Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Quote of the Day

Filed under: Anglophilia > Quote of the Day > Celebrity Feuds > Amy Winehouse

wenn1756529.jpg

“I'm going on record as an artist who is able to critique [Amy Winehouse]. I think she has a great talent, but I don't agree with the Grammys giving her those nods. I think it sends the wrong message, that even in the midst of her stupor of drugs she can get nominated for all these awards. It's a slap in the face to musicians and artists who work very hard that they turn around and give it to someone who really obviously doesn't have a grasp of what she has. I've been in this business over 25 years and I sacrificed five years of my own life on drugs and almost lost my life because of it. So I take great offence to almost see someone getting glory out of being in the position that they're in – she needs to get her life together and embrace her craft, she will lose it if she doesn't get it together.”

- Natalie Cole

[Image via WENN.]

1302 comments to “Quote of the Day”

More comments: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 1114 »

  1. Jenny says – reply to this


    301

    I agree with her statement and applaud her for saying it.

  2. lio says – reply to this


    302

    what a dumbass. amy isnt getting nods because shes on drugs, its bc she kicks ass. and yeah some others have to work harder than amy, bc they lack the natural talent. go away you washed up tranny.

  3. Magz says – reply to this


    303

    how can she say that??? amy's success may be the only thing that drives her towards reason and a drug-free life!

  4. Mia says – reply to this


    304

    She has some nerve. I remember when she was having substance abuse problems. She is jealous.

  5. FaceTheFacts says – reply to this


    305

    Who the Hell is Natalie Cole to make such statements?? She was under the influence when she won I think it was 95? She is a nobody!! and who the Hell is She to judge someone else! She is a has been and always will be!! She obviously made these statements to get media attention and She got it, She has NO talent and I dont think She even belonged there at the grammys, let alone presenting, What a joke!!!

  6. Mikhaila. says – reply to this


    306

    I AGREE LIO

  7. Sunny says – reply to this


    307

    Well said Ms. Cole! So true!

  8. Saree says – reply to this


    308

    Oh, please. The awards are based on her musical talent, not the issues in her personal life. Amy Winehouse made an amazing album, and she deserves every single one of those awards. I guess Ms. Cole just needs some attention of her own.

  9. me says – reply to this


    309

    she has a point!!!!!!!!!!

  10. outSHIne says – reply to this


    310

    Re: Sally
    you are ignorant ignorant ignorant.
    she fucking won FIVE grammy's. and what the fuck did taylor swift get?
    for fuck sakes shes not being awarded for "bad behaviour"
    is this fucking kindergarden?
    NO, IT'S THE GRAMMY'S
    she is being rewarded for making an incredible album

  11. yogini says – reply to this


    311

    I LOVE how everyone is agreeing with Natalie. NOT! OK, so people idolize Joplin, Hendrix, Morrison, Keith Richards….. I could just keep going. All of these people were celebrated musicians AND they were all drug addicts/alcoholics. I don't believe that they rewarded Amy Winehouse for her addictions, they acknowledged her artistry. If anyone had been digging around Frank Sinatra's life, Dean Martin or Sammy Davis Jr.'s lives they would have found a lot of alcohol and drugs. It was kept quiet. Look at Liza Minelli. Look at Judy Garland. Celebrated artists with debilitating drug problems.

  12. ts says – reply to this


    312

    What a bitch Natalie is! Who the fuck does she think she is? Amy deserved each and every one of her awards. Natalie, darling, who asked for your opinion? You jealous cow.

  13. racy lacy says – reply to this


    313

    You tell 'em miss thang!

  14. me says – reply to this


    314

    Natalie is a HATER!!!!

  15. Marshmallow Fluff says – reply to this


    315

    I've always thought Natalie "coasting on my dad's awesome voice" Cole sucked, but this confirms she's jealous and sanctimonious, as well. How completely unattractive of her. Let's a give a music award to the best use of a parent's talent, to cover up the lack of in their performing offspring. Has-been indeed.

