Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Uh Oh!

Filed under: Anglophilia > Film Flickers > Sarah Jessica Parker > Cynthia Nixon > Kristin Davis

a77057886__opt.jpg

The new Sex & The City film premiered in London on Monday night and…

The movie is getting mixed reviews. Not good!

The well-respected Times only gave the pic 2 out of 5 stars!

Here are some highlights of what their critic has to say:

- There may be a problem with a film when a narrator constantly tells you the meaning of what you have just seen, gift-wrapping each scene with a moral.

- There may be a problem with stretching Sex and the City into a two hour and twenty minute film - it can feel like a never ending dinner party: however pleasant the courses, after a while you can hardly eat another one.

It should be noted, however, that the reviewer was a guy.

We're assuming he wasn't gay!

[Photo via Getty Images.]

126 comments to “Uh Oh!”

More comments: « 1 [2]

  1. SARAH JESSICA PARKER says – reply to this


    101

    so i guess if i had fake boobs and nose i would be calling hot righttt !!

    get a life, dont need your approval bitches

  2. Phut says – reply to this


    102

    It is irrelevant that reviewer is male and may not be gay.A shit movie is a shit movie. SATC has been over cooked and its theme is so passe it is nauseating.

  3. ROGER says – reply to this


    103

    JUST SAW THE MOVIE - I liked the series BUT MAN IT WAS WAY TOO LONG AND TOO BORING !!!!! WILL WAIT FOR THE DVD ……I THINK TV HAS MOVED ON SINCE THIS SERIES - It was very predictable !!!

  4. fran says – reply to this


    104

    These reviewers should never be listened to cos they are all a bunch of old men who just don't seem to be able to understand that films are not the same as they were 10 yrs ago, and they defo aint the same as they were 20 yrs ago.
    The only film reviewer I listen to is the mighty James King who is on every Wednesday and Friday from 2.30 pm on Edith Bowman's radio show BBC Radio One - honestly if u want a decent review listen to the King!!!

  5. ann says – reply to this


    105

    what a fugly dress.

  6. heather says – reply to this


    106

    Why the FUCK would they have a guy review s and s??????? CRAZY!!! i don't think there is any way i will not like it

  7. Janell says – reply to this


    107

    Perez they should have let you do the review!!!
    I can't wait for May 30th and Im positive im going to love the movie

  8. Jissa says – reply to this


    108

    OMG its like a group of women speaking openly about sex! Its so current and hip. My mom and dad are gonna see how open and tacky my generation is about every issue from natural womens cycles to fornication. Coolness!

    Reality: Movie will suck just like show. Please get some clever and real writers for the next big "risque" flavor of the month. OMG that blonde one is such a slut and doesnt even hide it - how daring and uber cool (but it provides some relief for a confused and troubled generation - man I sympathize with them)! I smell best character ever!

  9. sam ford says – reply to this


    109

    WHY IN THE HELL IS ANYONE THERE??????????

    OMG

  10. lor says – reply to this


    110

    DVD rental video chick flick…

  11. queer queer queen says – reply to this


    111

    I am GAY and I have no desire to see this tired rehash of the HBO series. None of them have really done much since. It has also been a while since SITC was on some some might not remember it if some new pop icons like Brit S or Jessica S were not in it. After all in US pop culture most of these women are ready for the rest home.

  12. Katrina says – reply to this


    112

    I believe in your review of the review! :D

  13. brit says – reply to this


    113

    funny how the whole idea of SITC is Carrie's life/material for her column- there's supossed to be a moral & conclusion to everything- she's writing her freakin column while she's battling hers & her friends issues!! These "critics" need to do their research before criticing ANY movie- especially when it's a film that has followed a 6 season series- morons!

  14. holly says – reply to this


    114

    Re: charity case – um….it's always rude to ask people for money. However if you feel comfortable doing so, you might consider a career as a telemarketer.

  15. Yes, It was too much to ask says – reply to this


    115

    Re: charity case – Yeah, thats asking way too much. How would she really know your financial situation? Or your age? Anyone can find random photos and send them to her,asking for 5,000 dollars. How would she know that you are actually using them for braces? How do I even know Im responding to a real 16 year old girl? She must get millions upon millions of letters a week from around the world and she has been busy filming 2 movies (the other one is called Smart People) and traveling and promoting and shooting magazine covers and who knows what else. I doubt she even read your letter. Not that she doesnt care, but for lack of time. I know I dont have time to read millions of letters… and my life is way less hectic than hers

  16. Michelle says – reply to this


    116

    This movie was made for the cult following of the show…the narration was part of every show, narrating is Carrie…this movie was not made to bring on new fans it was to satisfy the already gazzillion fans….if you didn't like the show you're not going to like the movie genius.

  17. judytenudy says – reply to this


    117

    ummmm……aren't all british guys gay???

  18. NATALIA says – reply to this


    118

    This guy has no idea what he's talking about. Sex and the City has ALWAYS HAD A NARRARATOR. I'm more inclined to believe Oprah and the women in her audience who all said "IT DOES NOT DISSAPOINT!" that idiot can't rain on my parade

  19. Monica says – reply to this


    119

    Why would they send a man to review a total chick flick??? He's obviously never watched SATC!

  20. Kristi says – reply to this


    120

    Oh sorry Sux and Your Shitty….Shouldn't have tried to make a movie! Where are the Soprano's? Now that would be a great movie!!!

  21. sjp bitches says – reply to this


    121

    um didn't you put this story up yesterday?? slow news day I guess… why don't you talk about what a good thing she is doing for the fashion consious yet financially strapped…

    bittensjp.com

    all her clothes are 8.98!!! for real.

  22. jeez says – reply to this


    122

    Re: sjp bitches
    well, u know what that means, all of her clothes were manufactured in sweat shops. how else could everything be so cheap?

  23. The Bird says – reply to this


    123

    Re: H

    Correct, a lot of Brits don't get this because it's shit. The ones who do should be sent collectively to the States and left there. In my humble opinion of course.

  24. just curious says – reply to this


    124

    hey, howcome Kim Catrall wasn't in the category section?

  25. mon says – reply to this


    125

    DUUHHH! Where you expecting an Academy Award for this movie? It's been hyped for like 2 years - always a bad sign. When has a sitcom-turned-movie ever been good?

  26. d says – reply to this


    126

    i'm standing in between a lesbian and a tree

More comments: « 1 [2]