Desperate Much????
Filed under: Oops!
Somebody's begging for attention!
Former E.R. star Juliana Margulies totally flashed her vajayjay to the world at the Narciso Rodriguez fashion show in NYC on Tuesday night.
She sooooo did it on purpose!!!
She's not wearing any pantyhose or panties. She's wearing a super short dress. And she's not even crossing her legs.
She's practically inviting the camera up her skirt!
CLICK HERE to check out the uncensored photos!!!!
Update: Julianna's publicist sent us the following statement.
"Julianna and I saw you item today and it brought us pure laughter!!! She told me to tell you the following, “first, she was wearing nude underwear, so does that not count?” and “she would never NOT wear underwear when sitting in the front row, only the second!!”
I would like to add, I think that photo was photo shopped."
Update #2: A rep for the photographer emphatically tells us, "I can tell you right now that photo was not photoshopped!!!"
[Images via WENN.]
that picture is obviously photo shopped! unless her legs are really that short from hip to knee
It's so obvious that this is photoshopped. The line isnt even centered……….it goes diagonally down to the right
thats totally not her vadge. laaaaaaaaaaaame. its too far down and that would be really long lips
WTF thats her legs…
THAT DOESNT LOOL REAL….LOOKS LIKE VERY GOOD PHOTOSHOP IF YOUR LEGS ARE TOGETHER YOU'D SEE JUST THE TOP OF THE LINE OF YOUR VAJAYJAY…IT'S PASTED ON
seriously people??!!!!!!!!! Her vagina would have to hang halfway down her legs for this to be it! That is her THIGHS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ummm… that's her leg. NOT her Vajay-jay!
unless her "girl" is 4 inches above her knee!
Looks Photoshopped to me
.
.
Desperate fame whore…
.
.
WTF is that
that's not en a vagina,idiot. It could be her thigs or pantyhose
It's OBVIOUSLY Photoshopped.
That doesnt even look real. Women are not "cut" that way when they sit like that with their legs together. Where is the hump of her upper thigh? Give me a break.
Who cares? Claire Danes looks stunning next to her though.
that's not her vajayjay! thats just part of her stockings!
Re: STL – exactly, come on!! IDIOTS!!!! I CAN believe you morons actually think this is real.
Re: Andy27 – You're not funny, and you're a fag, eww!!
That's not her 'vayjayjay', its the fattier part of the thighs meeting. So technically, she didn't flash anything at all.
She looks like a doll with a cod piece that's had a line drawn on it. Obviously fake.
it doesnt even look like a cooch.. looks like a seam.
You're all dumbshits..Its her fucking legs squished together..it doesnt even look like a vagina! jesus..
I THINK HER ZIPPER WAS BROKE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
atleast she knows enough to wax
Perez sweetheart, you need to look at a few more real flanges babe! Even the moved shaved ones don't have a seam going down them - anyone can see she's got some sort of underwear on!
Love ya baby!
i think this photo is doctored…look how short her thighs are! that's just not right…
thats just her legs! come on people, i hope no ones vag is in that spot. lets just think about perspective.
healthy legs do that, you all are just used to looking at ana legs.
i wish you jsut cut juliane out… can we focus on how SMOKIN HOT claire danes looks?!!??!?! amazing. anyone agree?
don't believe its real
she has no lips!
it's just her legs! she's probably wearing underwear only you CANT SEE IT!
That picture is so fake. THere is no way that the vadge line would go up that high and be so pronounced at such a distance.
That's just her legs pressed together…
photoshopped. where are her legs coming from?
That is sooo fake. The line is painted on, and very poorly at that. Anyone that's ever seen a real vagina should know this is not what one looks like LOL
Whoever the other woman is beside her looks like she's got a 5 o'clock shadow LOL man face!
Perez,
You TRUELY are a gay man if you think THAT'S what a vagina looks like while sitting… there is NO WAY that the photo is real…I'm a bi chick and have seen MORE than enough vajayjays in my time, and NONE look ANYTHING like that flesh coloured "line" that they are trying to pass off as a vagina. Seriously, take out a biology book in the library and look for yourself!!!
obviously it wasn't photoshopped because it's OBVIOUSLY just her thighs stuck together you retards. unless her vagina starts near her knees……and then another lemming fell off the cliff…………
TOTALLY PHOTOSHOPPEDDDD! you can see the blur lines on the side, pshhhh stupid and lame!
IM IN A RADIO COMPETITION IN NEW ZEALAND.
IT'S BIG BROTHER MEETS SOCIAL NETWORKING.
I'M LOCKED IN A HOUSE WITH 7 OTHERS AND NEED TO HAVE THE MOST ONLINE FRIENDS.
IF YOU HAVE BEBO, PLEASE ADD ME AND HELP A SISTER(from another mother) OUT!!!!!!
:D
www.bebo.com/nicolap199
OR SEARCH
nicola@nexttopfriend.co.nz
CHECK
www.theedge.co.nz
FOR MORE INFO!
THANKS!
♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
i'm pretty sure that's just her thighs stuck together. nobody's vagina actually looks like that when their legs are crossed.
Omg, her vagina look mutated :/
U-gly
Notice how the shadow created by the left part of her dress doesn't follow the contours of her thigh in a manner that would suggest that there is indeed discontinuation and that what we see is her nude vagina.
It's photo shopped. Horrible photo shopping too.
that is totally not her vagina…. anyone who has ever seen a naked woman sitting in that position should know, the vagina would not look anything like that….
Oh, honey. You're supposed to wear pants when you wear a shirt.
legs pressed together…
is that a vagina???
CAN WE SAY PHOTOSHOP??? WOW, CLAIRE DANES ACTUALLY LOOKS PRETTY!
man that vagina is totally photoshopped, and poorly at that. you can see the line disappearing into nowheres-ville in a completely unnatural way.
You guys are retarded, that's the top of her thighs pushed together. She's probably wearing big ol' granny panties, not to mention her punani is most definitely does not look like a 7 year-olds crotch. Unless she's had a lift there… which i don't think happens?
Anyway, the problem is not her THIGHS sticking together, but that everything is wrong with that outfit. For christ's sake Claire Danes looks better than her.
For all you idiots that have posted how 'disgusting' this is, I say you are fucking blind. Obviously this is photo-shopped and it's so obvious this is NOT her vagina, if you honestly think this is - YOU ARE STUPID. If you look at where her hips bend because she's sitting, you'll see how far back her vag should really be, not so far front where it's claiming to be. Use your eyes people!
looks fake
thats all leg. sorry perez. i love ya but its leg. even if its was perfectly waxed, it wouldn't look like that. there would be more holes. duhhhh