Tough Titties Says The Mag
Filed under: Media Minute > Politik > Hillary Clinton
Vanity Fair must be LOVING all the press they're getting. When are they gonna put Perez in the magazine???? Yes, we're shameless!.
That shady V.F. article insinuating but never stating that former President Bill Clinton has had several recent affairs, including one with Gina Gershon, has got legs!
Gershon, a small time actress (best loved by the gays for her role in Showgirls), has adamantly refuted the statements in the pub and has even had her attorneys contact Vanity Fair to retract the story.
Of course VF isn't going to do that!.
Remember how much free press they got from those Miley Cyrus pictures?
A rep for VF has denied the article implies the pair slept together.
What?
Don't the people at VF read what they write?
It clearly does imply they slept together!
A spokeswhore for VF has said, "Todd Purdum's article does not indicate that former president Bill Clinton had an improper relationship with Gina Gershon. The story merely examines the concerns of some of Clinton's aides about reports of his behavior. We don't believe that any correction is warranted."
We're still thinking they might have published the story to ruin Hillary's rep a bit. But that's just our thinking.
As for the writer, he said he was "very careful to say there is no clear-cut evidence that President Clinton has done anything improper. I reject the notion that I'm making an insinuation. But I'm very comfortable quoting the people I quote because I know who they are, and I know that they are very senior people who have known President Clinton for a very long time and work for him at very high levels."
Ok, that doesn't mean they aren't lying to you or embellishing the truth to make the story better.
Do U think Vanity Fair should issue a retraction or clarification?
[Image via WENN.]
FYI!!! GINA IS NOT ONLY ADORED BY FRUITS FOR HER ROLE IN 'SHOWGIRLS', HER HOT BOD HAS ALSO GIVEN MANY A LESBO MOIST PANTIES, FOR HER ROLE AS HOOOOOOOT DYKE IN 'BOUND'!
Re: big – You do realize Mr. Clinton is most likely not reading your post on Perez right? Funny you direct your post to him.
Freedom of speech. they shouldn't have to retract shit, unless it's libel or slander.
BOYCOTT THIS DAMN MAGAZINE. They have recently stooped to printing articles worthy of The National Enquirer — its disgusting. All they want is the publicity, first Miley, now this. It's getting worse and worse. I'm no longer buying this magazine (and as a bonus I'm saving the trees).
Gina Gershon's best loved movie is BOUND, Perez, for gays and breeders alike. Dude, who even knew she was in Showgirls?
JUST GOES TO SHOW YOU HOW LOW OBAMA'S CAMP AND HE WILL GO JUST TO GET HIS NAME IN A STORY! LAME ASS
FUCK VANITY FAIR! AT THE RATE THAT MAGAZINES ARE CLOSING, I GIVE THEM 10 YEARS. TOPS. IRRESPONSIBLE REPORTING, AND DOWNRIGHT SLANDER IF YOU ASK ME.
OKAY, REALITY BREAK EVERYONE… THIS COUNTRY IS IN THE SHITTER! IF ANYONE CARES, ILL TELL U A LITTLE SOMETHING… WE BORROW FROM CHINA EVERYDAY!! WE EVEN OWE MEXICO! MEXICO! WE BALIED THEM OUT IN THE CLINTON YRS AFTER NAFTA WENT THRU AND THEY HAD THAT ZAPATISTA REVOLUTION, FOR LIKE 80 SOMETHING MIL. AND NOW WE OWE THEM??? YEAH! ITS LIKE THAT.
HILLARY CLINTON IS WORTH 100 MIL, WHY THE HELL SHOULD SHE BE HAVING TO PAY FROM HER OWN$$ TO KEEP HER CAMPAIGN ALIVE? ALL I CAN THINK OF IS BRINGING THE GREAT U.S.A. BACK FROM WHERE THOSE NUMBNUTS(CHENEY \BUSH)HAVE GOTTEN US.
HELL YES, THEY SHOULD PRINT A RETRACTION , BUT THEY WONT. ITS TIME FOR OBAMA TO PICK A RUNNING MATE… LETS MAKE HILLARY LOOK BAD FOR HER TO NOT GET ON THE TICKET AS V.P. BY MAKING BILL LOOK LIKE SHIT,THATS ALL THEIR AGENDA. THINK ABOUT THIS… IF OBAMA DOES NOT GET HILLARY HE WONT WIN AGAIMST MCCAIN. HE WONT. OBAMA /HILLARY IS A GOLDEN TICKET EVEN THE REPUBLICANS CANT GET AWAY WITH ANOTHER HANGING CHAD THEORY..
ONE MORE THING.. BILL CLINTON WAS A GREAT PRESIDENT!!!!!!!! HE LEFT US WITH A GREAT ECONOMY, HE REDUCED THE DEFICIT TO ALMOST NOTHING, FOUND A SURPLUS!, WHICH HE THREW BACK ONTO SOCIAL SECURITY, AND EDUCATION, AND HAD EMPLOYMENT DOWN. I DONT CARE WHO SUCKED HIS DICK!!!
HE WAS ELECTED AND GETTING PAID TO GOVERN AND MANAGE THE COUNTRY!!! THATS IT! IF HE WAS A BAD HUSBAND THE ONLY ONE THAT SHOULD HAVE SMACKED HIM AROUND WAS HILLARY!
OH, AND THAT ARGUMENT OF "HE IS A PRES. AND SHOULD BE HELD TO A HIGHER REGARD"….PLEASE!!! BUSH NEVER GOT HIS DICK SUCKED, BUT HE STILL RAN THIS COUNTRY INTO THE GROUND… SO I GUESS, IT DOESNT MATTER IF HE LEAVES US PENNILESS, AS LONG AS HE WAS FAITHFULL TO HIS WIFE. ILL TELL MY CHILD THAT WHEN HE ASKS ME WHATEVER HAPPENED TO SOCIAL SECURITY…..
Well Vanity Fair IS a liberal rag. Wonder if they were just for Obama, But then again this fell after Hillary had already lost it.
So there goes that idea.
Re: CHELLS ONE MORE THING.. BILL CLINTON WAS A GREAT PRESIDENT!!!!!!!! HE LEFT US WITH A GREAT ECONOMY, HE REDUCED THE DEFICIT TO ALMOST NOTHING, –
#1 Clinton had nothing to do with the Economy. The Bill Gates and Steve Jobs of the world did with their rising and over-inflated tech stocks. When those busted in the late 90s, the economy took a dive, and we went into a recession right before Bush got into office. Of course the libbies blamed it all on Bush even though the bottom falling out happened before he was even in office. Having said that, it wasn't Bill's fault either.
#2. Clinton "balanced" the budget by cutting MILITARY and INTELLIGENCE spending. That is were he "found" the "surplus" He cut it during a time when WE NEEDED IT MOST. A time when we were getting attacked my terrorist left and right (Need you forget, 9/11 was the last time we were attacked, but in the 90s, the WTC was attacked once before and several other attacks like USS cole etc.) Then when Bush got office and had to put a TON of money back into these thing which the Dems KNEW he would have to do they screamed SPENDING@1!111 OUR BUDGET1111
So ANY idiot could have balanced the budget the way Clinton did. Actually, only an idiot would have done what he did.
Having said that, I voted for that idiot once.
BTW all those "jobs" Bill and Hillary claim to have created weren't really helping.
Anyone remember in the 90s when the influx of Wal-Marts and telemarketing places started sprouting up everywhere? That was the Clinton administration creating jobs.
It's now Ironic how the left, and libbies are usually all anti-Wal-Mart too.
*snicker*
Re: Michel Freedom of speech. they shouldn't have to retract shit, unless it's libel or slander. –
Exactomondo.
Re: Gwen JUST GOES TO SHOW YOU HOW LOW OBAMA'S CAMP AND HE WILL GO JUST TO GET HIS NAME IN A STORY! LAME ASS –
You mean like the Hillary supporter than owns the Enquirer that ran the story about Edwards "mistress" being pregnant? I know what you mean sista.
