho
    wow perez reaches a new low… who woulda thought

  8. Cari says – reply to this


    708

    Perez, I think the photo with this story is perverse and disgusting and goes beyond the line. I think it is incredibly offensive and I have lost a ton of respect for this website. It's my opinion that you run a tighter ship.

  9. Brynderella says – reply to this


    709

    Perez, here's the thing. I think that what has attracted so many of us to this site has been the fact that we've sort of felt like we were all "gossip girlfriends" and we were somehow "in" because one of "us" got to rub shoulders with the celebs "we" poke fun at. It's easy to not have much mercy/sympathy for celebs who knowingly and actively pursue their fame, knowing full well that it comes at the cost of their privacy. But these dead babies are different. Using, no, keeping this picture up despite our objections rather, has shown a side of you that I think none of us knew existed and we probably feel a little betrayed. The fact that not only have you NOT removed this picture, but that you haven't even addressed the issue in any way (be it defending your decision to leave it up or whatever) is why there's such dissention in the ranks. This is what leads us to believe that we're NOT really "girlfriends" afterall…..
    And readers, every time you rant about Perez being "Fat and ugly" you've negated your argument. Think about how easy it is to disregard anything people have to say about you once you start hurling insults! Perez, I USED to just adore you but now you've just shown me that you're not worthy of that kind of attention from me, so even though I know you could care less, I'm done and won't be back here again.

  10. Angeliki says – reply to this


    710

    Your a fucken Idiot!!!!how dare you publish a photo of two dead children that have nothing to do with the story you are writing about!you fat American Fuck!!!!! It just goes to show what a fat ugly moron you are You American Shithead!!!!!

  11. kelly says – reply to this


    711

    Take those poor babies off, you are disgusting to even post this picture, you should be ashamed!!!!

  12. cleopatra71 says – reply to this


    712

    How the hell could this be true? Aren't conjoined twins identical twins??? Which would mean that they would both be boys or both be girls period. And btw, the picture is disgusting.

  13. WHAT DOES IT MATTER? says – reply to this


    713

    You reveal a lot about yourself to post this picture. I WILL NEVER PATRONIZE ANY OF YOUR ADVERTISERS OR RETURN TO THIS CESSPOOL AGAIN. May these poor babies rest in peace.

  14. Jay says – reply to this


    714

    Please take that picture off, its very offensive, especially when you have had a baby with complications, like me.

  15. Morgana says – reply to this


    715

    ok they were seperated at birth meaning that after they were born they were given to different parents not CONJOINED twins!

  16. sue says – reply to this


    716

    Ah, well: still haven't taken it down, but I don't see your sponsor Ciroc anymore.

  17. glad2befrankiesexgf says – reply to this


    717

    Omg r u serious pleaz take the ugly pic off it just made me throw up! And how can u not know tht ur "wife"is ur twin??!!

  18. Ur mama says – reply to this


    718

    Seriously was the graphic picture necessary?!

  19. Big Man Pop Pop says – reply to this


    719

    reminds me of the mellon twins

  20. amber says – reply to this


    720

    Hello Perez this is not possible. Conjoined twins are identical twins. This happens when the egg dosen't completly seperate. Unless one had a sex change I beleive you all have been fooled

  21. nosy parker says – reply to this


    721

    in countries where blood test aren't required to get a licence this gross stuff happens all the time, the poor people they'll be in counselling for the rest of their lives

  22. gowri says – reply to this


    722

    perez, i love you, but that picture is completely inappropriate. i'm all for baby jokes, but that picture of two/one deformed babies just makes me sad.

  23. AZ READER says – reply to this


    723

    You've lost a viewer. This photo is beyond vile. You are missing something to be able to find it entertaining.

  24. Wendy says – reply to this


    724

    You've posted some disrespectful pics before….. BUT THESE ARE SOMEONE'S INNOCENT CHILDREN. Please remove the pic. The twins in UK were separated at birth but they weren't siamese twins you idiots! Now they are saying the whole story was nothing but a publicity stunt.

    REMOVE THE PICTURE NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]