  16. Lady A says – reply to this


    316

    She has no sense saying something like that! Amy could be a crackhead, a whore, a humanitarian, or the most ungrateful bitch alive…but her talent and work is aside from it. Do you favor someone in an award ceremony because they are nicer than the other artists? No! That is an unfair statement, and she is simply and obviously craving attention and jealous of her work. The grammy doesn't give out lifestyle awards, it gives awards to those who produced great work!

  17. Krissy Snow says – reply to this


    317

    BITTER! BITTER! BITTER! She is hatin' on Amy b/c she is on the F-List and she is ONLY known for being Nat King Cole's daughter, Big Whoop! Can anyone actually name a Natalie Cole song??? *crickets*

  18. Selena says – reply to this


    318

    Amy won because of her talent nothing else, is Natalie saying that we take away her awards considering she won some during her drug phase.

  19. john says – reply to this


    319

    #8 - Yazzy says – reply to this

    she's lame. Why is she judging Amy???
    JUDGING AMY, I LOOOVE THAT SHOW

  20. reptiles unite says – reply to this


    320

    She has crocodile eyes

  21. Laurel says – reply to this


    321

    Re: boo – Only famous because of her Father? Why does everyone get so mad because someone give their opinion about something? Natalie Cole has more talent than most of those wannabes last night. Why must you bring her down to disagree with her? SHE HAS A RIGHT TO HER OPINION. And she, of all people, as the background to back it up with.

  22. Judi says – reply to this


    322

    I did'nt know that the Grammy's were supposed to give awards based on the singers personal lives. If it's going to base awards on who was or is on drugs then I think the Grammy's would'nt exist. Natalie Cole is a dumb ass. =)

  23. I agree says – reply to this


    323

    I don't know why everyone drools over Winehouse. I understand it's her voice and singing more of a soul type of music and that's fine and all, but she sounded kinda shitty last night and she's just blah with those tattoos and the druggie shit. Get your shit together girlfriend before you lose it all. I don't get these people like her and Britney.. they have it all, but they just piss it away. And by the way Natalie Cole… YOU CANT SING FOR SHIT so shut up already!

  24. michelle says – reply to this


    324

    Like she should talk!! She was such a cokehead!

  25. kerry says – reply to this


    325

    I totally agree with her, finally someone said it right!

  26. Barbara says – reply to this


    326

    Maybe this should tell her something. Someone who is so fucked up on drugs and alcohol is a better Grammy pick than the hardest working mediocre talent.

  27. J says – reply to this


    327

    jealousy is a bitch huh! Why bag on Amy for having a great CD?? That makes no sense, its not an award for a persons lifestyle choices, its for their CD! And you wonder why people think you are ignorant, because you make retarded comments like THAT!

  28. trinity says – reply to this


    328

    it's been sad to see her downfall in 2007…hopefully she gets her act together so she can create a 3rd amazing album

  29. ht says – reply to this


    329

    NATALIE WHO?????????

  30. meg says – reply to this


    330

    I agree 1000%.. it's like giving Britney Spears awards for her dancing

  31. Fallon says – reply to this


    331

    Um, firstly who the hell is this broad?
    Secondly, Any Winehouse won because she has talent, not because of her life. I thought this is what the awards are about? If they were about media attention also then Posh Spice would be up on that stage and everyone would be complaining!

    Don't forget about what the awards are actually about girl!

  32. Angela says – reply to this


    332

    I thought Grammys were given to people for their TALENT! Their personal life has nothing to do with it. The Grammys are giving Amy kudos for her talent and not for her drug abuse. They, her drug abuse and talent, have nothing to do with each other… and yes she does have problems but she is also extremely talented and deserved every single one of those Grammys!

  33. If she is such a looooser why righting abt her says – reply to this


    333

    #306 - FaceTheFacts says – reply to this

    Who the Hell is Natalie Cole to make such statements?? She was under the influence when she won I think it was 95? She is a nobody!! and who the Hell is She to judge someone else! She is a has been and always will be!! She obviously made these statements to get media attention and She got it, She has NO talent and I dont think She even belonged there at the grammys, let alone presenting, What a joke!!!
    *************************************************************

    Hey what happened to freedom of speech let her talk nothing wrong having your opinion just like yourselves.

