Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Dakota Fanning To Join Twilight Sequel???

Filed under: Film Flickers > Dakota Fanning > Twilight > Robert Pattinson

wenn5231005.jpg

Twilight will be getting some more "star" power for part two of the film franchise!

According to reports, set to play Volturi vampire Jane, opposite hottie Robert Pattinson in the upcoming sequel, will be Dakota Fanning.

The soon-to-be 15 year-old is said to be in talks to play the Italian bloodsucker in New Moon.

A source reveals that "There were no auditions. They just offered it to her outright, and now they're in negotiations."

Really? DAKOTA FANNING???? As a vampire?

New Moon is expected to start filming in Italy this March. The flick should be released in theaters this November.

What do U think? Should Fanning take the role of vampire Jane?

[Image via WENN.]

524 comments to “Dakota Fanning To Join Twilight Sequel???”

More comments: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »



  1. 301

    ok at least she is not some annoying tween actress



  2. 302

    Not quite how I pictured Jane. Love Dakota but I am not seeing her as Jane because Jane is too evil.



  3. 303

    absolutly not. shes nothing like the book says.



  4. 304

    nononono.



  5. 305

    No fucking way!..

  6. JCPR says – reply to this


    306

    sure why not? she's not that bad. and she'd be a cute vampire!



  7. 307

    ooo i live in italy. who knows in which city they'll be filming?



  8. 308

    fuck off !
    no way at all.
    jodelle ferland is the perfect jane,not her !
    plus jodelle got more experiance for movies like twilight.
    and dakota is to old,even if she looks not older than 8.
    no way,no flenning in twilight,please !



  9. 309

    NO WAY!!! SHE IS TOO YOUNG AND SHE DOESNT FIT THE PART!!



  10. 310

    Re: Kate – Ah-greed. Jane should look the same age as Edward [17] but petite at the same time..



  11. 311

    she has the right look, but i don't know if she can be bitchy enough jane is supposed to be evil. but she does definetly look the part



  12. 312

    I can kind of see this…



  13. 313

    mmmmm… dakota fanning? as jane the crazy bitch??? i can not imagine that i only see her as the cute little girl that she used to be



  14. 314

    Dakota i think would be great….just keep vaneXXXa HOOdjuson out!



  15. 315

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GET SOMEONE UNKNOWN!!!! PLEEEEASE

  16. helsy says – reply to this


    316

    i thought of her a looong time ago! yesss :)



  17. 317

    I think she's be a wicked Jane!!



  18. 318

    Now I'm definitely not going to see this movie. I can't stand Dakota Fanning.



  19. 319

    i think she would be a good jane, she definately has the look that you would imagine



  20. 320

    i never even thought of her as playing jane…she looks the part though
    and i also think she can play a bitch too…she did play a girl that was lil bitchy in that movie uptown girls….i have faith in her and i think she is a good actress.
    right about now i just hope the movie will be great so i dont waste my time seeing a freaking horrible movie cuz twilight was torture.
    i dont care whos hot or not…i just want great actors and a great movie.=)



  21. 321

    YAY!!!! they are sticking the shitty actress with no capabilities with the movie with no depth!!! finally they are lumping the sucky things together!



  22. 322

    she would be a great jane, but ther never going to find a twin brother for her!



  23. 323

    I think she would be a good Jane..tiny voice..evil eyes..



  24. 324

    I'm suprised by the choice but I like it. Jane is my all time favorite character and I think Dakota could play her…maybe. Lets wait and see eh?!



  25. 325

    All of you are assholes who are just bitching about everything, I mean really. Dakota has been acting since she was a kid, and she is a perfect fit for Jane. The movie will be fine, not the book, but movies never are as a good as the books anyways, so chill out people.



  26. 326

    Ugh, I really cant see her being Jane… But then again, its not like I think any young female actor would be fit for Jane, so Fanning it is.



  27. 327

    no way! now that i think about it, she would make a PERFECT Jane. this better not be a rumor.



