Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

So Ladylike!

Filed under: Oops! > Sharon Stone

sharooon.jpg

Desperate much????

Sharon Stone gives us a Basic Instinct flashback during a talk at the Think Tank 'Cite de la Reussite' at the Sorbonne University in Paris this past weekend.

CLICK HERE to check out the uncesnored photos!

[Image via JPI Studios.]

Is she or isn't she wearing panties?????
asharooon.jpg

385 comments to “So Ladylike!”

More comments: « 1 [2] 3 4 »

  1. Me says – reply to this


    101

    Who cares? She's an old bat anyways…..

  2. JH says – reply to this


    102

    EW FIRST

  3. faye says – reply to this


    103

    first

  4. Dayzeerock says – reply to this


    104

    eeeeewwwwwwwwwww

  5. se says – reply to this


    105

    omg thats totally gross man

  6. Brodie says – reply to this


    106

    I see flabby thighs, but no VaJay Jay!

  7. yomammy says – reply to this


    107

    wow… thigh… how scandalous! ….

  8. FIRST says – reply to this


    108

    old FIRST!

  9. omghaha says – reply to this


    109

    FIRST!!!

  10. rob says – reply to this


    110

    It doesnt really show anything

  11. fuzibuni says – reply to this


    111

    looks like legs to me.

    lame post.

  12. morgan says – reply to this


    112

    ewwww

  13. yay says – reply to this


    113

    first

  14. lala says – reply to this


    114

    YOU CAN ONLY SEE HER LEGS! Come on now, learn the female anatomy if you are going to post pictures like this!

  15. not a vag! says – reply to this


    115

    that's not a vag-jay-jay!!!!!!

    That's inner-upper-thigh action. Damn Perez. I mean, I guess if you've never seen a vagina, it would be hard to identify…

  16. bhghjkmnjbhghuji says – reply to this


    116

    thats just her top of thighs touching

  17. Christine says – reply to this


    117

    She should have better posture, BUT, the I only see thighs, nothing more.

  18. PhotoJo says – reply to this


    118

    totally photoshop'ed!

    totally obvious!!!

  19. Christine says – reply to this


    119

    Ummmmm…. you CAN'T see anything.. what's the big deal…

    I know you are gay, but have you ever sat with a skirt on…. this is what happens… surprise :)

  20. nonCYboY says – reply to this


    120

    I know she loves gays and all but that's just horrifying.

  21. ZUBI says – reply to this


    121

    EWWW
    crumpled

  22. 6y says – reply to this


    122

    Oh Perez!!!
    Running out of crap to post?
    :|

  23. jo-bj says – reply to this


    123

    eat it peggy, eat it peggy

  24. Mary says – reply to this


    124

    i think it is just thigh nothing for anybody to sensor or get excited about.

  25. barbie says – reply to this


    125

    ;) oh my ;) VOTE HILARY :) she is FIGHTING for America & fighting for GAY RIGHTS! VOTE HILARY :)

  26. Lauren (A) says – reply to this


    126

    ..it's just her thighs..I don't see any cooch.

  27. Smart says – reply to this


    127

    Why does that make her desperate, I don't understand? Women wear dresses, sometimes if you are perverted and are lookin for it you can see their underwear. What do you want, man.

  28. WTF?! says – reply to this


    128

    EWW, shes like 50 years old!!!

  29. dj says – reply to this


    129

    We can't see anything idiot.She is probably wearing something?

  30. Beav Pro says – reply to this


    130

    Its been photoshopped. The black outlines are different in the two shots?????

  31. zoe says – reply to this


    131

    Lame

  32. carla says – reply to this


    132

    just thighs p…

  33. jan says – reply to this


    133

    FREE TIBET!!!

  34. toad says – reply to this


    134

    her thighs are touching, its not her vagine

  35. nikki says – reply to this


    135

    umm….ew ?
    good thing u can barly see itt =]

  36. Obnoxious Joe says – reply to this


    136

    What's the point? Can't see a thing. No flashback here. Perez should stop fucking with us.

  37. Lindsey says – reply to this


    137

    I don't know what I am looking at.

  38. Tiffany says – reply to this


    138

    She's got panties… hard to see… but she's got em.

  39. Sandra says – reply to this


    139

    that is just her thighs close together, you can even see her panties behind there. So nothing strange with that pic.