  34. Heh says – reply to this


    334

    While I agree with Natalie somewhat, I think Amy's wins were well-deserved. The proof is in her music, the girl has soul and can sing. I also think it was good for her to win those awards, who knows, it may aid in her recovery. Amy could look at this whole thing like "my life was in the toilet, but there's a light at the end of the tunnel." Amy knows people are rooting for her to win the battle over her addictions, you could see the realization on her face last night. Yeah, she sounded and looked kind of cracky, but don't all addicts get the jitters while detoxing? One thing in Amy's defense, she's bringing back that classic do-wop (sp?) vibe that is long overdue. Natalie should have commented on that. Amy's trying to get it together, people need to give her credit for that. Natalie's heart was in the right place (she understands about addiction because she's been there), but she's out of touch with today's "standards" of music. Yeah, "Rehab" sends the wrong message, but at the same time the song deals with the one thing addicts have the biggest problem with: admitting they have an addiction. Natalie takes the song at face value, she should really listen to the song again. Besides, compared to some of the garbage we have to listen to on a daily basis, Amy's message is a drop in the bucket of bad messages everyone else's music supplies us with.

    And to those making racists comments about Natalie here: grow up, bigotry is a stinky cologne.

  35. kk says – reply to this


    335

    JEALOUS.

  36. mello says – reply to this


    336

    NATALIE "BAD WIG" COLE NEEDS TO SHUT THE FUCK UP. WE ALL KNOW SHE WAS A CRACKHEAD AND SO WHAT..GRAMMY ARE MADE FOR THE MUSIC..HER CD WAS A BANGER AND HER MUSIC WAS REAL…IF RIHANNA WON IT OVER HER THAT WOULDA BEEN A SHAME. AMY DESERVED IT AND SHES OBVIOUSLY TRYING TO GET HER LIFE BACK TOGETHER..NATALIE STOP HATING ON HER AND GET A NEW WIG STORE…AND STYLIST

  37. blablabla says – reply to this


    337

    Hey Natalie, thank GOD the Grammys are about TALENT and not acting as some moral police sending MESSAGES!!!
    .
    TELL ME FUKKIN IDIOT…
    …how you feel about the awards and praise lavished on Judy Garland
    …or BILLIE HOLIDAY!!!!

    FUKKIN CUNT

  38. Mariah says – reply to this


    338

    Opinions are like assholes….everyone has one, including Natalie.

  39. Annie says – reply to this


    339

    Well this smacks of bitterness! Ms. Winehouse is getting glory for her musical accomplishments, not her recovering drug addiction…I see no reason why her personal problems should compromise recognition for her talent.

  40. asd says – reply to this


    340

    Screams of jealousy

    she wish she had the talent amy had

  41. dp says – reply to this


    341

    maybe natalie cole should learn how to pick the right shade of face make-up before commenting on ANYTHING else…….?

  42. yggy says – reply to this


    342

    Omg give it up has been, winehouse is the best jealousy is such an ugly thing,where's your career?

  43. opinions are like says – reply to this


    343

    ok, while we're at it, I take offense to all of these music producers pumping out crap and these "artists" relying so heavily on t & a to sell their music. I could go on and on, bottom line it's supposed be about the MUSIC, not the amount of skin showing, how flat your stomach is, tacky clothes, stupid dance moves, and lipsynching (or a person's personal life)

  44. bitch plz says – reply to this


    344

    she has a point, but maybe winning all these grammy awards will motivate her to get her ass in gear. ever think of that, natalie?

  45. benjo says – reply to this


    345

    first I have to say…who gives a damn about natalie cole. sorry. secondly, i am tired of all these trainwrecks…and, love Amy Winehouse…she is amazing…hope she gets it together.

    if ms cole wants to look at what a true talent(and zero victimhood) can do at any age…she might want to compare herself to Ms Tina Turner…who at 68 years old…knocked it out of the park last night. Way to go TINA! She looked great and sounded as good as ever!

  46. Angela says – reply to this


    346

    Ummm I just read the first few comments and I do not appreciate FANNY calling Natalie the N word. GEEZ, I bet you enjoy wearing sheets over your head during your free time. YOU ARE RUDE, OBNOXIOUS AND IGNORANT!!!