  28. 328

    yes…….better than Vanessa Hudgens



  29. 329

    NO!



  30. 330

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
    She's horrible for Jane. Like seriously, no.



  31. 331

    God. Please no.



  32. 332

    WTF?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HELLZ NO!!!!!!!!



  33. 333

    yes pleeeease!



  34. 334

    I think that they should use less visable actors like they've done for most of the roles. Give someone else a chance!



  35. 335

    i like her as an accress a lot but i dont know about her as jane..
    that might ruin it.
    im on the fence.
    i kind of want them to find someone unknown. shes too famous for the unknowns in twilight. er, now theyre well known, but still. i dont really think shes a good choice.



  36. 336

    I never thought of her playing jane.
    but I can see why they did,
    she'd be a good jane.

    it's just weird to see Dakota Fanning-
    IN TWILIGHT.

    atleast its a small part.

    and as for LizardKinG–GET A LIFE.



  37. 337

    I think she'd make a great Jane…she may be young and "tween"-ish, but she's got acting chops.



  38. 338

    shes not sinister enough. Jane is evil ya'll. She won't be able to pull it off.



  39. 339

    I didn't care about the first film and don't care about the second, therefore, I do not care if Dakota Fanning plays some dumb Jane vampire in some dumb vampire movies for tweens.



  40. 340

    Twilight is being dragged on for far too long. It was nice when the books first came out a few years ago but now everyone is suddenly obsessed with it because of the movie.
    I went from loving Twilight to hating it in the blink of an eye. Meyer is not that great of a writer, she just chose a good target audience, obviously any girl who is capable of love is going to fall for the book and want to be Bella and have her own Edward but that's not reality. It is time for Twilight to take a hike.



  41. 341

    i think she could pull it off shes a good actress……



  42. 342

    YES! Do IT



  43. 343

    NOOOOOOOOOOO she'll ruin everything!!



  44. 344

    She would be perfect for the role of Jane



  45. 345

    shes ok but i thought that anna sophia robb should play jane i think she would be better



  46. 346

    ehhh… i'm not sure if i would choose her for jane…



  47. 347

    NO becasue Twilight was an AMAZING mvie with out bog hot stars
    Its not worth it. Twilight was sooo much better introducing
    new actors and actresses



  48. 348

    i think she could pull it off :)



  49. 349

    i dont know if she has an evil side but if she does than i think she would play a good jane



  50. 350

    Re: Vicky (: – exactly what i was thinking!!
    i mean shes a great actress but i dont think she even looks like Jane
    and if in any case that she does get to play Jane…
    i wonder who her twin brother [alec] would play the part..?



  51. 351

    She would totally fit the role, hope she gets it.



  52. 352

    I dont know because in the later books Jane is suppose to be scarier and mess with bella, Dakota looks too inocent.
    Shes 15 playing a much older role

  53. n7of9 says – reply to this


    353

    she'd be AWESOME as Jane, nice one :)



  54. 354

    Oh my God. She's perfect. I never even considered her…

  55. Anjay says – reply to this


    355

    They need to keep the cast all talented no-names, like the first!!
    Ugh. This blows.



  56. 356

    Shes actully a good actress, but im a little hesatent about her playing in this movie. We're all just expecting too much and not leaving ur minds open.Who knows maby she'll make the movie good.



  57. 357

    She's a little girl! isnt jane suppose to be a DEVELOPED WOMAN



  58. 358

    Actually. I think it works. I like it. I hope it ends up being true.



  59. 359

    I am thinking/HOPING this is another bad rumor. I don't like her at all, all she ever does is WHINE! I hope that the sourses are WRONG about this. And 15 years old? I know Jane is suppose to be child-like but couldn't they pick somebody better? And why no audition? Because everybody already knows she can't act?



  60. 360

    oh my…nice



  61. 361

    SWEET, I could see that, she'd make a pretty good Jane.



  62. 362

    Good for Dakota !!



