Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

saMAN Blogs About BiHan's Parisian Flour Attack

Filed under: Lindsay Lohan > saMAN Ronson

lezlo__opt1.jpg

saMAN Ronson took to her official blog after her lady love, LezLo, was flour bombed in Paris for wearing fur:

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Flour Power

I posted a blog last week that angered some people who didn't know how to read properly, I then wasted my own time defending myself and now I regret that.

There is a fine line that distinguishes the difference between exercising our freedom of expression and offending others, for example the debate regarding freedom of speech vs. hate speech…. i feel that this principle should apply to protestors also. It's a pity that some groups feel the need to assault people as opposed to fighting with words.

Whenever I feel the need to vent about something that feels unfair to me I reach for my computer, I don't run out of the house with abusive intentions. I don't expect everyone to react the same way, but I do expect people to respect each other. Maybe that's my first mistake? It seems lately I am learning that there are too many people who put another species before their fellow man and that's sad. I don't wear fur, but I don't think I have the right to ATTACK those who do. No one has that right.

PETA should focus their efforts on educating people on what they believe are injustices instead of seeking press via harassing those in the limelight. I received an apology too many days late from the PETA folks (the blog removal was too little too late) and today I'm pissed at the bag of flour thrown on Lindsay last night. Not because I got powdered down, but because the girl who threw it acted like an animal herself. I take that back, it's an insult to animals to group her in with them, my dog is FAR more civilized than that person. I would have more respect for them if they didn't use other people to get their point across. Lindsay, Mary Kate, Ashley Olsen, Anna Wintour and the rest of the targeted celebrities aren't the problem, I'm pretty sure they're not the only ones wearing fur, in fact, they should be appreciated by PETA for giving them a target. If it weren't for them, who would get them press?????

I know I'm probably going to get a lot of angry emails in response, but I don't really care. I got enough last week for no reason so I'm more than happy to ignore the nastiness after seeing what I saw last night. I'm not about to throw on a fur coat in retaliation, but had I had one within reach, I'm not sure I would have walked away from it.

p.s. when was the last time you saw an animal attack one of its own in defense of a human? hmmmmm….. that's one to grow on!

p.s.s. i think there are plenty of families that could have used that flour for a meal. nice job, lady.

Thoughts??

[Image via WENN.]

233 comments to “saMAN Blogs About BiHan's Parisian Flour Attack”

More comments: « 1 [2] 3 »



  1. 101

    maybe dumb ass lindsay shouldn't be wearing real fur in the first place and then the flour could have gone to a family, thanks sam MAN for the suggestion.



  2. 102

    In 1970 I was in London at a street market. I spied an ancient tiger skin rug from the "days of the Raj" for only $100. They wouldn't sell it to me because I was an American and tigers were/are endangered and to display a tiger skin rug would create envy and a market for such. So even vintage pelts and skins are not "fair game" in this world. Don't beat up the messenger. Sometimes you have hit vapid ho's over the head to get the message across. Lindsay should wear fake fur; it's more in keeping with her persona.



  3. 103

    I HAAAAAAAAAAAAAATE PETA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Wear fur, don't wear fur, who cares?! Seriously! Unless we stop all things animal related, they have NO validity with me. Maybe I won't wear fur, but don't you DARE take away my leather Jimmy Choos!!!! Leather is murder, too. So is steak. Maybe I'll go eat some meat and wear my Choos…

    PETA is a like the Scientologists of "activism". Taking things TOO far and often using brainwashing on their followers. I was a sad, sad PETA fighter for 5 years. I regret that more than I regret being an omnivore, leather wearing girl who doesn't think fur is evil!!! ;-)



  4. 104

    Re: Canadian Chuck

    In an effort to make yourself appear less ignorant, you should learn to spell. Get an eduacation first, then worry about which group in superior: vegans or meat eaters.



  5. 105

    PS–LOVE the comment about PETA choosing to target skinny celeb women in fur but not leather wearing bikers who would demolish them!!!! PETA sucks my aerobicized backside!!!!!! Wait…is that considered non-vegan!?!?!



  6. 106

    People only wear fur because it is expensive. It's a status symbol. It's a disgusting status symbol, at that.



  7. 107

    Samantha had some "great" points, none of them made any sense first off. Second my dog has attacked another dog as protection to me so therefore her p.s is thrown out the window.



  8. 108

    I completely disagree with Samantha on this. Lindsay should stop wearing fur. Why should the animals suffer? Plus, there are fake fur clothes that look fantastic.

    Mike Andrews
    Dante's Cove Remix 2008
    I T U N E S



  9. 109

    I love them they r so hotttt!!



  10. 110

    First of all, "here are too many people who put another species before their fellow man and that's sad." No, you thinking it's okay to say that is what's sad. That's the difference between humans and animals, humans have brains that use logic and understanding, animals don't. These animals are balancing YOUR ecosystem and enabling YOU to live. WHY the hell should people put other humans before animals? HUmans are CRUEL. Before you weep over that, what about the millions of innocent lives being killed during war ALL the time?
    That girl that threw the flour is stupid. She did waste good flour, and i don't understand really what that would have done to change what Lindsay decides to wear.
    Fur coats shouldn't be made in the first place, and if anyone does decide to wear/buy them. Whatever. Up to them. They're the animal killers and no one else should give a shit.

  11. meh says – reply to this


    111

    Firstly what a horrible picture of Lindsay and her little rat teeth.Wasn't Lindsay photographed at CHARLOTTE RONSONS fashion show wearing a "say no to fur" badge along with the rest of the Ronson clan? So maybe she has been wearing fake fur, although I'm sure she would have spoken out by now. And it's P.P.S not P.S.S.



  12. 112

    I am an animal activist, so I could easily agree with Peta for that one reason, but I don't. I think that she threw down some pretty solid points. It seems Peta is trying to get media attention, and throwing flour is not the way to do it. If they want people to really follow them, they need every message they throw out, to be positive. I don't go around throwing stuff on animals that have in the past killed people. I don't agree with what Saman said about animals not protecting people. Thats BS because there are tons of animals that fight for their owners, so sorry Sam, stupid comment there. But for the most part you had it.



  13. 113

    what's funny is how perez attacks lindsay lohan yet creams and praises the shiteous katy perry. I still can't tell who has more talent, it's a toss up!



  14. 114

    "p.s. when was the last time you saw an animal attack one of its own in defense of a human? hmmmmm….. that's one to grow on!"

    uhm, dogs do it all the time, moron.
    they're both stupid twats.



  15. 115

    (Real) Fur is for bad people. Someone who can wear fur without a single ounce of feeling are evil. Lindsey is probably not "evil" just self absorbed and stupid.



  16. 116

    oh, and maybe someone should key her in that animals brains aren't as advanced as humans….er?



  17. 117

    Samantha is RIGHT with this phrase:

    "Lindsay, Mary Kate, Ashley Olsen, Anna Wintour and the rest of the targeted celebrities aren't the problem, I'm pretty sure they're not the only ones wearing fur, in fact, they should be appreciated by PETA for giving them a target. If it weren't for them, who would get them press?????"



  18. 118

    She is stupid.



  19. 119

    Oh my god she's wearing a SKINNED ANIMAL people let's not lose sight of that just cos Saman is good with words. Yes PETA should target the people who make them (they probably already do) but when a celebrity wears something unfortuntatly it becomes hot and people want to wear it too. Targeting celebrities who wear fur is probably the best way to get through.



  20. 120

    Sam's made some great points. PETA is acting like terrorists…trying to get their way by controlling others by fear. Their tactics should be illegal



  21. 121

    she is officially a retard! why does she even speak….i dont understand. making the point that the flour could have fed people? come on! firecrotch could have fed an entire community with the money that she spent of the fur. glass houses saMAN!



  22. 122

    Point 1: Animals are skinned while still alive, they are left with portion of their fur skinned off, kept in small cages filled with feces, not fed, placed on rape racks and forcibly inseminated, and then ultimately either shot or gased.
    THAT IS REAL CRUELTY SAMANTHA RONSON
    Point 2: The right to live a life without pain or suffering, to have some measure of happiness, to not be faced with cruelty - should be a fundamental right shared by all, no matter what species. It is truly unfortunate that Samantha Ronson feels that it has to be only the gay and lesbian community (as I'm sure she has no idea what it means to be queer) that receives those rights.
    Point 3: Lindsay Lohan was not harmed, and quite frankly it should have served as a wake up call for her. She is wearing the skin of a creature that did not give it willing. Secondly she is not the sort of person that would respond to requests for conversations with animal rights groups, or for that matter I highly doubt she would even understand what they were saying.
    Point 4: I am sure in many respects both Ronson and Lohan are quite pleased over this event, mainly because of the lack of atttention they have received lately due to their complete and total lack of talent.



  23. 123

    Re: FREE*SPEECH*MY*@$$ – i would have forbid you too! theres a difference between speaking your mind and being an ass. and you my friend were the latter. Nobody likes to be preached to.



  24. 124

    How would she like to have her skin stripped from her body? Instead of slamming PETA she should watch some of their efforts on video to save animals, this is just another way to raise awareness, you live in the limelight, set an example, if people don't buy fur then the industry will die and thousands of animals will be live… These Loser's have lost touch with reality.



  25. 125

    I would also like to comment to all of you that believe those who wear leather are not targeted - determining leather (animal skin) from faux leather is by far harder to determine. I would also like to comment to people that if you happen to see a jacket that say the fur portion is fake but was made in China, it is DOG FUR and most definitely not fake fur.
    I would also like to say that in many respects yes, over the years PETA has lost sight of what truly matters, however I think if animal rights (and the rights of all) can be kept in the public eye, the better chance of change for the better we have.
    To further this comment, people please stop pretending you care about human rights or even the environment when you don't care about the welfare of animals. We are all interconnected and what happens to one is indicative of what will happen to all. When it takes 50 gallons of water to process one pound of hamburger or migrant workers who receive no aid are forced to work in such places to feed their families - it shows how it is a cylce of cruelty that won't end until we attempt to stop cruelty and inhumanity all together, not just for humans, not just for the earth, and not just for animals BUT EVERYONE.



  26. 126

    I have a lot to say, however, i will keep it simple because I am one of the last to post.

    She is not as logical as you all think.



  27. 127

    p.s. most animals will and do defend their humans from other humans….what a douche



  28. 128

    I agree with her. I myself am not into fur but I don't get angry at other people for wearing it. No one should violate someone's space or assault someone for having a different perspective especially about something like fur.



  29. 129

    My god im getting sick and tired of these two, they contribute NOTHING! OK they are both retards and craving for more attention what a couple of a stupid attention thirsty bitches..What will happen to them once we all get bored of their "am i lesbian or not?" little act…Hopefully they'll disappear like they rightfully should!

  30. SDawg says – reply to this


    130

    peta sucks



  31. 131

    i totally agree with her. i dont wear fur and i only buy meat from places who allow their animals to roam free but i would never get physical with another person who doesnt do the same.



  32. 132

    It's funny how she say's, "p.s. when was the last time you saw an animal attack one of its own in defense of a human? hmmmmm….. that's one to grow on!" - Actually, I think it happens a lot, especially w/ dogs. When my mom was pregnant w/ my sister, a pit bull was about to attack her, but our American Eskimo got between them and scared it off. Although there wasn't a fight, there would have been if that dog tried to attack my mom, who is his family & vise versa. I've never seen a time where he wasn't protective of us around a stranger. So grow on that!



  33. 133

    This Samantha is really a moron! How about she makes her next jacket from her beloved dog. To kill an animal to make a warm coat when you have the possibility of acquiring a warm coat without killing any animals is beyond stupidity.



  34. 134

    All for throwing shit at people who wear fur.
    all for tryin to prevent fur from being on the market.

    dont buy or wear fur



  35. 135

    fur wearing bitch
    stop the demand and you stop supply
    what a mormon
    i mean
    moron

  36. jrnpp says – reply to this


    136

    I think that the logical next step for Lindsay would be to join Sarah Palin in Alaska and they can gleefully shoot and kill plenty of defenseless animals from helicopters. Eliminate the middleman (designers) . Moose stew anyone?

    PETA ROCKS!



  37. 137

    OK - what do you think strapping a bomb to your body and setting it off in a crowd would make you - ? I think I'd rather have flour than that…and "that" goes on all the friggin time….thats the sad part



  38. 138

    GOOD JOB PETA! Lindsay's not dumb - she should know better - what these animals go through just so she can wear her stupid fur coat.

    Having a bag of flour thrown at you pales in comparison to being skinned alive, clubbed to death or thrown around like a worthless sack of shit. Pretty much how countless animals the world over are treated every day in the name of 'fur fashion'.

  39. FS says – reply to this


    139

    There is enough education out there about how a fur coat, hat, etc becomes an fashion piece. LL and Samantha cannot claim ignorance. The reason why designers make fur is because ignorant idiots like LL buy them.

    They should have pelted her with glue, something that really would've ruined her lovely coat….flour wasn't good enough.

    When you see how those animals suffer, you can't help but be angry when you see a fur wearing hoe parading around like a spoiled brat. LL should be ashamed of herself.



  40. 140

    I'm all for animal rights but most of those protesters are fucking crazy!



  41. 141

    Samantha is so right, although I don't like the way she says 'I don't wear fur' - why not? There is no reason to make a decision like that. As long as you know where the fur comes from, it's fine. I mean, don't get it from Canada or Eastern Europe. Get it from Scandinavia or France. They have other rules. I just hate when people say that… it's like saying 'I don't wear cotton'. Fine if you don't wear it all the time but don't rule it out.



  42. 142

    that samanta is so stupid,
    "Whenever I feel the need to vent about something that feels unfair to me I reach for my computer, I don't run out of the house with abusive intentions."

    yeah tell the animals why are in cages to go to their computers to complaint

    what an asshole is she,, and the stupid lindsay is worse, im glad she got that flour on her. i want pictures of that ,,

    and her question about animals fighting with animals in defense of humans,, HELLO what about dogs, if another dog barks you your dog always defends you.
    go away stupid samanta bitch. (and develope a body, you look like a kid)



  43. 143

    I felt bad for Lindsay.

    Wether you like her or not, wether she wears fur or not did not give that person, or anyone, the right to throw flour on her!



  44. 144

    she can suck it.



  45. 145

    Peta supporters get WAY TOO OUT OF HAND. Why don't they defend slain HUMANS? Don't get me wrong: I can't stand Lindsay LoHOE, but PETA is beyond retarded with their hatred toward humans versus animals. They need a WHOLE lotta prozac and a few bacardi chasers.



  46. 146

    I say Samantha is pretty dead on!
    Dogs do attack for their owners, but that is besides the point…
    The PETA attacker was out of line. They should be charged with some form of harassment at the very least. There's more productive ways to make a point. An attack like that just shows ignorance.

    Go Samantha!



  47. 147

    She's a asshole….and so is her dirty hooker girlfriend.



  48. 148

    She makes a decent point, but what's wrong with having compassion for animals? Wearing fur is WRONG, and she's dumb if she thinks otherwise. Why does she take offense to people having compassion for animals? Why can't she see that maybe us as humans should treat other living things with more kindness?



  49. 149

    and my response to this would be………Samantha, I respectfully ask you this… have you ever seen the disgustingly cruel way that these animals are raised, tortured and skinned alive for their fur??? All so that some socialite or celebrity can walk around thinking that it makes them more beautiful, when really it does the complete opposite. I realise that YOU don't wear fur, but defending those who do, is almost is bad. The last time I checked, animals couldn't speak, so they need those of us compassionate humans to be their voice.
    Shame on you for defending this and shame on Lindsay for perpetuating this inhumane practice. As for the flour comment being used for a meal, how about the THOUSANDS of dollars that the fur costs? I imagine that could feed more than a few people.
    Food for thought non?



  50. 150

    Cry me a river……….what ev!



  51. 151

    Those PETA people should just calm down and take a breather. They are not helping any animals by doing those antics..



  52. 152

    Despite numerous objections and counterattacks on Ronson's text, she does make stable points. You cannot sit there and call her stupid, she definitely articulated herself well. It's nice to see that some celebrities have a brain.



  53. 153

    "p.s. when was the last time you saw an animal attack one of its own in defense of a human? hmmmmm….. that's one to grow on!"

    Ummm…. last I checked, animals don't mass kill humans for their own pleasure. And I also cite mc2294's comment about dogs… maybe that dumb bitch should think a lil more before posting absolute lies.



  54. 154

    Members of PETA are generally witless, pretentious fools who think they are actually making a difference. Physically attacking another person in the name of "WHATEVER YOUR CAUSE" is never right.

    I find it interesting the Perez is the first person to hammer on a celeb for assaulting a person and admonishing a person for violence, but turns a blind eye whenever it is a cause he supports.

    I will always find it disturbing that people will spend so much time and effort promoting their eco-terroristic cause to save animals at the expense of a fellow person. If these people spent the same energy protecting the rights of humans globally and locally our world would be a better place.

    Sad. . .



  55. 155

    PETA is a disgusting organization. They take the shit too far, and one of these days, someone's overzealous bodyguard it going to take out a pistol and show them the meaning of the word overkill. They really need to lay off people. Who even really wears fur anymore, honestly? Leave people alone! There's a difference between giving a good message, and harrassment/borderline violence against people for doing something you don't like.



  56. 156

    Re: nanaama – right on!



  57. 157

    Re: jrnpp – Love this response. She should join her, sick bitches!



  58. 158

    Obviously, the PETA people don't care about starving humans otherwise they wouldn't be wasting food. Besides, isn't it against the law to assault people? I hope they're sued.



  59. 159

    listen up BIYACH… there is no rationalization for wearing fur period….. it is fucking horrible how they trap animals and breed them for slaughter so ugly bitches like you whore girlfriend can prance around in fur and thinks its fucking cool when it is so not cool…. woman who wear fur do not have a conscience and are shallow fucking bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



  60. 160

    Well written, well thought out points, Samantha.



  61. 161

    PETA's so worried about people killing animals… HELLO!!! PEOPLE ARE KILLING PEOPLE TOO, WHY WON'T THEY WORRY ABOUT THAT?



  62. 162

    Re: adrishit

    I was there that night,Saturday November 15th, and they were in LONDON not Paris… at the Cafe De Paris in LONDON!!



  63. 163

    I REALLY LIKED THEM BUT AFTER READING THIS! FUCK THOSE LESBOS!!!
    LINDSEY IS IN THE PUBLIC EYE AND IN STEED OF USING THAT POWER FOR THE RIGHT REASONS SHE GO'S AROUND WEARING FUR AND BEING A IDIOT! I WAS TOTALLY FOR YOU GIRLS BUT IF I WAS THAT FLOUR SWINGING GIRL I WOULD HAVE DONE IT WITH A SMILE!



  64. 164

    Yeah and somewhere there's an animal that could be alive if your dumbass, talentless ho of girlfriend wasn't wearing it's fur!!! Both are dumb bitches!!!!! They should have poured blood on her instead!!!!



  65. 165

    STFU sam. No one gives a fuck about your response

    They through flour ffs that's hardly "assault"

    I assume they do this these days as it is less horrible than throwing blood or red paint onto the fur. I hate people that can justify torture.
    Stupid bitches. What the fuck have they done to make the world a better place?

    One PLAYS CD's for a living.. The other sits around watching her play cd's and has her photo taken for a living wtf kinda DJ is that. Hope they choke on their own pitiful existences.



  66. 166

    she should eat somethin and fatten up….hate these two fuckers

  67. k-lee says – reply to this


    167

    I usually don't care about what Samantha says, but this time she's absolutely. PETA activists act like animals themselves. That flour thingy was uncalled for. They're getting weirder by the day.



  68. 168

    PETA members don't believe in educating people, because they're not smart enough. Troglodytes!

  69. k-lee says – reply to this


    169

    Re: k-lee

    *absolutely RIGHT.



  70. 170

    P.E.T.A. are a bunch of hipocrites!! I read that they pick up animals from people who have to give them up and wind up uthenizing them!!!
    i



  71. 171

    screw both "Saman" and Lohan - at least PETA is trying to get the word out by making a statement. Handing out pamphlets to be informative isn't always the answer. Go PETA!



  72. 172

    I'm glad they threw this flour on her. It's not like they destroyed the coat (like when they were throwing red paint). She deserves it. Why does she need to kill an animal just to look good?



  73. 173

    hahahahahahaha! In your face, bitch!



  74. 174

    While her thoughts are well articulated. It's still just not cool to wear fur. Yes the flour thrower did act aggressively but you got to understand that chick has seen hours and hours of footage of animal abuse. She's read a large amount of horrible animal torture stories and she's faced with a huge population of humans who are too in denial to care. Lindsey is fair game in my books to be dumped on because, and this is whether you like it or not Sam, she's what lots of little girls look up too. Some of us don't want wearing fur to become "fashionable" and she was bitch slapped with powder to get that point across - c'est la vie. Oh and the comment about the dinner for the poor Mother - lame considering you're rich and blow away more than a bag of wheat.



  75. 175

    I have to agree with Sam R. The PETA people can protest all they want but throwing flour at Lindsey is not going to get the fur wearing population to stop! What the fuck does Lindsey have to do with that?



  76. 176

    all this Saman ronson stuff, so what she's a lesbian , grow up! perezwoman!

  77. allyk says – reply to this


    177

    wow. really? people agree with her? she makes good points? there was nothing even remotely intelligent or substantial in what she had to say. i am just appalled by people's ignorance. saMan why don't you check out some peta videos and see the torture these animals go through. and then, just for the fun of it, envisage your loving ,loyal dog being ripped to shreds all in the name of VANITY. MAN LET'S SKIN YOUR DOG ALIVE AND LET LINDSAY PARADE AROUND IN IT'S SKIN. YOU ARE AN APPALLING HUMAN BEING.



  78. 178

    dogs protect their owners from other dogs all the time; therefore, her first "p.s." is quite dumb.

  79. allyk says – reply to this


    179

    wow. really? people agree with her? she makes good points? there was nothing even remotely intelligent or substantial in what she had to say. i am just appalled by people's ignorance. saMan why don't you check out some peta videos and see the torture these animals go through. and then, just for the fun of it, envisage your loving ,loyal dog being ripped to shreds all in the name of VANITY. YEAH sa MAN LET'S SKIN YOUR DOG ALIVE AND LET LINDSAY PARADE AROUND IN IT'S SKIN. YOU ARE AN APPALLING HUMAN BEING.



  80. 180

    I agree with her and she is right! If the celebrities didnt wear fur, etc., PETA would not even be able to get their free PR on and stay relevant.

  81. jlk says – reply to this


    181

    She's and IDIOT!!

    "The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created for men." ~Alice Walker

    -p.s. I can't believe i just commented, for the first time, on Samantha Ronson; even more shameful: i can't believe i read this blog…what is the world coming to?!



  82. 182

    she has a point … you can go around attacking people cuz y'all don't share the same views



  83. 183

    ANIMALS ARE BEING NEEDLESSLY KILLED!!! The rest is just people saying anything so they can be right and make the other person wrong.



  84. 184

    Re: stcjanell
    I actually HOPE that there comes a day when PETA wouldn't be "relevant" anymore because that would mean we have evolved to treat animals and livestock humanely before we kill them.



  85. 185

    that was a pretty lame rant.



  86. 186

    I agree with everything. PETA is way out of line. I used to support PETA but now I think that they're bullies. The strategy of going after those that wear fur instead of going after those that skin the animals and profit (do the dirty deed) is stupid.



  87. 187

    Re: FREE*SPEECH*MY*@$$

    Honey, nobody gives a shit about your drivel from the Bible on here. We come here to read CELEBRITY GOSSIP. That's why Perez blocked you. Preaching is like spamming and it gets blocked on all forums. Take it elsewhere….believe me: we don't give a shit!



  88. 188

    well, for starters, its P.P.S. not P.S.S.



  89. 189

    Blah … read this and I figure hey - she's human. No one wants to see someone they care about being attacked or humiliated. I like animals a lot and don't like the treatment they get on commercial farms, slaughterhouses, etc. but you don't throw shit at people because they're wearing fur. She's right - PETA supporters pick people like Lohan to screw with because she's a skinny chick and can't beat the everlivin crap out of em, plus she's got a bunch of paps followin her and it'd all be recorded and she'd get sued. Ya never see PETA freaks outside of biker bars throwin flour at leather clad Banditos. I'd love to see THAT video, lol.



  90. 190

    dumb bitch! if your stupid girlfriend stopped wearing dead animal skin, there wouldn't be a problem.. PETA have asked the designers countless number of times to stop using fur and they don't listen.. if people stopped buying it, especially celebrities who have an influence on alot of people, they would stop using it.. Can't you see that they are using celebs as an example so people will listen.



  91. 191

    Boooooring, Samantha! All that reads as is "boo hoo, my girlfriend got bitch-slapped by PETA" and she's trying to turn it around into an animal science issue?
    *
    The last time I saw an animal attack on of its own in defense of a human was my DOG "attacking" another DOG because it came too close to me and my dog was defending my territory. Duuuuuhhhhh, it's a pretty natural thing to animals, dear!



  92. 192

    companies wouldn't make it if there weren't a demand for it. liverlips had it comin



  93. 193

    sell the fur and give the money to poor people you ronson bitch. fuk you, i h8 you now you slut. go sell your 100k carrera you bitch. fur wearing bitch. loser. ugly ass bitch, i hate your fucking ass now.



  94. 194

    there is no fuking excuse to be wearing fur you bitch



  95. 195

    ronson fuktard go to alaska and kill a moose with palin you bitch



  96. 196

    if you weren't wearing fur, you wouldn't have PETA to deal with dumbass



  97. 197

    why don't u use your $ and fame for good you self princess bitch



  98. 198

    i am so hurt and disapointed, i loved ronson
    i love porsches and lesbians
    but this is out of line with ignorance and stupidity
    wtf?!
    I want to see you, RONSON, to REDEEM YOURSELF
    make up for your stupidity so I can love you again
    you are giving porsche owners a bad name
    you fuktard



  99. 199

    DEFENSELESS ANIMALS HAVE NO VOICE!!!!
    SAMANTHA YOU MISSED THE POINT COMPLETELY!!!
    LINDSAY'S COAT WAS SKINNED WHILE THE ANIMAL WAS STILL ALIVE, SCARED AND IN TORTURE!!!

    PETA'S MESSAGE IS INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT — GET A CLUE. IT IS TIME TO BE AWARE OF WHERE YOUR COATS/BAGS COME FROM. EDUCATE. THESE DRASTIC MEASURES ARE THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE EVEN BEGIN TO PAY ATTENTION.



  100. 200

    next time throw a giant condom over her

More comments: « 1 [2] 3 »