  47. pfft says – reply to this


    347

    Natalie Cole is poorly informed and a bitter, no talent bore who wouldn't be to get arrested if her father hadn't been supremely gifted.
    Amy Winehouse was not whacked out on drugs when she recorded that album. Her descent into hell began when she hooked up with that loser husband of hers, which was well after the recording and release of Back to Black.

  48. juicyj says – reply to this


    348

    as dave chapelle once said
    hate hate hate hate hate hate hate

  49. lily says – reply to this


    349

    I don't agree w/illegal drug use, but throughout history people have done drugs and have been very successful. Look at the beatles-sgt pepper's album.
    Many times it has a bad ending-Elvis, Kurt Cobain, etc…, but it is a fact. This isn't something unique to the current pop culture. We just have the media informing us of all that goes on now. There is no respect of privacy. If we didn't know Amy Winehouse did drugs, would the award be merited then?

  50. heterosexual says – reply to this


    350

    Natalie is a very pretty women.

  51. Lindsay says – reply to this


    351

    She is just jealous bc Amy sings amazingly without any effort, on drugs or not…. and because Amy's hair may be fake too, but sure as hell looks better than that weave!

  52. Tara says – reply to this


    352

    Well said, Natalie!

    Amy Winehouse is a joke.

    But hey, let her get all those Grammys. She can just become another Grammy winner that falls out of the limelight immediately after they pick up a few trophies in one night. Happens to so many of them. Amy Winehouse needs to go to rehab and a mental facility. She's fuckin nuts.

  53. sarah says – reply to this


    353

    she has a fucking point!!! amy winehouse did NOT deserve those grammy's last night, not one of them. best new artist?!!? my ass … her cd may have been decent but she had ONE song on in the Top 40 and it was a song about NOT GOING TO REHAB!! Which is exactly where that skank bitch is now!! And did she seriously beat out Kanye … I know he cries and carries on like a little girl who just saw her puppy die, about not getting recognized but seriously his shit was WAYYYYYY better than hers. Almost every other artist in the catagories she was nominated for deserved it over her.

  54. Cristina says – reply to this


    354

    Shutupppp…

    shes a good talent and thats what the award was for

  55. sarah says – reply to this


    355

    Think about this …. Christina Aguilera beat out Britney Spears for best new artist back in 99, and yes Britney is a great artist, I fucking love her, but Christina deserved it, she will be around in many years to come, she has an amazing voice un-like any other. Do you honestly think the whore, smoking crack, is really going to be around in a few years?! Best new artist is deserved by someone like, Alicia Keys, Carrie Underwood, Christina Aguilera … NOT addicts and people who obviously give a shit less about their lives and careers. I was so mad watching her get those awards last night, it made me sick. And yes I did watch the whole show until her performance because you know that it was going to be the train-wreck that it was, and it truly was awful. Sure she sounded exactly like she does on her records, but she looked like she had just got done smoking that crack pipe again. I say revoke Milli-Vinilli style, give it to someone more deserving!!!

  56. ericka says – reply to this


    356

    Who cares what she thinks- hater- she hates Amy cause she's white and has great pipes!

  57. thanksnatalie says – reply to this


    357

    couldn't agree more
    amy is so talented
    of course, the grammys aren't about one's personal life, so…

  58. Christine says – reply to this


    358

    Now there's the pot calling the kettle black…..

  59. Meg says – reply to this


    359

    I agree!! I am so tired of 'hollywood' glamorizing this type of shit. Amy Winehouse might have a good voice, but giving her all of these awards sends the wrong message. But who gives a shit these days? I mean, the more fucked up a person can be, the better, right? Brittney, Amy, Paris, Lindsay-Lo? The more you act out, the better. It's okay to go down this road because there's always rehab. Right? I mean, why stay sober and act like you have morals? Why? Because that doesn't sell very many magazines. Or CD's. Or movie tickets. Amy Winehouse is a slap in the face to any young artist that has made good music but is over looked because they choose to live a quiet, drug free life. She is disgusting. That they even chose to let her perform just goes to show that they are willing to do anything for the ratings. The whole situation makes me sick. And her husbands little stunt was just as sickening. Throw both of them in a jail cell and let them rot together.