  40. sourdoggie says – reply to this


    140

    that doesn't look like vajayjay. her legs are closed those be thighs

  41. LickMyNutz says – reply to this


    141

    MMM…LOVE A NICE PAIR OF JUICY WET BEEF FLAPS…SPREAD SOME MAYO ON TOP THEN LICK IT ALL OFF…MMM!

  42. SHOPGIRL says – reply to this


    142

    i think that fat boy licking should have been censored..i just see cellulite thighs….

  43. HUH says – reply to this


    143

    I only see thighs?!?!

  44. heatherrr says – reply to this


    144

    jeeze perez how gay are you? you can't even tell that's not her vagina!

  45. Meg Perk says – reply to this


    145

    You realize that's just smooshed up old lady thighs?

  46. lil89 says – reply to this


    146

    they're her legs!!

  47. WOW! A THIGH!!!! says – reply to this


    147

    You're an idiot.

  48. jennifer says – reply to this


    148

    haha PEREZ!! YOU need glasses!!! All that is is 2 not-so-toned inner thighs toucing!! In fact, faintly, you can see a small area that is white (underwear). hahaha CALL YOUR EYE DOCTOR

  49. basicvagstinkd says – reply to this


    149

    Re: duh!

    hahahaa

    I see no vag here, move along!~

  50. Scott says – reply to this


    150

    I'm sorry but all i'm seeing is two thighs up against each other. I've seen much more in BASIC INSTINCT.

  51. gared says – reply to this


    151

    Sure, it's not ladylike the way she's sitting but I don't see any poon.

  52. M from Toronto says – reply to this


    152

    Perez, those are thighs! Granted she should have her knees together and it looks like she is sitting on a stage or dais, so she should cross her ankles and fold her knees to the side, it's more ladylike and would be better for her spine!

  53. cjm says – reply to this


    153

    So, it's thighs and legs, can't even see if she is wearing underwear or not. She is keeping her legs firmly together. Probably is wearing underwear, because I am sure someone would get a shot if she wasn't…. Looks like she dressed nicely and was put on a chair/sofa that was a little too short for her legs.

  54. David says – reply to this


    154

    She's not even flashing.

    I love Sharon Stone, leave her alone!

    Oooh, that rhymes! :P

    P.S. You spelled "uncensored" wrong. Proofread, Perez, proofread!

  55. Ronn says – reply to this


    155

    Those are obviously her legs meeting.
    Desperate, I don't think so….she's smarter and classier than half the folks in Hollyweird and always will be!

  56. whhhat says – reply to this


    156

    the photographers are pervs.

  57. Susan says – reply to this


    157

    NASTY WHORE!

  58. BritneyFan!!! says – reply to this


    158

    You all are so "mature" becuase you can see nothing, assholes!

  59. johnnyLawEsq. says – reply to this


    159

    So…have we gotten to a place in this society where we take pictures up a women's dress and then condem her for our actions?

  60. abbizmal says – reply to this


    160

    You need to stop with that Click Here stuff. That is not her hoohah, Perez. But you're forgiven, you've probably never seen one before. :P

  61. milkoo says – reply to this


    161

    *barf*

  62. footballisus says – reply to this


    162

    I dont see anything I dont know who is worse me for looking or the cameraman whos got it pointed down on her crotch

  63. L. says – reply to this


    163

    You can't see anything cuz her tighs won't let.

  64. eh says – reply to this


    164

    how is she not being ladylike? she is sitting with her legs CLOSED. if you can't even tell if she is wearing panties or not, being that you cannot remotely see her crotch, there is not questioning if she is being ladylike. asshole. how about pinning the photographer as scum for attempting to take a perverted pic? you're a chauvenist pig trying to make a woman look bad when she is totally innocent and a MALE (most likely) is in the wrong. nice try.

  65. shitzeratti says – reply to this


    165

    Except there's enough cellulite now to cover up the beav…..

  66. erica says – reply to this


    166

    looks like thighs to me….

  67. tara says – reply to this


    167

    that is ridiculous…its just her thighs touching. better luck next time pervs…

  68. Lisa says – reply to this


    168

    Probably learned that trick from her pal Madge. They're good friends, aren't they?

  69. Lori says – reply to this


    169

    Those are her thighs, idiots!

  70. Stephanie says – reply to this


    170

    Well it doesn't show anything.

  71. muahz. says – reply to this


    171

    horrible. youre shit perez you cannot see anything.

