Desperate Much????
Filed under: Oops!
Somebody's begging for attention!
Former E.R. star Juliana Margulies totally flashed her vajayjay to the world at the Narciso Rodriguez fashion show in NYC on Tuesday night.
She sooooo did it on purpose!!!
She's not wearing any pantyhose or panties. She's wearing a super short dress. And she's not even crossing her legs.
She's practically inviting the camera up her skirt!
CLICK HERE to check out the uncensored photos!!!!
Update: Julianna's publicist sent us the following statement.
"Julianna and I saw you item today and it brought us pure laughter!!! She told me to tell you the following, “first, she was wearing nude underwear, so does that not count?” and “she would never NOT wear underwear when sitting in the front row, only the second!!”
I would like to add, I think that photo was photo shopped."
Update #2: A rep for the photographer emphatically tells us, "I can tell you right now that photo was not photoshopped!!!"
[Images via WENN.]
The more I look at it, the more I think that it's her thighs squished together. It does look like her vajayjay at first glance, though!
OH how disgusting! That hairless little slit.
Cover that money slot up, honey.
photo shopped?
That isn't her va-jay-jay. It's her inner thighs. Seriously, you blew this way out of proportion… And honestly, photogs should NOT be looking up ladies' dresses. It's an invasive and disgusting act. Not cool.
EWWWWWWWW HO IS NAAAAASTY!!!!!!!
That's effin' hilarious! And what a crappy Photoshop job
Srsly….whose slit goes that high?
Hell, you can't even see her Vajayjay, her thighs are in the way.
Thats not even her vag. it's he legs squished together
FAKE!!!! Ever heard of Photoshop guys?? You poor gullible things, must have never seen the real thing before!
Love from the UK xxx
How can anyone look at that and not realize it's Photoshopped?
Um, that is clearly the fat on her upper thighs. You haven't even gotten to the crotch area yet.
You can see that she is sitting down, that skirt would have to be cut way higher then that and the bend at her waist would be right next to it instead of way above.
Open your eyes drama queen
That is a rather ODD looking vagina! YUCK
Thighs.
I'll give you a pass on this one seeing as you might not have ever really seen one up close…but that's her legs not her snatch!! sheesh, you can't even tell if she has underwear on….
this one was reaching!!
Re: oh_nono – right? thats clearly not a vagina! lol
Isn't this just the top of her thighs? Maybe?
totally photoshopped, it doesn't even look like its in the right place
Well now we know she doesn't have Vagina Dentata!! LMAO
There is no poofta to be seen. It's her thighs and poor lighting/angle along with the pantyhose she's wearing.
OMG…..I'm not sure how to feel about this….YIKES!!!
seriously, have NONE of you ever seen an actual vagina (not surprising).. those are her THIGHS.. that's not her lovely bit, does anyone know anatomy around here? Legs do NOT lead directly to vajayjay, there are hips and a pelvis involved that are NOT seen here.. I mean honestly.
THATS PHOTO SHOPPED!
IF YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE FEMALE ANATOMY, AS WE LADIES SHOULD, THE VAGINA DOES NOT BEGIN 3 QUARTERS OF THE WAY UP YOU THIGHS…
PLEASE TAKE A REALLY CLOSE LOOK…LOOK WHERE HE KNEES BEGIN…JESUS PEOPLE ARE WE ALL REALLY THIS STUPID NOW A DAYS?
it is DEFINITELY photoshopped. how do i know? a) i'm a female and we don't have our vajayjays that close to the front. duh. b) i've taken plenty of digital design classes in college to know what a crappy photoshop job that is. TRUST.
uhm i think thats her legs…
that's soooo fake.
Well……at least it's damn near perfect.
LADIES!! Put your vagina away! No one wants to see that dried up old thing. Sheesh!
wow thats fucking disgusting..and she obv is NOT wearing underwear BARF
Perez, if you cannot tell that it's her thighs pressed together as opposed to her clean vajayjay, then you are really making things up and sensationalizing things. It is very obvious that those are her thighs; it may be a bit on the fatty side, but those are her thighs.
Don't lie. I know it is easy for you but try to be truthful.
That's two thighs touching, not vaj.
Something looks not right about it
Well at least it is waxed Brazilian style…thank God for that
It is SO photoshopped! There's not even a crease between her vj and leg…
their her legs …. the vag is higher up but perez no one expects you to know this:)
That totally looks photoshopped! - No one has JUNK that far down on their thigh… geez
looks photoshopped to me.
So0o0o0o0 obviously PHOTOSHOPPED! no way her *coughs* line could go way up there! like duh…..
lol obviously tweaked.
Its defenetly just her thighs!
but then again ppl just need this kinda stuff to talk about…
DEFINITELY photoshopped. DEFINITELY.
Haven't any of you ever seen a vagina? That is clearly her thighs. And look where her hands are…over her crotch. That in no way could be her vajayjay.
Thank god, someone with thighs that touch. That is all it is!
It was TOTALLY photoshopped!! It looks like her thigh goes directly into her vajayjay….there is no crease there where there would NORMALLY be when someone is seated. p-h-o-t-o-s-h-o-p-p-e-d!!
Wait wait, that doesn't look right! Somethings wrong here! hmm….
.
.
It's still hot tho
Uhh.. those are her thighs. And who can say she isn't wearing underwear? YOU CAN'T TELL BECAUSE HER THIGHS ARE HIDING HER VAGINA. So, stop speculating like a bunch of pre-teen bobbleheads.
it's HER THIGHS TOUCHING TOGETHER, omg IDIOTSSSSSSSSS
doesnt look real to mee it looks weird , ew
Its the best celeb-no-panty crotch shot yet!
cut perez some slack, he doesn't know what it's supposed to look like!
What I want to know is….WHY do people call the vulva the vagina? The vagina is the part tucked inside a woman. The vulva is the name for the area on the outside. That is pathetic that people don't know that.
As for that…it looks like a pantyhose line…but she has no pantyhose on. Something isn't right. It doesn't look like a normal VULVA (see how I used the correct term there? LEARN IT!)
It looks like a pantyhose seam. But if you look really closely, you can see white lines on either side of the seam. I wonder what those are??
THOSE ARE HER LEGS STUCK TOGETHER! NOTHING ELSE! GET YOUR MIND OUT OF THE GUTTER!!!!!
no no no, silly gay man… Perez doesnt know what a vagina looks like if it fell out of the sky & hit him in the face.
Its just her thunder theighs. jeez louise. her vag is located right under her clasped hands.
(I just sat like that to double-check…. and i am correct. If they were that low down, it would literally be growing out of the middle of her theighs. silly gooses.)
soooooooo fake
That's gross, it doesn't even look natural.
I wonder why in Hollywood panties are often snubbed, whereas the rest of the human race wears them.
Okay SERIOUSLY!! No ones slit goes up that far…..and it you notice if that was her vaginal area…..you could clearly see where her hips end and her va jay jay starts….which you can't see. That is clearly her hips coming together. What a shitty thing to do to someone!
SOO FAKE!!!!!!!!!!
are you people blind?? her legs go up another 3 inches past that really bad photo shopped vajayjay….
idk… that doesn't look like a va jay jay
thats stockings! helllo!!!
Please, that is just her thighs pushed together. It's no where near her private area!
look how beautiful and composed claire danes looks in comparison to that disaster! i do think it's just her legs pushed together, however.
who cares about a vajayjay, claire danes looks FUCKING AMAZING… you go girl
Okay as a woman who refuses to wear underwear unless I'm on my cycle I seriously don't get how their vajayjay is always somehow sneaking a peek at the world. I think these crazy beeches need some etiquette classes on how to sit properly. And oh that shiz looks photo shopped in so many ways its sad.But if its not then at least we can say she is clean I mean at least it don't look like Lindsy's all wrinkled which is sad considering their differences in age.
That looks delicious! lol
Come on please! No real vagina could look like this! The pic was wether photoshopped or she is a man!
WHY DONT THEY EVER WEAR UNDERWEAR?!?!?!?
perez, i know you're not fully aware of female genitalia, but this is obviously altered. she looks like a barbie doll. terrible.
Ok thats obviously not flesh colored underwear cause there are no lines (beside the one down the centre) but it could also be her thighs?
If anyone would put their feet in the ground would just notice that is it not what it looks like…it is where both legs come together as a normal person seats!! omg!!! you people believe anything…gosh!!
Re: oh_nono –
I totally agree~ just her thigh's. Her thighs would have to be super skinny for us to see the naughty stuff.
I love Juliana!
I dont know who are you guys trying to fool… thats clearly photoshoped!, you can see it from a plane!
her vag looks fake.
thats def not her u know what… thats the top of her thighs touching.. geniouses
what is wrong with people? wear panties!
Oh God, that's gross!!
wow.
that DOES look photoshopped!!!
Clearly this is a shot of her THIGHS. They always stick together when you sit down, unless you're a stick figure like Vicki Beckham. If it's not one "photographer" it's another trying to stick his camera up someone's hoo-ha for the proverbial money shot. JUST SICK.
wtf's that??
IT”S THE CROTCH SEAM ON HER PANTY HOSE YOU IDIOTS!!!!!!!! YOU DUMB ASS RETARDS COULDN'T PICK OUT A VAJAYJAY IN A LINE-UP!!!
that's OBVIOUSLY a photoshop. no one's snatch is down that far!
It's amazing how slutty Hollywood can be. However, look at Claire Danes next to her. She is elegant and proper yet still looks hot!
looks photoshopped to me!
Got to be photo shopped. Pa leeeez tell me its photo shopped.
Does this woman have the intelligence of a knat?? Dear Lord, please be photo shopped. Why would anyone wear a dress that short, with a freaking zipper no less and no underwear unless they wanted this to happen?? Photo shopped, photo shopped, please be photo shopped.
Just disgusting woman.
that's just her fucking legs touching…seriously, have any of you ever seen on of these?! jeez
Again, photo shopped.
C'mon peoples, it's her thighs touching eachother…sheesh man!
So her thigh and her vagina are attached? Give me a break, that is not what you think it is.
it's so photoshopped!
that is just her thighs not her cooter
thats not even her vajay jay it her JIGLLY big legs together, Not all women have twig legs the meat from the inner thighs are together forming a line in between if you look at her legs leading to the line they are EXTREMELY short , her thighs are not THAT small!!
It looks photo-shopped to me! That is not human looking…
Perez, since you've never seen an actual vagina, I'll let this one slide.
But there's no way in hell that's a vagina. That's her thighs touching.
THAT IS NOT HER VAG!!!
ITS THE UPPER PART OF HER THIGHS! SERIOUSLY!.. SERIOUSLY. PEREZ I KNOW YOU DONT GET PERSONAL WITH ALOTA VAG BUT WHAT YOURE SEEING THERE IS NOT HER VAGINA… ITS HER UPPER THIGHS PRESSED TOGETHER! THAT POOR WOMAN IS PROBABLY NOT THAT BALD ON HER ACTUAL VAG…
SAVE HER!
THAT IS NOT VAGINA!
That's not her Vajayjay at all, it is totally just her thighs. Dumb shits.
thats not even her vagina you idiots!!
its her thighs together!!
omg, c'mon guys serioulsy!
wow sooooooooooooooooooo fake a vagina is btween legs, not on top of them, goo try perez
Totally photoshopped.
She is a forty y/old woman. That shit is sooo tight it looks plastic.
Have your wife/ girlfriend sit down nude in front of you. this is fake.
So super fake you guys. And who cares about Julianna MarbleEase anyway!