  60. kate says – reply to this


    360

    WHAT ABOUT JIMI HENDRIX?? JANICE?? FERGIE?? ALL OF THESE PEOPLE WERE ON DRUGS AT ONE POINT AND I'M SURE THERE ARE WAYYYY MORE PEOPLE THAT ARE ON DRUGS IN THE MUSIC WORLD THAN WE KNOW. SO SHUT THE HELL UP NAT COLE!

  61. Crack is whack says – reply to this


    361

    Wow, well said. Now, I love me some Wino and I don't even really care for Natalie Cole, but she's right!

  62. Agree 100% says – reply to this


    362

    I agree 100% with Natalie. Amy isn't all that talented and no way should have even been nominiated for a grammy let alone win one. Her performace was horrid and she looked like a $2.00 hooker. She needs to step outta the limelight and get some help. It is not right to reward for her kind of behaviour. Oh well the grammys sucked ass last night anyways.

  63. lauren says – reply to this


    363

    sore fucking loser.
    who cares about her anyway?
    she has no talent

  64. laura says – reply to this


    364

    if it's really about the music then she should win awards. she makes good music.
    p.s.
    she's in rehab. read: working on getting her shit together. what the fuck more do you want?

  65. hahaha says – reply to this


    365

    BITTER BITCH!

  66. brittney dotson says – reply to this


    366

    i totally agree with her comment. while i was watching amy whinehouse me and my best friend said the same thing… it sends out the wrong message. i mean yeha shes a good singer, but its going a lil far to say hey lets give an award for being a coke hore !! what about all the other singers who actually stayed on
    track !!! im actually really mad they gave her those awards. she doesnt deserve them.
    AND DID ANYONE ELSE FEEL LIKE AMY LOOKED LIKE SHE NEEDED A FIX WHILE SHE WAS SINGING ? AND SHE LOOKED LIKE SHE WAS HAVING AN ORGANISM

  67. too surreal says – reply to this


    367

    excuse me but wasn' t sh herself a drug addicted?
    She shoukld be the last to talk. Such a religious person…she is sending the wrong message by judging someone when she herself is not without fault. Natalie,, natalie you come with dirty handfs,. be careful… Turn back the clock whe you were Amys age and lift up a mirror and you will see the mirror image of Amy in yourself at her age.

  68. Jessica says – reply to this


    368

    Wow…I totally effing agree with her.

  69. Suzanne says – reply to this


    369

    Natalie Cole spent 5 years wasted on HEROIN and COCAINE, in and out of rehabs, getting beat up by different guys, fronting from prostitutes to draw in biz, etc. She speaks from terrible experience.
    While I adore Amy Winehouse and see her as a HUGE talent, I will be honest and admit that it was uncomfortable last night to hear her singing NO, NO, NO to Rehab - AND- worse, she is still standing by her loser husband who will help kill her through addiction.
    Many who submitted to this blog clearly have no experience with addiction and what it means to ENABLE people. It's clear Natalie knows what it will take to get Amy turned around. Amy needs to be knocked off her current path, in a way that she truly gets what her addiction has cost her. She doesn't get it yet. She was in a happy fog last night with no incentive to quit and not incentive to dump her loser/killer husband.

  70. Kris says – reply to this


    370

    No one is perfect. Amy is a unique talent in a world of identical pop tarts using their sex and fake boobs to sell records and make $$. We all have our demons and the I am happy to see that the Grammy's respected true talent and put aside the personal issues that have nothing to do with her music. If nothing, these awards should make Amy see her true talent and figure her life out.

  71. Holly says – reply to this


    371

    This is exactly what I was thinking last night when they kept saying "up next the performance of the night, Amy Winehouse" Thanks Natalie, for being able to articulate my thoughts!

    P.S. I love Amy Winehouse as well.

  72. lol says – reply to this


    372

    who the fuck is natalie cole.