  72. redsongia says – reply to this


    172

    Looks like some photog just about broke their neck to get a picture of…well…nothing! So sad.
    .
    When are shots like this going to be recognized as ILLEGAL. Amatures with phone cams get arrested all the time for trying to get the same shots of private people in shopping malls. Why are celebrity vags not protected by the same laws?

  73. joeyOh says – reply to this


    173

    She figured IT WORKED THE FIRST TIME!!!

  74. stasia says – reply to this


    174

    shes airing the fishy thing out

  75. Mary says – reply to this


    175

    Slow news week? So what, it's thigh touching thigh… and that first one is so obviously photoshopped. Come on, Perez.

  76. cass says – reply to this


    176

    she so old her vajaja probably shriveled up!
    maybe thats why some cant see it!
    I'm glad i cant see it real good…that shits P-NASTY! lol

  77. cpt obvious says – reply to this


    177

    there's no vag…it's just old lady thighs

  78. You so Stoopid!!! says – reply to this


    178

    I know you're gay and all Perez…but do you really not know what a vagina looks like??? You must be retarded or something, clearly the photoshopped pic is her thighs. By the way, the REAL image is listed on Hollywood Rag.

  79. ILENE says – reply to this


    179

    Why don't any of these women wear panties? It's just so stupid.

  80. KMM says – reply to this


    180

    Hopefully she wasn't trying to be serious!! Really is that what it takes to stay in the spot light?? You've seen one you've seen them all right!!

  81. abi says – reply to this


    181

    Sometimes old age makes your vagigi look like two wrinkly thighs pressed together. That is why it is so hard to tell exactly what we're looking at here.

  82. sarah says – reply to this


    182

    hey skirt bunching between her legs isnt even the same in the two pics.

  83. mrs.jonas says – reply to this


    183

    what??? thats her legs not her you-know-what!!!!

  84. Viva La Meggles says – reply to this


    184

    If that's her vagina, then I'm a monkey's uncle. Her vagina would be further back anyhow..Apparantly none of you have seen a vagina..Obviously Perez hasn't..If he wasn't gay he'd know there is no way…

  85. Megannnn says – reply to this


    185

    ahah, ewww. I don't know if she's wearing undies or not. It kinda looks like thighs, but then again it kinda looks like saggy old woman kooter. :(

  86. Lola La Pistola says – reply to this


    186

    Hey Perez, your mom must be about the same age as Sharon Stone, right? We'll since you're always making fun of how celebrities age, let's see a picture of yo mama and see how she's aged.

  87. BALLZAK says – reply to this


    187

    mmmmm…..punani………yahoooooooooooo!

  88. Kristin says – reply to this


    188

    At least she's making an effort- her legs are pressed together, and she's sitting modestly. She's just sitting in a dress; pictures like this happen will happen when the camera's shooting from that low…

  89. Sarah says – reply to this


    189

    There is no vagina in this pic. Just a wrinkly thigh. She is still beautiful.

  90. Jim says – reply to this


    190

    so what, u cant see anything

  91. MariFukkinSunshine says – reply to this


    191

    At her age, she should know how to properly sit in a dress/skirt!!!… Ya never know when a camara will be angled for a peep show. Perhaps that was the point.

  92. Blake says – reply to this


    192

    PEREZ YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT, THOSE ARE HER THIGHS PRESSED TOGETHER!!!!!!

  93. Jenn says – reply to this


    193

    Those are her thighs touching, nothing else. Perez, get your mind out of the gutter and quit accusing her of being desperate, the only one doing something wrong here is the desperate photographer trying to get a money shot. What kind of decent person takes that low of angle on a lady while sitting? What an ass.

  94. b says – reply to this


    194

    Thats just her legs jeez

  95. hollywood says – reply to this


    195

    what does FIRST mean?!?!!…why does everybody keep writting that? …. i'm a perezito begginer

  96. Frances says – reply to this


    196

    It's just her thighs, you can't see nothing. You promised us vag!

    BOOOOO!!!

  97. Starla says – reply to this


    197

    C'mon…no one can give a nice crotch shot like Sharon….NO ONE!!!

  98. Sean Lorentz says – reply to this


    198

    very pervish but i see her undies whooooo hoooooo Rats

  99. Lili says – reply to this


    199

    Re: Lulu – Looks better than your fat ass will ever look with your fake tranny eyebrows and your cottage cheese thighs.

  100. redondo2 says – reply to this


    200

    Can't you assholes think of anything remotely important? Like our fucked up government. This is so weak.

More comments: « 1 [2] 3 4 »