EVERY PRESIDENT AMERICA HAD WAS A WHORE,BILL IS A OLD AVERAGE PIMP IN THE RACIST HOUSE OOPS I MEAN WHITE HOUSE AND HILARY HAS A GIRLFRIEND REMEBER THE WOMEN THAT WAS RUNNING HER CAMNPAIGN IN THE BEGINNGING BILL GAVE HER THE BOAT.THERE PROBABLY COUSINS LIKE ELEANOR ROOSEVELT AND PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT YES THEY ARE COUSINS LOOK IT UP.DO IT EVEN LOOK LIKE HILIARY LIKE MEN AND DO BILL LOOK ATTACTED TO HER THEY JUST WANTED TO CONQUER AND GET MONEY.BUT BARACK PUT A ROCK IN THERE PLANS ..I LOVE IT MS BAPS
no way should they print a retraction! That slim ball has been getting away with womanizing for years! I hope the paparazzi starts to follow him now so we know what he is really up to…but I am sure the liberal media will protect him as they have for years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Catie – Catie this article was written by a liberal(his wife was clintons first press secretary) in a libeal run magazine…what do the conservatives have to do with it? Know your facts before you write stupid comments like this. In case you haven't noticed the media is run by the liberals which is why bill and hillarys unmoral ways have gotten a pass for so many years! I think the article is hillarous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hillary and Bill Clinton are the slimiest couple to occupy the White House in my recent history and I'll not deny it, that would be in the past 53 years, people. I challenge someone to come up with a couple that has lied more and been one step ahead of a grand jury more than the Clinton's. As you'll notice I haven't even thrown in the nasty sexual predator issues, I'll give that away for free as I duck and cover from the sniper fire in Bosnia.
My wish is that more Americans would have woken up to the fact that this couple is narcissistic and can't tell a truth to save their lives. We saw a peek of the real couple when they slipped and talked about sniper fire and Jesse Jackson winning in the south and the fact that they had inside proof that Barrack was going to use the race card all along. Why didn't that story get more legs by the way? How is it that Bill had proof and where did he get it? Take the blinders off people, do not let Hillary back into any other political office, she and Bill are WHITE TRASH.
This is the face of white trash, and much like the Jews who now go to bat legally for those that would wipe them off the face of the earth, people who voted for Hillary because they thought it would harken back to the "Wonderful years of Bill Clinton" are the most delusional people living in America. The Clinton's speak with poisoned forked tongues. If they had to sit in a vat of Holy Water it would become a steam bath that would par boil them both in a New York Minute because the truth and the Clinton's have never been close friends or even kissing hillbilly cousins.
I am so sad for my demographic, older white women, who spent their energy propping up a corrupt woman just because they felt that's what the "sisterhood" expected of them. The fact that they chose THIS woman to represent them goes beyond all good sense and I say shame on them for being so superficial. Choose more wisely next time. Here's a hint, integrity DOES matter.
Since I know people will throw out Chaney and Bush as being the most corrupt couple I will contend that I need to specify Married Couple that has lived in the White House.
Of course they Should make a retraction, Purdum has done everything we were taught NOT to do in Journalism, but Perez, you're right - they won't. Vanity Fair is an attention-whoring publication and OF COURSE it was run to tear down Hillary's campaign. It's completely obvious. All I can do is cancel my subscription - which I did that day. No one has any respect any more - reminds me of the the other recent sell-out Babawah Walters….
Re: mary b Catie this article was written by a liberal(his wife was clintons first press secretary) in a libeal run magazine…what do the conservatives have to do with it? –
You can't tell em anything. Remember in the 90s when Hillary called the internet a "Right Wing Conspiracy" ? lawl.
Oh and BTW, the computer industry is what caused the economic boom of the 90s. Not the Clintons.
Though it doesn't stop them from taking credit for it.