  73. Shawna says – reply to this


    373

    WHO GIVES A SHIT ABOUT NATALIE COLE? Just cause your Nat King Cole's daughter DOES NOT mean that your opinion matters, is justified, or frankly, even asked for. What awards was she up for again????? hmmmm….anything at all? All of the greats have suffered from some addiction or issue. It is that bad end of the talent. OH, and to all of you twats who call giving her awards for her talent is "enabling", you are stupid and clearly need to find a dictionary. Did you ever consider that awarding her talent may give her enough confidence to aide in her recovery? Hmmm, guess not you dumb asses.

  74. alex fajardo says – reply to this


    374

    Really! Ms, Winehouse deserved those awards she worked just as hard as the other nomanies. Plus maybe this win will straighten her up, in other words leave that dumbass blake! DONT MESS WITH WINO!

  75. too ridiculous says – reply to this


    375

    check wikepedia on Natalies story she was one of the bigest druggies of her time during her populart years as a singer. Such a hypocrit

  76. CBE says – reply to this


    376

    I agree a musician's work should be recognized if it is worthy. In the case Of Winehouse, she has some good material on this CD. What I find appalling and sends the wrong message to kids is the "special arrangements" the grammys made for her to appear because she could not get a work visa on time due of her own fuck-ups.

    She did not have to appear to win. Fed-ex still delivers. They should have mailed her shit to her.

  77. LookAtYou says – reply to this


    377

    Natalie should stop lying, she's been in the business for almost 40 yrs, but she looks damn good for a woman approaching 60. Natalie is an ultra diva and her voice is 10 times better than Amy Crackhouse. Natalie was one of the originators of train wreck whose mother had to take control of her estate like Britney Spear's parents. I do agree with her about Wino. Amy only ran to rehab because she got caught smoking crack and to keep from going to jail. Her husband is a douchebag and gold digger. Her performance was mediocre last night and i could undersand only a few words she was saying. It is sending a bad message to young people that you don't have to work hard for your craft and you can walk around looking like hell and spend your night's in drug dens and bars. Kudos to Natalie for speaking out against this mess. Fat Perez only likes her because he is a big mess like her.

  78. Kat says – reply to this


    378

    I completely agree. Amy Whitehouse is a shitbag

  79. Losers says – reply to this


    379

    Jealous much? She is like 105 years old…Fuck her

  80. Lyte says – reply to this


    380

    Amy Winehouse didn't deserve all of those grammy's. The industry is trying to show her that if she doesnt keep true to rehab, all of the recognition and awards can be taken away from her in a blink of an eye. She is a true talent, I agree. Natalie Cole has a point, but at the end of the day, Amy won and what's done is done. Let's see if she can stay clean and continue on the right path.

  81. cackalacky says – reply to this


    381

    I have never commented on here before, but Natalie Cole needs to STFU. These remarks coming from someone who is where they are because of nepotism, not to mention someone who was an addict is the heights of idiocy. As someone said, the Grammy is for the work, not the personal life of the artist. Amy would still be a Grammy winner if we never saw her face, hair or knew squat about her personal life. And Natalie, lay off the Botox and other "enhancements" - you look really freaky.

  82. jenn says – reply to this


    382

    Well gee Natalie, then we'd be judging her on her lifestyle and NOT the music and that's really none of anyone's business. What other lifestyle choices or affiliations would you like us to discrimate against? sheesh!

  83. KatieB says – reply to this


    383

    Tell her to stfu. If she had supposedly been on drugs for 5 years of her life and almost lost it then she should know wtf Amy is going through and is trying to defeat. The song "Rehab" is just another song and there are a lot worse ones out there getting nominated for awards. Amy is getting help and she's a great artist. Natalie Cole, you just suck.

  84. Mitch says – reply to this


    384

    Amy Winehouse is a big load of fuck.

  85. sara says – reply to this


    385

    back to black is an amazing album…but could you imagine how shitty it would be if she were to have written & recorded it in 2007??? she's become a dirty piece of shit over the past year and a half, and mostly that fuck blake is to blame. hopefully 2008 is the start of her getting her shit together

  86. Tarren says – reply to this


    386

    I AGREE 100%!!!! The Grammys are a big joke now! Whoever is on the most magazine covers, the most red carpets, the most tabloids, and the most commercials wins. It's not even about the music anymore.

