Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Dakota Fanning To Join Twilight Sequel???

Filed under: Film Flickers > Dakota Fanning > Twilight > Robert Pattinson

wenn5231005.jpg

Twilight will be getting some more "star" power for part two of the film franchise!

According to reports, set to play Volturi vampire Jane, opposite hottie Robert Pattinson in the upcoming sequel, will be Dakota Fanning.

The soon-to-be 15 year-old is said to be in talks to play the Italian bloodsucker in New Moon.

A source reveals that "There were no auditions. They just offered it to her outright, and now they're in negotiations."

Really? DAKOTA FANNING???? As a vampire?

New Moon is expected to start filming in Italy this March. The flick should be released in theaters this November.

What do U think? Should Fanning take the role of vampire Jane?

[Image via WENN.]

524 comments to “Dakota Fanning To Join Twilight Sequel???”

More comments: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »



  1. 201

    I think it would be interesting. But I dont want to see them fill the cast with all these actors and actress that only want parts cause of how big it turned out to be. We need people who really respect the books and want to be in the movie cause they really believe it, and like it. Not just cause its the next big thing.



  2. 202

    mm yeah i think she would do well.

    Rob, have another brewski, on me!

  3. KDick says – reply to this


    203

    No, simply because Jane appears in the fourth book, and (if they end up making the fourth movie) she's still young and growing and it might ruin it later on considering vampires don't age.



  4. 204

    That girl can do no wrong,kudo's to her parents and manager.



  5. 205

    i love her! she looks wicked so she would make a good vampire.. but jane is supposed to be super sexy and… uhm.. well shes not. shes so young



  6. 206

    Hello?
    These people are actors and actresses! who the hell are you (commenters) so say that she doesnt 'fit the role.' its her JOB to adapt to the roles and ACT as various different people on screen.



  7. 207

    I can't believe they offered the part to Dakota Fanning….she's definitely not vampire material…and definitely not evil vampire material…



  8. 208

    No, this will RUIN the movie, she is wayy to young, and she's much too big of a star to be in it! they need to find an actress that isnt in many things, so she wont stand out in the movie



  9. 209

    she is so beautiful. every time i signed in CelebMingle.com and there were always
    many men talking about her how sexy and pretty … you know it is a site
    where rich women can seek young cute men and men can
    find extramarital affairs….they are picky, but they like her too.



  10. 210

    Ohhh she would make a great Jane, I still wonder who the rest of the Volturi is gonna be???? It should be very interesting to find out!!!



  11. 211

    I've read a lot of comments about how she looks to sweet to play a vampire. Read the books people. Jane is supposed to look young, petite, sweet and innocent but in reality is very dangerous. This role is perfect for Dakota, I hope they cast her.



  12. 212

    oh no they can not do that!!!!1 she is to young and it would be a complete joke!!!



  13. 213

    I just got chills running down my spine… although i prefer that Twilight choose less well known actors because its makes the expectations different and mysterious… i think Dakota will be okay playing Jane… I definitely saw her different in the book.. but she can pull it off. I can't wait for the Italy scene! :)



  14. 214

    I think she's too young. Vampire's are supposed to be sexy, and it's hard to be sexy when you haven't gone through puberty yet, right? Grow some boobs first.



  15. 215

    She would be great for a role in twilight. SHE ACTULLY LOOKS LIKE A 15 YEAR OLD….. you should follow into her foot steps miley be a real actress not a fake slutty bitch ! lets face it looking like you do is not looking like a woman either!!!! BE A TEEN NOT A PROSTITUTE look-a-like !!
    …….thats alll :-)



  16. 216

    According to the description of Jane :
    Jane is slight with short, pale brown hair. She has a rather slim and androgynous figure. She has an angelic face, which is the only thing that keeps her from being mistaken for a boy. She has wide eyes, full lips, and a childlike voice. Her eyes are red/black. Along with her face being angelic, it is also described as being fiercely childlike. She is in her early teen years.

    According to that… Dakota fits perfectly.. even if you think she is sort of a tool.. the description is accurate..

  17. MP says – reply to this


    217

    I'd like to see Kristen Chenoweth play this part.



  18. 218

    I think she is perfect for Jane! I hope Summit does cast her! I can definitely see it and so can other fans, judging from the comments I've read.



  19. 219

    Re: aliceleng – pedophile anyone? LOL



  20. 220

    Fanning's a real actress. They should be thrilled to get her.



  21. 221

    jane is supposed to be blonde, so, i wouldn't be apposed. if she can do the hard stares and look cute while looking evil, give her the part



  22. 222

    So the rest of the cast is pretending to be actors then?



  23. 223

    yes yes yes yes yes love her! she'd be a great jane!



  24. 224

    she will be great as jane



  25. 225

    She's adorable, but she's just to young looking.
    I mean sure, Jane is tiny and what not, but she still has to look of age!



  26. 226

    im against big names for this film but i can sooo see her as Jane!



  27. 227

    um , i love dakota but not for Twilight :|



  28. 228

    idiots who think shes too sweet to play a vampire read the book jane is supposed to be sickenly and unnervingly sweet!



  29. 229

    Dakota is true talent and she has the acting chops, to do any role that she wants. She is more talented than people twice her age and I will be happy to see her in New Moon. Although Jane's character is very strong and is of great authority but she will do great.



  30. 230

    Re: holllyj – and yes Jane is young looking too, but I'm sure she's not 15 year old young looking.
    Oh well, we'll see. I like Dakota Fanning, she's a talented actress.



  31. 231

    YES YES! She embodies Jane totally!… utterly innocent and shes a strong actor… screw Disney-tween-star rumors… lets get some young talent in there!



  32. 232

    i love dakota fanning.

    she makes me feel inadequate….being broke and a year older than she is -_-



  33. 233

    I dunno about this one, might be ok! I am counting the days haha



  34. 234

    maybe her little sister would be better. Afterall Jane is supposed to be really cute and young. Dakota is getting old! I kid, I kid….



  35. 235

    I think she'd be perfect. They just have to cut her hair to give her a more androgenous look but aside from that she has the right age and look of innocence.



  36. 236

    yes!!! shes perfect to play jane!!
    by the way..
    love ROBERT"!! :)



  37. 237

    YESYESYES!!!!



  38. 238

    better then vanessa Hudgens although im jealous i wish i could film with Rob(L)



  39. 239

    she would be great for that part.

  40. Brina says – reply to this


    240

    I think she would be alright… an interesting choice, I dont hat ethe idea.
    SOOOOO cant wait!!



  41. 241

    you twilight/new moon fans will NEVER be satisfied, will you?

  42. J80 says – reply to this


    242

    I HOPE NOT!



  43. 243

    i think she could do a good job.
    she is a great actress so i think she might be able to pull it off.



  44. 244

    NOOOOOOOOOOOO!



  45. 245

    Ewww no.
    Come on!
    Whats the matter
    with the casting directors??

    …idiots.



  46. 246

    I think that Dakota Fanning is a very good choice for Jane. She may even be a little too old for the girl I pictured in my head but I think she'll do pretty awesome :o )



  47. 247

    I never would even consider her as jane, but if she could pull the character off it would be awesome. I really love dakota fanning's acting. I kinda wish they wouldn't hire such famous celebs though just for the pr purpose.



  48. 248

    She'd be perfect for that part!



  49. 249

    uhmmm … honestly it is such a small/minimal part for those of you who have read new moon know… with the movie she'll prob. only be in it for all of 10 minutes. also, i would think they would find a better character. Jane is actually kind of scary in the book… they are definitely going to need to dye her hair as well. i think they could fine better, butttt she'll have to do if they just 'offered' her the role and didnt even bother to do casting… whatever.



  50. 250

    i actually think she would make a good jane…they said she was childlike and stuff…but crazy at the same time…aka dakota fanning…



  51. 251

    i cant believe shes 15!! i still think of her like the little girl in uptown girls!!



  52. 252

    At first I was thinking that Dakota Fanning is too good for this cheesy franchise and wouldn't do it…then I realized she IS 15 so she's probably obsessed with it like every other young teen and was like YES!!! YESSS!!! YESSSSS!!!!!!!!



  53. 253

    i cant imagine her as this jane-girl….
    i tought jane was old-old.
    fanning could be this new born vampire kid in eclipse, but not jane!



  54. 254

    I think she will be great as Leah :)
    Also shes very georgeous



  55. 255

    yes, i've said this for so long!
    she's perfect



  56. 256

    i think that she's a really good choice.



  57. 257

    are you kidding?
    shes worse than vanessa. D:



  58. 258

    I could see Dakota as Jane. I agree with this more than V.Hudgens for Leah CLearwater. Ugh!



  59. 259

    only if this means no vanessa!!!!….i just dont get why there trying to put people in who everyone knows….the first film did amazing with no bodies



  60. 260

    Hell No.



  61. 261

    Did not see the twilight movie cause i heard it sucked. Maybe if they had better actors it might have not. Dakota is a great young actor and I see her having a long career if she doesn't go the Britney-Lindsay route. She has acting chops so I think she could do any role. Hello, she didn't even have to audition because she is that good.



  62. 262

    She is perfect for the part and anyone who has read New Moon should know that. She is a childlike vampire who can torture people by using her mind to paralyze their minds in pain. She is small, but deadly.

  63. mday says – reply to this


    263

    i think she fits into it fine. i mean take away the fact that it's dakotta and she looks and fits right into the scheme. It's a small small part peeps, i think she'll do fine. she looks perfect for it.



  64. 264

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  65. mday says – reply to this


    265

    now if she can just find a way to make a REALLY creepy smile….



  66. 266

    i think dakota would be sooo good!
    in the book, jane is described as having child..he face is very childlike but she is grown..that's deff the look dakota has!



  67. 267

    OMG! i never thought of her!! she would make a great jane!! maybe darken her hair tho



  68. 268

    OH MY GOD HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE! JANE IS BLACK! IT SAYS SO IN THE BOOK!



  69. 269

    If she can pull it off acting-wise it will be amazing. Her looks fit the description of Jane perfectly. However, I think it would be more appealing if they could get a no-name to rock the role. Twilight and Harry Potter have been good for bringing out no-name and barely-heard-ofs to A list status!



  70. 270

    i think she would be good as the role of jane. but there already working such a low budget, is it really worth it to have her in the film? (assuming she gets paid a couple million per film) i think the money that would be used for her salary could be used elsewhere, like for special affects.



  71. 271

    Can i just say…
    JANE IS BLACK!
    re-read New Moon twilight producers!

    I LOVE YOU PEREZ



  72. 272

    omg, yah she IS SOO gunna ruin new moon… or in any twilight scene she'd be put in for that matter!!! wtf are they thinking???

  73. cver says – reply to this


    273

    i can see it and im definately okay with it! I



  74. 274

    she has the look of jane, but she probably wont act very well.
    shes a creepy little movie star.



  75. 275

    YES!! she would be awesome as jane!



  76. 276

    Definitely sure she'd do a great part as Jane.
    Iffy they keep wanting to cast "stars."



  77. 277

    i'm sorry but she's too young. i pictured someone older.



  78. 278

    i'm sorry but she's too young. i definitely pictured someone older.



  79. 279

    Dakota Fanning…. hmmm. I honestly never thought about her as Jane, but to be honest I've been so caught up stalking Rob Pattz and freaking over Taylor getting to stay as Jacob (i was so happy) that I havent thought about the other characters. She def fits the physical description. Lets all hope she pulls it off, cuz if she doesnt I will be SOOOO disappointed (but at least I can stare at Taylor and Rob for an hour and a half haha)



  80. 280

    Re: Vicky (: – Wtf???? Have you even read the books?

    "In the casting notice we got our hands on earlier this month, Jane is described as a petite blonde with a “Botticelli angel-like face…[and] crimson irises.” While fellow Volturi guards Demetri & Felix “are three times the size of her, they are terrified of her,” the casting notice reads."



  81. 281

    Hmmm… I think she could play it. Jane's supposed to look very child-like and sweet which Dakota does so by looks she fits. And skill wise, Dakota's a fabulous actress sooo…



  82. 282

    NOOOO dakota fanning is soo fucking creepy. they cant ruin the movie by putting her in it…and i thought jane was supposed to be beautiful and elegant and a little more mature. shes just scary.



  83. 283

    After reading all the books, and looking at her and then thinking of how I visualized Jane, I think she would to an awesome job



  84. 284

    I imagined her face when I first read about Jane. She may look the part, but can she follow through with acting?



  85. 285

    I rather see Vanessa Hudgen playing Leah than this brat as Jane… UGH



  86. 286

    Woo whoo!! I can't picture Dakota as Jane, but hey why not?! I would like to see what happens.



  87. 287

    No.
    shes extremely annoying.



  88. 288

    I think she would do a good job as jane



  89. 289

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
    she would not be a good Jane!
    ugh, are they purposely trying to destroy New Moon?



  90. 290

    Well considering they casted mostly unknown or not extremely famous actors, Dakota Fanning doesn't really fit in. Also, I don't like her.

    I would've casted someone with really pale skin, and black hair.



  91. 291

    FUCKKK NOOOOOO!!!
    she would be a horrible jane. find someone a little older!
    god, shes such a horrble little bitch
    ugh i would not watch new moon if she was in it



  92. 292

    Also, since she's playing an Italian, I will just dislike her even more if she doesn't do a proper Italian accent.



  93. 293

    She's not so bad… as long as Vanessa Whore Hudgens isn't in it.



  94. 294

    NO! Why do the producers insist on fucking with the movies, with all the controversy they're causing, I wouldn't be surprised if they cancel the next two.



  95. 295

    She will be perfect =D
    I luv her and i think she'll
    be perfect for the role ! and im sure
    she would play it well so good luck Dakota !



  96. 296

    this is actually really funny because my friend and i were just talking about her playing jane like two days ago and how ridiculously un-cool that would be because we would like it better if Twilight stuck to unknowns to better play into the people "being" these characters… dakota fanning is too mainstream. her playing Jane would take away the mystical aspect of Twilight



  97. 297

    Re: ValPal – ermm hello have you, "the body under the cloak - which was darker, almost black - was slim and adrogynous." what were you saying darling?



  98. 298

    Shes perfect for the part when i was reading new moon i thought of her as jane. I love her i really hope to see her apart of the movie.



  99. 299

    I think she would be perfect! She looks innocent but she has those eyes that can really get into your mind and cause you pain……..Perfect choice!



  100. 300

    She would ne such a good jane!
    She is so like scary and small!
    So ya i want her

More comments: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »