Desperate Much????
Filed under: Oops!
Somebody's begging for attention!
Former E.R. star Juliana Margulies totally flashed her vajayjay to the world at the Narciso Rodriguez fashion show in NYC on Tuesday night.
She sooooo did it on purpose!!!
She's not wearing any pantyhose or panties. She's wearing a super short dress. And she's not even crossing her legs.
She's practically inviting the camera up her skirt!
CLICK HERE to check out the uncensored photos!!!!
Update: Julianna's publicist sent us the following statement.
"Julianna and I saw you item today and it brought us pure laughter!!! She told me to tell you the following, “first, she was wearing nude underwear, so does that not count?” and “she would never NOT wear underwear when sitting in the front row, only the second!!”
I would like to add, I think that photo was photo shopped."
Update #2: A rep for the photographer emphatically tells us, "I can tell you right now that photo was not photoshopped!!!"
[Images via WENN.]
She should have crossed her legs and the world probably be left in wonder as to what her snatch looks like!! Now we all know!
We all know Mario has no idea what a reall vagina looks like, only his own, so I don't beleive that is what it is. Julliana Margulis is not a teen ho that needs this for publicity. She's a grown ass woman. Move on Perez.
Oh an her publicist should have proof read before sending you her comment!!
Actually, anatomically those are her thighs slammed tight together NOT her crotch.
Gold mine!
PHOTOSHOPPED, it's so fucking obvious… come on.
Its just her thighs…….
Perez you are such a moron. That's her thighs. Are you that blind and ignorant?
uhhhh that doesnt look like a vagina
You dumb people that is totally her thighs!!!! Any of you out there that have a vagina know that your lips don't go up that high when you sit down. Use your brain b4 you start typing. Not to mention those of you who are vomiting you obviously wanted to see it that's why you clicked on "uncensored picture" Stupids!
No way! That's TOTALLY photoshopped!
Am I mistaken, or is this just her thighs pressed together? NOT her vajayjay
sorry guys buttt
its her thighs together ……
LOOKS FAKE!
fuckin idiots. if you look closely you can see it's where her legs touch..not her vajayjay…seriously people
jesus christ. no one wants to see that. cover it up god damn!
1. a vagina does not look like that
2. it was totally photoshopped
that is soooo photoshopped!
have you ever seen a vagina? those are her tights.
Dooood! That has GOT to be photoshopped, or else she has alien snatch!
that's totally fake…
SEROUSLY i think shes wearing likee thights or somethingg !
those are her thighs…pressed together…you guys really don't know too much about womens bodies…obviously
Good Lord!! Where does her slit end, at her navel?!?!?!?!?
Thats just her thighs pressed together!!!
that isnt her punani i think its just her thighs???
People…thats just her thighs pressed together!
That looks SO fake. It's not even in the right place…
To me that looks like inner thighs sticking together in a vaginal way. Unless her thighs are actally 3 inches long and her labia is underdeveloped as a baby's.
notice how her dress is unzipped just the right amount so everyone can see her vaj.
hmmm
Doesn't anyone know what a bad photoshop job looks like? If not just look above.
That's not a vj, that's thighs next to each other!!
i don't think that's her vajayjay, that's just the fat of her legs.
That's definately not puss, Perez. She's not fat, but she's not a 20 year old either, that's all thigh booboo.
that is DEF not a vagina. more like her legs are tight together.
That is so obviously photoshopped. Sorry if you think that's real - you must not get to look at real women naked much!
You're an idiot Perez, because a photog would NEVER lie to make a buck off his or her pictures!!!
umm that doesnt look like a vag, or her thighs pressed toegether…
I DONT KNOW WHAT THE HELL THAT LOOKS LIKE?!?!?!
that's obviously not real. do you not know what vaginas look like?
YIKES!!!
.
THAT AIN'T THIGH!! WHATEVER IT IS, IT'S FREAKY!!!
I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S BETWEEN HER LEGS, BUT THAT'S DEFINITELY A TWAT SITTING NEXT TO HER!!!
Clearly Perez is a gay, those are thighs, not a vagina!
that looks weird…….
oh, PANTYHOSE!
it's obvious.
thats her thighs that have suctioned themselves together… its ok perez, we know you don;t have too much first hand knowledge of the vajay
Um, it does look super photoshopped. I dont see anything.
that got me for a second. it's just thigh.
I thought…"what a papercut."
that definitely does not look like a vagina.
Holy shit perez youve obviously never seen a vag, thats photoshop or something or yes she is wearing nude underwear because thats not what a vagina looks like when ur sitting down, cmon uve seen lidsays and britneys
That's still her thighs sticking together, that's NOT VAJ. Yeah she should've worn pantyhose, but that's not poon.
WEAR PANITIES
is it that hard???
Oh purlease! that is her fat thighs. Anyone who's ever seen a de-fuzzed adult vagina knows that it doesn't look like this, it's a slightly darker pigment. Grow up you pubescent losers!
are you retarted that is not her vagina is her fat thighs together. well at least i think it is.
i think thats her thighs sticking together not a vagina
eww!
That looks p'shopped. Sorry, it doesn't look like a normal vagina.
i think its her thighs…
EWWWWWWWWW
ummm yaaaaaaaaaaaa..tha is SO not nude undies..what a bunch of crap! lol… if it IS nude undies then it has a slit in it….gawd lol
Re: AnotherAndyAlias – Giggle, I so agree with you. You have to have seen one to identify it!
SHES OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW BETTER………..SMELLY OLD CROTCH
perez, hon, it might be because you're gay and don't really get a chance to see vajayjay in dif situations, but that doesn't look right.
that looks photoshopped.
That is NOT her vagina, people!!! It looks like her thighs/legs are pressed together. Get a better set of eyes, Perez….
It's soooo photoshpped! She has no creases at the top of her thighs.
omgggggg its so shaved
TOTALLY SHOOPED. AMATEURS!
I actually believe the nude panties explanation–that is what the seam on panyhose looks like. And the explanation for why she was not paying careful attention to the position of her legs: most likely a strong martini. give the girl a break!
Sorry but by the placement of her hands resting at the top of her legs it's looks clearly to be her thighs…
That does not look like a vagina.
To me it looks like just the tops of her thighs and from the angle it makes it seem like her vaj.
You are either idiots or you have never seen an actual vagina. It is her thighs stuck together.
You have to excuse perez, he hasn't see many in his life. He doesn't know when he's looking a two thighs pressed together. Apparently neither do many others.
I dont think is her vagina, cause her stuff is hanging really low there, so i think it should be set a little higher. It might be that she has big flabby thighs perhaps? lol
That's just her thighs pushed together! Geez…come on people.
She either has the shortest thighs on the planet or well or nothing thats her thighs..right? I dont think thats her hooha..
I've been using Photoshop for 8 years now and I am totally confident is saying that image is a fake. Poor quality job too. As a woman though it's not my knowledge of image editing software that tells that's a fake! Hello…
pretty sure that's just the top of her thys pressed together? that doesn't even look REMOTELY like a coochie.
dude
it seriously just looks like her thighs are touching
if thats genetalia
its weird looking
That's her thighs.
tht doesnt look like vagina…. it looks like her legs…
Really? That's her thighs? Maybe that black shadow is photo shopped and that would explain it. Otherwise, I've been looking in the mirror at my own and have to say only the vajayjay looks like that.
This is either an alien vagina or a pair of nude undies.
is that clare danes next to her? if it is she looks like crap. {& i mean that in a loving way}-sux getting old!.
totally photoshopped pic here!! look at the sides of the vagina, no creases or folds where here legs meet her pelvis?? this is so fake and funny! it looks like someone melted her crotch into her thigh!!!HAHAHA GOOD LAUGH!
Has Perez ever seen a vagina? This is not a vagina,its her thighs.
I agree, That does just look like her thighs…
photoshop no questions, theres no crease to separate her legs from her crotch. even super skinny girls have a separation, that would just be weird, it looks like her legs blend.
That's the top of her legs touching dumb fuck, not her vagina slit.
She must have known. Better watch out for those ingrowns with that close a shave!
Just looks like her thighs touching. They're not twigs like some other young starlets.
I think it's superimposed. On the close up shot you can tell.
Looks like inner thighs to me.
So obviously photoshopped, she has no thigh in these pictures. her vagina is on her thigh!
OK ..BOYS AND GIRLS- WORD TO WISE FROM THE WISE… THIS PHOTO HAS SOOOOO BEEN WORKED ON…I HAVE USED SOME OF THE BEST SOFTWARE FOR PHOTOSHOP.. AND I HAVE TO TELL YOU THAT THIS S THE WORST PHOTOSHOP'D CRAP I HAVE EVER SEEN!!! PLEASE— IF YOU ARE GOING TO EVEN ATTEMPT TO PHOTOSHOP SOME FEMALE GENITLE PLEASE CONSIDER THE PLACEMENT AND PORTION OF A FEMALE!!!!! IF THAT SHOT IS TRUE ..LADIES AND GENTS.. WE HAVE A FIRST PHOTO OF AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL PA-DU-SSY-IT LOOKS LIKE THOSE LIPS COULD KISS HER BELLY BUTTON..EWW GAG-ING
Doesn't look real to me! it just doesn't look rite… no don't believe it perez! looks photoshoped or something!
Thats either her thighs or a really bad photo shop job. You outta be embarrassed you paid for this photo.
that doesnt look like a vagina.
Those are panti-hose
Those are pantie hose