  63. 363

    kay. before i couldnt crae about what dakota did, or wher she worked, or whatever.
    and i am a huge fan of twilgiht. ( teh books! forget r-pattz, he gets me nervous) and twilight means a lot to me, but now dakota's in it and that botehrs me! alot!



  64. 364

    and… shes supposed to have a twin broterh alec.
    no guy loosk liek dakota.
    and tehy shouldnt ruin it by making it her faternal brother.
    tasht just a discrase to teh twilight saga



  65. 365

    she would actually be pretty good i rekon, never thought of her doing it but she would do a good job



  66. 366

    The ONLY reason why I want her to play Jane is because she is too young for RPatz to have the option of hooking up with her. Other than that, her voice is very monotone…dont really know how she became famous.



  67. 367

    Absolutley!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



  68. 368

    OH PLEASE NO. NO NO NO NO NO NO.



  69. 369

    OMG! i wouldnt mind her being jane but…i kinda dont like them using "stars" for these roles!!!



  70. 370

    i never really thought of her being janE!
    not at all like i pictured someone very different,but i think if she does get the roll….shes will do a great job!!!



  71. 371

    ughhh. i can't stand her. isn't there someone better? she'll ruin the movie !!



  72. 372

    I'm not sure. I love her and I love the Twilight series but I don't know how she would do as Jane.



  73. 373

    She is actually a perfect choice for the role. This girl is one of the best actresses already and she's fourteen! And she's going to be gorgeous in a few years. I don't think there is any stopping her. Go Dakota you will kick ass if you get it!



  74. 374

    i don't think she can pull it off. she's too girl next door hahaha



  75. 375

    i think she will do a great job playin that part



  76. 376

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!



  77. 377

    I think Dakota Fanning would do great as Jane! I personally didn't want any Famous actors/actress to be in the Twilight movies because it would take away from Twilights greatness lol but Dakota doing a part like Jane would be pretty cool.



  78. 378

    she's a good jane…in the book she's described as a perfect botocceli angel so dokato would be good. She got the whole blonde hair fair skin perfect face thing going on



  79. 379

    she looks too little.

  80. Annew says – reply to this


    380

    She is perfect for the part! yes.



  81. 381

    i totally picked it.
    what difference does it make? she's only playing a minor part and is in the film for all of what? half an hour?



  82. 382

    Sounds great!

    Dakota is a great actress! Can't wait to see her in New Moon!



  83. 383

    nooo, this is goin to ruin the movie!!
    they cant do this!
    she'll stuff up the whole film!!!



  84. 384

    I pictured jane as so much older.
    terrible choice.
    this movie will suck.

    except i haven't even seen the first one..



  85. 385

    i could see her pulling it off i think she'd be great for the roll



  86. 386

    I can understand why people would want to keep it with relatively unknown actors…but I CAN see her in that role. Very similar to how I pictured her in the book.



  87. 387

    woah that would be interesting…



  88. 388

    She's really pretty and talented. Unlike others



  89. 389

    no. Definatly not! Jane is suppost be a child like adult but she is an adult

    ADULT!

    definatly not how i puictured her



  90. 390

    she would make a good jane! :D



  91. 391

    I think she'd make a perfect Jane.



  92. 392

    Oh yea she would be perfect, although I think the movies gonna suck just like the first one did

  93. Ouisa says – reply to this


    393

    I think she is a cutie! GOOD LUCK DAKOTA!



  94. 394

    no no no no no no no



  95. 395

    I just finished reading it and Can barley remember who jane is but wat I do remember is that dacotw fanning does not fit her !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  96. Fia says – reply to this


    396

    That's what I call perfect casting!



  97. 397

    She would be perfect! ;)

  98. GIO says – reply to this


    398

    She turned into a pretty girl



  99. 399

    I think she is PERFECT for Jane - Jane acts hella sweet like Dakota in the books, I reackon she can pull off evil as well!



  100. 400

    i think she fits the part perfectly
    i cant wait for the new movie

More comments: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »