Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Not Quite What It Seems

Filed under: Love Line > Winona Ryder

winona__opt.jpg

So there have been rumors circulating that Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder are a pair.

The rumors began at Star magazine.

And there's no better way to put this than how OK Magazine so eloquently states, "Inside the current issue of tasteless tabloid Star there's a 'news' item about how actors Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder are getting romantic, embracing each other and spending lots of time together in their trailers on the Connecticut set of their film The Private Lives of Pippa Lee. That would be really interesting — if there was even one ounce of truth to it."

Ouch!

That burns.

The only truth in what Star reported was probably just that the two are indeed filming a movie together, but aside from that, it seems they've fabricated everything else.

An insider on the set of the film has confirmed that there are NO TRAILERS on the set for Keanu and Wino to cuddle in.

Interesting.

And, another source adds that the two have yet to be on set together, which would make it basically impossible for them to be hugging so much infront of the crew.

If Star wants to save face they better put up some pictures of the two kissing or hugging, cuz without any proof, people are going to stop reading and believing them all together.

Wait, they probably already have.

If you recall, Star was also the publication that falsely reported Angelina and Brad Pitt had gotted married back in March.

You'd think with such a large staff, they could afford to fact check more often!

[Photo via Getty Images.]

111 comments to “Not Quite What It Seems”

More comments: « 1 [2]

  1. Brittney says – reply to this


    101

    Keanu Reeves? I'm confused… that womanish looking man next to Wynona looks like the guy from that stupid worthless movie, "The New Guy". Not Keanu. Keanu is a stupid ass, but he's hot.

  2. demi says – reply to this


    102

    what's with the matching 'do's and blank expressions?

  3. linksausage says – reply to this


    103

    Star corrected stuped Inbred, I mean, InTouch, which said Angelina Jolie was having a boy and a girl. WRONG. Girl and a girl, as confirmed by Star cover story and Angeline herself. Stop eating the shtuff that OK! feeds you without first smelling your food. Liars working everywhere, bro..

  4. Kendra loves Rilo Kiley says – reply to this


    104

    I just met Blake again for the second time last night. I wish so badly that he and winona weren't together. He deserves so much better.

  5. kj says – reply to this


    105

    isn't the guy in this picture the guy from RILO KILEY??

    i saw him flirting with Alicia Silverston at coachella…..

  6. Rash Manly says – reply to this


    106

    After this photo was taken,
    that guy blurted out,
    "Hey, where the Hell is my wallet!"

  7. emily says – reply to this


    107

    uh… that's not Keanu Reeves dumb asses… that's Blake Soper from Rilo Kiley… he also played Pinsky in the Nickelodeon show Salute Your Shorts. Seriously Perez, I thought you checked all your facts before posting to ensure your readers that they are only reading the truth.

  8. meemaw says – reply to this


    108

    That is not Keanu Reeves… that is the guy (don't even know his name) who played Ron Pinsky on Salute Your Shorts, an old Nickelodeon show. Who the fuck said that was Keanu Reeves?

  9. Bron says – reply to this


    109

    It's Blake Sennett in the picture - from the band Rilo Kiley. Dense bitches.

  10. Jacob says – reply to this


    110

    I knew this story about Keanu & Winona being a couple was bullshit! Afterall, she's not even his type. He likes men.

  11. Starli says – reply to this


    111

    Star wouldn't hire you, Mario?

More comments: « 1 [2]