  87. SoTrueNatalie says – reply to this


    387

    that is so true well done nat for saying what know one esle wouldn't say Amy DID NOT! deserve all them awards maybe one of two wins But NOT ALL OF THEM good on ya nat love ya

  88. emelros says – reply to this


    388

    I agree with the concept that talent and personal behavior are two separate issues, and that the Grammys aren't about role models. However, for an addict to get better they have to experience some fallout from their behavior and it seems the more f'd up she is, the more attention and accolades she receives. That just seems wrong to me. I'm not sure that giving an addict Grammys for a song denying the need for rehab while she is in rehab is a good idea.

  89. Rachel says – reply to this


    389

    Who the fuck's Natalie Cole? And why does she think that anyone cares?

  90. LB says – reply to this


    390

    Re: FANNY

    what???? are you really trying to have a race debate here???

    Perez I heart you to death, but I hope that you don't condone such ignorant behaviour

  91. Nicole says – reply to this


    391

    She should shut up!

    Her big hit was a duet with her dead father.

    The fact that Amy Winehouse won was because HER MUSIC WAS THE BEST!

  92. WHITE PEOPLE ARE DUMB WANNABE'S says – reply to this


    392

    AMY WINO CRACKHEAD IS A WANNA BE SOUL SINGER WITH NO TALENT. AMY WINO CRACKHEAD IS A WANNA BE SOUL SINGER WITH NO TALENT.
    AMY WINO CRACKHEAD IS A WANNA BE SOUL SINGER WITH NO TALENT.
    AMY WINO CRACKHEAD IS A WANNA BE SOUL SINGER WITH NO TALENT.
    AMY WINO CRACKHEAD IS A WANNA BE SOUL SINGER WITH NO TALENT.
    AMY WINO CRACKHEAD IS A WANNA BE SOUL SINGER WITH NO TALENT.
    AMY WINO CRACKHEAD IS A WANNA BE SOUL SINGER WITH NO TALENT.

  93. sam says – reply to this


    393

    I have to agree. She doesn't deserve those grammy's, no matter how hard she may have worked, that just supports the fact that you can be crack head and get honored!! BULLSHIT

  94. lcami says – reply to this


    394

    Re: FANNY – you are a racist son of a bitch there is no need for that shitttt….. anwayssss no need for her smart ass comment whether you like it or not Amy has talent

  95. casey says – reply to this


    395

    If awards were given out based on lack of drug abuse and dysfunction, there would be very few awards to give out. Natalie Cole may have been working hard for 25 years, but she wouldn't be half as far if it weren't for her father's name. She has no right sticking her nose into this business. Who really cares about her opinion anyway?

  96. Alo says – reply to this


    396

    excuse me hypocrit, didn't she just say she battled with drugs and whatever for how many years? just cuz this bitch didn't win any nods or awards or have a hit record like amy does, she thinks she can hate or judje someone, puhlease, amy wasn't on the shit very long and if natalie could read a computer she could see that amy has been ketting herself help and that these awards are hopefully going to keep her that way. if only she could get over shitface blake….shut yo mouth mrs Cole… maybe when you can have world wide fame you can understand and sympathize more freely for someone other than yourself.

  97. ago says – reply to this


    397

    no but I really really strongly agree with natalie. I thought it was very strange to see her getting all these awards when she's been on crack, heorine, meth, every drug you can name, walking the streets in her bra, losing teeth, buying food for her binges cause the girl is clearly bulemic. and it just seemed like such a disconnect. I mean she is sitting there singing "they tried to make me go to rehab I say no no no, my daddy he thinks im fine" meanwhile her daddy and mommy DONT think she's fine, they had to send a fuckign letter to the media because they were SO desperate because their pathetic daughter is on the verge of death due to her addiction, and meanwhile, she is only performing at the grammy's as a break from rehab.

  98. mamafive says – reply to this


    398

    Who is Amy Winehouse?

  99. kat says – reply to this


    399

    She is absolutely right! Good for her!

  100. Lucyloo says – reply to this


    400

    Um, Where was this holier than thou bitch when her "friend" Whitney Houston was in rehab winning Grammys? Sounds to me like she needs to sit down and STFU!

More comments: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 1114 »